Inflation and Profits — The SVA and Depreciation Adjustments in the National Accounts*

This paper argues that the figures of profits contained in the national accounts are inappropriate in assessing the performance of industry. The error lies in deducting amounts for stock valuation adjustment from recorded profits. There is a discussion of the arguments usually proposed by national accountants for the deduction and it is concluded that these arguments are invalid. A suggestion is made that the amount of the stock valuation adjustment should be regarded as reflecting the delay in passing on costs of production, and this should be recorded in the national accounts as a timing difference between estimates of national expenditure (which exclude the stock valuation adjustment) and national product (where profits include the stock valuation adjustment).     

Commitment and observability in a contracting environment

This paper examines leader-follower games where a leader must purchase an essential input from a price-setting supplier in order to take an action. We show that equilibrium outcomes when the followers perfectly observe the leaders' actions cannot be approximated by mixed equilibrium outcomes of the game where followers imperfectly observe the leaders' actions, i.e. they are not accessible. Accessibility fails since in a pure strategy equilibrium, a supplier makes positive profits; however in an equilibrium where a leader randomizes, supplier profits must be zero. Our result follows from a generalized indifference principle that mixed strategies must satisfy in economic environments. While supplier profits cannot be approximated, player action profiles are accessible. Our results also apply to games with costly observation.     

论城乡地域系统空间组织的微观机制

城乡地域系统的空间组织是经济资源的地域配置和重组过程,企业的区位选择、政府的空间安排及其相互间的空间博弈构成系统空间组织的主要驱动力。城乡地域系统主要是一种基于市场机制的空间自组织系统,空间行为主体的地理区位选择形成空间扰动,不同区位的空间边际价值是系统空间自组织的序参量,空间边际利润率的变化是系统空间自组织的“无形之手”。最后简要分析了葛店开发区的发展对鄂州市城乡地域系统空间组织的影响。     

Profit Maximization and the Market Selection Hypothesis

We examine the proposition that competitive firms must behave as if they were maximizing profits; otherwise they would go bankrupt, or even fail to be financed in a competitive capital market. We investigate a model in which an entrepreneur raises funds for a risky enterprise on a competitive capital market, by offering a "dividend policy" based on the realized (stochastic) flow of earnings. We show that an entrepreneur who maximizes the expected sum of discounted dividends is sure to fail in finite time. On the other hand, many other behaviours yield positive expected profits and are able to attract investment funds, and yet result in a positive probability of surviving forever. As a consequence, if new firms have sufficiently diverse behaviours, then even if there is a constant stream of new entrants, after a long time practically all of the surviving firms will not have been maximizing profits.     

现代企业竞争的新潮流——生态经营战略

利益相关方对企业社会责任的关注已成为现代企业竞争的新潮流。本文就为履行社会责任,企业如何将生态经营战略纳入到企业的可持续发展战略之中进行了探讨。同时,指出企业要根据可持续发展战略的不同,制订出不同的生态战略以及如何明确具体的经营策略,选择适当的指标来衡量和监控企业的生态战略绩效。     

Firms as knowledge repositories

One reason firms exist is to serve as knowledge repositories. Firms compete against other firms and need profits to survive. Firms must be entrepreneurial to discover and act on profit opportunities. Knowledge required to spot profit opportunities is disbursed among economic actors and often is tacit knowledge that can only be obtained by those in close proximity. This gives rise to agglomeration economies, which can be leveraged within firms. In a competitive economy people have an incentive to keep knowledge from people in other firms, but to share it with those in their firm. One role of the firm is to act as a repository of knowledge for those within the firm’s boundaries, and to lower the cost of obtaining knowledge about profit opportunities. Entrepreneurs need firms to contain and capture the profits from their innovations.     

Profit maximization mitigates competition?

Summary. We consider oligopolistic markets in which the notion of shareholders’utility is well-defined and compare the Bertrand-Nash equilibria in case of utility maximization with those under the usual profit maximization hypothesis. Our main result states that profit maximization leads to less price competition than utility maximization. Since profit maximization tends to raise prices, it may be regarded as beneficial for the owners as a whole. Moreover, if profit maximization is a good proxy for utility maximization, then there is no need for a general equilibrium analysis that takes the distribution of profits among consumers fully into account and partial equilibrium analysis suffices.     

