我国县域民营经济特点分析

几十年的经济发展证明:县域民营经济的产生既有内在动力,又有外在要求,是客观的必然选择。本文阐述了县域民营经济发展的现状,并提出对县域民营经济发展具有针对性的基本策略及战略性策略,以促进县域民营经济能健康、快速、持续地发展。     

鄂西地区县域民营经济发展战略分析——以湖北省宜昌市夷陵区为例

自改革开放以来,我国民营经济从无到有、从小到大、由弱到强.结合对湖北省宜昌市夷陵区民营企业发展实际情况的分析,文章对县域民营企业的发展战略进行了分析研究,提出要立足于新农村建设,从创造良好的内外部环境入手,促进县域民营经济的持续、健康、稳定发展.     

培育民营经济产业集群促进县域经济持续发展

县域,是解决“三农”的切入点,是中心城市发展的辐射点、支撑点,也是壮大经济总量的增长点。发展县域经济是全面建设小康社会的重要任务。发展县域经济主力军是民营经济,着力点应落在各县(区)具有资源禀赋优势、独具特色的民营经济产业群。只有发挥比较优势,促进特色产业群的发展,才能使县域经济扬后发优势,实现超常规、跨跃式发展。     

邵东民营经济的发展现状及对策研究

本文分析了邵东县民营经济发展的现状,认为县域民营经济的发展具有与体制创新相结合的特点,但县域民营经济的发展又被思想保守、人才匮乏、管理落后等内部因素所困扰同时也被融资、环境等外部因素所阻碍,因此,促进县域民营经济的健康快速发展必须走更新观念、创新机制、整治环境、引导投资、拓宽渠道、提供服务的新路子。     

推进“民本工业”

在推进县域工业化进程中的“民本工业”发展过程中,地方政府和金融机构如何更好地促进民营经济健康、快速发展,是摆在我们面前的一个重大课题。最近,我们对醴陵市在推进县域工业化过程中的“民本工业”发展情况进行了专题调查,得出如下启示:实现湖南省工业化的主要任务在于实现县域工业化,走“民本工业”之路,大力发展民营经济,使民营经济成为推进县域工业的主体力量。民营经济在推进县域工业化中的主体地位基本确立民营经济占据所有制结构中的主体地位。2002年,醴陵市基本完成“两个置换”的改革任务。与此形成鲜明对比的是,民营工业不断发…     

抓大放小方能做大做强——宾阳建设民营经济强县的再思考

近年来，宾阳县提出建设民营经济强县的目标，把发展民营经济作为县域经济发展的第一支柱来抓紧抓好，先后出台《关于加快发展个体私营经济的决定》、《关于扩大招商引资的若干规定》等优惠政策；深入开展质量兴县、诚信宾阳活动，进一步规范市场经济秩序；积极举办两年一届的广西民营经济发展（宾阳）研讨会暨小商品展销会等节会活动，为宾阳民营经济的发展搭建宽大平台，有力地促进了民营经济的发展。全县民营经济提供的税收占全县财政税收的70％以上，民营企业的工业总产值占全县工业总产值的90％以上。2005年底，全县民营企业481家，其中新发展88家；个体工商户22893户，其中新发展7496户，民营企、世从业人员超万人。民营经济已成为推动宾阳县域经济发展的重要力量。     

建设民营经济强县发展壮大县域经济

县域经济是国民经济的重要基础,而民营经济是国民经济的重要组成部分,是宾阳县的特色经济,优势经济。但由于宾阳县民营经济受到内外因素影响,还存在一定问题,影响了民营经济的发展和县域经济的壮大。从宾阳县民营经济在宾阳县域经济中的地位、作用出发,探求把宾阳县民营经济做大做强以发展壮大宾阳县域经济的对策。     

发展县域民营经济的策略探析

本文分析了民营经济在县域经济中的地垃与作用，阐述了县域民营经济的发展机遇，提出了发展县域民营经济要理性选择产业空间，充分发挥行业协会等中介组织的作用，走产业集群之路，对国有和集体企业进行民营化改革，营造有利于民营经济发展的环境，帮助民营企业克服自身弱点等六项策略。     

加快壮大广东县域经济 全面建设小康社会

本文通过分析广东县域经济发展现状并与其他强省比较,提出了广东县域经济发展对策。其对策应是强县扩权,发展地方特色经济,调整和优化产业结构,大力发展民营经济,稳步推进小城镇建设。     

县域民营企业融资难的成因及对策

县域民营经济是县域经济中最具活力的增长极,是促进县域经济增长、扩大社会就业、增加农民收入的重要渠道。融资难已成为制约县域民营企业发展的“瓶颈”。本文深入剖析了县域民营企业融资难的成因,并从健全县域金融体系、创新县域国有商业银行金融服务机制、建立多层次的担保体系和规范民营企业经营行为等方面提出了应对策略。     

“温 良 恭 俭 让”

选自于:<论语·学而> 解读:人要学会温和、善良、恭谨、简朴、谦让.即:做人一定要有美好的德行.其实这正也是自古以来的做人之本.     

经纪人、交易员、律师和间谍

金融危机过后，“华尔街阴谋论”逐渐盛行起来，可惜都是臆测居多，缺乏真凭实据。而本书的作者以真实的访谈入手，揭出CIA等情报机构与华尔街银行合作的种种细节，可谓匠心独具。     

Assessing black progress: employment,occupation, earnings,income, poverty

Farley discusses changes in employment, occupation, earnings, income, and poverty among US blacks. Among black men, there has been a persistent rise in unemployment since 1960. By the early 1980s, 1 black man out of 8 had dropped out of the labor force, compared to 1 in 20 white men. Some contend that many black men lack the skills to be employed or have personal habits and criminal records which make them unacceptable to employers. Others believe that the expansion of federal welfare programs offers attractive alternatives to men who have limited earnings potential. Still others stress that blacks are concentrated within cities, while the growth of employment is occurring in suburbs. Among those blacks over age 54, labor force participation has declined because of improved Social Security benefits, better private pensions, and the greater availability of Supplemental Security Income. The employment of young blacks compared to whites has deteriorated since 1960. For both races, there has been a steady rise in the employment of women. The recent increases, however, have been great for whites. By the early 1980s, white women caught up with black women in terms of employment. Unlike the indicators of employment itself, there is unambiguous evidence that the occupational distribution of employed blacks has been upgraded and is gradually becoming similar to that of whites. Findings from many studies show that blacks once earned much less than similar whites, but this racial difference has declined among men and has nearly disappeared among women. The proportion of blacks impoverished fell sharply in the 1960s, reaching a minimum of 30% in the early 1970s. Since the early 1970s, blacks have made few gains. The proportion impoverished actually increased and the ratio of black-to-white family income declined. The fact that the earnings of black males are no longer rising faster than those of whites and that there is no longer a migration from southern farms to cities plays a role, but changes in family structure are also important. At all dates, poverty rates have been high and income levels low in families headed by women. In 1984, for example, 52% of the black families with a woman as head of household were below the poverty line, compared to 15% of the black married-couple families. While similar trends are occurring in white families, there has been a sharper increase in the proportion of blacks living in these female-maintained families which have high poverty rates.