企业社会责任观的演进与发展:基于综合性社会契约的理解

利益相关者理论与主流企业理论在企业社会责任fq题上存在着根本的分歧，但从历史的视角来审视企业社会责任观的演进可以发现，企业社会责任与利益相关者的利益要求是紧密结合在一起的。企业在履行其囊括显性契约与隐性契约在内的综合性社会契约时，必须考虑其利益相关者合理的利益要求，进而主动承担起应有的社会责任。     

被“绑架”的社会责任

施工企业的社会责任主要表现为在追求营利性目标的同时,应承担对环境、社会和其他利益相关者的责任或应尽的义务.理性、合理的社会责任履行是施工企业无可推卸的责任,然而在现实中却有很多强加给施工企业的所谓的“社会责任”,搞得施工企业疲于招架,苦不堪言,给企业造成了沉重的负担.     

国有成品油销售企业社会责任研究

根据我国国有成品油销售企业的性质、地位及利益相关者理论,按照党中央提出的建设和谐社会治国方略,提出了基于建设社会主义和谐社会的国有成品油销售企业社会责任体系模型,即成品油销售社会责任=企业核心责任＋企业内部责任＋企业外部责任。通过分类论证,进而把保障社会成品油的长期安全稳定供应作为核心责任,以确保社会总体经济目标的实现;把企业自身发展的经济利益和保障企业内部员工利益的实现作为内部责任,以确保内部和谐发展;把对与企业相关的成品油消费者和其他利益相关者的责任作为外部责任,以实现与利益相关者的外部和谐发展。分类探讨现阶段国有成品油销售企业社会责任内涵及其实现途径,为国有成品油销售企业全面履行社会责任、实现企业与社会和谐发展提供了解决方案。     

企业社会责任与财务绩效关系的实证研究——利益相关者视角的面板数据分析

本文按照资本形态的不同,将利益相关者划分为货币资本利益相关者、人力资本利益相关者、生态资本利益相关者、社会资本利益相关者,构建了企业社会责任的利益相关者模型。以46家上市公司2003—2007年的数据为依据,运用面板数据模型,研究了企业社会责任与财务绩效之间的关系。研究表明:我国上市公司已经开始关注其社会责任,但社会责任的披露信息仍然很少;大多数企业社会责任变量对当期财务绩效的影响为负;长期来看,企业履行社会责任对其财务绩效具有正向影响作用。     

企业慈善捐赠带来价值回报吗——以利益相关者满足程度为调节变量的上市公司实证研究

慈善捐赠与企业价值之间的关系是企业社会责任研究关注的热点问题。本文就利益相关者满足程度对慈善捐赠影响企业价值的调节作用,进行了理论分析和实证检验。利用中国A股上市公司2002—2008年慈善捐赠的面板数据,研究发现,慈善捐赠价值效应以利益相关者满足程度为条件,即利益相关者满足程度越高时,慈善捐赠提升企业价值的效果才会越明显。进一步的研究表明,企业资源与董事会治理水平以及市场化程度,分别弱化和强化了利益相关者满足程度在慈善捐赠价值效应中的调节作用。本研究为评价慈善捐赠对企业价值的影响提供了更深层次的思考,对企业更好地履行慈善捐赠责任亦有重要启示。     

石化企业应构建和谐文化

对于企业而言．以“和谐”为核心内容和目标的企业文化与传统文化中的“和谐”思想息息相关，血脉相连。“和谐”企业文化应当是“尊重规律、协调有序”的文化。企业是社会的经济细胞。存在于社会，受制于自然。作为道德范畴的和谐企业，它要承担社会责任。处理好与社会、与自然环境、与员工、与政府、与利益相关者之间的关系。同时在企业内部要构造各个利益主体之间的和谐氛围，遵循企业运行规则，维护良好的秩序。     

企业在构建和谐社会中的责任

在构建和谐社会的过程中,企业的社会责任就是企业在经营上必须对所有利益相关者所产生的影响负责,包括企业应该承担为投资者谋取最大利润的责任、为员工谋取最大福利的责任、实现顾客价值最大化的责任、为保护环境实现经济活动绿色化运行的责任等。只有做到对所有利益相关者所产生的影响负责,企业才能与利益相关者达到均衡,实现和谐、有序共存的社会状态。     

