股权激励政策对企业创新能力的影响与机制研究

本文通过深入分析企业内部股权激励政策的实施,探讨了其对企业创新能力的影响及相关机制。研究发现,股权激励政策在提升员工创新动力、激发团队协同创新的同时,也在企业内部形成了更加积极的创新氛围。通过实证研究和案例分析,本文构建了企业内部创新能力评价体系,深入挖掘了股权激励在激发个体创新潜能和促进团队创新协同方面的具体机制,为企业优化股权激励政策、提升创新能力提供了理论支持和实践指导。     

企业异质性、债务融资与企业创新

创新作为国家发展的主要动力,一直是我国工作重点,而企业作为落实国家创新战略的主体,是提升国家创新能力,落实国家战略的主要推动力。本文主要研究债务融资对技术创新的影响,通过相关学者理论,本文认为债务融资会促进企业的研发投入,企业的经营范围、盈利能力、发展阶段不同对企业创新的影响也会呈现不同的结果,因此,将企业的异质性作为分组依据进一步研究债务融资与企业创新的关系。其中主要选取了两个角度,分别是企业市场化进程和产权性质,分别探讨债务融资对企业创新的影响效应,将产权理论、财务理论、创新理论、丰富了相关理论。     

基于小企业集群视角的科技园技术创新能力分析

建设大学科技园是完善国家创新体系的重要内容之一,本文以中国大学科技园为研究对象,分析了大学科技园小企业集群的特征,进一步运用制度经济学和创新经济学的理论方法从制度创新能力和技术创新能力两个方面对大学科技园小企业集群的创新能力进行了研究,并分别提出了一些有益的政策建议     

财税政策对企业创新绩效影响评价

随着科技的迅速发展和社会的不断进步，创新变得越来越重要，创新是社会进步的根本源泉，是促进经济发展、科技进步的不竭源泉，已成为个人、企业和整个国家提高竞争力的必要途径。在这样的社会大背景下，企业创新越来越受到更广泛的关注，其中财税政策对企业创新绩效的影响更是必不可少、重中之重。本篇文章在查阅、研究相关文献典籍的基础上，基于我国目前财税政策的内容和现状，科学合理地分析阐述了财税政策对企业创新绩效的影响以及财税政策影响企业创新绩效的机理和过程，从而使企业科学有效地运用相关财税政策提高企业创新能力。     

对中国企业创新意识创新能力的再思考——创新,基业长青的制胜法宝

改革开放30年,大浪淘沙中无数的中国企业一蹶不振,而只有少数精英企业得以基业长青。在世界许多国家,创新理论研究和实践都取得了显著成效,我国的创新理论和创新能力的开发,也已从学校、企业、科研院所,走向各级机关和单位。但与世界发达国家相比,我们的综合实力远远落后,我们的企业与世界500强相比,在创新意识和创新能力方面也相对滞后,本文拟从创新意识、创新能力等方面的差距对我国企业进行探究,对中国企业的未来出路进行再思考。     

提高我国自主创新能力探讨

自主创新的特征主要有以下几点:创新主体为企业自身,创新企业独享创新成果,创新风险较大.提高自主创新能力是我国经济发展状况决定的,国际市场竞争的要求,构建创新型国家的要求.提高自主创新能力,要分阶段、有步骤实施,提高企业自主创新意识,营造自主创新的政策环境.     

城市创新能力的模糊综合评审研究

城市创新系统是连接国家创新系统和企业创新系统之间的桥梁,对于提高企业和国家的创新能力具有重要的作用。城市创新能力的评审是城市创新系统能否有效运行的关键。遵循城市创新系统性、可操作性、有效性、综合性的原则,构建城市创新能力指标体系,利用模糊综合评审模型对某个城市的创新能力进行定性研究。     

对我国支持自主创新的金融政策的反思

中国自主创新投入大幅度提高,但是,国家创新能力绝对值仍较低,企业自主创新能力低,科技创新投入产出的效益低下,部分原因是由于过去的金融支持政策的有效性低。建议进一步完善我国现有的金融政策,注重金融政策的有效性,金融政策要激发金融机构和企业的积极性,力争单位资金投入的创新成果产出较高,提高自主创新的投入产出效益。     

