如果爱，请深爱

行动起来最重要 我非常欢迎（股权捐赠），慈善要大发展，非要走到捐股票那步不可。从全世界慈善事业发展中也可看出，必须有大数额股票捐赠，才能真正把慈善事业发展的声势做大，而且捐股票是慈善事业发达程度的标志。企业家不一定都要捐现款。     

中国企业慈善行为模式与路径选择

近些年来,随着中国经济的快速发展的发展和市场的不断成熟,大量企业也快速成长起来,越来越多的企业的开始参与慈善活动中来。企业慈善被誉为企业社会责任的最高形式,已经成为慈善事业的重要力量,其对组织社会资源、缓和社会矛盾、调节贫富差距、以及促进社会和谐都发挥了很大的作用。我国的企业慈善虽然起步较晚,存在一定的问题和不足,但发展迅速。目前很多企业结合自身优势,在慈善领域进行了大量的探索,我国的企业慈善正由"一捐了之"逐渐走向战略性的项目合作和参与,由简单捐赠逐渐走向专业化、系统化的慈善道路。文章在总结我国企业慈善在实践中经验与不足的基础上,提出相关建议,对提升促进企业慈善的效率和影响力行为、理性化以及我国的社会主义慈善事业的发展无疑都具有非常重要意义。     

扶持慈善事业发展的税收政策研究

慈善事业发展是经济社会健康发展的需要,同时也是经济社会发展的结果。合理的慈善捐赠税收政策能够积极的推动慈善事业发展。本文从我国目前的慈善捐赠税收政策实际出发,着重关注对慈善捐赠的税收优惠制度,分析了慈善捐赠税收政策存在的问题,并提出了相关建议。     

我国慈善捐赠与慈善投资的现状与困境

相比西方国家,我国的慈善捐赠具有较长的历史,但企业捐赠的数量不大;而企业慈善投资作为一个新鲜事物,还鲜为人知.杨澜倡导的"阳光媒体投资"一经出现,就遭到媒体的质疑与责难,这个事件折射出我国企业慈善捐赠和慈善投资的现状,也暴露了我国慈善事业的困境.     

我国慈善捐赠制度的改进与完善

慈善捐赠具有他利、自利和互利动机的经济学属性,转型期中国慈善捐赠事业由于与西方产生、发展条件及其背景不同,公益慈善事业面临复杂的制度环境。本文针对我国慈善捐赠的现状,从制度环境比较自然过渡到制度安排,借鉴西方经济学与管理学相关理论,提出符合我国国情的运行机制和制度安排建议,以促进我国企业慈善捐赠健康发展。     

当代中国企业家慈善捐赠行为的研究

在我国慈善事业中,企业家们占有着举足轻重的地位.根据现实情况,将企业家的慈善捐赠分为捐赠物资,捐赠时间和服务、捐赠股权三种,分析了其中的优点和不足;尽管我们近几年慈善事业发展有了长足的进步,但仍然大幅度落后于欧美发达国家.本文从国家、企业家、普通民众三个角度探讨了阻碍企业家慈善捐赠行为的因素,并提出相应的建议,以此营造出一个和谐、稳定的慈善环境.     

“慈善榜”的中国式尴尬

我国的慈善事业正处在起步阶段,慈善事业不成熟,慈善捐赠不透明;很多富豪捐赠方式隐秘,不少企业家保持低调,不愿公开其在慈善领域的贡献;中国富豪乐于慈善的公益意识不强,缺乏“人人可慈善”的大气候等,是福布斯这样一个商业性质的杂志取消中国慈善榜的真正根源。     

探讨我国公司慈善捐赠的税收优惠政策

当今,通过鼓励企业捐赠来促进慈善事业的发展已成为众多国家积极采用的方法。但是,我国目前的企业捐赠税收优惠政策因其本身的制度缺陷和一些外来因素的影响无法实现其原有的政策目标。结合国外的经验,探寻完善我国企业慈善捐赠税收优惠政策的新思路。     

慈善捐赠与企业社会资本形成的理论分析

正一、引言企业一直是我国慈善捐赠的主要力量,根据2010年度的《中国慈善捐助报告》,2010年度中国的的慈善事业捐赠达到700亿,其中企业捐赠的份额就达到了60%以上,企业对调节收入分配和其他社会问题的解决发挥了重要的作用(邱海雄、许东黎、张青,2010)。     

