面向客户需求的企业物流战略制定策略

借助全面质量管理中的新产品开发工具——质量功能展开(QFD),本文提出了一种面向客户需求的、以市场导向的企业物流战略制定方法,即应用QFD进行企业物流战略制定。     

供应链环境下的质量机能展开应用研究

基于供应链环境下QFD的理论研究，从供应链上厂商集合体与终端顾客间的关系为切入点，对产品／服务组合的QFD进行了定性分析，并以手机产品的供应链为例，应用QFD进行了质量目标的设计，最后得出了在供应链竞争的环境下以产品／服务组合的QFD比单一节点的QFD更能适应市场竞争需要的结论。     

基于顾客需求转换的QFD方法改进研究

在顾客需求转换中,质量功能展开(QFD)理论和方法的应用成就突出,但也暴露出许多缺陷和不足,文章针对传统QFD理论的局限性,相应提出了具体解决措施。     

QFD的历史、现状与发展

一、QFD的产生和推广QFD是Quality Function Deployment的简称,欧美国家将其称为质量屋(The House of Quality),是由于该方法包含一系列的展开,应用时要绘制一系列像房屋一样的展开表;国内也有译作质量功能配置,笔者曾撰文讨论过该词的译法。QFD在形式上以大量的系统展开表和矩阵图为特征,集合价值工     

QFD在服装产品开发中的应用

首先对QFD作了简单介绍,然后结合顾客对服装产品的需求观念的改变,探讨了动态QFD在服装产品开发中的应用研究。     

QFD在大规模定制下快速设计中的应用研究

文章基于质量功能配置(QFD)方法适用性的分析,提出了对QFD方法进行改进以适应大规模定制下快速设计产品开发模式,并对QFD方法的主要工具质量屋,从内容和形式上进行了重构,最后进行了例子分析。     

基于质量功能展开的云会计AIS可信性评价

AIS可信性水平是企业选择云会计时关注的关键问题之一。基于云会计环境下的AIS可信性层次结构模型,引入QFD质量功能展开技术,提出了一种云会计环境下基于QFD的AIS可信性评价方法。以某AIS系统总账模块为例说明了该方法的具体应用。     

质量管理中的QFD法

QFD是Quality（质量）、Function（功能）与Development（发展）的缩写,中文译为质量功能展开。质量功能展开由赤尾洋二和水野滋两位日本教授于上个世纪六十年代作为一项质量管理系统提出,目的是为了设计、生产充分满足顾客需求的产品和服务。丰田公司于70年代后期使用QFD取得了巨大的经济效益。福特公司于1985年在美国率先采用QFD方法。今天,在美国,许多公司都采用了QFD方法,QFD技术受到世界各国重视。     

质量机能展开(QFD)研究综述

文章以对QFD的EI检索结果为基础，从QFD的发展、内容、应用及方法论研究四个方面对QFD的研究进行综述，以便于理论和实践工作者进一步开展工作。     

模糊聚类方法在QFD中的应用——以汽车安全带为例

随着QFD应用的不断深入与发展,将模糊理论应用于QFD系统已成为QFD的重要研究方向之一。在获取顾客需求信息的基础上,重点研究模糊聚类方法在获得的顾客需求信息分类中的应用,使得所分的类别更加清晰地对应技术特性。通过把模糊聚类方法应用于汽车安全带设计开发顾客需求信息分类处理中,获得更加合理、科学的顾客需求分类,最大化地满足顾客对产品特性的需求。     

质量机能展开在高等教育质量改进中的应用研究

为适应快速变化的社会需求,培养相应的专业人才,高等教育要构建一个有效的培养体系。本文综述了质量机能展开（QFD）在高等教育质量改进中应用的现状,分析了高等教育的系统模式,提出了质量机能展开在高等教育质量体系中的应用展望。     

QFD与组织设计

随着企业环境的不断变化，传统的层级组织已不能适应需要。探讨了运用质量功能展开（ＱＦＤ）技术来确定企业内部组织以及供应链结构的思路和方法。     

Optimization tools for design and marketing of new/improved products using the house of quality

Quality function deployment (QFD) has helped many firms realize significant reduction in product design costs and development time. The QFD process includes ranking customer preferences, rating the competitors, and parts deployment for the new/improved product. Prior to this research, such activities have been performed based on expert opinion, or the “best-in-class” approach. We develop and solve optimization models for the identification of consensus rankings and ratings, that take into account the priorities and perceptions of all the customers in a target market. Then, based on the consensus rankings, we identify a parts mix for the new/improved product that satisfies a budget constraint and matches or exceeds the performance expectations of all customers surveyed in the target market. Finally, we show how the QFD charts can be used to identify competitors that are falsely perceived as superior, as well as areas where the firm's marketing strategies have had the desired effects. Such insights are useful in developing the future marketing strategy of the firm.     

