Optimal statistical decisions about some alternative financial models

We study Neyman–Pearson testing and Bayesian decision making based on observations of the price dynamics (_Xt:t∈[0,T])$(X_t:t\in [0,T])$ of a financial asset, when the hypothesis is the classical geometric Brownian motion with a given constant growth rate and the alternative is a different random diffusion process with a given, possibly price-dependent, growth rate. Examples of asset price observations are introduced and used throughout the paper to demonstrate the applicability of the theory. By a rigorous mathematical approach, we obtain exact formulae and bounds for the most common statistical characteristics of testing and decision making, such as the power of test (type II error probability), the Bayes factor and its moments (power divergences), and the Bayes risk or Bayes error. These bounds can be much more easily evaluated than the exact formulae themselves and, consequently, they are useful for practical applications. An important theoretical conclusion of this paper is that for the class of alternatives considered   neither the risk nor the errors converge to zero faster than exponentially in the observation time T$T$. We illustrate in concrete decision situations that the actual rate of convergence is well approximated by the bounds given in the paper.     

Risk-parameter estimation in volatility models

This paper introduces the concept of risk parameter in conditional volatility models of the form _?t=_σt(_θ0)_ηt${?}_t={\sigma }_t\left({\theta }_0\right){\eta }_t$ and develops statistical procedures to estimate this parameter. For a given risk measure r$r$, the risk parameter is expressed as a function of the volatility coefficients _θ0${\theta }_0$ and the risk, r(_ηt)$r\left({\eta }_t\right)$, of the innovation process. A two-step method is proposed to successively estimate these quantities. An alternative one-step approach, relying on a reparameterization of the model and the use of a non Gaussian QML, is proposed. Asymptotic results are established for smooth risk measures, as well as for the Value-at-Risk (VaR). Asymptotic comparisons of the two approaches for VaR estimation suggest a superiority of the one-step method when the innovations are heavy-tailed. For standard GARCH models, the comparison only depends on characteristics of the innovations distribution, not on the volatility parameters. Monte-Carlo experiments and an empirical study illustrate the superiority of the one-step approach for financial series.     

A simple,robust and powerful test of the trend hypothesis

In this paper we develop a simple test procedure for a linear trend which does not require knowledge of the form of serial correlation in the data, is robust to strong serial correlation, and has a standard normal limiting null distribution under either I(0)$I(0)$ or I(1)$I(1)$ shocks. In contrast to other available robust linear trend tests, our proposed test achieves the Gaussian asymptotic local power envelope in both the I(0)$I(0)$ and I(1)$I(1)$ cases. For near-I(1)$I(1)$ errors our proposed procedure is conservative and a modification for this situation is suggested. An estimator of the trend parameter, together with an associated confidence interval, which is asymptotically efficient, again regardless of whether the shocks are I(0)$I(0)$ or I(1)$I(1)$, is also provided.     

The Jevons double coincidence condition and local uniqueness of money: An example

Jevons’s double coincidence of wants condition is derived as the result of household level transaction costs in general equilibrium where N   commodities are traded at (1/2)N(N−1)$(1/2)N(N-1)$ commodity-pairwise trading posts. Each household experiences a set-up cost on entering an additional trading post. Budget constraints are enforced at each trading post separately implying demand for a carrier of value between trading posts, commodity money. General equilibrium consists of prices so that each trading post clears. Existence and local uniqueness of commodity money in equilibrium can follow from the scale economy implied by the household set-up cost.     

Strictly monotonic preferences on continuum of goods commodity spaces

We consider a set K of differentiated commodities. A preference relation on the set of consumption plans is strictly monotonic whenever to consume more of at least one commodity is more preferred. It is an easy task to find examples of strictly monotonic preference relations when K   is finite or countable. However, it is not easy for spaces like ?^∞([0,1])${?}^{\infty }([0\text{,}1])$, the space of bounded functions on the unit interval.     

Nonlinearity,nonstationarity, and spurious forecasts

Implications of nonlinearity, nonstationarity, and misspecification are considered from a forecasting perspective. Our model allows for small departures from the martingale difference sequence hypothesis by including a nonlinear component, formulated as a general, integrable transformation of the I(1)$I(1)$ predictor. We assume that the true generating mechanism is unknown to the econometrician and he is therefore forced to use some approximating functions. It is shown that in this framework the linear regression techniques lead to spurious forecasts. Improvements of the forecast accuracy are possible with properly chosen nonlinear transformations of the predictor. The paper derives the limiting distribution of the forecasts’ mean squared error (MSE). In the case of square integrable approximants, it depends on the _L2$L_2$-distance between the nonlinear component and approximating function. Optimal forecasts are available for a given class of approximants.     

Randomized experiments from non-random selection in U.S. House elections

This paper establishes the relatively weak conditions under which causal inferences from a regression–discontinuity (RD) analysis can be as credible as those from a randomized experiment, and hence under which the validity of the RD design can be tested by examining whether or not there is a discontinuity in any pre-determined (or “baseline”) variables at the RD threshold. Specifically, consider a standard treatment evaluation problem in which treatment is assigned to an individual if and only if V>_v0$V>v_0$, but where _v0$v_0$ is a known threshold, and V is observable. V can depend on the individual's characteristics and choices, but there is also a random chance element: for each individual, there exists a well-defined probability distribution for V  . The density function—allowed to differ arbitrarily across the population—is assumed to be continuous. It is formally established that treatment status here is as good as randomized in a local neighborhood of V=_v0$V=v_0$. These ideas are illustrated in an analysis of U.S. House elections, where the inherent uncertainty in the final vote count is plausible, which would imply that the party that wins is essentially randomized among elections decided by a narrow margin. The evidence is consistent with this prediction, which is then used to generate “near-experimental” causal estimates of the electoral advantage to incumbency.