基于区块链技术的慈善组织公信力提升机制剖析

慈善组织是疫情防控多元治理体系中的重要一环,对促进社会公平稳定发挥着重要作用,但近年来有关慈善组织的负面信息对其公信力所造成的负面影响限制了我国慈善事业的发展。在此背景下,探讨区块链技术在化解慈善组织信任危机、提升慈善组织公信力上的可能性就显得尤为重要。在对基于区块链技术的慈善组织公信力提升技术架构进行分析的基础上,构建基于区块链技术的慈善组织公信力提升机制,包括基于区块链技术的慈善组织财务管理机制、慈善捐赠追溯机制、慈善捐赠信息防篡改机制、智能合约机制和信用评价机制,并分析技术变革对我国慈善事业发展所带来的潜在挑战。     

In-kind giving: it's a good thing ... but don't be naive

In-kind giving is of great importance to fund raisers, but it raises many red flags. This article explores in-kind giving on both sides of the table, with corporate givers and charitable takers, and suggests new ways of looking at these gifts.     

Corporate giving: Targeting the likely donor

Recent years have seen a major change in corporate attitudes to giving. There are many accounts in the literature of a move away from a purely philanthropic motive for charity support, to an opportunity-based paradigm where companies seek some tangible benefits in exchange for their donations. This paper reports the findings of a detailed survey of corporate givers undertaken in the county of Devon. The aim of the research was to determine the primary motivations for giving among the business community and the criteria most commonly used to select charities for support. The results clearly indicate that the primary motivation for giving remains a purely philanthropic one. The majority of businesses presently do not look for any gain to accrue from their charitable support and therefore do not monitor the success of their relationships with the charity sector.     

Corporate Charitable Giving, Multinational Companies and Countries of Concern

This paper investigates the degree to which corporate charitable giving is influenced by a firm's internationalization and/or whether it has operations in one or more countries of concern. For a sample of large UK firms, we find evidence of a positive effect not for internationalization per se, but only for a presence in particular countries. In this connection, the salient country characteristic is a lack of political rights and/or civil liberties, and the positive impact on charitable giving is restricted to a presence in only those countries that are, according to Freedom House indicators, most lacking in this respect. Furthermore, our study highlights a mode of corporate response to stakeholder concerns and pressures – offsetting – that is qualitatively different from those suggested in earlier conceptual literatures.     

The Development of Corporate Charitable Contributions in the UK: A Stakeholder Analysis

This paper investigates the determinants of corporate charitable donations within a comparative study of corporate behaviour in two time periods, 1989–90 and 1998–99. The analysis is based on a longitudinal data set that includes over 400 UK listed companies. The determinants of corporate charitable donations are explored within a stakeholder model and the relationship between corporate charitable donations and a set of firm and industry variables is estimated using OLS. Particular emphasis is placed on industry effects and the impact of social and environmental stakeholders. The results highlight a significant change in behaviour between 1989–90 and 1998–99 that may reflect a strategic response by corporate decision‐makers to external concerns over corporate social responsibility. In the early period corporate charitable donations were substantially determined by profits. However, this relationship has weakened during the 1990s as firms have become increasingly responsive to stakeholder influences. The results for the later period emphasize the increasing importance of corporate visibility, and the development of social and environmental influences on corporate charitable contributions.     

Charitable giving inside and outside the workplace: the role of individual and firm characteristics

Over the past several decades, charitable solicitations in the workplace have played an increasing role in the fundraising strategies of nonprofit organizations. Although many studies have examined the factors that influence overall charitable giving, very few studies have focused on giving when asked to donate in the workplace. This paper examines the determinants of charitable giving in and outside of the workplace in addition to the role of individual and firm-level characteristics. The study is based on one of the largest surveys of workplace giving including unique information on both workplace giving and overall charitable giving for 6000 employees in the USA. Specific factors uniquely influence charitable giving in the workplace. An employee's personal level of confidence in the nonprofit sector is strongly likely to influence workplace donations. At the firm level, an organization's size and industry also affect the presence of workplace campaigns and giving trends. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Exploring the role of charitable ethnocentrism and donation motives in international giving: Empirical evidence from Germany