中国创业板上市公司创新能力研究与建设性意义

创新能力是一个国家经济实力的集中体现,是决定一个国家或地区经济发展的根本因素。企业创新能力则是国家创新、区域创新乃至产业创新的基础,也是企业制造力与核心竞争力的重要体现,是把变化转为机会的唯一方式。企业是创新的主体,无论是宏观或中观层面的创新,其微观的经济主体都是企业。企业创新能力的水平能够在一定程度上反映国家的整体创新能力。     

我国自主创新的现状 问题及其成因

提升企业自主创新能力是新世纪中国工业发展的主题,是国家创新的关键;是提高中国企业及国家竞争力的关键;是我国产业进入结构升级阶段后降低技术进步成本的战略性措施。2007年将继续加快企业创新步伐,提升企业创新能力。为了进一步推动自主创新,加强对我国自主创新在各方面现状及未来发展的认识,2006年底,国务院发展研究中心组织各方面的专家做了一系列关于创新的调查报告。值此2007全国两会召开的时刻,我们选择三篇,以对我国自主创新的现状、问题及其成冈有更深刻的了解,对我国目前的创新体系特点有更直接的认识,并进一步思考我国企业创新的政策情况,提出相关建议。     

信息技术行业企业规模与技术创新关系的实证研究

企业规模是影响技术创新的一个重要因素,研究企业规模与技术创新之间的关系,对国家制定正确的产业政策,具有十分重要的意义。文章结合信息技术行业应用方差分析对企业规模与技术创新之间的关系进行实证研究,实证结果表明：在信息技术行业,企业规模对技术创新具有显著性的影响,中小企业的技术创新水平要大于大规模企业的技术创新水平。因此,应加大对信息技术行业中小企业技术创新的扶持力度,以促进我国整体技术创新水平的提高。     

How young firms achieve growth: reconciling the roles of growth motivation and innovative activities

This special issue focuses on entrepreneurship, innovation and enterprise dynamics, as these key components of any prospering economy are at the heart of the current policy discussion. It gathers the latest national and comparative cross-country evidence about: new business venture formation and the role of framework conditions in fostering entrepreneurial activities; the determinants and outcomes of firms’ innovative activities and, more generally, of business and innovation dynamics; and the determinants and patterns of post-entry firm growth performance. The contributions synthesised in this introductory piece all rely on sound micro-level data and robust econometrics and propose novel findings that are relevant for policy making. Among them, that risk aversion encourages individuals to invest in balanced skill profiles, making them more likely to become entrepreneurs; and that while micro firms may grow when they are young, they are less likely to do so when old.     

国内主要城市群创新体系成熟度判定

目前,创新型城市建设是我国创新型国家建设的重要抓手,国内正经历着创新型城市和创新型城市群建设的热潮。借鉴了区域创新体系成熟度模型,对我国14个城市群创新体系的成熟度进行了实证分析,供政府部门规划和决策服务。     

创新型企业培养路径及对策研究

创新型企业的培养路径应以技术创新为主线,本文从非高新技术企业、成长期高新技术企业、成熟期高新技术企业三类创新型企业所处的发展阶段和成长规律,在技术创新、制度创新、战略创新等方面分阶段、有重点的进行引导和培养,进一步明确处在不同成长阶段的创新型企业培养的政策着力点,并制定相对应的政策实施手段,不断完善创新型企业培养措施,稳步推进创新型企业建设。     

关于吸引外商来华设立研发机构的思路与对策——以沈阳为例

沈阳作为我国区域性中心城市,外商来沈设立研发机构具有投资主体国别集中、以适应型和技术支持型研发为主、苓土化程度较高等特,量;同时也有研发层次较低、品牌效应不强、机构规模偏小的弊端。要增强自主创新能力,吸引跨国公司设立研发机构,实施生产性和研发性引资并举,建立适合跨国研发转移的国际合作创新发展平台和政策支持体系,才能迅速融入国际创新发展的主流,占领科技自主创新的制高点,成为区域性制造业基地和重要的知识创新中心。     