关于供电企业发布社会责任报告

近年来,我国越来越重视企业履行社会责任工作。2008年1月4日国务院国资委发布了《关于中央企业履行社会责任的指导意见》,要求中央企业必须坚持以人为本,科学发展,在追求经济效益的同时,对利益相关者和环境负责,实现企业发展与社会、环境的协调统一。可以说,积极履行社会责任已成为社会各界对企业的殷切期望和广泛要求。     

资源型企业社会责任履行的实证研究——以贵州省毕节地区煤矿企业为例

文章基于利益相关者管理理论、规制理论及当地实践,提出了一个可操作性的框架——企业社会责任四主体动态协同履责模型,模型基本表述为：利用当地丰富的资源,依托当地资源型企业,通过政府引导、企业承担、非政府组织（NGO）协调、公众监督的方式协同履行企业社会责任（CSR）。文章对CSR的履行主体划定了清晰的边界,规定了具体的履行内容,并以毕节地区煤矿企业为例对模型中重要的规制内容进行了解析,希望通过此模型建立CSR的履行范式,以供参考和借鉴。     

企业成长性与利益相关者满足关系的实证研究

利益相关者的满足对促进企业的规范运营具有不可忽视的作用。本文在构建企业成 长性综合评价指标体系和利益相关者满足评价指标体系的基础上,采用结构方程模型,对企业成长性整 体及各个因素与利益相关者满足的关系进行分析,结果发现：企业成长性在总体上对利益相 关者满足呈正向影响,即企业成长性的增强,有助于提升利益相关者满足,从而反过来又吸 引各方利益相关者投入更多的资源促进企业的持续发展。从各个因素来看,企业偿债能力和 盈利能力的提升对利益相关者满足有着积极的影响,而企业规模和营运能力对利益相关者满 足的影响程度则不显著。     

Looking good by doing good: The antecedents and consequences of stakeholder attention to corporate disaster relief

Stakeholder theory suggests a relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and corporate financial performance (CFP) because certain stakeholders reward certain types of CSR. This argument assumes that stakeholders attend to firms' CSR activities—an assumption that has yet to be examined. We fill this gap by extending stakeholder theory to the context of stakeholder attention to firm CSR and exploring the antecedents and consequences of stakeholder attention to corporate disaster relief CSR. We test the resulting hypotheses on a sample of public companies that engaged in natural disaster relief efforts, finding that stakeholder attention partially mediated the relationship between disaster relief and CFP and that stakeholder attention to corporate disaster relief was driven by the legitimacy, urgency, and enactment of disaster relief CSR initiatives. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

企业社会责任与企业价值的相关性研究--来自沪市上市公司的经验证据

作者以我国上海证券交易所2003年521家上市公司为样本，研究了企业社会责任活动与企业价值的相关性问题。结果表明，从当期看。承担社会责任越多的企业。企业价值越低；但从长期看，根据关键利益相关者理论与社会资本理论。承担社会责任并不会降低企业价值。同时，本文的研究也表明资产规模、负债比率、重污染行业因素与企业承担社会责任活动显著正相关；财务状况或其他状况异常的ST类公司、前一年的盈利能力与企业承担社会责任活动显著负相关。     

企业社会责任表现、报告质量与企业声誉——基于中国上市公司的实证研究

近年来，越来越多的企业通过发布企业社会责任（CSR）报告与利益相关者沟通CSR表现的情况。在CSR与企业声誉之间的关系备受关注的背景下，CSR报告质量在其中发挥着什么样的作用呢？梳理现有文献，将CSR表现划分成责任管理、市场责任、社会责任以及环境责任，通过实证检验，分别探讨各自与企业声誉之间的作用机理，并研究CSR报告质量在二者之间关系中的调节效应。研究结果显示CSR表现正向作用于企业声誉，相较于责任管理，责任实践的正向作用更强。同时CSR报告质量在二者之间的关系中具有调节效应，能够进一步提升企业声誉，并且对环境责任的调节效应最为明显。     

