市场行情影响投资者的股利偏好吗?

基于2005-2017年A股上市公司的数据,研究了在不同的市场行情中,投资者对于股利政策的偏好差别。研究发现：对于现金股利而言,在上涨和下跌的市场行情中,投资者更偏好不发放现金股利的上市公司;在平稳行情中,投资者更偏好发放现金股利的上市公司。对于股票股利而言,在上涨行情中,投资者更偏好发放股票股利的上市公司;在下跌行情中,投资者更偏好不发放股票股利的上市公司;在平稳行情中,投资者对于是否发放股票股利没有显著的偏好差异。在上涨和下跌的市场行情中,超能力派现和高送转不会改变投资者的偏好;在平稳行情中,只有正常派现和正常送转才能赢得投资者的青睐,超能力派现行为无益于上市公司,高送转还会损害公司价值。     

中国股民投资收益结构分析

本文利用中国A股上市公司股利分配现状及相关政策对股民投资收益的结构进行分析,研究发现中国股民投资收益以资本利得为主,现金股利和股票股利为辅。其中股利分配以现金股利和现金股利加转增股为主。中国虽然实施强制分红的股利政策,但是,上市公司整体盈利能力不强,公司治理有待完善以及股民的"投机行为"使得股民获得的股息红利较少。随着股息红利差别化征收政策的出台,现金股利在股民利润中所占比例会逐渐增加。本文对于培育高水平、持续稳定分红的上市公司也有一定的启示作用。     

浅议现金股利与股票股利的比较与选择

现金股利与股票股利是公司进行股利分配最主要的两种分配方式。本文通过比较现金股利与股票股利的区别及影响,分析中美上市公司对两种股利分配方式的不同选择的现状及原因,据此分别从投资者、公司治理、资本市场三个角度提出思考与建议,以期对改善我国上市公司股利分配行为提供指导。     

关于证券交易印花税的几点思考

证券交易印花税身兼二职?完善的证券税制主要包括流转税和所得税两部分,虽然各税种都有增加财政收入的作用,但并不同时具备其他功能。例如证券交易税能控制交易频率,调节资金流向,但在维护公平方面却收效甚微;证券所得税兼顾收入与公平,但侧重于调节投资者的利益差别。二者各司其职,相互补充,但是不能相互取代。与成熟的证券市场相比,我国证券市场尚处在发展初期,目前市场的主要交易品种是股票,因此,与股票相关的税种就成为我国证券税制的主体税种。我国现行税制中,与股票相关的税种主要包括两大类:一是证券交易印花税;二是证券收益所得税,其中包括证券交易收益所得税和证券投资收益所得税(交易收益指的是资本利得,即股票买入价和卖出价之间的差额;而投资收益指的是股息、红利收入)。从目前的实施情况来看,证券收益所得税的课征尚未达到规范、全面的程度,如对国家股、法人股的股利所得尚未纳入课税范围;对上市公司的证券投资所得按15%的税率征收;对个人的证券交易所得免税等。因此,我国目前证券市场的主体税种是证券交易印花税。一般来说,证券交易印花税是一种流转税(就我国目前证券交易印花税而言,其实质是对交易行为课税,因此,应该归为证券交易税的范畴),资本利得...     

股票期权交易:我国股市的现实选择

我国上市公司现金股利支付率过低、股票市场缺乏做空机制这两个基本因素导致我国股市风险突出,股民对股市信心大失,股市陷入低迷;与股指期货相比,股票期权交易更能给投资者带来安全感,更能活跃股市;推出股票期权交易不仅是必要的,而且是可行的.     

