新旧会计准则下无形资产的差异分析

随着知识创新步伐的不断加快，无形资产在我国许多企业中所占的比重越来越大。无形资产的会计核算和信息披露也就变得非常重要了。为了进一步规范无形资产的确认、计量和相关信息的披露，财政部于2006年2月15日根据《企业会计准则一基本准则》制定了《企业会计准则一无形资产》。准则分别从定义、确认、初始计量、后续计量、处置和报废，以及披露等方面对企业无形资产的会计核算及信息披露要求作出了详尽的规定。     

新会计准则下无形资产核算的探讨

我国在2001年实施的<企业会计准则--无形资产>(以下简称旧准则)存在一定的缺陷,2006年2J115日,财政部颁布了<企业会计准则第6号--无形资产>(以下简称新准则).新准则已于2007年1月1日在上市公司率先执行.本文对无形资产新准则下的确认,计量与问题进行了初步探讨,肯定了新准则对无形资产确认与计量的改进,同时指出了新准则下无形资产确认与计量存在的缺陷并提出了完善无形资产确认与计量体系的建议.     

谈无形资产准则的可商榷之处

我国新颁布的企业会计准则与国际会计准则实现了实质性趋同,对规范企业的会计确认、计量和报告等起到了重要的作用,在一些具体准则上也有一些值得探讨的地方,如无形资产准则关于研究支出费用化、已费用化的研发支出不可调整、使用寿命不确定的无形资产不摊销等,文章从完善会计准则的角度提出了一些建议和做法。     

新准则下关于无形资产会计准则的思考

无形资产新准则对无形资产的确认、计量、披露等方面进行了一系列的修改。本文在对这些内容进行阐述的基础上,指出了新准则的积极作用,同时也提出无形资产新准则有待完善的方面。     

浅析新旧无形资产准则的主要区别

2001年，财政部颁布了《企业会计准则——无形资产》，并与2001年1月1日进行实施，该准则对无形资产的定义、确认条件、计量、后续支出、摊销、减值、处理和报废、披露等方面进行了规范。2006年2月15日重新颁布了新的会计准则和审计准则体系，其中新的会计准则将于2007年1月1日起在上市公司中执行。本文就《企业会计准则第6号——无形资产》与现行的无形资产准则的区别进行浅析。     

企业会计新准则的构架分析及实施

一、新准则基本构架分析 新准则与现行准则相比较,无论是适用范围、无形资产的定义、还是无形资产的确认、计量、记录以及披露均有不同程度的修订和变化。从整体构架来看,新准则内容较现行准则结构更加严谨、内容更加科学和规范,它预示着我国企业会计准则进一步走向成熟化和国际化。     

无形资产会计准则解析

2006年2月15日，财政部发布了修订后的《企业会计准则——无形资产》，新准则将于2007年1月1日起实施。新会计准则的颁布，既是对原有会计准则的修改与完善，也体现了会计的国际趋同，同时也带来了一些新的问题和挑战。无形资产的新准则在关于无形资产的确认、计量、披露等方面都发生了较大的变化。本文拟就新旧无形资产会计准则的一些重要规定进行比较，解析新准则的重大变化，对如何理解这些重大变化提出自己的看法。     

对新旧准则下无形资产会计核算的对比分析

面临知识经济时代,技术和知识的创新步伐越来趱陕,无形资产在企业整个资产中所占的比重越来越大,无形资产的确认、计量和会计核算也就显得非常重要了。原准则中的无形资产的有关规定就日益显出其不适应性。这迫使我国必须进一步完善无形资产会计准则;与原准则相比,新准则对无形资产确认、     

解析企业研发形成的无形资产所得税会计处理

现行企业会计准则对无形资产的定义、确认及计量原则作出了新的规定,加大了无形资产初始计量和后续计量在会计处理与税务处理上的差异,用实例阐述企业内部自行研究开发无形资产相关费用的所得税会计处理。     

或有事项确认为负债时的会计核算

2000年4月份，财政部发布了《企业会计准则——或有事项》准则，对或有事项的确认、计量和披露做出了规范。     

非物质文化遗产生产性保护的实施框架与策略——中外对比的视角

非物质文化遗产相较于物质文化遗产有其特殊性,旅游可作为一种新的模式参与＂非遗＂的保护。本文通过对中外非物质文化遗产保护工作的比较,提出生产性保护的实施框架与策略,旨在为今后非物质文化遗产保护工作的可持续发展提供借鉴。     

R&D investments and corporate cash holdings

This paper presents evidence about how research and development (R&D) expenditures affect corporate cash holdings in European country groups that differ in their innovation capacity. In theory, one can expect intangible investments such as R&D to result in higher cash stocks than fixed investments, particularly because intangible capital is less suitable as collateral for obtaining external funds. The relationship can be expected to be particularly strong in innovative countries. These countries carry out a relatively high proportion of cutting-edge R&D, which tends to be particularly risky and may be associated with substantial gestation lags before becoming productive. These features tend to increase firms' precautionary cash holdings. To investigate this issue in a European context, we examine different groups of countries that are clustered based on differences in their innovative capacity. Our estimation results confirm a positive relation between changes in R&D investment and changes in cash holdings, whereas changes in fixed investment do not appear to be related to changes in cash positions. The impact of changes in R&D on cash tends to be higher for country groups characterized by a high level of innovative capacity than for countries with moderate levels of innovative capacity. However, the differences across country groups are less pronounced than expected.     

