首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 640 毫秒
1.
Business groups in East Asia: Post-crisis restructuring and new growth   总被引:9,自引:7,他引:2  
Business groups played an important role in the economic development of East Asian countries. Yet business groups in East Asia face an uncertain future. Following the Asian Crisis, foreign creditors and investors have demanded that business groups have more transparent operations and stronger corporate governance. At the same time, as governments in East Asia have loosened trade barriers, business groups have become subject to intense competition in domestic markets. This paper argues that business groups can survive or even prosper by taking initiatives in corporate restructuring. This paper also highlights some areas for further research on business groups in this region.
Sea-Jin ChangEmail:

Sea-Jin Chang   is currently Kumho Asiana Group Chaired Professor of Business Administration, Korea University. He received his PhD in management from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. Previously, he was a faculty member of New York University. He also had visiting appointments at Stanford, INSEAD, and London Business School. Professor Chang is primarily interested in the management of diversified multinational enterprises. His research interests include diversification, corporate restructuring, foreign direct investment organizational learning, corporate growth through joint ventures and acquisitions, and comparative management studies of Japan, Korea and China.  相似文献   

2.
Real options and MNE strategies in Asia Pacific   总被引:1,自引:1,他引:0  
Asia Pacific offers a lot of promising growth opportunities, but it also presents high levels of uncertainty for multinational enterprises (MNEs). In this paper, we introduce real options theory as a theory of investment under uncertainty, and we discuss its implications for MNEs and their strategies with a focus on the emerging economies in Asia Pacific. We suggest that MNEs must recognize the various sources of uncertainty, as well as the various options embedded in their investments, and real options theory can help them structure and design their investments to benefit from uncertainty. In particular, MNEs need to develop the dynamic capabilities of managing real options in their investments to respond to the evolving economic and institutional environment in the region. This paper also provides several implications for policy makers in Asia Pacific to stimulate investment activities in the region and to help their firms venture successfully in the international market place.
Jing LiEmail:

Tony W. Tong   is an Assistant Professor of Strategic Management at the Leeds School of Business at the University of Colorado. He obtained his Ph.D. from The Ohio State University. His current research applies real options theory to study firms’ corporate development activities and growth initiatives. His research in these areas has been published or accepted in journals such as the Academy of Management Journal, the Journal of International Business Studies, and Organization Science. Jing Li   is an Assistant Professor of International Business at the Faculty of Business Administration at Simon Fraser University, Canada. Her research focuses on alliance activities in China, capability building of Chinese firms, and applications of real options theory to international strategy. Her research in these areas has appeared in the Journal of World Business, Advances in Strategic Management, and Managerial and Decision Economics.  相似文献   

3.
The growth of outward investment from China has generated expressions of concern from policymakers in the United States regarding the economic and national security impacts of such investments. While inward foreign direct investment (FDI) has come to be viewed by most observers as generally imparting net economic benefits to the host economy, acquisitions of US companies by Chinese multinational companies (MNCs) have been criticized on several grounds. One is based on the mode of entry itself: some critics believe that entry by acquisition brings lower benefits than greenfield entry. A second and more prominent concern is that acquisitions of US companies by Chinese state-owned enterprises (SOEs) may be motivated by non-commercial objectives which, in turn, make those acquisitions of questionable value to the host economy. In this paper, we argue that Chinese FDI in the United States is more likely to take the form of acquisitions than greenfield investments for the foreseeable future. However, there is no strong case to be made that the host country economic benefits from Chinese FDI would be larger if entry took place primarily through greenfield investments. Furthermore, most of the alleged costs to the US economy from inward FDI from China are either unlikely to occur or are already anticipated by existing US laws and regulations, thus necessitating no additional, specific legislation.
Daniel ShapiroEmail:

Steve Globerman   (PhD, New York University) is the Kaiser Professor of International Business in the College of Business and Economics at Western Washington University. His research interests focus on international trade and direct investment determinants and effects, as well as public policies toward trade and direct investment. He has published widely on these and other topics and has consulted for various companies and international organizations including The World Bank and the OECD. Daniel Shapiro   (PhD, Cornell University) is the Dean and Lohn Professor in the Faculty of Business Administration, Simon Fraser University. His research focuses on MNEs and foreign direct investment, corporate performance and strategy, and corporate ownership and governance. His research has been published in Strategic Management Journal, Academy of Management Journal, Journal of International Business Studies, and Journal of Industrial Economics, among others. He has served as a consultant to various organizations in the public and private sectors in the areas of foreign investment, mergers, competition policy, strategy and industrial policy.  相似文献   

