共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 46 毫秒
1.
中国银行业市场结构与绩效分析 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
以哈佛大学的的梅森和贝恩等人为代表的现代产业组织理论,构造了市场结构(Structure)--市场行为(Conduct)--市场绩效(Performance)的分析框架(简称SCP分析框架).其基本内容是市场结构决定企业在市场中的行为,而企业市场行为又决定市场运行的经济绩效.本文将借助SCP的分析框架,对中国银行业的市场结构进行实证研究,在分析市场结构和绩效关系的基础上,并进一步探索导致这种关系的原因所在. 相似文献
2.
跨国并购、战略联盟与网络型寡占市场结构的形成 总被引:3,自引:0,他引:3
20世纪90年代中期以来,跨国并购和战略联盟的迅速发展正在改变跨国公司所处的传统市场结构,网络型的寡占结构随之形成。在这种以知识为基础的新型寡占结构下,跨国公司之间的竞争重点由对国际、国内市场的争夺转为全球范围内的不断创新,而企业驾驭战略关系的能力也成为其竞争成败的关键。 相似文献
3.
4.
中国汽车产业市场结构与市场绩效研究 总被引:11,自引:0,他引:11
本文利用中国汽车工业1998—2008年的数据,通过多元回归分析方法,对中国汽车产业市场结构和市场绩效进行实证研究。实证表明,中国汽车产业市场已从竞争型转向了中下集中寡占型,市场集中度对汽车产业的市场绩效为正效应,但对内资企业、外商投资企业、港澳台投资企业的影响程度不同。本文剖析了中国汽车企业通过市场集中度提高提升市场绩效的主要影响因素及市场集中度对内外资企业市场绩效影响程度差异的原因,并探讨相关政策建议,以期对中国汽车产业发展提供有益的思路。 相似文献
5.
文章对西部工业的市场结构与经济绩效进行实证分析,揭示制约西部工业发展的产业组织障碍,并提出相应的对策建议. 相似文献
6.
阮敏 《地质技术经济管理》2009,(5):43-45
产品差别化对市场结构的形成有很大的作用,经典的豪特林模型只得出了产品差别最小化和最大化原则,由此模型得到的市场结构为完全竞争市场和寡头垄断市场,但垄断竞争市场却无法得到。文章在豪特林模型的基础上构造出统一框架,不但分析产品最大和最小差别情况,而且提出中间程度差别化的分析模型。得出所时应的三种市场结构。尤其是中间程度的差别化对应的垄断竞争市场。对这三种市场结构进行社会福利分析,得出在消费者不同质时,相对于完全竞争市场,垄断竞争市场是相对较好的选择。 相似文献
7.
8.
基于福利视角,提出煤炭产业经济、安全和环境绩效的构念,从去产能政策视角,构建SC—SCP (外部冲击—产业特征—市场结构—市场行为—产业绩效)分析范式对煤炭产业绩效的形成机理进行探讨,并运用联立方程模型方法展开验证。结果显示:①产业特征会对市场结构、市场行为和产业绩效产生直接影响,并且市场结构,市场行为和产业绩效之间存在动态交互影响。市场结构会对市场行为产生正向影响,市场行为影响产业绩效,而产业绩效的提升也会给市场结构的提升带来正向促进作用;②去产能政策对煤炭市场行为和绩效产生直接正向影响,进而对煤炭市场结构产生影响;③产业资本密集度会提升煤炭产业经济绩效、安全绩效和环境绩效水平。针对煤炭产业提升自我调节能力和提高产业集中度,建议采取技术创新、产品创新等措施提升经济绩效、安全绩效和环境绩效的协同发展。 相似文献
9.
利用信息论和熵原理构建市场结构熵模型,测度了完全竞争、垄断竞争、寡头垄断和完全垄断4种市场结构熵,并比较了这四种市场结构熵。认为竞争条件下,寡头垄断市场结构熵最小,而完全垄断市场结构熵大于或小于寡头垄断市场结构熵,是市场调节失灵的市场结构。从较长的时间跨度和动态竞争角度来看,提出寡头垄断市场结构运行效率要高于其他类型的市场结构。 相似文献
10.
