创业教育“后危机时代”经济发展的新引擎

创新型经济助力＂后危机时代＂经济增长,创业型人才是发展创新型经济的强大动力,发展创业教育与创新创业型经济是转变经济发展方式的内在要求。厘清创业教育路径、搭建创业教育平台、深化创业理念、激发创业激情、提升创业能力、优化创业环境、提供创业支撑、激活创业经济。     

中小企业的生存现状及应对措施

中小企业是中国经济的主力军，在中国经济转型的关键时刻，面临着原材料、劳动力涨价、人民币升值、融资难等一系列的危机。如何在危机中生存发展是中国经济发展面临的严峻考验。探析了目前中小企业生存现状、面临的危机及应采取的措施和对策。     

区域经济转型中集群构建与创业人才培育

创新型产业集群和创业型经济对区域转型发展、区域创新体系构建和区域经济增长的作用都被大量的研究所证实;创业型人才的大量涌现是创业型经济构建的关键要素。通过对产业集群和创业型人才培育的互动演化分析,论证了区域经济转型及区域创新体系构建中,政府可以通过制度的完善,促进产业集群的形成和创业人才的培育,并使得二者形成良性互动关系,为区域经济发展提供持续动力。     

发展创业型经济的路径模型与政策趋势

从1970年代中期开始,美国及欧洲一些国家相继出现了创业型经济形态.创业型经济以创业精神和创业活动作为经济增长的关键驱动因素,是比传统的管理型经济更为优越的一种经济发展模式.近年来,越来越多的国家和地区致力于发展创业型经济.发展创业型经济要求政府通过制定和完善创业政策营造一种适宜创业的社会经济环境,即培育一种激励、支持人们参与及从事创新和新创事业的机制与氛围,帮助创业企业获取资金、信息、技术、人力等资源,同时促进知识产出和知识商业化.     

二次探属尚待观察 中国经济发展应“以我为主”

美债危机使得全球经济发展不确定性增加，市场近期剧烈波动。中国经济发展遇到更强挑战，输入型通胀、出口压力陡增，外汇储备面临贬值风险。在接二连三的利空事件之后，世界经济是否将二次探底，重新陷入2008年经济危机时的低谷？中国经济是否能够继续保持平稳较快发展？     

创业型经济生态体系的构建及政策设计

创业型经济是一种建立在新创企业和创新事业基础上的全新的经济形态,它成为经济可持续发展的引擎。在深入分析我国发展创业型经济的主要问题的基础上,探索创业型经济发展的内在演化规律,提出了发展我国创业型经济的生态体系模型以及政策框架。     

中小企业的生存现状及应对措施

中小企业是中国经济的主力军,在中国经济转型的关键时刻,面临着原材料、劳动力涨价、人民币升值、融资难等一系列的危机.如何在危机中生存发展是中国经济发展面临的严峻考验.探析了目前中小企业生存现状、面临的危机及应采取的措施和对策.     

创业经济的动力型培育模式研究

针对创业经济发展的特点,从创业经济发展的龙头企业、资源禀赋、重点项目等动力因素入手,提炼了创业经济的龙头推动型、资源禀赋带动型、重点项目拉动型培育模式,剖析了这3种动力型培育模式的内涵与作用机理。创业经济的龙头推动型培育模式基于龙头企业本身的辐射、集群与示范作用;创业经济的资源禀赋带动型培育模式依赖“资源融合-资源协同”作用;创业经济的重点项目拉动型培育模式取决于“二八原理”作用。     

资源型城市实现可持续发展的对策

长期以来 ,中国资源型城市的发展问题一直是人们关注的一个重点。特别是资源型城市发展中出现的“三危现象” (经济危困、资源危机、环境危机 )受到政府和学界的普遍关注。那么 ,中国资源型城市究竟怎样发展 ?采取什么措施来扭转资源型城市目前发展的困境 ?本文对这些问题进行了探讨研究 ,提出了相应对策。     

趋稳的中国经济

当前,国际金融危机还没有结束,各种挑战层出不穷。无论是发达经济体还是新兴经济体,经济增速普遍放缓,全球经济下行风险不容低估。正是在这样严峻形势的背景下,作为世界第二大经济体的中国经济发展成为各国普遍关心的问题。     

发展中国家金融危机的两难与机遇

受制于自身的发展水平和世界经济体系中的地位,发展中国家不仅是经济领域的落后,也是整体性制度安排的落后。所以,金融危机对发展中国家影响的后果不仅体现在经济领域,也体现在非经济领域。金融危机放大了发展中国家存在的固有问题,使其反危机政策的制定和实施处于两难境地,进而制约各项反周期政策的实施,但反危机政策的+国际协调也为发展中国家提升在国际经济体系中的地位带来了机遇。     

硅谷绿色能源经济发展及启示

当今国际倡导的绿色能源经济架构,不仅契合了全球经济日趋紧迫的可持续发展现实需求,更是新一轮科技革命中,各国积极培育经济增长点、抢占创新高地的重要战略。以这一趋势的领跑者——硅谷为研究对象,分析其绿色能源经济发展现状、驱动机制和相关策略,总结其经验,为我国经济可持续发展提供决策借鉴。     

How Digital Economy Affects High-Quality Economic Development: Based on International Comparison

This paper estimates the size of the digital economy in 38 countries between 2005 and 2018 and conducts an empirical study on this foundation. The results show that the digital economy has a significant role in promoting high quality economic development, primarily through industrial digitalizaion. Further research shows regional heterogeneity in the impact of the digital economy, which is greater in developed countries. Analysis of the underlying mechanisms shows that the digital economy promotes high-quality economic development in both developed and developing countries by improving technological efficiency and technological progress. However, the effect of technological progress in developing countries is clearly weaker than that in developed countries. In addition, scale efficiency in developing countries are not strengthened by the digital economy. Therefore, high-quality economic development requires the digital transformation of traditional industries and promoting their integration with digital technologies.     

