通胀之下教您选择一些自动“加息”理财产品

有分析认为,此次加息后,我国已经进入加息通道,对投资者来说,将不断面临加息风险。因此,投资者可以选择一些自动＂加息＂的理财产品,享受加息的收益。     

加息了“奴房”怎样最省钱

对于原本背着沉重债务的＂房奴＂们来说,加息之后如何开源节流,节省房贷,显然是每个＂房奴＂关心的话题。改＂等额本金＂本款贷款省钱主要有两种方式：缩短还款期限或者增加月供。     

美联储开启加息模式的效应反馈研究

一、美国历史加息周期回顾 2015年12月17日,美国联邦市场公开委员会（FOMC）发表声明,决定将联邦基金利率提高0．25个百分点,预计已经开启新一轮的加息周期。将本次加息计算在内,二十世纪九十年代至今,美联储共开启了五个加息周期,除去1997年仅一次的加息周期,本文主要分析其他四个加息周期。根据加息周期的特点,本文将其分为1994年2月至1995年2月预防通胀加息周期、1999年6月至2000年5月应对互联网泡沫加息周期、2004年6月至2006年6月遏制楼市过热加息周期、2015年12月份开始的恢复性加息周期,如图1所示。     

美联储加息与人民币汇率之间的相关性

美联储加息通常会对全球经济产生较大扰动,引发部分国家尤其是新兴市场国家的资本撤离和汇率大幅贬值。2022年3月,美联储启动加息,标志着美国开启新一轮的货币政策正常化过程。历次美联储加息对人民币汇率是否产生了负面影响;本次美联储加息将会如何影响人民币汇率:在国际形势多变、国内经济承压的局面下,人民币汇率走势如何:本文将从国际收支角度展开分析讨论。     

6月美联储议息会议点评

我们认为,FOMC委员加息倾向虽有所延后,2015年何时真正加息要看经济强弱。目前,即使指标在接近这一目标水平。乐观情况下加息也暂不会提前;若经济状况复苏缓慢,可能会使美联储将联邦基金利率继续在低位维持一段时间,0～0．25％的超低利率依旧是合适的,时点延迟至秋季加息。     

发达国家央行拉开加息序幕

2011年初以来,由于石油等国际大宗商品价格大幅上升,发达国家的通货膨胀压力日益增大。文章在依次分析欧洲、英国、美国的经济与通胀发展形势乃至其货币政策决策者观点后指出,欧洲中央银行加息拉开了发达国家央行加息的序幕,预计年内欧央行还可能加息;英格兰银行将视经济情况决定年内加息时机;美联储在退出量化宽松货币政策后,可能于今年底或明年初提高美元基准利率。     

加息,防通胀的一个信号

加息——这只备受业内与媒体百般猜测揣摩的＂靴子＂,终于在10月19日晚7点落了地,而这距离上次加息已有34个月。中国人民银行宣布,自2010年10月20日起上调金融机构人民币存贷款基准利率。金融机构一年期存款基准利率上调0.25个百分点,由现行的2.25%提高到2.50%;一年期贷款基准利率上调0.25个百分点,由现行的5.31%提高到5.56%。     

关注美联储二次加息对全球经济金融的重要影响

<正>在2016年12月份的议息会议上,美联储宣布将联邦基金目标利率从0.25%~0.5%提高至0.5%~0.75%,这是次贷危机发生后美联储第二次加息。相比2015年底的首次加息,美联储二次加息意味着对美国经济回暖的确认,综合各方面情况看,美联储后期加息步伐或加快,并对全球经济金融环境产生重要影响。     

通胀之下选择一些自动“加息”理财产晶

有分析认为，此次加息后，我国已经进入加息通道，对投资者来说，将不断面临加息风险。因此，投资者可以选择一些自动“加息”的理财产品，享受加息的收益。     

连续十次激进加息周期宣告终结?

<正>当地时间5月3日,美国联邦储备委员会发布最新的联邦公开市场委员会(FOMC)货币政策会议纪要。根据会议纪要内容,美联储将联邦基金利率目标区间上调25个基点到5%至5.25%之间,这是自2022年3月以来美联储连续第十次加息。此次加息后,“后沃尔克时代”最激进的加息周期是否接近尾声?未来货币政策走向如何?     

地方政府债券发行如何影响贷款利率？

基于2015—2021年31个省（区、市）的面板数据,采用时间和个体双向固定效应模型实证检验地方政府债券发行如何影响贷款利率。结果发现,地方政府债券发行会通过影响上海银行间同业拆放利率（Shibor）,促进贷款利率下行,尤其在西部欠发达地区的影响效应最为明显。鉴于此,应注重积极的财政政策与稳健的货币政策协调配合,合理安排地方政府债券发行的规模和频次,同时做好市场预期引导,增强货币政策调控效果。     

Fiscal and Monetary Policy Coordination,Macroeconomic Stability,and Sovereign Risk Premia

In standard macroeconomic models, equilibrium stability and uniqueness require monetary policy to actively target inflation and fiscal policy to ensure long‐run debt sustainability. We show analytically that these requirements change, and depend on the cyclicality of fiscal policy, when government debt is risky. In that case, budget deficits raise interest rates and crowd out consumption. Consequently, countercyclical fiscal policies reduce the parameter space supporting stable and unique equilibria and are feasible only if complemented with more aggressive debt consolidation and/or active monetary policy. Stability is more easily achieved, however, under procyclical fiscal policies.     