Profits in the UK economy: some Kaleckian models ∗

Official statistics on profits in the UK economy during the 1980s show a substantial increase in the share of profits in GDP after 1981. However, these figures are based on companies' own returns which have been distorted by changes in accounting practices and taxation, privatization and the arbitrary allocation of profits by multinational companies. Kalecki's theory of profits provides a way of systematically determining gross profits in national income. However, the use of this method is complicated by the absence of data on the distribution of savings and consumption between wages and profits, and Kalecki's own estimates of the equation appear to be flawed in their statistical methodology.

A number of ways of overcoming the distributional problem are explored in this paper, using data from the sectoral capital accounts of the UK during the 1980s. The methodology suggested by Asimakopulos to estimate Canadian profits turns out to be the weakest on theoretical and statistical grounds. All estimates are highly correlated with the officially reported profit series. However, in real terms (defined in Keynes' wage units as a proportion of implied wage income), they all show a profits cycle in which real profits in the second half of the 1980s are lower than they were at the end of the 1970s. The conclusion that there was no upward trend in the profits cycle suggests that the UK government's supply-side policies, designed to make the economy more profitable, did not achieve this purpose during the 1980s.

This article is an investigation of what happened to profits in the UK using Kaleckian models of how profits are determined to supplement the rather unreliable data that is provided by the government's Central Statistical Office. In the course of the investigation, a number of different models derived from Kalecki's fundalmental profits equations are presented. Two of them turn out to have a high correlation with the official published data, but contrary to that information suggest that there has been no upward trend in profits.     

Environmental regulation and profitability: An application to Swedish pulp and paper mills

In this paper we analyze the impact on firm profits of the environmental regulations in the Swedish pulp and paper industry. The approach taken is a non-parametric programming model of the technology. A feature of this industry is that environmental regulations are determined individually for each mill. A question, then, is if these individual regulations have a similar impact on firm profits. The approach in this paper allows us to calculate both the regulated and unregulated profits, which means that the severity of the regulations, in terms of foregone profits, can be calculated for each mill. The empirical result shows that the impact on the mills varies substantially, and that the burden from the regulations is less severe in 1990 than in 1989.     

Terms-of-trade policy in a model with non-produced means of production

Terms-of-trade policies between agriculture and industry are analysed in a two-sector Sraffian model. If both sectors use only produced means of production and labor, it can be shown that an improvement in agriculture's terms of trade always leads to higher profits in agriculture. However, when non-produced means of production are introduced an exogenous increase in the relative price of agricultural commodities may cause the rate of profit in agriculture to increase, remain constant, or even decrease. Two preconditions are identified for the case in which a favorable movement in agriculture's terms of trade decreases that sector's profit rate. First at least one quality of competitively priced land must be scarce relative to the total output required. Second, the initial, economy-wide rate of profit must be positive. Finally, the effect of an input subsidy used in conjunction with terms-of-trade policy is considered. It is shown that under certain conditions reducing the price of production inputs can also cause profits to fall and rents to rise in agriculture.     

经济结构调整过程中农村土地制度的创新

二元经济结构的改善需要农地制度的创新.农地制度改革目标模式的设计必须兼顾社会保障与效率两重功能,国有制、个人所有制、土地股份制都不符合这一原则.作者的产权分析框架认为,产权效率取决于权利的界定及实施.中国农地制度改革的方向,是坚持集体所有制的前提,通过农地权利的界定、农村集体经济组织决策制度的创新,进一步理顺乡镇政府、村集体组织与农民的关系.     

Small Leading Firms*

We formally analyze the question of whether a price leader must control a large share of the market. Our main result is that if other producers have rising marginal costs and behave as price takers, even the smallest firm in a competitive industry with a rising supply curve can enhance its profits by cutting output and raising price, becoming a price leader. Therefore, we would expect pure competition to be destroyed under these technological conditions.     

PRICING IN PUBLIC ENTERPRISES

The pricing in private and public enterprise differs primarily on the supply side. In the long run, private enterprises must cover total costs and provide an adequate return necessary to attract venture capital. In contrast, extra-commercial considerations may influence pricing in public enterprises. They may incur losses in the public interest under explicit directives from the government. A number of theories of pricing in public enterprises have been put forward. Most important of these are: (1) marginal cost of production theory; (2) no profit, no loss theory; (3) average cost of production theory; (4) theory of making profits. All these theories suffer from a number of weaknesses and none of them taken individually is a satisfactory guide for determining the prices of the products of public enterprises. There however exists a strong case for public enterprises, particularly in developing countries, to earn reasonable profits in pricing their products. Public enterprises fostered on public revenues must yield surpluses which can be used either for their own expansion or for financing the general development plans of the country. The profits which a public enterprise can earn are an important indication of the justification for the use of economic resources in that economic activity. Upholding the test of profit not only lessens possibilities of the investment decisions being subjected to political pressures but also safeguards against inefficiency in management. A policy of profits is essential for attaining the goal of building a socialist society. The amount of profits expected from different enterprises, however, cannot be uniform because of diverse objectives sought in the setting up of public enterprises, degree of essentiality of their products, nature of the services provided by them, size of their market, class of their consumers and their paying capacity, conditions of market under which they operate, their role in stimulating growth and social benefits conferred by them.     

