• 首页 | 主办单位 | 期刊简介 | 编委会 | 作者指南 | 刊物订阅 | 下载中心 | 联系我们 | English | 期刊界
引用本文:王文旭,曹银贵,苏锐清,邱敏,宋蕾,周伟.我国耕地保护政策研究:基于背景、效果与未来趋势[J].中国农业资源与区划,2020,41(10):40~51
【打印本页】   【HTML】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 1054次   下载 320 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
我国耕地保护政策研究:基于背景、效果与未来趋势
王文旭1, 曹银贵1,2, 苏锐清1, 邱敏1, 宋蕾1, 周伟1,2
1.中国地质大学(北京)土地科学技术学院,北京100083;2.自然资源部土地整治重点实验室,北京100035
摘要:
[目的]我国耕地保护政策对保护耕地、保障粮食安全具有重要意义。研究我国耕地保护政策出台的背景及前后关系、相同政策在不同区域内的执行效果差异,能够为更针对性地提出政策建议提供参考。[方法]主要运用了资料分析和定性描述的方法,首先按照耕地保护政策内涵划分为5个阶段,其次从时间、空间两个尺度,判断了耕地保护政策的数量、质量保护效果差异,最后提出了未来政策出台的方向和趋势。[结果]时间尺度上:1986年、1997年、2004年出台的政策对耕地数量保护的成效明显; 2014—2016年耕地质量保护效果略优于2009—2014年; 目前数量保护成效较好,但质量保护远未达到要求。空间尺度上:耕地数量保护效果西部地区最好,东北地区次之,中部地区优于东部地区; 耕地质量保护效果中部地区最佳,东北地区次之,东部地区优于西部地区。[结论]未来政策可向规范补充耕地全国统筹、完善耕地质量保护法律体系、调动农户保护耕地积极性等方向发展。
关键词:  土地利用耕地保护执行效果差异性对策
DOI:
分类号:F301
基金项目:教育部人文社科基金项目“三峡库区快速城镇化地区耕地利用管理对策研究”(15YJC630005); 北京市社会科学基金“京津冀潮白河流域耕地变化驱动力与协同管理对策”(17GLC063); 中央高校基本科研业务费项目“黄土典型露天矿区生态系统服务的优化控制研究”(2-9-2018-025); 中央高校基本科研业务费项目“黄土露天煤矿区重构土壤特征对植被恢复影响研究”(2-9-2019-307)
CULTIVATED LAND PROTECTION POLICY IN CHINA: BACKGROUND, EFFECT AND FUTURE TRENDS
Wang Wenxu1, Cao Yingui1,2, Su Ruiqing1, Qiu Min1, Song Lei1, Zhou Wei1,2
1.School of Land Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China;2.Key Lab of Land Consolidation, Ministry of Natural Resources, Beijing 100035, China
Abstract:
The cultivated land protection policy in China is of great significance to cultivated land protection and food security. The purposes of this paper are to study the background and context of cultivated land protection policy in China, and analyze the differences of policy implementation effect in different regions, so as to provide reference for more targeted policy recommendations. The methods of date analysis and qualitative description were applied. Firstly, the development of cultivated land policy was divided into five stages according to its connotation. Secondly, the quantity and quality of cultivated land protection policy were judged from both time scale and space scale respectively. Finally, the directions and trends of future policy were put forward. The results of this paper are as follows. On the time scale: (1) Cultivated land policies which introduced in 1986, 1997 and 2004 had achieved obvious effects on quantity protection. (2) The effect of cultivated land quality protection in 2014-2016 was slightly better than that in 2009-2014. (3) At present, the effect of cultivated land quantity protection was ideal, but the effect of cultivated land quality protection needed to be strengthened. On the space scale: (1) The order of cultivated land quantity protection effect was the western region, the northeast region, the central region and the eastern region. (2) The quantity of cultivated land quality protection effect was good in the central region, followed by the northeast region, the eastern region and the western region. In the future, cultivated land protection policy in China should be developed in the direction of standardizing the requisition compensation balance among regions, improving the legal system of cultivated land quality protection, and mobilizing the enthusiasm of farmers to protect cultivated land.
Key words:  land use  cultivated land protection  execution effect  regional difference  countermeasure
版权所有:  您是本站第    位访问者
主管单位:中华人民共和国农业农村部 主办单位:中国农业科学院农业资源与农业区划研究所
中国农业绿色发展研究会 地址:北京市海淀区中关村南大街12号
电话:010-82109628、82109647 电子邮件:quhuabjb@caas.cn
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备11039015号