The purpose of this study is to contribute to a better understanding of the drivers of international giving intention by examining the joint effect of ethnocentrism and donation motives. More specifically, this study analyzes the direct effect of charitable ethnocentrism on the intention to give to international causes. Additionally, the study investigates the moderating effect of charitable ethnocentrism on the relationships between donation motives and the intention to donate to international causes. This study's findings indicate that ethnocentric donors are less willing to donate to international causes. Moreover, the study results show that the effects of egoistic and tax-saving donation motives vary across different levels of charitable ethnocentrism: charitable ethnocentrism enhances the effect of the egoism motive on international donation intention, whereas the effect of the tax-saving motive on international giving intention is mitigated. Based on the empirical findings, this study discusses implications for theory and practice along with study limitations and avenues for future research.     

Charitable bequest importance among donors to different types of charities

This paper explores differences in the self‐rated importance of charitable estate giving depending upon the type of charitable cause a person donates to during life. One theoretical motivation for lifetime giving is to personally enjoy benefits from improving a shared collective good. However, this motivation is not possible for bequests. Bequest transfers and resulting improvements occur after personal enjoyment of benefits is no longer possible. This paper hypothesizes that among donors to high personal benefit causes (those typically creating shared goods benefitting donors), interest in a charitable bequest (which offers no opportunity for receiving such benefits) will be relatively less than among donors to low personal benefit causes. In order to explore this, each charity type is categorized as providing high, low, or mixed personal benefits from shared collective goods. This hypothesis receives mixed support. Donors to international relief organizations, a low personal benefit charity type, do place a higher importance on charitable bequests than do donors to shared‐goods type causes such as neighborhood associations, service clubs, sports leagues, or “other” charities, including those focused on local public safety and crime. However, donors to arts organizations—a classic example of donors creating a shared good—have a relatively high interest in charitable bequests. One important exception to the exclusion of postmortem personal benefits could come from religious belief. Accordingly, donors to religious causes do place a higher importance on charitable bequests.     

How should charitable organisations motivate young professionals to give philanthropically?

One hundred and fifty‐eight bankers, accountants and corporate lawyers, aged under 40 years, earning more than £50,000 annually and working in the City of London were questioned about their attitudes and behaviour in relation to charitable giving. A conjoint analysis of the respondents' preferences revealed strong predilections for certain types of charitable organisation; for ‘social’ rewards in return for donating (invitations to gala events and black tie dinners for example); and for well‐known charities with established reputations. ‘Planned giving’ whereby donors receive tax breaks and other financial incentives to donate (as increasingly practised in the USA) did not represent a significant inducement to give so far as this particular sample was concerned. Overall the results suggest that young affluent male City employees constitute a distinct market segment for charity fundraisers, with unique characteristics that need to be addressed when developing donor products. Copyright © 2004 Henry Stewart Publications     

Holier than thou: Investigating the relationship between religiosity and charitable giving

One's religiosity (or lack thereof) is the touchstone from which people view and interact with the world. The presumed positive impact of religiosity on charitable giving, however, may be an oversimplification. The present study takes a more nuanced approach to the subject and investigates the impact of 2 potential mediators (attitudes toward helping others, AHO, and attitudes toward charitable organizations) and 1 moderator (materialism) on the religiosity–charitable giving relationship. Study results suggest that religiosity has a positive effect on attitudes toward charitable organizations, AHO, and donating to charity. Religiosity was also found to have an indirect impact on charitable giving via AHO. Materialism interacted with AHO, such that the indirect effect of religiosity on charitable giving through AHO is attenuated as materialism increases. Implications of the present research for better understanding charitable giving are discussed.     

How and why small to medium size enterprises (SMEs) engage with their communities: an Australian study

• While many studies address corporate philanthropy and corporate community involvement, limited work has been conducted internationally in small to medium businesses and even less has been elucidated about the Australian small business landscape.
• This article reports findings from qualitative research investigating giving to community causes by 52 small to medium size enterprises (SMEs) across Australia.
• Three key questions addressed in this article are: (1) why SMEs engage with community (2) how they engage with community and (3) obstacles they perceive in giving.
• Our findings suggest that SMEs have a preference to avoid cash gifts, prefer to support local causes and would benefit from the development of best practice giving guidelines and templates.

Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.