两税合并、税收筹划与盈余管理方式选择

文章以2007年的两税合并为背景,研究上市公司出于税收筹划的目的如何选择盈余管理方式。研究发现,税率下降公司由于税率下降幅度较大,税收筹划收益较高,因此进行了显著向下的应计盈余管理,而没有选择真实盈余管理方式;而税率上升公司则由于存在5年的过渡期,税收筹划收益较低,因此既没有进行显著的应计盈余管理,也没有进行显著的真实盈余管理。这意味着上市公司在进行税收筹划时会综合权衡各种避税方式的成本收益,进而选择最合适的避税方式。政府部门在制定税收政策时必须预先考虑企业可能的税收筹划策略,以达到预期的政策效果。     

中部区域协调发展过程中的障碍性因素的研究

中部崛起战略应该从国家全局利益最大化和整体发展的角度，而不仅仅是中部地区区域发展的角度，来考虑、设计和具体安排“中部崛起”战略步骤和政策措施，应该与东部地区，西部地区和东北老工业基地等地区沟通合作，使各种区域战略和措施政策之间形成良性互动、发挥合力，构建整体效率最大化的区域政策组合。在这个中部地区与其他区域协调发展的过程中，必定会遇到一些人为的阻碍。本文研究的就是这些障碍的具体表现形式，并在找出障碍的形成原因的基础上提出消除这些障碍的具体措施。     

Imperfect legal unbundling of monopolistic bottlenecks

We study an industry with a monopolistic bottleneck supplying an essential input to several downstream firms. Under legal unbundling the bottleneck must be operated by a legally independent upstream firm, which may be partly or fully owned by an incumbent active in downstream markets. Access prices are regulated but the upstream firm can perform non-tariff discrimination. Under perfect legal unbundling the upstream firm maximizes only own profits; with imperfections it is biased and to some extent accounts also for the incumbent’s downstream profits. We show that increasing the incumbent’s ownership share increases total output if the upstream firm’s bias is sufficiently small, while otherwise effects are ambiguous. Stronger regulation that reduces the bias without changing ownership shares generally increases total output. We also endogenize the bias and show that it can depend non-monotonically on the ownership share.     

A post‐Keynesian model of output,employment and monetary demand

This paper presents a simple model based on three broad Post‐Keynesian hypotheses: (1) the economic process develops over time; (2) money is endogenous; and (3) producers are price setters. To make the analysis easier we also assume (4) that firms are vertically integrated. Producers assess the expected demand and ask banks for credit in order to start production; banks create credit at the request of producers to finance the wage bill; workers buy goods sold by firms; firms must repay banks the amount borrowed plus interest and earn a target rate of profit. Since firms have created only as much purchasing power as they have advanced to workers in the form of the wage fund, equilibrium requires that there is an amount of autonomous monetary demand equal to profits and interest. Furthermore, in order to make the value of supply equal to the value of effective demand, firms will employ the number of workers necessary to create the purchasing power which, when added to the anticipated autonomous demand, enables all costs to be covered and the planned rate of profits to be attained.     

温州市土地利用空间格局研究

本文运用多种数学模型对温州市及县（市,区）的土地利用的空间格局进行定量分析,找出了各地区的土地利用存在的差异,这种差异与其所处的地理位置,地形地貌,经济水平及历史文化等密切相关,因此,在土地利用方面,对经济发达的平原地区,应防止农业用地的流失,对经济欠发达的山区,应努力提高林业的多种效益。     

On the theory of the competitive firm with a utility function defined on profits and regret

In this paper we analyze the optimal output determined by a competitive firm facing uncertain demand. We analyze the effect of introducing uncertainty and the effect of increasing uncertainty on the optimal output, under the assumption that the utility function of the firm depends both on profits and on regret. We show that if the firm is more risk averse to profits than to regret (in a sense described below), both effects tend to decrease the optimal output. Similar effects of introducing uncertainty and of increased uncertainty were previously shown by Sandmo (1971) to exist in the case where utility is defined on profits only. Thus, this paper provides conditions under which the above results hold true, even when utility is defined on regret and on profits.