The Effects of Business Cycles on Growth - Time Series Evidence for the G7-countries Using Survey-based Measures of the Business Cycle

The paper analyses whether business cycle fluctuations affectlong-run growth. This hypothesis is tested using quarterly timeseries for the G7-countries. A vector-autoregressive model containingtotal factor productivity and a survey-based direct measureof the business cycle is estimated. In this vector-autoregression,technology and business cycle shocks are identified based onthe assumption that productivity-improving measures need sometime and, thus, there is no contemporaneous response of productivityto a business cycle innovation. The results suggest that positivebusiness cycles shocks have a small negative impact on long-runproductivity. However, the results appear to be not robust againstchanges in the empirical model.(JEL E32, O41)     

Lessons of the 1999 Abolition of Intra-EU Duty Free Sales for the New EU Member States

The abolition of intra-EU duty free was critically discussedand accompanied by a vigorous and well-financed lobbying campaignby the duty free industry. The opponents of this resolutionargued that such a tax-free sales sector created jobs and hardlyreduced the value added and excise tax revenue of individualcountries. In their opinion, the duty free trade not only contributedto the reduction of the travel fare but also could be characterisedas a supplement to the normal retail trade for some products.The challenges for some specific industries led by the abolitionof duty free shopping appear to be considerable in the short-term.However, theoretical and empirical examinations made in thisstudy suggest: (a) intra-EU duty free shopping disturbs theallocation neutrality guaranteed in the single market, (b) macroeconomicsignificance of duty free shopping is rather negligible, and(c) some background studies made for the lobbyists exaggeratethe negative impacts of eliminating intra-EU duty free shopping.These three important arguments, which can also be applied tothe new EU Member States, justify the abolition of intra-EUduty free shopping. (JEL F10; F15; F18; E62; P20)     

Comment: Lucas on involuntary unemployment

Keynes distinguishes three concepts: voluntary, frictional and(Keynesian) involuntary unemployment. Frictional unemploymentis a Classical form of involuntary unemployment (not voluntary,as Lucas suggests), and reflects the Marshallian, rather thanWalrasian, treatment of time and equilibrium. Lucas contradictsboth Keynes and Pigou in asserting that there are always immediatevacancies for unskilled labour, and abstracts from the veryproblem that Keynes seeks to address. If voluntary unemploymentis re-defined appropriately, as De Vroey helpfully suggestselsewhere, the prefix ‘involuntary’ is dispensable,not because all unemployment is voluntary, as Lucas would haveit, but because it is all involuntary.     

The hypostasis of money: an economic point of view

The purpose of this article is to show that money is not anentity but hic et nunc a genuine mode of circulation associatedwith a genuine social organisation. Criticising money hypostasismay help to to: (i) elucidate the ambivalence of monetary relationsin our modern society (equivalence and subordination); (ii)criticise the idea that ‘primitive monies’ are nothingbut imperfect forms of our modern money and show that exoticsocieties are worth studying for themselves; and (iii) relativisethe knowledge we have about our societies and to develop comparativeanalysis. A sketchy comparison between wodani society and ourssuggests that an abduction relation exists between money andsociety.     

Optimal 'soft' or 'tough' bankruptcy procedures

This article describes optimal bankruptcy laws in a frameworkwith asymmetric information. The key idea is that the financialdistress of a firm is not observed by its lenders for quitea while. As early rescues are much cheaper than late rescues,it may pay if the creditors are forgiving in bankruptcy, therebyinducing the revelation of difficulties as early as possible.Either 'tough' or 'soft' bankruptcy laws can be optimal, dependingon the parameters. This implies that mandatory one-size-fits-allbankruptcy procedures cannot be optimal. 'Hybrid' procedures,which try to combine elements of soft and tough procedures,are found to be redundant, and possibly harmful. Absolute priorityrules may be helpful as a part of tough procedures, but theirintroduction is (partly) inconsistent with the design of softprocedures. The article also reinterprets much of the evidenceon the performance of Chapter 11, the 'rather soft' U.S. reorganizationprocedure, questioning many negative conclusions.     