4.
Building upon the market, institutional, and cultural perspectives, this paper identifies the major impetuses and impediments that affect the professionalization of Chinese family business at the environment, firm, and owner levels. Our integrative framework projects that whether a family business owner will adopt professional managers is largely determined by the relative strength of impetus factors and impediment factors. We then discuss the possible governance choices under different configuration of impetuses and impediments. This theoretical framework is expected to help set the momentum for further conceptual exploration and empirical study in this area.
Hao MaEmail:

Jianjun Zhang   (PhD, University of California at Berkeley) is an assistant professor at Guanghua School of Management, Peking University. His interests include entrepreneurship, firm governance, and political strategy of Chinese private firms. He is the author of Marketization and democracy in China and a number of articles. Hao Ma   (PhD, University of Texas at Austin) is a professor of management at University of Illinois at Springfield, and professor of management and director of Academic Committee at Beijing International MBA Program, China Center for Economic Research, Peking University. His research interests include the nature and cause of competitive advantage, competitive analysis, strategic decision making, leadership style, and the entrepreneurial process, especially the exploration of the above topics in international setting. He has published in Academy of Management Review, Journal of Business Venturing, Journal of International Management, and Organization Dynamics, among others.  相似文献   

5.
This paper integrates institution-, industry-, and resource-based views of internationalization and demonstrates that industrial characteristics, firm resources, and institutional factors can significantly explain the differences and similarities of international expansion of Chinese and Japanese multinational enterprises (MNEs). In particular, this paper maps the growth of Chinese MNEs since economic reforms in 1978 and that of Japanese MNEs after World War II. We illustrate the similarities and differences between Chinese and Japanese MNEs with two case studies: foreign direct investment (FDI) of Haier and Matsushita. We suggest that how firms internationalize, in addition to being influenced by industry- and resource-based considerations, is inherently shaped by the domestic and international institutional frameworks governing these endeavors.
Yinbin KeEmail:

Xiaohua Yang   (PhD, University of Kansas) is a Senior Lecturer in the School of Management at Queensland University of Technology. She has presented and published her work in the leading management journals and conferences around the world. She has taught in the United States, Australia, China, and Taiwan and lectured in Europe. Her research interests are in the areas of global strategy, expatriate management and corporate social responsibility. Her current research is on internationalization of firms in emerging markets. Yi Jiang   (PhD, The Ohio State University) is an Assistant Professor at California State University, East Bay. She has published her research in leading management journals and presented her papers in management conferences. Her research interests are in the areas of international business, corporate strategy and corporate governance. Her recent research interests include privatization and corporate governance in emerging economies. Rongping Kang   is a Senior Researcher at Institute of World Economics & Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. His research interests are in the areas of Chinese corporate strategy. His current research is on internationalization of Chinese firms. Yinbin Ke   is an Assistant Chief Editor, Peking University Business Review. He graduated from Dalian University of Technology with a BSc. His research interests are in the areas of Chinese corporate strategy. His current research is on internationalization of Chinese firms.  相似文献   

6.
A growing number of Western-educated management PhD graduates are starting their academic career in Chinese business schools. While opportunities are abundant for these returnees, they also face the choice between developing internationally transferable assets and building locally embedded competences. Some possible solutions are discussed, at both personal and institutional levels.
Dean XuEmail:

Dean Xu   (PhD, York University) is an associate professor of strategy and international business at School of Business, the University of Hong Kong. Previously, he was on the faculty of Guanghua School of Management, Peking University. His research interests include multinational enterprises, Chinese firm strategy, and the competitive advantages of foreign and local firms in China. His research has been published or accepted at the Academy of Management Review, Journal of International Business Studies, Journal of Management, Strategic Management Journal, and other management journals.  相似文献   

7.
Venture capital in China: Past,present, and future   总被引:8,自引:6,他引:2  
This article reviews the literature on venture capital in China and examines where China’s venture capital industry has been and where it is likely to go in the future. Since the 1980s, venture capital in China has grown steadily alongside the robust national economy. The future is likely to offer even greater opportunities, as entrepreneurs are encouraged and property rights improve. However, there will also be a period of transition as the market continues to mature and as new legal structures and commercial arrangements emerge. Venture capital in China has many interesting differences from that in Western countries. The venture capital industry is shaped by the institutional context and China is no exception to this. This article also examines some specific differences between the system in China and that of the United States. Future prospects for venture capital are also appraised as China continues its transition to a market economy.
Kuang S. YehEmail:

David Ahlstrom   (PhD, New York University) is a professor in the Management Department at The Chinese University of Hong Kong where he has taught for 11 years in international management and human resources. His research interests include international management and entrepreneurship in emerging economies. Professor Ahlstrom has published over 50 refereed articles in publications such as The Academy of Management Review, the Journal of Business Venturing, and Asia Pacific Journal of Management where he is currently a senior editor. Garry D. Bruton   (PhD, Oklahoma) is a professor of entrepreneurship at the Neeley School of Business at Texas Christian University. His research focuses on entrepreneurship in emerging markets. He has published over 50 academic articles in journals such as The Academy of Management Journal, Strategic Management Journal, and Asia Pacific Journal of Management. Professor Bruton has also co-authored two textbooks published by Thomson-Southwestern. He is currently an associate editor of the Academy of Management Perspectives and is a senior editor of the Asia Pacific Journal of Management. Kuang S. Yeh   (PhD, Carnegie Mellon) is a professor and chairman of the Department of Business Management at the National Sun Yat-Sen University in Kaohsiung, Taiwan. His areas of interest are in organization theory, corporate governance, business ethics, and entrepreneurship and venture capital. Professor Yeh has published in journals such as the Journal of World Business, International Business Review and a number of academic journals in Taiwan. He is currently studying issues of firm growth and change in China’s and Taiwan’s private enterprises.  相似文献   

8.
“Asian Management Research Needs More Self-confidence” (Meyer, 2006) generated a surprisingly extended and diverse set of responses from Asia and beyond. In this rejoinder, I draw together a few lines of arguments that have emerged in that debate with the aim of moving the debate—and thus Asian management research agendas—forward. In particular, I argue that context is a crucial variable to explain management behavior, yet for practical reasons, it has been neglected in research published in top journals. Thus, I challenge management scholars in Asia and beyond to devise new research strategies to enhance our understanding of the contextual boundaries of our knowledge.
Klaus E. MeyerEmail: URL: www.klausmeyer.co.uk

Klaus E. Meyer   (PhD, London Business School) is currently Professor of Strategy and International Business at the University of Bath. He has previously served 8 years on the faculty of Copenhagen Business School, and held visiting appointments at Hong Kong University of Science and Technology and National Cheng-chi University, Taipei. His research focuses on the strategies of multinational enterprises in emerging economies, especially foreign entry and growth strategies in Eastern Europe and East Asia. He has a personal website at . This is Professor Meyer’s third contribution to APJM.  相似文献   

9.
The regional character of Asian multinational enterprises   总被引:10,自引:6,他引:4  
In recent issues of this Journal a debate has raged concerning the appropriate nature of academic research in the Asia Pacific region. While we support the desire for both rigor and regional relevance in this research, we wish to demonstrate a strong commonality between the performance of large Asian firms and others from Europe and North America. This prompts us to question the need for a new theory of the MNE based on the experience of Asian firms. Like their counterparts elsewhere, the large Asian firms mostly operate on an intra-regional basis. While in the literature it has been assumed that the path to success for Asian firms is globalization, we show that the data supporting this is confined to a handful of unrepresentative case studies. We also present a bibliometric analysis which shows an overwhelming case study sample selection bias in academic studies towards this small number of unrepresentative cases.
Alan M. RugmanEmail: URL: http://www.kelley.indiana.edu/rugman

Simon Collinson   (D.Phil., SPRU, University of Sussex) is Associate Professor (Reader) of International Business at Warwick Business School and the Lead Ghoshal Fellow at the Advanced Institute of Management (AIM), UK. He has held visiting positions at NISTEP in Tokyo and AGSM at the University of Sydney, and was Visiting Professor at the Kelley School of Business, Indiana University. His research interests include global innovation strategies, knowledge management and adaptability in multinational firms, and FDI and collaborative innovation in Japan and China. He has published widely, such as in Organization Studies, the International Journal of Technology Management, Management International Review, R&D Management and Organizational Dynamics, and has received funding awards from the ESRC, EPSRC, DTI, Royal Society and CEC. With Professor Alan Rugman, Simon is also co-author of the FT Pearson International Business (4th Edition, 2006) textbook. Alan Rugman   holds the L. Leslie Waters Chair of International Business at the Kelley School of Business, Indiana University, where he serves as Professor of International Business and Professor of Business Economics and Public Policy. He is also Director of the IU CIBER. He was Thames Water Fellow in Strategic Management at Templeton College, University of Oxford where he remains an Associate Fellow. Dr. Rugman has published widely in leading refereed journals that deal with economic, managerial, and strategic aspects of multinational enterprises and with trade and investment policy. His forty plus books include: The End of Globalization (Random House 2000; AMACOM 2001); (co-ed) The Oxford Handbook of International Business (Oxford University Press 2001) and, The Regional Multinationals (Cambridge University Press 2005). He has served as a consultant to major private sector companies and as an outside advisor to two Canadian Prime Ministers. Dr. Rugman served as President of the Academy of International Business from 2004–2006.  相似文献   

