Panel unit root tests in the presence of a multifactor error structure

This paper extends the cross-sectionally augmented panel unit root test (CIPS$CIPS$) proposed by Pesaran (2007) to the case of a multifactor error structure, and proposes a new panel unit root test based on a simple average of cross-sectionally augmented Sargan–Bhargava statistics (CSB$CSB$). The basic idea is to exploit information regarding the m$m$ unobserved factors that are shared by k$k$ observed time series in addition to the series under consideration. Initially, we develop the tests assuming that m⁰$m^0$, the true number of factors, is known and show that the limit distribution of the tests does not depend on any nuisance parameters, so long as k≥m⁰−1$k\ge m^0-1$. Small sample properties of the tests are investigated by Monte Carlo experiments and are shown to be satisfactory. Particularly, the proposed CIPS$CIPS$ and CSB$CSB$ tests have the correct size for all   combinations of the cross section (N$N$) and time series (T$T$) dimensions considered. The power of both tests rises with N$N$ and T$T$, although the CSB$CSB$ test performs better than the CIPS$CIPS$ test for smaller sample sizes. The various testing procedures are illustrated with empirical applications to real interest rates and real equity prices across countries.     

Quasi ML estimation of the panel AR(1) model with arbitrary initial conditions

In this paper we show that the Quasi ML estimation method yields consistent Random and Fixed Effects estimators for the autoregression parameter ρ$\rho$ in the panel AR(1) model with arbitrary initial conditions and possibly time-series heteroskedasticity even when the error components are drawn from heterogeneous distributions. We investigate both analytically and by means of Monte Carlo simulations the properties of the QML estimators for ρ$\rho$. The RE(Q)MLE for ρ$\rho$ is asymptotically at least as robust to individual heterogeneity and, when the data are i.i.d. and normal, at least as efficient as the FE(Q)MLE for ρ$\rho$. Furthermore, the QML estimators for ρ$\rho$ only suffer from a ‘weak moment conditions’ problem when ρ$\rho$ is close to one if the cross-sectional average of the variances of the errors is (almost) constant over time, e.g. under time-series homoskedasticity. However, in this case the QML estimators for ρ$\rho$ are still consistent when ρ$\rho$ is local to or equal to one although they converge to a non-normal possibly asymmetric distribution at a rate that is lower than N^1/2$N^{1/2}$ but at least N^1/4$N^{1/4}$. Finally, we study the finite sample properties of two types of estimators for the standard errors of the QML estimators for ρ$\rho$, and the bounds of QML based confidence intervals for ρ$\rho$.     

Semiparametric binary regression models under shape constraints with an application to Indian schooling data

We consider estimation of the regression function in a semiparametric binary regression model defined through an appropriate link function (with emphasis on the logistic link) using likelihood-ratio based inversion. The dichotomous response variable Δ$\Delta$ is influenced by a set of covariates that can be partitioned as (X,Z)$(X,Z)$ where Z$Z$ (real valued) is the covariate of primary interest and X$X$ (vector valued) denotes a set of control variables. For any fixed X$X$, the conditional probability of the event of interest (Δ=1$\Delta =1$) is assumed to be a non-decreasing function of Z$Z$. The effect of the control variables is captured by a regression parameter β$\beta$. We show that the baseline conditional probability function (corresponding to X=0$X=0$) can be estimated by isotonic regression procedures and develop a likelihood ratio based method for constructing asymptotic confidence intervals for the conditional probability function (the regression function) that avoids the need to estimate nuisance parameters. Interestingly enough, the calibration of the likelihood ratio based confidence sets for the regression function no longer involves the usual χ²${\chi }^2$ quantiles, but those of the distribution of a new random variable that can be characterized as a functional of convex minorants of Brownian motion with quadratic drift. Confidence sets for the regression parameter β$\beta$ can however be constructed using asymptotically χ²${\chi }^2$ likelihood ratio statistics. The finite sample performance of the methods are assessed via a simulation study. The techniques of the paper are applied to data sets on primary school attendance among children belonging to different socio-economic groups in rural India.     

On the distribution of estimated technical efficiency in stochastic frontier models

We consider a stochastic frontier model with error ε=v−u$\epsilon =v-u$, where v$v$ is normal and u$u$ is half normal. We derive the distribution of the usual estimate of u,E(u|ε)$u,E\left(u\right|\epsilon )$. We show that as the variance of v$v$ approaches zero, E(u|ε)−u$E\left(u\right|\epsilon )-u$ converges to zero, while as the variance of v$v$ approaches infinity, E(u|ε)$E\left(u\right|\epsilon )$ converges to E(u)$E\left(u\right)$. We graph the density of E(u|ε)$E\left(u\right|\epsilon )$ for intermediate cases. To show that E(u|ε)$E\left(u\right|\epsilon )$ is a shrinkage of u towards its mean, we derive and graph the distribution of E(u|ε)$E\left(u\right|\epsilon )$ conditional on u$u$. We also consider the distribution of estimated inefficiency in the fixed-effects panel data setting.     