Formal and Informal Labour Markets: Challenges and Policy in the Central and Eastern European New EU Members and Candidate Countries

The paper aims at comparing the formal and informal labour marketsin the Central and Eastern European new EU Member States andcandidate countries of the European Union. First, the currentsituation of the labour market is described, focusing on therecent developments since the breaking up of the East. Thenthe policy design of these labour markets is depicted and itseffects on formal and informal labour markets. The most importantchallenges for employment policy as well as the effects of enlargementon the labour markets are analysed. The paper ends with a shortsummary. (JEL J21, J23, H26, H11, O17, O57)     

Does Partisan Heritage Matter? The Case of the Federal Reserve

Received evidence suggests that changes in appointer- and overseer-preferencesinfluence monetary policy (i.e., partisan heritage matters).Evidence presented here, on the other hand, is consistent withchanges in the cost of pursuing a common preference influencingpolicy. I draw this evidence from a panel of Federal Open MarketCommittee (FOMC) votes and find support for the following conclusions:(1) Federal Reserve Board (FRB) governors who were nominatedand confirmed by the same party (Republican or Democrat) prefersignificantly looser policy than do other FOMC members. (2)Monetary policy is significantly looser when either party controlsthe oversight mechanism (i.e., the presidency and Senate) thanwhen control is split. (3) Oversight acts less forcefully ondistrict bank presidents than on FRB governors. In short, thepresent evidence suggests that political agents from both partiesprefer loose money and pursue this preference more efficientlywhen their parties are aligned.     

Welfare Leakage and Immigration Policy

This paper analyzes the interaction between the welfare stateand immigration policy. We establish a negative relationshipbetween the number of dependents and the extent of the welfarestate due to the leakage of benefits. We also explain the determinationof immigration policy as the outcome of a lobbying game betweendomestic interest groups and the government. Our results indicatethat there is evidence for welfare leakage and for lobbyingas a determinant of immigration policy. In our baseline specification,a 10 percentage points increase in the share of dependents leadsto a 7–10 percentage point decrease in the labor tax rate.Furthermore, an increase by 10 percentage points in union densityleads to a decrease of one percentage point in the share ofimmigrants in the population. In the context of EU enlargementand the ensuing migration flows, our model predicts a reductionin the size of the welfare state in the old member countries.(JEL H5, J1, J61)     

U.S. Welfare Reform: What's Relevant for Europe?

This paper reviews the U.S. welfare reform efforts over the1990s and the effects of these reforms to date. Seven "lessons"of potential interest to European observers are discussed, withparticular attention to the conclusions of more recent research.Such research indicates, for example, that more effective programscontain both positive and negative incentives, utilise work-firstas well as job training programs, and provide some importantsupports beyond just job and work skills. The paper ends withsome speculations about why European policy-makers are becomingmore interested in U.S. welfare reform experiments than theyhave been in the past. (JEL I3, J2, H1)     

All About the Giants: Probing the Influences on World Growth and Income Inequality at the End of the 20th Century

This paper presents estimates of world output growth from 1970to 2000, the distribution of income among countries and personsfor the years 1980, 1990 and 2000, and world income povertyrates for the same years. It also presents the results of aseries of simulation exercises that attempt to isolate the effectof particular country and regional experiences on world outputgrowth and changes in global income inequality and poverty. The authors find that rapid growth in China (despite a downwardadjustment of official growth estimates) had a powerful impacton the growth of world output in both the 1980s and 1990s, butthat negative economic growth in Eastern Europe more than offsetthat effect in the 1990s. With respect to the distribution ofworld income between countries, the impressive growth performancesof the worlds most populous countries, China and India, ensureddecreasing levels of inequality during both the 1980s and 1990s.When the distribution of world income between persons is measured,the equalizing effect of China's rapid growth remains dominantthrough both the 1980s and 1990s, despite the contradictoryimpact of increasing domestic inequality. Only India's influenceremained substantial by comparison. Other identifiable eventsof the period, such as the economic contraction in Eastern Europeand continued economic decline in Africa, had little statisticalimpact. However, when the combined influence of China and India'sabove-average growth rates is removed, or their size effectdampened, the improving global distribution of (inter-countryand inter-personal) income suggested by all statistical measuresbecomes one of sharply worsening inequality. The impact of thesetwo countries is similarly critical with respect to global povertyreduction. (JEL F0, I3, O4)     