10.
This paper examines the impact of state shares on corporate innovation strategy and performance in the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Through an investigation of 541 publicly traded companies in five high-tech industries during the period between 2000 and 2005, we find that the presence of state shares have a positive effect on the corporate choice of a process innovation strategy over a product innovation one. However, this relationship is moderated by the overall ownership concentration ratio. Moreover, our findings suggest that companies with large state shares prefer to conduct innovations independently rather than collaboratively with others, and they usually achieve better innovation performance. These findings indicate that the government play a role as both an investor and a resource allocation coordinator and therefore complicate the relationship between ownership structure and corporate innovation activities.
Han Zhang (Corresponding author)Email:

Erming Xu   (PhD, Renmin University of China) is a professor of management at the School of Business in Renmin University of China. His research interests include corporate governance mechanisms and performance in China, state shares with corporate innovation strategy, Asian business strategy in the emerging markets. His work has appeared in premier journals such as Management World, China Industrial Economy, etc. He is editor of Management Review, Nankai Business Review, R&D Management, Chinese Journal of Management, and Economic Management. He serves as the associate chair of the Chinese Academy of Business Management, and also an independent director of China Telecom Corporation Limited. Han Zhang   (PhD, Capital University of Economics and Business) is a lecturer of management at School of Business Management in Capital University of Economics and Business. Her research interests include strategic management and innovation. Her work has appeared in Economic Theory and Business Management and Contemporary Finance & Economics.  相似文献   

11.
Varieties of export-oriented entrepreneurship in Asia   总被引:2,自引:2,他引:0  
This paper explores differences in the proportion of export-oriented early-stage entrepreneurial activity in 12 Asian countries. Drawing on varieties of capitalism theory, we find that Asian countries with high quality institutions are more likely to have higher proportions of young export-oriented firms. However, analysis on a 51 country data set indicates that Asian countries have significantly fewer young export-oriented firms than do non-Asian countries. Furthermore, the multi-country study reveals that countries with higher proportions of export-oriented entrepreneurial activity tend to have flexible industrial relations, high quality vocational training, and confrontational labor–employer relations, however the proportion of export-oriented new ventures is not related to the quality of corporate governance and inter-firm relations.
Jolanda HesselsEmail:

Siri Terjesen   (PhD, Cranfield University) is an assistant professor in the Management and Entrepreneurship Department at the Kelley School of Business at Indiana University. Concurrently, she is a visiting research fellow at the Max Planck Institute of Economics in Jena, Germany. Her primary research interests are international entrepreneurship and strategic management. She has published in journals including Strategic Management Journal, Small Business Economics, Journal of Business Ethics, Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice and Venture Capital and is co-author (with Anne Huff, Steve Floyd and Hugh Sherman) of Strategic Management. Jolanda Hessels   (PhD, Erasmus University Rotterdam) is an assistant professor at the Erasmus School of Economics and a researcher at EIM Business and Policy in Zoetermeer. Her research interests include internationalization of SMEs, international new ventures and cross-country comparisons of entrepreneurship. Her work has been published in several journals including Small Business Economics as well as book chapters. Jolanda is the project coordinator of the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) for the Netherlands.  相似文献   

