供应链上制造商不同合作类型的风险评价

针对供应链的制造商合作关系的复杂性,将制造商合作类型分为战略联盟、一般合作和交易关系等,通过对这三种合作类型风险的构成因素分析,其中考虑到环保因素指标。建立相应指标体系。运用模糊理论进行评价,为进一步对其风险的管理和控制提供依据.     

技术创新多阶段风险分析

当前研究技术创新风险大多是从整体上对技术创新的风险因素和风险后果之间的关系进行分析。但是在技术创新进展过程中的不同阶段,风险因素的影响可能不会完全一致。因此,文章对技术创新过程中不同阶段的关键风险因素进行了识别,并对技术创新风险在不同阶段的分布规律进行了分析。     

基于系统分析的产业技术创新战略联盟运行机制研究——以江苏省石墨烯产业联盟为例

本文首先比较了传统产学研合作方式与产业技术创新战略联盟的特点,分析了产业技术创新战略联盟的优势。然后以江苏省石墨烯产业技术创新战略联盟为例,运用系统结构理论,提炼了石墨烯产业技术创新战略联盟的系统结构模型并分析了系统各要素间的关系,同时分析探讨了产业技术创新战略联盟系统的运行机制。     

基于生命周期理论的战略联盟风险识别与管理重点研究

文章在对战略联盟生命周期和联盟风险管理文献进行总结分析的基础上,归纳出战略联盟形成发展过程中每个阶段的核心事件和管理重点,明确了联盟生命周期每一个阶段的风险侧重,并针对战略联盟的各个建立阶段提出风险防范重点。     

战略联盟的组建、管理和发展

随着经济全球化,企业之间的竞争方式也发生了巨大的变化,战略联盟越来越多地被企业采用。本文在梳理战略联盟的有关理论的基础上,对战略联盟中有关战略联盟伙伴的选择、联盟的风险、联盟的管理、知识转移和联盟文化等若干主要问题进行了探讨。最后针对我国企业实施战略联盟的实际情况,提出了相应的发展策略。     

辽宁高校在产业技术创新战略联盟中的管理策略探究

随着科技的日新月异和全球竞争的加剧,科技创新能力成为决定社会发展的重要因素。作为新型创新组织形式——产业技术创新战略联盟日益受到社会各界的广泛关注。高校作为产业技术创新战略联盟的重要参与主体为联盟技术创新提供重要的智力支持,在联盟可持续发展中起着不可替代的作用。文中首先介绍了产业技术创新战略联盟的基本内涵,重点分析了辽宁省高校参与联盟的现状及存在的问题,在借鉴国外高校在参与联盟中的成功经验的基础上,提出了辽宁省高校在产业技术创新战略联盟构建中的具体管理策略。     

企业技术创新风险与防范

技术创新是企业实现科技进步、增强核心竞争力的根本源泉,是企业生存与发展的重要基础。但是,技术创新与风险共存,创新风险已成为阻碍企业技术创新的重要因素之一。文章通过对技术创新风险的类型和成因进行分析与探讨,提出了企业防范技术创新风险的应对措施。     

网络组织联合决策方案实施中的风险及其防范

文章认为,网络组织实施联合决策方案过程中的风险主要包括来自各节点企业的能力风险、责任风险和道德风险,来自节点企业之间的相互信任风险、关系风险和沟通风险,来自整个网络组织的战略协作风险、组织管理风险和文化融合风险,以及来自外部环境的市场风险、政策变动风险和技术创新风险;最后,提出防范风险的具体策略。     

战略联盟与企业风险承担

基于风险承担视角,研究战略联盟合作的经济效果,发现参与战略联盟的公司其整体风险承担水平显著提升。机制检验表明,战略联盟通过降低企业代理成本和企业运营成本提高企业风险承担水平。异质性分析发现,对于非国有企业、高行业竞争度企业及处于市场化水平较低区域的企业,战略联盟对企业风险承担的提升效应更大。拓展性研究表明,股权式合作模式、双边契约形式,区域商业合作文化显著增加了战略联盟对企业风险承担的提升作用。战略联盟对企业风险承担的影响具体表现为债务融资规模的扩大、资本性支出水平的提升和研发投入的增加。鉴于此,企业应积极寻求建立有效的战略联盟,监管机构应激励和支持企业构建战略联盟,以提升企业的风险承担能力,增强企业竞争优势,助推企业高质量发展。     

中小创新型企业成长风险因素分析与风险控制对策

通过对中小创新型企业特点聚焦,分析了中小创新型企业成长过程中的存在的五大风险因素:技术创新风险、市场竞争风险、人才流失风险、资金短缺风险和企业管理风险。在此基础上提出了对应的风险控制对策。     