Asymptotics for panel quantile regression models with individual effects

This paper studies panel quantile regression models with individual fixed effects. We formally establish sufficient conditions for consistency and asymptotic normality of the quantile regression estimator when the number of individuals, n$n$, and the number of time periods, T$T$, jointly go to infinity. The estimator is shown to be consistent under similar conditions to those found in the nonlinear panel data literature. Nevertheless, due to the non-smoothness of the objective function, we had to impose a more restrictive condition on T$T$ to prove asymptotic normality than that usually found in the literature. The finite sample performance of the estimator is evaluated by Monte Carlo simulations.     

Inference in regression models with many regressors

We investigate the behavior of various standard and modified F$F$, likelihood ratio (LR$LR$), and Lagrange multiplier (LM$LM$) tests in linear homoskedastic regressions, adapting an alternative asymptotic framework in which the number of regressors and possibly restrictions grows proportionately to the sample size. When the restrictions are not numerous, the rescaled classical test statistics are asymptotically chi-squared, irrespective of whether there are many or few regressors. However, when the restrictions are numerous, standard asymptotic versions of classical tests are invalid. We propose and analyze asymptotically valid versions of the classical tests, including those that are robust to the numerosity of regressors and restrictions. The local power of all asymptotically valid tests under consideration turns out to be equal. The “exact” F$F$ test that appeals to critical values of the F$F$ distribution is also asymptotically valid and robust to the numerosity of regressors and restrictions.     

A Lagrange Multiplier test for cross-sectional dependence in a fixed effects panel data model

It is well known that the standard Breusch and Pagan (1980) LM test for cross-equation correlation in a SUR model is not appropriate for testing cross-sectional dependence in panel data models when the number of cross-sectional units (n)$\left(n\right)$ is large and the number of time periods (T)$\left(T\right)$ is small. In fact, a scaled version of this LM test was proposed by Pesaran (2004) and its finite sample bias was corrected by Pesaran et al. (2008). This was done in the context of a heterogeneous panel data model. This paper derives the asymptotic bias of this scaled version of the LM test in the context of a fixed effects homogeneous panel data model. This asymptotic bias is found to be a constant related to n$n$ and T$T$, which suggests a simple bias corrected LM test for the null hypothesis. Additionally, the paper carries out some Monte Carlo experiments to compare the finite sample properties of this proposed test with existing tests for cross-sectional dependence.     

Identification and nonparametric estimation of a transformed additively separable model

Let r(x,z)$r(x,z)$ be a function that, along with its derivatives, can be consistently estimated nonparametrically. This paper discusses the identification and consistent estimation of the unknown functions H$H$, M$M$, G$G$ and F$F$, where r(x,z)=H[M(x,z)]$r(x,z)=H\left[M(x,z)\right]$, M(x,z)=G(x)+F(z)$M(x,z)=G\left(x\right)+F\left(z\right)$, and H$H$ is strictly monotonic. An estimation algorithm is proposed for each of the model’s unknown components when r(x,z)$r(x,z)$ represents a conditional mean function. The resulting estimators use marginal integration to separate the components G$G$ and F$F$. Our estimators are shown to have a limiting Normal distribution with a faster rate of convergence than unrestricted nonparametric alternatives. Their small sample performance is studied in a Monte Carlo experiment. We apply our results to estimate generalized homothetic production functions for four industries in the Chinese economy.     

High dimensional covariance matrix estimation using a factor model

High dimensionality comparable to sample size is common in many statistical problems. We examine covariance matrix estimation in the asymptotic framework that the dimensionality p$p$ tends to ∞$\infty$ as the sample size n$n$ increases. Motivated by the Arbitrage Pricing Theory in finance, a multi-factor model is employed to reduce dimensionality and to estimate the covariance matrix. The factors are observable and the number of factors K$K$ is allowed to grow with p$p$. We investigate the impact of p$p$ and K$K$ on the performance of the model-based covariance matrix estimator. Under mild assumptions, we have established convergence rates and asymptotic normality of the model-based estimator. Its performance is compared with that of the sample covariance matrix. We identify situations under which the factor approach increases performance substantially or marginally. The impacts of covariance matrix estimation on optimal portfolio allocation and portfolio risk assessment are studied. The asymptotic results are supported by a thorough simulation study.     

On bootstrapping panel factor series

This paper studies the asymptotic validity of sieve bootstrap for nonstationary panel factor series. Two main results are shown. Firstly, a bootstrap Invariance Principle is derived pointwise in i$i$, obtaining an upper bound for the order of truncation of the AR polynomial that depends on n$n$ and T$T$. Consistent estimation of the long run variances is also studied for (n,T)→∞$(n,T)\to \infty$. Secondly, joint bootstrap asymptotics is also studied, investigating the conditions under which the bootstrap is valid. In particular, the extent of cross sectional dependence which can be allowed for is investigated. Whilst we show that, for general forms of cross dependence, consistent estimation of the long run variance (and therefore validity of the bootstrap) is fraught with difficulties, however we show that “one-cross-sectional-unit-at-a-time” resampling schemes yield valid bootstrap based inference under weak forms of cross-sectional dependence.