12.
It has long been recognized that there is a tradeoff between exploration and exploitation. How organizations utilize resources across time and space will affect firm survival and growth. In this paper, we examine resource utilization and performance implications over time in an environment undergoing fundamental institutional transformation. Based on a large archive of Chinese government data from 1988, 1992, and 1996, the study finds that (1) the impact of resource utilization is contingent on the degree to which different resources are committed to factors of production, (2) the impact is curvilinear and only valid within an “optimal” range, and (3) the performance implications change over time. As firms enter later stages of the transitional process, efficiency becomes less important as they shift their strategic focus from exploitation to exploration, which requires more flexibility. These findings have significant bearing on the issue of upgrading technological competitiveness in China as the country becomes increasingly integrated in the global economy. Such insights may also have implications for other emerging economies in Asia.
Justin TanEmail:

Justin Tan   (PhD, Virginia Tech) is professor of management and the Newmont Endowed Chair in Business Strategy in the Schulich School of Business at York University in Canada. He is also a Distinguished Visiting Professor in the Guanghua School of Management at Peking University in China. He received the US Fulbright Distinguished Professorship and served in China from 2005 to 2006. Yong Zeng   (PhD, Tsinghua University) is professor of finance in the College of Economics and Management at the University of Electronic Science and Technology in China. His research interests include financial engineering, corporate finance and capital market, economic forecasting and strategic decisions. His works have been published in major academic journals.  相似文献   

13.
Indian business groups: Evolution and transformation   总被引:9,自引:8,他引:1  
Business groups are an important constituent of many emerging economies. In this paper, we focus on the evolution and transformation of Indian business groups (IBGs) over two economic eras — pre-reform era (pre 1991) and reform era (post 1991). To this end, we analyze IBG behavior during these periods, and explain the implications of such behavior on IBG value creation. Our conceptualization of IBG dynamics utilizes the perspectives of product relatedness and institutional relatedness, and undertakes a broad review of the extant literature.
Somnath LahiriEmail:

Ben L. Kedia   holds the Wang Chair of Excellence in International Business and is Director of the Wang Center for International Business Education and Research (CIBER) at The University of Memphis, USA. His research interests include cross-cultural and comparative management, and international business strategy. Dr. Kedia has served as Chair of the International Management Division of the Academy of Management and President of the Academy of International Business–U.S. Southwest. His research has been published in Academy of Management Review, Journal of World Business, Management International Review, etc. He received his PhD from Case Western Reserve University. Debmalya Mukherjee   is a doctoral candidate in strategic management at The University of Memphis, USA. His research interests include international business strategy, emerging economies and virtual organizations. Debmalya has presented research papers at various national and international conferences. He received his MBA from Ohio University. He has served in a team consulting project in Italy. Prior to coming to the United States, Debmalya worked as a lawyer at the Calcutta High Court, India. Somnath Lahiri   is a doctoral candidate in management at The University of Memphis, USA. His research interests include international outsourcing, emerging economies, and global business strategy. Somnath’s writings have appeared in European Business Forum and he has presented research papers at various conferences in the United States and abroad. He has also co-authored a book chapter on BRIC economies. Prior to coming to the United States, he served as a professional engineer for several years in India, both in the private- and government sector, where he specialized in contract handling and project monitoring.  相似文献   

14.
The development of entrepreneurship in China   总被引:2,自引:1,他引:1  
In this paper, we provide an overview of the extant research on the development of entrepreneurship in China. This research focus is a relatively recent phenomenon since China’s market transition started from late 1978. We review the literature over the 26 years from 1980 through 2005, as published in 11 leading English-language academic journals. We identify 68 articles from this review and analyze them based on the research subjects, methods, and firm types. From this review, and integrating with research on market transitions, we propose a three-stage model of market transitions that has important implications for entrepreneurship research in transition economies.
Jiatao LiEmail:

Jing Yu Yang   (PhD, Hong Kong University of Science & Technology) is Assistant professor of international business discipline at The University of Sydney. Her current research interests include management and organization issues in emerging economies, entrepreneurship, MNC strategy, organizational learning and change, and inter-firm networks. Jiaotao Li   (PhD, University of Texas at Dallas) is Professor and Head of the Department of Management of Organizations, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. His current research interests are in the areas of strategy, organization theory, and entrepreneurship, with a focus on issues related to global firms and those from emerging economies. Professor Li has published in journals such as The Academy of Management Journal, The Strategic Management Journal, Organization Science, and Journal of International Business Studies.  相似文献   

15.
The emergence of knowledge-intensive society has changed the nature of business competition. Knowledge management becomes an important managerial task and formulating a sound innovation strategy is an integral part of strategic management. Adopting an institution-based view, this article argues that the institutional environment in the Asia Pacific region plays a multi-faceted role behind firms’ knowledge management and innovation strategy. Specifically, institutions impose rules for legitimacy, serve as a source of knowledge, and allocate incentives and resources for innovation. We believe that future research drawing on the institution-based view has significant potential to advance our understanding of knowledge management and innovation strategy in Asia Pacific firms.
Mike W. PengEmail:

Yuan Lu   (PhD, University of Aston) is a professor at the Chinese University of Hong Kong and works in the areas of corporate diversification, business groups, and institutional entrepreneurship. He is on the editorial board of the Asia Pacific Journal of Management. Eric W. K. Tsang   (PhD, University of Cambridge) is an associate professor at the University of Texas at Dallas. He is a Senior Editor of the Asia Pacific Journal of Management, and is on the editorial boards of five other journals, including the Academy of Management Journal and the Academy of Management Review. He has published over 50 journal articles. Mike W. Peng   (PhD, University of Washington) is the Provost’s Distinguished Professor of Global Strategy at the University of Texas at Dallas and Editor-in-Chief of the Asia Pacific Journal of Management. His market-leading text, Global Strategy (South-Western Thomson, 2006), has been translated into Chinese and Portuguese, and his new Global Business text (South-Western Cengage Learning, 2009) has recently been launched.  相似文献   

16.
We consider the effect of national culture and corporate culture differences on the management of international strategic alliances (ISAs). Findings are based on the perceptions of a relatively large sample of Chinese partner firms in ISAs with foreign partners. We find that differences in national culture and corporate culture have contributed to a similar extent to differing views on ISA management. However, findings indicate that differences in national culture and corporate culture have a differential impact on aspects of ISA management. Perception of national culture and corporate culture differences and the contribution of those differences to differing views on the management of ISAs are greater in relatively younger ISAs compared with older ISAs. Managers in equity-based ISAs report fewer problems with culture related impediments to managing ISAs than managers in non-equity-based ISAs.
Keith W. GlaisterEmail:

Li Dong   is a Lecturer in International Business at School of Management, Royal Holloway, University of London. He received his MSc in International Management from University of Reading, UK. He previously worked in a major global bank in China, and holds a professional certification in International Banking. His current research interests include strategic and managerial issues pertaining to international strategic alliances, the management of multinational enterprises, direct foreign investment, and business strategies in China. Keith W. Glaister   is Dean of the Management School, University of Sheffield, and Professor of International Strategic Management. His main research focus is on the analysis of the formation, partner selection, management and performance of international joint ventures and strategic alliances.  相似文献   

17.
China’s business network structure during institutional transitions   总被引:4,自引:3,他引:1  
This study adopted a structural approach to examine the formation and characteristics of Chinese business networks via interlocking directorates during a stage in China’s institutional transitions. Analyses of the network structures of 949 listed companies revealed that: (1) Chinese business networks were smaller in scale and lower in density than their Western counterparts; (2) no nationwide network with a dominant center existed; (3) interlock occurred mainly in the form of smaller business groups which tended to be regionally fragmented; (4) ties were more prevalent among industrial peers than with financial institutions; and (5) government ownership was predominant. These findings therefore deepen our understanding about the pattern and extent of business interlock in China. Not only do these findings provide substantive implications to the notion and dimensionality of guanxi, but they also offer inspiration to managers and policy makers by illuminating key characteristics of network structure. Laying these foundations shall pave the way for future research in the structure of Chinese business networks.
Thomas A. BirtchEmail:

Bing Ren   (PhD, The Chinese University of Hong Kong) is an associate professor in the Department of Management, School of Business at Nankai University, China. Her main research areas include Chinese business network studies, institutional transition and firm strategic choices, entrepreneurship and corporate governance issues in China. Currently, she is undertaking two research projects funded by the natural science foundation of China. The first one relates to the intercorporate network of interlocking directorates and its influence on firm strategies during China’s institutional transition. The second relates to a legitimacy perspective of new venture growth and creation in China. Kevin Au   (PhD, University of British Columbia) is an associate professor of management at the Chinese University of Hong Kong, and serves as an associate director for the MBA programme and Centre for Entrepreneurship. His research interests span across micro and macro issues in global management, social network, entrepreneurship, and research methodology. He serves on the editorial boards of Asia Pacific Journal of Management and Journal of Organizational Behavior and conducts consulting projects for business and government organizations. This is Professor Au’s fourth contribution to APJM. Thomas A. Birtch   is a Senior Research Fellow (Centre for Economics and Policy) at the University of Cambridge. He has held an academic appointment at The Chinese University of Hong Kong, visited universities in Asia, Europe, and North America, and has affiliations with several research centres, including at MIT, Cambridge, and The Chinese University of Hong Kong. He has also held directorships and senior management positions in large scale organizations and government spanning three continents and consulted in over 30 countries. His current research interests include the performance of individuals, organizations, and markets, the transferability of management practices, FDI and post-merger integration strategy, rewards and incentives, entrepreneurship and innovative organizations, and business in China. His recent publications appear in journals such as Human Relations, Management International Review, International Journal of Hospitality Management, International Journal of Human Resource Management, and Journal of International Management.  相似文献   