Keynesian Economics, Monetary Policy and the Business Cycle - New and Old

After a brief review of the main differences between New andOld Keynesian economics from the sixties this paper focuseson a tension between traditional sluggish measures of potentialoutput commonly used by policymakers and the New Keynesian (NK)notion of this variable which conceptualizes it as the levelof output that would have been produced under perfect competitionhad all prices and wages been flexible. The paper shows that,under monopolistic competition, NK potential output is oftenmore volatile than the level of output produced under stickyprices and wages implying either of the following. Real lifepolicymakers mistakenly target smooth versions of output or(since actual economies are monopolistically rather than perfectlycompetitive) the flexible price and wage equilibrium does notnecessarily maximize welfare. The paper shows, that dependingon the shape of the utility function and of the distributionof productivity shocks either case is possible and proposesa criterion for discriminating between them. (JEL E3, E4, E5,E6)     

Testing Goodwin: growth cycles in ten OECD countries

Following Desai (Desai, M. 1984. An econometric model of theshare of wages in national income: UK 1855-1965, pp. 253-77in Goodwin, R. M. et al. (eds), Nonlinear Models of FluctuatingGrowth, Berlin, Springer), Goodwin's simple 'predator-prey'growth cycle model of the economy (Goodwin, R. M. 1967. A growthcycle, pp. 54-8 in Feinstein, C. H. (ed), Socialism, Capitalism,and Economic Growth, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press;reprinted in Goodwin, R. M. 1982. Essays in Economic Dynamics,Basingstoke, Macmillan, pp. 165-70) is tested, using post-wardata for ten OECD countries - Australia, Canada, Finland, France,Germany, Greece, Italy, Norway, the UK and the US. At a quantitativelevel, Goodwin's model is found not to be adequate: (i) estimatedparameter values poorly predict the cycles' centres; and (ii)Goodwin's restrictive assumptions are not justified. However,at a qualitative level, the evidence presented here for theexistence of Goodwin-type cycles is extremely encouraging, justifyingboth existing theoretical extensions of Goodwin's model andfurther empirical work in this area.     

Consumption and the Within-household Income Distribution: Outcomes from an Australian "Natural Experiment"

Does the within-household distribution of income influence householdconsumption patterns? In one attempt to answer this question,Lundberg, Pollak and Wales (1997) exploited the ‘naturalexperiment’ of a change in family benefits in the UK.They found that the within-household income distribution didhave a significant impact on expenditure. This paper exploitsa similar natural experiment in Australia. During the 1990s,unemployment benefits for unemployed married couples changedfrom being paid almost entirely to husbands, to being paid primarilyto wives. Using household expenditure data it is found that,although the changes in the within-household income distributionwere large, the changes in expenditure patterns were small andnot in the expected direction. The data do not, therefore, providesupport for the hypothesis that women's control over householdexpenditure was increased. The paper concludes with a discussionof the possible reasons for this. (JEL J10, J12, I38)     

The Phillips Curve, the IS Curve and Monetary Transmission: Evidence for the US and the Euro Area

In this paper we assess the empirical performance of commonlyused empirical specifications of the baseline New Keynesianmodel for the US and the euro area. We estimate standard specificationsof the model and extended specifications also including non-standarddeterminants of aggregate supply and demand. The results suggestthat based on the standard specifications it is often not possibleto establish a significant link between the monetary policyinstrument and output and inflation. Based on the extended specificationsof the model, which take into account the significant effectof commodity prices on inflation and of house prices on theoutput gap, we are generally able to restore a significant monetarytransmission channel. (JEL E3, E52, C22)     

Hollander, de Vivo and the 'further evidence' for the corn model interpretation of Ricardo: a conspiracy of silence?