企业技术创新风险的管理

文章从企业技术创新风险管理的内涵入手,分析技术创新风险的类型及成因,并针对风险因素分析得出企业技术创新风险的规避方法和对策。     

校企合作战略联盟反馈控制机制研究

校企合作是经济发展和技术创新的必然要求。本文在对校企合作战略联盟内涵界定的基础上,构建了校企合作战略联盟反馈控制模式,高校和企业之间建立起密切的战略伙伴关系,通过实现资源共享,实现利益均沾"、互惠双赢"的目的。校企合作战略联盟系统是复杂反馈系统,通过反馈机制,不断调整系统,促进合作的顺利实施。校企合作战略联盟反馈控制机制需要强化控制意识、控制机制实施和构建信息系统三方面开展。     

Green management,firm innovations,and environmental turbulence

The multifaceted nature of firm innovation has prevented researchers from fully explaining the relationship between firm innovation and green management. This study, building on the Schumpeterian theory of innovation, explores this relationship by examining three major types of firm innovation—strategic innovation, managerial innovation, and product innovation—and their respective relationships with green management, considering several dimensions of environmental turbulence as distinctive boundary conditions. We propose that both strategic innovation and managerial innovation facilitate green management, which in turn mediates these effects on new product performance. The results of a survey of 303 Chinese firms provide strong support for this mediating logic. Moreover, we find that market turbulence weakens the effect of strategic innovation on green management whereas technological turbulence strengthens such effect but the effect of managerial innovation on green management is not influenced by environmental turbulence. Our research contributes to the innovation as well as green management and sustainability literatures by offering a framework in which to analyze firm innovation and green management and by showing how firms pursue sustainability and prosperity under specific environmental conditions.     

中小企业技术创新的风险及其控制

文章首先分析了中小企业技术创新风险的三种类型:人因风险、物因风险和关系风险;接着指出中小企业技术创新风险的两种危害:对技术创新自身的危害和对企业整体的危害;最后提出了中小企业技术创新风险的控制措施:风险预警、风险规避、风险宏观控制和风险微观控制。     

Does Familiarity Foster Innovation? The Impact of Alliance Partner Repeatedness on Breakthrough Innovations

Does familiarity with alliance partners promote breakthrough innovations? This study draws on the literature of interorganizational routines to examine the impact of repeated R&D collaborations within a firm's alliance portfolio on its breakthrough innovations. Specifically, we contend that the benefits and liabilities of interorganizational routines, arising from alliance partner repeatedness at a firm's alliance portfolio level, lead to an inverted U‐shaped relationship between alliance partner repeatedness and breakthrough innovations. Further, we build on the recent theoretical development of interorganizational routines to propose that technological dynamism will make the inverted U‐shaped relationship steeper. Analyses of approximately 230 firms in the US biopharmaceutical industry from 1983 to 2002 support our hypotheses. Our findings provide important implications for research on alliance portfolio and management of firm innovation.     

Strategic Motives For International Alliance Formation*

This paper considers the strategic motivation for international alliance formation for a sample of UK firms with partners in western Europe, the United States and Japan. the relative importance of a set of strategic motives is identified and related to extant theory. A parsimonious set of strategic motives for the sample studied is provided by means of factor analysis. the paper identifies the main strategic motives for alliance formation by UK firms as intrinsically linked to the market and geographical expansion of the firm and that the main strategic motives are underpinned by the theories of strategic positioning and organizational learning. This study also finds that some of the often suggested motives for alliance formation found in the literature, in particular aspects of risk reduction associated with new projects, appear not to be particularly important motivating factors. Hypotheses are tested on the relationship between the relative importance of individual strategic motives and a number of characteristics of the sample - contractual form of the alliance, relative partner size, primary geographical location of the venture, industry of the alliance and partner nationality. Implications of the findings for future theorizing on alliances and their motives is identified.     

Learning and Innovation in International Strategic Alliances: An Empirical Test of the Role of Trust and Tacitness

Drawing on knowledge-based, organizational learning, and social capital perspectives, we propose and test an integrated framework in which knowledge tacitness and trust act as mediating mechanisms in the relationship between partner characteristics and alliance outcomes. We distinguish between learning and innovation outcomes and suggest that while innovation may result from alliance learning, it can also be created by combining separate knowledge bases without learning from each other. We contend that tacitness and trust play differing roles in the pursuit of learning and innovation and test this proposition on a sample of 120 international strategic alliances.