政策灵活适度,市场整体趋稳——2019年货币市场回顾与展望

2019年,在国内外风险挑战明显上升的背景下,人民银行坚持实施稳健的货币政策,灵活运用多种货币政策工具,精准投放,维护银行体系流动性稳定。货币市场运行平稳,市场深度广度进一步提高,利率中枢有所下行,全年利率呈宽幅震荡走势。展望2020年,我国将继续维持稳健的货币政策和积极的财政政策,各种政策工具灵活适度,流动性合理充裕。     

新凯因斯DSGE模型与货币政策法则之汇率动态分析

对于小型开放经济而言,当经济存在价格僵硬的情况下,中央银行在面对不同冲击发生时,各政策法则执行对汇率波动的影响及动态调整过程差异较大。从中国台湾地区的情况为案例来看,在稳定汇率波动方面:当国内技术冲击时,货币法则优于利率法则;当国外通货膨胀时,利率法则优于货币法则;当国外利率冲击时,执行利率法则或货币法则,其结果无显著差异。在汇率动态调整方面:当国外利率调升时,中央银行执行利率法则与货币法则下,汇率的瞬时反应为过度贬值;当国外物价膨胀时,执行利率法则与货币法则下,汇率的瞬时反应表现为立即升值;当国内技术进步冲击时,因为国外冲击对小型开放经济体系影响力道较强,使得国内技术进度对体系的影响相对较小,其中在利率法则下,汇率微幅贬值,而在货币法则下,汇率微幅升值。     

The interest rate effects of government bond purchases away from the lower bound

I analyze the recent experience of unconventional monetary policy in Sweden to study the interest rate transmission mechanisms of government bond purchases when interest rates are away from the lower bound. Using dynamic term structure models and event study regressions I find that government bond purchases have important portfolio balance and signaling effects. The signaling channel operates mainly by lowering short-rate expectations in the intermediate segment of the yield curve, while the portfolio balance channel is effective in lowering longer maturity term premia. In addition, I find that target interest rate policy and government bond purchases operate in different segments of the yield curve. This suggests that a combination of the two policies can be used to lower interest rates across the whole maturity spectrum, making monetary policy more expansionary.     

Does government ideology matter in monetary policy? A panel data analysis for OECD countries

This paper examines whether government ideology has influenced monetary policy in OECD countries. We use quarterly data in the 1980.1–2005.4 period and exclude EMU countries. Our Taylor-rule specification focuses on the interactions of a new time-variant index of central bank independence with government ideology. The results show that leftist governments have somewhat lower short-term nominal interest rates than rightwing governments when central bank independence is low. In contrast, short-term nominal interest rates are higher under leftist governments when central bank independence is high. The effect is more pronounced when exchange rates are flexible. Our findings are compatible with the view that leftist governments, in an attempt to deflect blame of their traditional constituencies, have pushed market-oriented policies by delegating monetary policy to conservative central bankers.     

Factors affecting monetary policy in an era of inflation

A money supply-reaction function is developed and estimated within the context of an IS-LM framework to test the responsiveness of the Federal Reserve to the government budget restraint and certain parameters of the model. The results reveal that a large portion of the recent expansion of the monetary base may be attributed to increases in government debt and provide an essential first step in quantifying the inflationary impact of deficits. The monetary base is also expanded in response to increases in inflationary expectations and previous increases in the monetary base, but is not statistically correlated to changes in the unemployment rate or potential national income, or to rises in interest rates caused by sources other than higher inflationary expectations, previous monetary policy, or the Treasury borrowing requirement.     

The Federal Reserve's Tools for Policy Normalization in a Preferred Habitat Model of Financial Markets

We develop a model to analyze monetary policy implementation with multiple Federal Reserve liabilities and superabundant reserves. The analysis demonstrates the Federal Reserve's tools including interest on excess reserves (IOER), overnight reverse repurchase agreements (ON RRP), and term deposits should allow the Federal Reserve to raise the short‐term interest rates to any desired level. We find the contribution of each the increase in the IOER and ON RRP offering rates in firming money market rates suggested by the data during the December 2015 policy tightening event is remarkably similar to the effect of each tool implied by the calibrated model.     

2008年宏观经济及债券市场前景展望

该文分别从经济增长、资金面以及货币政策三个方面分析了宏观经济的前景,认为通货膨胀会见顶回落、债券市场的资金面和宏观货币政策会转为宽松;文章认为2008年宏观经济的增长将趋缓,但利率的由升转降以及资金面的宽松将使得债券市场得以起飞和发展。     

Deficits,money and inflation

This paper examines the interrelationships between monetary and fiscal policy. Specifically, it seeks to determine whether Government budget deficits influence monetary growth. Using a money supply model originally developed by Barro, we find that deficits have had a significant impact on the growth of the U.S. money supply throughout most of the period since 1961. Such a relationship need not always hold. It depends on whether government deficits place upward pressure on interest rates and whether the central bank monetizes the debt in an effort to stabilize interest rates.