This paper reconsiders the debate between de Vivo and Hollanderover the ‘further evidence’ in favour of Sraffa's‘corn model’ interpretation of Ricardo in the lightof Torrens's Letter to Lord Liverpool (1816). It is argued thatthe Letter provides unique evidence of the influence on Torrensof Ricardo's Essay on Profits (1815); and that, contrary tode Vivo, the evidence is not that of a ‘corn model’influence. It is further argued that the manner in which theLetter has been dealt with is unsatisfactory. The shortcomingsin Hollander's position are traced to peculiarities in his long-standinginterpretation of the early Ricardo.     

Coming to the Nuisance: An Economic Analysis from an Incomplete Contracts Perspective

We construct a model in which an investment opportunity arisesfor a first mover before it knows the identity of a second moverand in which joint location results in a negative externality.Contracts are inherently incomplete since the first mover cannotbargain over its ex ante investment decision with the anonymoussecond mover. Given this departure from the setting of the Coasetheorem, the allocation of property rights over the externalityhas real effects on social welfare. We investigate the relativeefficiency of property rights regimes used in practice: injunctions,damages, the ruling in the Spur Industries case, etc. The firstbest can be obtained by allocating property rights (in particularthe right to sue for damages) to the second mover. Allocatingproperty rights to the first mover, as a "coming to the nuisance"rule entails, leads to overinvestment. In contrast to conventionalwisdom, this inefficiency persists even if a monopoly landownercontrols all the land on which the parties may locate.     

The Cambridge School of Keynesian Economics

There have been strong ties between the Cambridge Journal ofEconomics (CJE) and the Cambridge School of Keynesian Economics,from the very beginning. In this paper, the author investigatesthe environment that saw the birth of the CJE at Cambridge (UK),in 1977, and the relationship that linked it to the direct pupilsof Keynes. A critical question is explicitly examined: why didn'tthe ‘Keynesian revolution’ succeed in becoming apermanent winning paradigm? Some behavioural mistakes of themembers of the Keynesian School may explain this lack of success,but only to a certain extent. In any case, there were and therestill are remedies too. But what we are inheriting is a uniqueset of analytical building blocks (the paper lists eight ofthem) that makes this School of economics a viable (and in somedirections definitely superior) alternative to mainstream economics.Admittedly, there is some important work still to be done. Thepaper highlights the need for a two-stage approach, addressingpure theory and extensive institutional analysis. It is arguedthat a combination of the two would strengthen the coherenceof the theoretical foundations, and at the same time would providea fruitful extension of economic analysis to empirical, institutionaland economic dynamics investigations.     

Adam Smith and the division of labour: is there a difference between organisation and market?

The paper claims that, in The Wealth of Nations, the divisionof labour refers simultaneously to two different things: a socialdivision of labour and an organisational division of labour.The central point is that the organisation of work (the organisationaldivision of labour) in the firm is the logical counterpart ofthe social division of labour, and that these reflect two inseparableaspects of the process of the division of labour. Smith is thusconcerned with organisations as well as with markets, each functioningaccording to the same principle. Hence, Smith does not believethat the organisational and the social divisions of labour arefundamentally different, although he does recognise some variationbetween them and describes different states of the divisionof labour within the firm, liberal and capitalist.     

Rational drug design, the knowledge value chain and bioscience megacentres

This paper seeks to trace important shifts and cluster evolutionin the healthcare industry. Its key aim is to examine the implicationsof the rise of science-based clusters for economic geographyand related policies. A special focus is biosciences and therise of ‘biologics’ more generally at the expenseof fine chemistry in drug development. The old agglomerationsof pharmacy are no longer leaders in knowledge exploration,as universities, research laboratories and medical schools takeover research, they are beginning to lose prominence to dedicatedbiotechnology firms (DBFs) in knowledge examination, and retaintheir most important involvement as financiers and marketersof DBF exploitation knowledge. This has profound geographicalas well as industry organisation equilibrium effects. Over-concentrationof the bioscientific knowledge value chain has given rise tothe new spatial policy practice of developing regional sciencestrategies. Aspects of these are commented upon.