基于上市公司股利分配的所得税政策探析

<正>股利分配是指公司将企业盈利在留存收益与支付股利之间进行分配的行为,公司通常在综合考虑各种相关因素后,对不同的股利分配政策进行比较,最终选择一种符合本公司特点与需要的股利分配政策予以实施。对于上市公司而言,会根据公司的实际状况,采取不同的股利分配方式,如现金股利、股票股利等。此外,由于上市公司部分或全部股份始终处于交易之中,其股东人数和身份并不特定,既有个人投资者,也可能有合格的境外机构投资者(QFII)。因此,在收到上市公司股利分配时,不同的股利分配方式、不同的股东身份使得适用的所     

A股税收客户群效应及除息日税负效应实证研究

本文分析了2002—2007年A股市场的纯现金红利分红数据,检验了这一期间在除息日套利的可能性,证实该期间市场存在除息日股价的税负效应,以及税收客户群效应。说明A股市场不同类的投资者对分红具有不同的偏好,上市公司应制定合适的股利政策以最大化股东财富。早期的关于国内市场的研究得到市场不存在税收客户群效应的结论,前后对比说明随着国内证券市场的发展,投资者更趋于理性。     

基于期权理论的股票定价模型的研究

传统的现金流量模型在对股票定价的过程中,存在着不能精确地确定投资者的收益率和未来支付的现金股利的不足。公司的权益资本(股票)具有期权的特性,公司的股票实质上是基于公司价值的看涨期权,该期权的执行价格就是公司债券到期时的还本付息的金额,于是可以用期权定价模型来进行股票定价。该方法不需要估计未来的现金股利和投资者的预期收益率,在一定程度上克服了传统股票定价方法的缺陷。     

A股税收客户群效应及除息日税负效应实证研究

本文分析了2002-2007年A股市场的纯现金红利分红数据,检验了这一期间在除息日套利的可能性,证实该期间市场存在除息日股价的税负效应,以及税收客户群效应.说明A股市场不同类的投资者对分红具有不同的偏好,上市公司应制定合适的股利政策以最大化股东财富.早期的关于国内市场的研究得到市场不存在税收客户群效应的结论,前后对比说明随着国内证券市场的发展,投资者更趋于理性.     

基于期权理论的股票定价模型的研究

传统的现金流量模型在对股票定价的过程中,存在着不能精确地确定投资者的收益率和未来支付的现金股利的不足.公司的权益资本(股票)具有期权的特性,公司的股票实质上是基于公司价值的看涨期权,该期权的执行价格就是公司债券到期时的还本付息的金额,于是可以用期权定价模型来进行股票定价.该方法不需要估计未来的现金股利和投资者的预期收益率,在一定程度上克服了传统股票定价方法的缺陷.     

“两税合一”对台湾上市公司股利税资本化的影响

本文以1994～2001年两税合一税制实施前后的台湾上市公司为样本，运用Harris-Kemsley股利税后收益模型，探讨所得税制改革对权益投资者收益的影响，以及两税合一税制的实施对股利税资本化的影响。实证结果表明：两税合一税制实施前，台湾上市公司的末分配盈余与其股利税资本化程度负相关，即股利税资本化效果存在；两税合一税制实施后，台湾上市公司的股利税资本化程度低于两税合一前的程度。     

税收竞争和税收套利对国际税收制度的挑战

当前被动投资的税收竞争、主动投资的税收竞争和税收套利等问题阻碍了单一税收原则和受惠原则的实践运用。本文介绍了税收竞争和税收套利对国际税收制度的挑战,并以OECD成员国的应对为例,阐述了OECD成员国不断与时俱进修订税收法规的历程,试图引起人们关注国际税收制度的完善。     

Payout Policy Tax Clienteles,Ex‐dividend Day Stock Prices and Trading Behavior in Germany: The Case of the 2001 Tax Reform

This paper examines the impact of the German 2001 tax reform, where Germany switched from a full imputation system to a classical system. Theory suggests that both price drop ratios and trading volume decrease following the reform. We document a significant reduction in the valuation of net dividends–in particular for high dividend yield stocks–and weakening payout policy tax clienteles. Ex‐dividend day returns are likely to be driven by short‐term traders. Though the reform removed incentives for cross‐border dividend stripping and reduced tax heterogeneity among investors, we show that the high trading volume around ex‐dividend days persists.     