The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: an empirical test of the risk management hypothesis

Do shareholders gain when managers disperse corporate resources through activities classified as corporate social responsibility (CSR)? Strategy scholars have recently developed a theoretical model that links such activities to shareholder value when a firm suffers a negative event; we test key portions of this theory of the ‘insurance‐like’ property of CSR activity. We posit that such activity leads to positive attributions from stakeholders, who then temper their negative judgments and sanctions toward firms because of this goodwill. We extend the risk management model by theorizing that some types of CSR activities will be more likely to create goodwill and offer insurance‐like protection than other types. We delineate several firm and event specific characteristics that we expect to influence the link between CSR activities and an insurance effect. We then test our model using an event study of 178 negative legal/regulatory actions against firms throughout the 11 years from 1993–2003. We find that participation in institutional CSR activities—those aimed at a firm's secondary stakeholders or society at large—provides an ‘insurance‐like’ benefit, while participation in technical CSRs—those activities targeting a firm's trading partners—yields no such benefits. We conclude by considering the implications of our findings for future theorizing and research into the economic value of CSR engagement. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Corporate Social Responsibility and Governance: The Role of Executive Compensation

This article examines the relationship between corporate governance and corporate sustainability by focusing on an essential component of companies' governance structure: executive compensation programs. We propose an original empirical strategy based on a large set of the biggest capitalizations in Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries over the period 2004–2018, with explicit measures of how companies integrate into executive managers' remuneration precise criteria of corporate social responsibility, an incentive scheme called corporate social responsibility (CSR) contracting. Our results show that proposing executive compensation programs including CSR criteria has a negative impact on financial performance, and a large positive impact on extra-financial performance based on the following dimensions: relationship with customers and suppliers, and community involvement. Second, we explore the moderating role of the corporate governance model by distinguishing the impact between firms with a shareholder or stakeholder corporate governance model and reveal significant differences in the impact of CSR contracting. For firms with a stakeholder corporate governance model, CSR contracting is no longer associated with a fall of financial performance and has a large positive impact on human resources, environmental, and human rights performance. On the other hand, CSR contracting has a negative impact on financial performance but no impact on extra-financial performance for firms with a shareholder corporate governance model.     

How CEO hubris affects corporate social (ir)responsibility

Grounded in the upper echelons perspective and stakeholder theory, this study establishes a link between CEO hubris and corporate social responsibility (CSR). We first develop the theoretical argument that CEO hubris is negatively related to a firm's socially responsible activities but positively related to its socially irresponsible activities. We then explore the boundary conditions of hubris effects and how these relationships are moderated by resource dependence mechanisms. With a longitudinal dataset of S&P 1500 index firms for the period 2001–2010, we find that the relationship between CEO hubris and CSR is weakened when the firm depends more on stakeholders for resources, such as when its internal resource endowments are diminished as indicated by firm size and slack, and when the external market becomes more uncertain and competitive. The implications of our findings for upper echelons theory and the CSR research are discussed. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Corporate social responsibility and access to finance

We investigate whether superior performance on corporate social responsibility (CSR) strategies leads to better access to finance. We hypothesize that better access to finance can be attributed to (1) reduced agency costs due to enhanced stakeholder engagement and (2) reduced informational asymmetry due to increased transparency. Using a large cross‐section of firms, we find that firms with better CSR performance face significantly lower capital constraints. We provide evidence that both better stakeholder engagement and transparency around CSR performance are important in reducing capital constraints. The results are further confirmed using several alternative measures of capital constraints, a paired analysis based on a ratings shock to CSR performance, an instrumental variables approach, and a simultaneous equations approach. Finally, we show that the relation is driven by both the social and environmental dimension of CSR. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

企业社会责任的动态演进机制研究

从企业承担社会责任的两个维度出发,结合特定制度及相关因素,厘清企业社会责任的演进机理。企业社会责任行为在相应条件具备时,围绕情境化、概念化、规范化以及定型化四个阶段循环演进,从而形成企业社会责任的动态发展模式。明晰企业社会责任动态演进机制,把握企业社会责任的内在演生特质,为企业更好地履行社会责任提供了路径参照。