18.
The first decade of the Asia Academy of Management   总被引:5,自引:5,他引:0  
This paper briefly reviews the history of the Asia Academy of Management, the official sponsor of the Asia Pacific Journal of Management. It is suggested that establishing the Asia Academy of Management is a response to the new challenges of the academic institutional environment, both in Asia and in the mainstream management research community. Judging from the achievements in terms of reputation in the region, publication citations, school rankings, and internal organizational development, this new venture has added significant value to the global academic community. The challenges facing the Asia Academy, however, include the need to attract more interested parties to actively involve in its activities, more genuine cooperation among Asian and non-Asian institutions, and a need to affirm the contributions of Asian management studies.
Chung-Ming LauEmail:

Chung-Ming Lau   (PhD, Texas A&M University) is professor in the Department of Management, The Chinese University of Hong Kong. He was the founding President of the Asia Academy of Management, where he served as President during 1998–2006 and now serves as its Secretary. He has also served on the editorial board of the Asia Pacific Journal of Management from 2002 to 2007, including one term as Senior Editor (2004–2007). His teaching and research interests include strategic change, organization culture, and management of Chinese organizations. He has published in the Academy of Management Journal, Journal of International Business Studies, Journal of Applied Psychology, Management International Review, Organization Science, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, and other major journals in management and international business.  相似文献   

19.
Despite the increasing recognition of the importance of the research mission of universities, no previous work has investigated the research productivity and research strategies of Asia Pacific business schools. This article fills this important gap by conducting the first study to rank the publication productivity of 130 Asia Pacific business schools. Drawing on data from the UTD Top 100 Business School Research Rankings™ and several additional sources, we rank Asia Pacific business schools’ research productivity in three areas: (1) twenty-four leading business journals, (2) seven top management journals, and (3) five Asia Pacific management journals. We also extend this analysis by documenting the distinct publishing strategies of various Asia Pacific business schools—global, local, or both.
David H. WengEmail:

Ram Mudambi   (PhD, Cornell University) is Professor and Perelman Senior Research Fellow at Temple University and Visiting Professor of International Business at the University of Reading. His research interests focus on knowledge/innovation management and international entrepreneurship. Mike W. Peng   (PhD, University of Washington) is the Provost’s Distinguished Professor of Global Strategy at the University of Texas at Dallas and Editor-in-Chief of the Asia Pacific Journal of Management. His research interests are global strategy, international business, and emerging economies. David H. Weng   is a PhD student at the University of Texas at Dallas. His research interests include institutional theory and international management.  相似文献   

20.
Institutions and the OLI paradigm of the multinational enterprise   总被引:4,自引:2,他引:2  
The prevailing ownership-based theories of the firm are increasingly being challenged by new forms of organising, as exemplified by the Asian network multinational enterprise (MNE). We believe that an institutional approach, that tries to bridge both the macro and micro levels of analysis, and that encompasses both formal and informal institutions, offers a promising way to advance our understanding of the different forms of the contemporary MNE. This paper introduces a theoretical framework that draws substantially on the work of Douglass North, and examines how an institutional dimension can be incorporated into the three components of the OLI paradigm.
Sarianna M. Lundan (Corresponding author)Email:

John H. Dunning   is Emeritus Professor of International Business at the University of Reading, UK and at Rutgers University, US. He is an ex-president of both the Academy of International Business, and the International Trade and Finance Association. He has written or edited 48 books and more than 250 articles in professional journals. Sarianna M. Lundan   is Associate Professor of International Business Strategy at the University of Maastricht in the Netherlands and Research Fellow at ETLA, the Research Institute of the Finnish Economy in Helsinki. She is the co-author with John Dunning of the second edition of Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy, a major reference work in the field of International Business.  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号