中日创新及国际贸易效应比较分析——以专利为例的实证研究

本文运用Johansen协整检验、Granger因果关系检验等计量方法,验证了一国的发明专利对该国贸易出口的直接促进作用;并通过中日两国的比较分析,发现日本的创新活动对该国的贸易出口促进作用比中国更显著。这说明在知识经济时代,一国持续的自主创新能力对该国的贸易竞争力乃至国家竞争力有着至关重要的作用。大量数据的比较显示,中国在自主知识创新方面同日本相比,差距是显然的。积极发展和完善我国创新系统,大力培育以知识优势为核心的国家竞争优势,是贯彻落实科学发展观,保持我国经济可持续发展的重要环节。     

美国支持中小企业科技创新的政策体系及其借鉴

企业创新是各国经济增长的主要推动力,美国支持中小企业科技创新的政策已经形成了比较完备的体系,在立法支持、财政与税收支持以及创新服务支持等方面积累了丰富的成功经验。我国中小企业创新发展对建立"创新型国家"战略目标的实现具有重要意义,通过梳理美国支持中小企业科技创新的政策体系,分析提炼其主要特征,力图为我国中小企业科技创新提供有益的政策借鉴。     

Cultural influences on national rates of innovation

The purpose of this research was to examine the effect of the cultural values of individualism, power distance, uncertainty avoidance, and masculinity on national rates of innovation in 33 countries in 1975 and 1980. The study found that rates of innovation are most closely associated with the cultural value of uncertainty acceptance, but that lack of power distance and individualism also are related to high rates of innovation. This research suggests that nations may differ in their rates of innovation because of the cultural values of their citizens.These findings have important implications for managers and policy-makers. First, culture matters. Countries may not be able to increase their rates of innovation simply by increasing the amount of money spent on research and development or industrial infrastructure. They also may need to change the values of their citizens to those that encourage innovative activity. This concept, in turn, suggests that national rates of innovation are driven by more fundamental forces than economic conditions, and that societal change may be necessary to make less innovative societies more innovative.Second, the values associated with high national rates of innovation are those that many scholars have long argued are important at the firm level. An acceptance of uncertainty appears to be necessary, probably because innovation requires a tolerance for risk and change. Individualism seems to be important, perhaps because of its association with autonomy, independence, and freedom. Lack of power distance appears important, perhaps reflecting the role that tolerance of change in the social order and distribution of power play in the innovation process.Third, the study indicates that the strength of the relationship between innovation and two cultural values—individualism and lack of power distance—were stronger in 1975 than in 1980, suggesting, perhaps, that these values are becoming less important in spurring the innovation process. This finding supports the anecdotal evidence that many collectivist and hierarchical Asian nations are becoming more innovative.Fourth, this study shows that per capita income is a more important economic variable than industrial structure in determining national rates of innovation. This finding confirms previous work that has shown that as nations become wealthier, they become more innovative. The reason may be that wealthier countries have more demand for innovations, both because innovations are often laborsaving, and because wealthier nations have greater demand for new and differentiated consumer goods.     

Vision Zero – a road safety policy innovation

The aim of this paper is to examine Sweden's Vision Zero road safety policy. In particular, the paper focuses on how safety issues were framed, which decisions were made, and what are the distinctive features of Vision Zero. The analysis reveals that the decision by the Swedish Parliament to adopt Vision Zero as Sweden's road safety policy was a radical innovation. The policy is different in kind from traditional traffic safety policy with regard to problem formulation, its view on responsibility, its requirements for the safety of road users, and the ultimate objective of road safety work. The paper briefly examines the implications of these findings for national and global road safety efforts that aspire to achieving innovative road safety policies in line with the Decade of Action for Road Safety 2011–2020, declared by the United Nations General Assembly in March 2010.     

Vision Zero--a road safety policy innovation

The aim of this paper is to examine Sweden's Vision Zero road safety policy. In particular, the paper focuses on how safety issues were framed, which decisions were made, and what are the distinctive features of Vision Zero. The analysis reveals that the decision by the Swedish Parliament to adopt Vision Zero as Sweden's road safety policy was a radical innovation. The policy is different in kind from traditional traffic safety policy with regard to problem formulation, its view on responsibility, its requirements for the safety of road users, and the ultimate objective of road safety work. The paper briefly examines the implications of these findings for national and global road safety efforts that aspire to achieving innovative road safety policies in line with the Decade of Action for Road Safety 2011-2020, declared by the United Nations General Assembly in March 2010.