Cross‐Country Income Differences Revisited: Accounting for the Role of Intangible Capital

This paper develops a new intangible investment database that is consistent and internationally comparable for a set of 60 economies over the period 1995–2011. I find that over time a growing share of total investment consists of intangible assets, rather than investment in tangible assets, like machinery and buildings. Across countries, the level of economic development of a country is positively associated with its investment intensity in intangibles. By including intangible capital as an additional production factor, this paper finds that we can account for substantially more of the variation in cross‐country income levels. Depending on the assumptions regarding the output elasticities of factor inputs, the observed differences in intangible capital can account for up to 16 percentage points of the cross‐country income variation.     

The (lack of) international harmonization of EU standards: import and export effects in developed versus developing countries

This article studies the effect of the lack of international harmonization in agri-food standards on international trade flows focusing on the European Union (EU). The EU is characterized by high level of protectionism, which makes it an ideal case study. We measure the differences in countries’ level of ‘protectionism’ by applying an index of aggregation of non-tariff measures to data on maximum residue levels on pesticides and veterinary drugs allowed by countries on agri-food products. The restrictiveness of countries standards’ is compared with the one imposed by the Codex Alimentarius, which is considered as non-protectionist. The EU emerges as the most rigorous standards setter. The higher standards imposed by the EU affect in particular imports from developing countries, while it facilitates its exports, irrespective of the level of development and standard restrictiveness set by the importing countries.     

论环境标准差异对企业竞争力的影响及对策

环境标准产生于环境管理的需要,依内容而分为环境技术标准与环境管理标准。不同经济发展水平的国家在环境技术标准上存在差异,这种差异从成本和市场两个方面对企业竞争力产生重要影响,其总体效应取决于消费者的偏好和企业战略。在现实中,偏低的环境技术标准虽使我国企业获得了短暂的贸易优势,但不利于长期的持续发展。要打造长久的竞争优势,必须选择最优环境技术标准,并大力采用ISO 14000系列管理标准。     

Determinants of Net Trade Flows in the OECD: New Evidence with Special Emphasis on the Former Communist Members

This study estimates an econometric panel-data model, in order to explore the capacity of some of the hypotheses formulated in recent dynamic models of trade and economic growth to explain the bilateral trade of OECD countries. The study suggests that the larger a country's endowment of both tangible and intangible (human and technological) capital in relation to that of its trade partners, the higher the export/import ratio of its bilateral trade. It also shows that direct investment enhances the export/import ratio with the host country. The former communist countries reflect only minor differences from the other OECD members.     

浅谈非物质文化遗产保护研究专项经费的管理

非物质文化遗产保护研究经费是为完成特定工作任务和实现明确的事业发展目标而安排的专项资金,它是开展非物质文化遗产保护工作的前提条件和物质基础,管好用好这项资金,对非物质文化遗产保护研究工作将发挥重要的作用。因而,应通过加强对非物质文化遗产保护经费的预算管理,规范非物质文化遗产保护经费的使用及建立相应的考核制度等举措加强对这一专项经费的管理。     

HUMAN CAPITAL FORMATION AND CONTINUOUS TRAINING: EVIDENCE FOR EU COUNTRIES

This paper links data on continuous training from the EU Labour Force Survey (LFS) to information on skill levels and earnings from the EU KLEMS growth and productivity accounts, to examine the relative magnitudes of continuous workforce training versus human capital formation through the general education system in the European Union. The measurement methodology draws from the literature on measuring intangible investments by firms and sources of growth in an accounting framework. The results suggest that in the EU15 group of countries, intangible investments in continuous training represent just under 2 percent of GDP or about 35 percent of expenditure on general education. The share of GDP accounted for by training is less than a third as large in the new member states. A growth accounting method is employed to show that failure to account for continuous training leads to an underestimate of the impact of human capital on output growth in the EU.     

企业品牌战略和品牌建设

凝聚着巨大无形资产的品牌，是在国际竞争中获得市场资源优先分配权的强大武器，其价值已从企业延伸到了国家。具有更大影响力、渗透力和竞争力的大品牌，是企业利润最大化和国家竞争力的载体。本文综述品牌、品牌价值的基本内涵。针对目前企业品牌国际化存在的问题，就企业品牌战略和品牌建设的问题，提出看法和建议。     

发达国家食品安全监管的实践及对我国的启示

当前,食品安全问题正日益引起世界各个国家的广泛关注,各国大多将食品安全视为国家公共利益安全,纷纷加大了监管力度。总的来说,发达国家在该领域的研究和实践普遍较发展中国家更为深入,积累了丰富的经验,他们在法律规范、技术标准、机构设置、全程监管、惩戒手段等方面进行了一些有益的实践,对完善我国的食品安全监管具有很好的启示作用,我国应树立科学的监管理念,健全完备的法律体系,严格市场准入制度,健全食品安全回溯体系,建立严格的惩戒机制。