The Informativeness of Dividends and Associated Tax Credits

This paper investigates the informativeness of dividends and the associated tax credits with respect to earnings persistence. After confirming that dividend‐paying firms have more persistent earnings than non‐dividend‐paying firms, we show that the taxation status of the dividend is also important. Firms that pay dividends with a full tax credit attached have significantly more persistent earnings than firms that pay dividends which carry no associated tax credit. Consistent with higher levels of tax credits identifying more mature firms, those paying dividends with full tax credits have significantly less persistent losses than firms that pay dividends with only partial tax credits. Further, market pricing tests confirm that the incremental information in dividends and tax credits contributes to reductions in market mispricing of the persistence of earnings and earnings components. Our results are robust to alternative model specifications and controlling for dividend size and firm age.     

Anticipating Tax Changes: Evidence from the Finnish Corporate Income Tax Reform of 2005*

Using register‐based panel data covering all Finnish firms from 1999 to 2004, we examine how corporations anticipated the 2005 dividend tax increase via changes in their dividend and investment policies. The Finnish capital and corporate income tax reform of 2005 creates a useful opportunity to measure this behaviour, since it involves exogenous variation in the tax treatment of different types of firms. The estimation results reveal that those firms that anticipated a dividend tax hike increased their dividend payouts in a statistically significant way. This increase was not accompanied by a reduction in investment activities, but rather was associated with increased indebtedness in non‐listed firms. The results also suggest that the timing of dividend distributions probably offsets much of the potential for increased dividend tax revenue following the reform.     

我国证券市场税收政策浅析

我国现行以证券交易印花税为主体的证券税制,在组织财政收入、调节证券市场、抑制过度投机等方面发挥了一定作用,但还存在一些不足之处。建议:进一步调整证券交易印花税的征收办法;建立一套系统、健全的证券税制;消除对公司和股东个人股、红利的重复征税;统一上市公司的企业所得税政策。     

The composite dividend tax rate

Dividends often impose taxes on investors. However, as certain prior financial models indicate, they also can produce a tax gain from leverage. Hence the composite marginal dividend tax rate can be specified as the nominal rate minus the offsetting tax gain from leverage. Although this principle has been embedded in theoretical models for more than 40 years, no prior study has examined empirically whether the dividend-induced tax gain from leverage influences dividend policy. We address this empirical void and find dividends decrease in the nominal dividend tax rate and increase in the offsetting tax gain from leverage. In addition, we find the composite tax rate outperforms traditional measures in explaining dividend policy for our full sample of firms. Consistent with prior theory, we also find the composite rate varies in influence according to the financing source for a dividend.     

家族企业、税收稽查治理与企业避税行为

采用多种指标,检验家族和非家族企业的税收规避程度。研究发现,较之非家族企业,家族企业表现出更加明显的避税倾向,这反映出家族企业更重视税收节约收益;而且,家族企业所表现出的较高的避税程度和动机主要发生在税收稽查治理强度较弱的地区。我国家族企业避税收益要高于税收稽查的惩罚成本和由此产生的声誉损失,特别是在税收治理较弱的地区尤为如此。     

Tax Competition and Tax Coordination in the European Union

This paper examines the tax competition literature and attempts to draw out its implications for the debate on corporate tax coordination within the EU. It begins with the early basic tax competition model, which derives conditions under which underprovision of public services occurs and tax harmonization unambiguously improves welfare for all states in the union. The paper then turns to a wide variety of extensions of this model, some of which reinforce its results and others that yield rather different conclusions. The analysis concludes by considering the implications of the tax competition literature for the debate on EU corporate tax coordination, drawing on some recent efforts to synthesize this vast literature by estimating the efficiency costs of tax competition and simulating the efficiency gains from various tax coordination palns.     

Tax Costs and Signalling Benefits: The Impact of Surplus ACT

Companies with surplus ACT are faced with additional tax costs if they use dividends to signal information to investors, hence there is a trade-off between tax costs and signalling benefits. This paper provides evidence that investors' reactions to dividend surprises are influenced by the signal generated by earnings and tax planning considerations. The results indicate that in the presence of a positive earnings signal and a binding tax constraint, decreases in dividends are value enhancing.