企业动态联盟激励机制的设计与运行探讨 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
一、引言 企业动态联盟又称“虚拟企业”(Virtual Corporations 或Virtual Enterprise),是企业为快速响应市场机遇,而采取的相互联合、优势互补的合作方式.企业动态联盟主要是基于企业核心能力(Core Competence)资源的一种外部优化整合,即企业将投资和管理的注意力集中于企业本身的核心能力上,而一些非核心能力或自己短时间内尚不具备的核心能力则依靠外部的动态联盟伙伴(Partner)提供. 相似文献
11.
不完全信息与网络产业激励性规制改革 总被引:13,自引:0,他引:13
规制体制改革的核心是解决信息不对称下的最优激励问题,规制体制设计的关键就是要设计有效的激励合约,为企业提供适当的激励以达到成本效率,从激励角度看,价格上限规制的效率最高,竞争是重要的激励性体制,网络产业竞争体制形成的关键是约束在位运营商排斥竞争行为和建立有效的互联资费政策。 相似文献
12.
Kenneth D. Boyer 《Review of Industrial Organization》1992,7(2):191-202
Standard models of oligopolistic interdependence predict that firms remaining outside of a horizontal merger will benefit from it. Why, then, do nonparticipating firms feel threatened by mergers? This paper shows that under reasonable conditions a non-participating firm is harmed by a merger. The analysis is based on a spatial equilibrium with suppliers and demanders located at fixed points. Mergers harm non-participating firms as a result of the decrease in the level of marginal costs of the merged firm attributable to decreased output in markets where competition is eliminated. This lowered marginal cost makes the merged firm a more formidable competitor in markets in which outsiders participate. This effect is in almost all cases sufficient to make outsiders worse off after a merger. Simulations on a sample of spatial equilibria show that the harm to outsiders is a reliable index of the harm that the merger causes to social welfare. 相似文献
13.
网络效应、消费偏好与标准竞争 总被引:17,自引:0,他引:17
完全信息静态标准竞争可能产生三种市场格局:技术标准市场不存在、个体标准并存、强势标准阻止弱势标准进入。强制标准化的错误来自两个方面:选择了错误的个体标准即弱势个体标准的标准化,错误地选择了标准化,即优势个体标准的标准化市场的社会福利低于竞争市场的社会福利。 相似文献
14.
Strategy scholars have asserted that a firm's alliance capability provides competitive advantage. As interest in alliance capability has grown, we see two streams of research emerge that address different, but equally important, issues related to this subject: one stream that focuses on how alliance capability develops in firms, and a second stream that investigates what elements specifically constitute a firm's alliance capability. In recent literature, the question of how firms develop alliance capability has received greater attention than the question of what elements actually comprise it; therefore, in this study we address the latter issue in great depth. We do this by building on prior research and on our fieldwork, to conceptualize alliance management capability as a multidimensional construct that comprises three distinct but related aspects or skills to address the following aspects in managing a given individual alliance after it is up and running: coordination, communication, and bonding. We then test our conceptualization in a framework that also links this capability to relevant outcomes at the alliance and firm level. We use survey and secondary data from a large sample of interfirm relationships between software service providers and three major global software vendors. We find general empirical support for our conceptualization of alliance management capability and for its predictive validity in impacting certain alliance outcomes. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 相似文献
15.
