积极发展民营经济实现广东富民强省

为使广东民营经济持续健康发展，首先要正确认识民营经济的地位、作用；其次要为民营经济的发展创造良好环境；另外，民营经济自身也要不断提高素质。     

浅谈民营经济政策对广东民营经济影响

民营经济作为广东经济发展的生力军，是广东经济发展的重要力量。本文在回顾国家和广东省对民营经济政策后，结合在民营经济政策背景下广东民营经济发展的实际情况，特别是就广东民营企业外向型发展情况、民营经济结构发展情况以及融资情况等几个政策制定比较集中的方面入手从中了解得到民营经济具体发展中的各项政策对民营经济增长的实际的影响以及民营经济政策效力程度。     

浙江与广东会展业的发展比较

浙江和广东，在经济实力、民营经济、出口贸易方面有很多的相似之处。在会展业发展方面，浙江在政府逐步加大政策扶持力度的同时，利用发育完备的市场条件和特色产业优势，促进会展业有了长足发展；而广东依托雄厚的制造业基础、便利的国际市场渠道以及悠久的经商传统，已经成为中国三个重要的区域展览中心之一。对浙江与广东会展业进行比较分析，有利于促进两省会展业的健康发展。     

从“深圳模式”看民营企业的融资问题

民营企业作为社会主义市场经济的重要组成部分，作为当前必须毫不动摇地鼓励、支持和引导发展的经济主体，作为当前中国经济中最具有活力的部分，其与金融之间的关系，实际上是经济与金融之间的关系的具体反应，应该能够相辅相成，互相促进——民营企业发展了，金融机构的资金来源增加，业务增多，经营效益和经营质量改善；反之，金融机构对民营经济提供优质高效的金融支持，也会给民营经济注入持续动力，促进民营经济乃至国民经济的发展。     

继续坚定不移地推进改革开放——宁波农村改革发展的回顾与展望

宁波农村的改革发展，先后经历了从探索土地家庭承包经营，废除人民公社三级所有、队为基础的旧体制，到建立农村基本经营制度，确立农民生产经营自主权；从实行农产品流通体制改革到多种经营全面发展、乡镇企业异军突起，乡镇企业体制转换和民营经济的大发展；从农村税费改革、取消农业税，调整国民收入分配关系到统筹城乡经济社会发展，扎实推进社会主义新农村建设三个重大阶段。     

关于民营经济的三点思考

文章对民营经济存在的一系列问题提出了如下思考：１．“民营”是一种经营方式，是所有制实现形式范畴，而不是所有制范畴，主张摒弃“民营”概念是缺乏科学依据的；２．民营经济是天然的市场经济，实行社会主义市场经济适宜建立以民营为主体的经营格局；３．“民营经济”发展的“两面性”，决定了其管理的“两重性”     

政企携手共创深圳民营经济发展新局面

本文概述了深圳民营经济发展的现状，并用事实从四个方面说明民营经济对深圳市经济发展的重要作用，中肯指出了民营经济发展中存在的问题；然后，提出了政府要大力营造有利于民营经济发展优良环境的具体建议，并根据深圳民营企业的实际情况，提出了促进民营经济上规模上水平的对策。     

广东民营经济发展现状与对策分析

近年来广东民营经济发展总体规模不断扩大，民营经济成为广东税收收入的重要来源，但当前民营经济还存在龙头企业和品牌偏少、创新能力较弱、吸纳就业能力少等问题，因此，要促进民营经济发展，必须采取放宽产业准入限制、内外结合缓解融资难题、强化民营企业创新能力、大力发展产业集群、优化民营企业人力资源等对策措施。     

关于我国民营经济及其定位和私营企业定性的理论探讨

本文认为凡不是国家政府经营的经济就是民营经济；民营经济在我国国民经济中已占主体地位；在我国社会主义制度中的私营经济，具有社会主义和资本主义两种性质，而社会主义性质是其主要方面。     

大力发展民营经济 促进新一轮大发展──湖北省委、政府召开发展民营经济工作表彰先进会议

近日，湖北省委、省政府在武昌召开发展民营经济工作暨表彰发展民营经济先进单位会议。省委书记贾志杰、省长蒋祝平在会上作了重要讲话。副省长苏晓云、周坚卫分别宣读了省委、少政府关于表彰发展民营经济十强（县）市十强民营企业的决定，并向受表彰的单位颁奖。贾志杰就突破性发展民营经济谈了如下意见：一、正确分析形势，深化战略认识，增强加快发展民营经济的紧迫感。要从个面贯彻落实十人大精神；从建立社会主义市场经济；从深化改革、确保稳定大局；从实现湖北振兴崛起的战略高度深化认识，增强发展民营经济的紧迫感。－－－M、借鉴…     

“温 良 恭 俭 让”

选自于:<论语·学而> 解读:人要学会温和、善良、恭谨、简朴、谦让.即:做人一定要有美好的德行.其实这正也是自古以来的做人之本.     

经纪人、交易员、律师和间谍

金融危机过后，“华尔街阴谋论”逐渐盛行起来，可惜都是臆测居多，缺乏真凭实据。而本书的作者以真实的访谈入手，揭出CIA等情报机构与华尔街银行合作的种种细节，可谓匠心独具。     

Assessing black progress: employment,occupation, earnings,income, poverty

Farley discusses changes in employment, occupation, earnings, income, and poverty among US blacks. Among black men, there has been a persistent rise in unemployment since 1960. By the early 1980s, 1 black man out of 8 had dropped out of the labor force, compared to 1 in 20 white men. Some contend that many black men lack the skills to be employed or have personal habits and criminal records which make them unacceptable to employers. Others believe that the expansion of federal welfare programs offers attractive alternatives to men who have limited earnings potential. Still others stress that blacks are concentrated within cities, while the growth of employment is occurring in suburbs. Among those blacks over age 54, labor force participation has declined because of improved Social Security benefits, better private pensions, and the greater availability of Supplemental Security Income. The employment of young blacks compared to whites has deteriorated since 1960. For both races, there has been a steady rise in the employment of women. The recent increases, however, have been great for whites. By the early 1980s, white women caught up with black women in terms of employment. Unlike the indicators of employment itself, there is unambiguous evidence that the occupational distribution of employed blacks has been upgraded and is gradually becoming similar to that of whites. Findings from many studies show that blacks once earned much less than similar whites, but this racial difference has declined among men and has nearly disappeared among women. The proportion of blacks impoverished fell sharply in the 1960s, reaching a minimum of 30% in the early 1970s. Since the early 1970s, blacks have made few gains. The proportion impoverished actually increased and the ratio of black-to-white family income declined. The fact that the earnings of black males are no longer rising faster than those of whites and that there is no longer a migration from southern farms to cities plays a role, but changes in family structure are also important. At all dates, poverty rates have been high and income levels low in families headed by women. In 1984, for example, 52% of the black families with a woman as head of household were below the poverty line, compared to 15% of the black married-couple families. While similar trends are occurring in white families, there has been a sharper increase in the proportion of blacks living in these female-maintained families which have high poverty rates.