New general theory of economic development: Innovative growth and distribution

Economic development, which refers to the process of progressive transformation of an economy, is a multifaceted term without a universal definition. This article presents the constitutive elements of economic development: growth, distribution, and innovation. Economic development has been ubiquitous with the economic progress of “developing” countries, but the changing economic circumstances of “developed” countries, such as stagnant growth, regional economic disparity within developed countries, and deepening income gaps among citizens of developed countries, have made this term also relevant to address the economic problems of developed countries. The mechanisms of economic development, with respect to both developed and developing countries, are elusive, and the existing theories have not been able to explain these mechanisms of economic development adequately. This article reviews the existing theories and presents a new theoretical framework to explain the process of economic development.     

Investing in innovation to enable global competitiveness: The case of Portugal

The concept of leveraged innovation to create wealth within regions, countries and economies is not a new concept. Competitiveness of regions in the increasingly global economy now requires not only that innovation be present within a regional economy, but also that mechanisms exist to effectively transfer those developed innovations from the research laboratory to the marketplace. It is surmised that increased innovation, and the transfer of this innovation, can lead to increased prosperity of regions (Porter). As such, many developing countries around the world are looking at investments in innovation as a means to spur regional economic development and wealth creation while preserving national competitiveness. That said, innovation investment is by no means an exact science. Historically, typical “innovation investments” have been focused on “tangible” capital infrastructure projects such as the establishment of incubators and science parks. While many regions point to the existence of such tangible innovation assets as proof of investment in innovation, it has been discovered that in some cases, an investment in the capacity building of human networks to engage in technology transfer and commercialization related activities can act as a stronger facilitator for the transformation of economies and produce a larger return on investment in innovation for the country. Given not only Portugal's, but other regions throughout the EU-Zone, recent financial and economic woes, it bears examination on whether investing in the innovation and technology transfer knowledge and “know how” of key human networks within a struggling economy is a worthwhile investment for financially struggling countries during the current times of fiscal crisis.     

Can trust effects on development be generalized? A response by quantile

While the beneficial effects of social trust on economic performance have been largely recognized, we analyze whether these effects can be generalized for economies at different stages of economic development. Contrary to previous studies on this issue based on average effects (mostly considering ordinary least squares estimations), we follow a quantile regression approach that enables us to capture heterogeneous effects of trust for different development levels. By considering data for 80 countries, and using trust indicators from five different waves of the World Values Survey (WVS), our results by quantile indicate that trust is not relevant for the poorest economies, showing the existence of a social poverty trap. In addition, results suggest that the impact of trust on income decreases as an economy becomes richer. This would suggest not only that trust benefits cannot be generalized for all countries, as some previous studies have proposed, but also that the extent of its implications are heavily dependent on the level of development.     

略论高新区创新环境的创造与规划——以太原高新区新产业园区为例

高新区是孵化、催生、培育高新技术产业的重要载体.建设高新区已成为世界各国发展高新技术的一种普遍做法.在知识经济和全球化加速发展的背景下,知识和创新成为经济发展的内源动力.各国的高新区作为智力资源的密集区,不仅是区域创新的基础,更是国家创新体系形成的关键所在.通过对高新区创新模式特征的分析,结合太原高新区新产业园区规划的实例,试图摸索出园区规划在高新区创新环境创造中的作用.     

试论近代中国证券市场的特点

社会经济发展到一定阶段后出现的证券市场,除了有筹集社会资金推动经济发展的效能外,证券市场的运行和变迁,还能够直接反映社会经济结构中的特点和问题。近代中国证券市场上出现的几国交易所并存、六次投机高潮和证券市场为政府财政服务等特点,是近代中国证券市场非正常发展的集中体现,也是近代中国证券市场难以正常发展的重要原因。此外,中国几千年悠久历史中形成的特殊商业习惯——企业商号可以直接吸收社会储蓄的传统,同样是制约近代中国证券市场发展的重要因素。     

“一带一路”沿线国家吸引国际直接投资的制度建设研究——中国“渐进式改革”经验与借鉴*

从世界经济发展的历程来看,国际资本流动是全球化背景下要素流动配置的必经之路,国际直接投资对东道国的经济增长具有积极的推动作用。对于正处于经济发展初级阶段的“一带一路”沿线国家而言,国际直接投资可以通过促进其资本形成、技术水平提升等来推动经济增长。但是由于沿线涉及诸多国家,环境相对复杂,各国经济社会发展水平落差巨大,投资环境大不相同,地区安全风险频发等,这些国家在吸引国际直接投资的时候面临诸多问题,而这些问题本质上与沿线大部分国家处于发展初期阶段,欠缺相对规范的市场经济体制和市场规则紧密相关。中国改革开放以来取得的成绩以及吸引FDI的成就与渐进式改革密切相关。中国采取诱致性制度变迁与强制性制度变迁相结合的渐进式改革经验可以为“一带一路”沿线国家吸引国际直接投资进行制度改革提供有效的借鉴,即建立和完善市场经济体制,培育真正的市场化主体,建立和完善相关法律法规,同时加强国际合作与互助等。     

发达地区与不发达地区可持续发展的协调机制

区域经济发展的不平衡是一个国家经济发展过程中的必然表现。协调地区经济既要解决公平问题,又不能牺牲效率。按此要求,协调地区经济有两个机制:市场协调和政府协调。