In recent years, academics and managers have been very interested in understanding how firms develop alliance capability and have greater alliance success. In this paper, we show that an alliance learning process that involves articulation, codification, sharing, and internalization of alliance management know‐how is positively related to a firm's overall alliance success. Prior research has found that firms with a dedicated alliance function, which oversees and coordinates a firm's overall alliance activity, have greater alliance success. In this paper we suggest that such an alliance function is also positively related to a firm's alliance learning process, and that process partly mediates the relationship between the alliance function and alliance success observed in prior work. This implies that the alliance learning process acts as one of the main mechanisms through which the alliance function leads to greater alliance success. Our paper extends prior alliance research by taking a first step in opening up the ‘black box’ between the alliance function and a firm's alliance success. We use survey data from a large sample of U.S.‐based firms and their alliances to test our theoretical arguments. Although we only examine the alliance learning process and its relationship with firm‐level alliance success, we also make an important contribution to research on the knowledge‐based view of the firm and dynamic capabilities of firms in general by conceptualizing this learning process and its key aspects, and by empirically validating its impact on performance. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 相似文献
16.
17.
Investors in financial markets bet their dollars on whether amerger will raise or lower prices. Below, we apply an event-probability methodology to the proposed merger between Staples and Office Depot, which was challenged by the FTC and eventually withdrawn. In addition to a time-series regression,we also look at the effect of the merger in specific event windows. We find highlysignificant returns to the only rival firm in the relevant market. We estimate theprice effect of the merger and find it highly consistent with independent estimates. 相似文献
18.
Contractual joint ventures (CJVs) are a major form of non-equity strategic alliance in China, employed mainly by Hong Kong
firms in the south China province of Guangdong. Due to their ambiguous legal status and the lack of conceptualisation and
of their contractual nature, there has been little empirical research on CJVs. By theorising CJVs as a relational subcontracting
arrangement and drawing on data from structured interviews with managers from both sides, this paper reveals the managerial
decisions pertaining to the formation and evolution of the CJV non-equity alliances in Guangdong.
相似文献
Stephen NicholasEmail: |
19.
Research Summary: We ask if managerial opportunism is a significant problem in alliance partner choice and examine the role of corporate governance mechanisms in explaining this choice. Using a sample of 313 alliances of U.S. firms from the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries from 1992 to 2010, we find that managerial incentives lead to managerial preference for relationally risky distant partners over existing and new close partners. Further, board monitoring encourages managers to pursue existing and distant partners over new close ones, choices aligned with shareholder interests. In addition, we find that board monitoring substitutes for managerial incentives in alliance partner choice. We contribute to the literature on alliance partner choice to identify an important, and hitherto, unexplored perspective. Managerial Summary: This article examines whether managers and shareholders view alliance‐related risks differently, and how the divergent interests between managers and shareholders affect alliance partner choice. We argue that managers’ concern about their loss of employment and compensation from alliance failure impedes the choice of relationally risky alliance partners that may increase shareholder value. We also argue that managerial stock ownership and board monitoring mitigate this managerial propensity. Our findings suggest that stock ownership owned by managers and strong board monitoring are effective governance mechanisms to align managers’ interests with those of shareholders. Our study offers a novel perspective to understand alliance partner choice by viewing the firm as an entity comprised of fragmented interests. 相似文献
20.
Werner H. Hoffmann 《战略管理杂志》2007,28(8):827-856
Interorganizational relationships are recognized as an increasingly important source of competitive advantage. Hence, goal‐oriented management of the alliance portfolio—all the alliances of the focal firm—plays a decisive role in company performance. Consequently, the configuration and development of the alliance portfolio become important strategic issues. In light of that, this article develops theoretical propositions that seek to clarify what determines the configuration and evolution of an alliance portfolio, and then presents the results of a longitudinal study to illustrate the developed theoretical framework. Building on contingency theory and a coevolutionary framework, we were able to identify three distinctive types of portfolio strategies at business level and to illustrate how they interact with the development of the business strategy and the business environment. Encompassing all this, the study illustrates and explains developmental paths and patterns in the evolution of an alliance portfolio. The developmental course typically evolves from adapting to shaping and to exploiting (stabilizing), according to the state of strategic uncertainty and the firm's resource endowment. A sudden increase in exogenous strategic uncertainty, however, can lead to a strategic shift back to an exploration or hybrid strategy. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 相似文献