A combination of QFD and imprecise DEA with enhanced Russell graph measure: A case study in healthcare

Quality function deployment (QFD) is a proven tool for process and product development, which translates the voice of customer (VoC) into engineering characteristics (EC), and prioritizes the ECs, in terms of customer's requirements. Traditionally, QFD rates the design requirements (DRs) with respect to customer needs, and aggregates the ratings to get relative importance scores of DRs. An increasing number of studies stress on the need to incorporate additional factors, such as cost and environmental impact, while calculating the relative importance of DRs. However, there is a paucity of methodologies for deriving the relative importance of DRs when several additional factors are considered. Ramanathan and Yunfeng [43] proved that the relative importance values computed by data envelopment analysis (DEA) coincide with traditional QFD calculations when only the ratings of DRs with respect to customer needs are considered, and only one additional factor, namely cost, is considered. Also, Kamvysi et al. [27] discussed the combination of QFD with analytic hierarchy process–analytic network process (AHP–ANP) and DEAHP–DEANP methodologies to prioritize selection criteria in a service context. The objective of this paper is to propose a QFD–imprecise enhanced Russell graph measure (QFD–IERGM) for incorporating the criteria such as cost of services and implementation easiness in QFD. Proposed model is applied in an Iranian hospital.     

基于QFD的汽车技术服务企业服务质量体系研究

本文首先介绍了基于质量功能展开(QFD)的汽车服务质量模型,并根据企业调研的客户需求和客户满意度,得出服务质量特性指标和重要度,将QFD运用到汽车技术服务企业服务质量的提升中。从该模型中找到汽车技术服务企业服务质量的薄弱环节并给出相应的提升服务质量的对策,帮助汽车技术服务企业提高服务质量。     

A fuzzy group decision-making approach in quality function deployment

Quality function deployment (QFD) is comprised of two major group decision-making processes. One is to collect the customer requirements from a group of customers, whereas the other is to determine the relationship between customer requirements and technical measures by a cross-functional team. Generally, different and/or even subjective opinions are quite often in a group decision-making process due to the limitations of experience and impreciseness. Obviously, the importance of each customer requirement and the relationship between customer requirements and technical measures are determined by a group of people with imprecision and vagueness. Under such circumstances, a fuzzy group decision-making approach can be applied in QFD to deal with a group decision-making process when the information is imprecise and fuzzy. Moreover, an example is provided as well as the computational steps to show this fuzzy group decision-making approach can be effectively used in QFD to make decisions with imprecision and vagueness.     

Determination of an optimal set of design requirements using house of quality

Quality Function Deployment (QFD) has been used to translate customer needs and wants into technical design requirements in order to increase customer satisfaction. QFD utilizes the house of quality (HOQ), which is a matrix providing a conceptual map for the design process, as a construct for understanding Customer Requirements (CRs) and establishing priorities of Design Requirements (DRs) to satisfy them. Some methodological issues occurring in the conventional HOQ are discussed, and then a new integrative decision model for selecting an optimal set of DRs is presented using a modified HOQ model. The modified HOQ prioritization procedure employs a multi-attribute decision method for assigning relationship ratings between CRs and DRs instead of a conventional relationship rating scale, such as 1–3–9. The proposed decision model has been applied to an indoor air quality improvement problem as an illustrative example.     

顾客需求变化对供应商选择影响的一种量化方法

本文在零部件供应商参与产品设计的背景下,根据顾客需求权重的变化,利用QFD技术中的产品规划质量屋、部件配置质量屋及两者之间的关系,以客户满意度最大化为尺度,建立整数数学规划模型,求解各部件的变化情况,实现了从顾客需求变化到外包给供应商部件变化的转换,从而为供应商的动态选择提供依据,并给出了数值实例。     

Advanced models of quality function deployment: a literature review

In this paper, a literature review conducted to study the characteristics of advanced models of quality function deployment (QFD) that have appeared in the literature arena is reported. QFD technique emerged in Japan in the 1970s. QFD has been proving to be a powerful tool that can be used for translating the voice of customers into technical languages. Yet from the beginning of this century, researchers began to point out the need to refine, modify and improve the features of QFD technique. In order to fulfil this need, few researchers brought out several advanced models of QFD. While conducting the literature review reported in this paper, six types of such advanced models of QFD were identified in the literature arena and their characteristics were studied. The result of this study revealed that the procedural and computational complexities are least in the case of an advanced model called total quality function deployment (TQFD). TQFD technique replaces the complex computations involved in applying conventional QFD technique with simple ratings. Besides the formation of teams to translate the voice of customers into work instructions ensures the quick reactions to the customers’ desires in the actual field of implementation. In this background, at end of this paper, it is suggested to adopt TQFD for implementation in traditional organizations in which the prevalence of adequate education for adopting complex procedures is found to be least.     

QFD技术在计算机软件改造中的应用

本文介绍了质量功能展开（ＱＦＤ）技术在计算机软件改造中的应用，案例表明，该方法效果显著。