论中俄新型国家关系的合作机制

一、中俄新型国家关系合作机制的建立与发展20世纪90年代,国际形势风云变幻,俄罗斯作为苏联的继承者登上国际舞台,中国与俄罗斯建立了新型国家关系,即不结盟、不对抗、不针对第三国的战略协作伙伴关系。同时,两国逐步建立起与新型国家关系相适应的合作机制,使新时期中俄关系不断向前发展。     

黑龙江省对俄人文合作上升为国家战略研究

近年来,中俄全面战略协作伙伴关系不断深化,各领域务实合作不断加强,促进了黑龙江省对俄人文合作的不断提升.黑龙江省对俄人文合作是我国对俄人文合作的领头羊,对俄人文合作具有得天独厚的区位优势.在国家文化大发展大繁荣的有利背景下,顺应新形势发展的需要,充分发挥黑龙江区位优势,将对俄人文合作提升到国家战略层面,对深化中俄全面战略协作伙伴关系、促进各领域深入合作具有深远影响.     

抓住和用好中俄区域合作的战略机遇期

从长远来看,把业已建立起来的中俄战略协作伙伴关系推进到新的高度,需要积极与务实地发展两国经贸关系,不断提高两国之间经济利益的依存度,而加强中俄间的区域合作是提升两国经贸合作水平的重要一环。这几年来,中俄区域合作有利因素在增加,突出表现在:两国相互战略依托关系不断强化;两国发展战略经济利益切合点在增多;确定了区域合作的重点领域。因此,可以认为,中俄面临区域合作的战略机遇期。     

新形势下中俄经贸关系探析

美国亚太再平衡战略的加紧实施进一步加大了中国沿海的战略压力,而与此同时乌克兰危机后美欧对俄罗斯制裁的升级,使中俄全面战略协作伙伴关系得到空前的提高。中俄全面战略协作伙伴关系的高水平和特殊性,有利于两国关系的发展、有利于东北亚局势稳定,中国应抓住美日相对衰落的历史机遇,要创造条件深化中俄经贸合作,推动国际格局朝有利的方向发展。     

中国伙伴关系战略评估与展望北大核心CSSCISSCI

伙伴关系是国际行为体间基于共同利益、通过共同行动、为实现共同目标而建立的一种独立自主的国际合作关系。基于维护国家利益和拓展国际影响的需要,中国构建了以和平共处五项原则为基础,通过双边关系改善带动全球战略拓展的伙伴关系战略。自1993年与巴西建立战略伙伴关系以来,中国的伙伴关系战略历经探索和实践,合作的全面性与战略性不断深化。截至2014年年底,中国同世界上67个国家、5个地区建立了72对不同形式的伙伴关系,在全球、地区、双边和国家层面上均取得积极成效,既为中国的崛起创造了有利的国际环境,也在一定程度上维护了地区乃至全球的和平与稳定。但中国的伙伴关系战略仍有亟待完善之处,存在着地位不清晰、成效不确定和层次不分明等问题。据此,作者提出如下政策建议:优化中国伙伴关系战略,将伙伴关系战略打造成中国外交战略的核心支撑,建立伙伴关系战略与自由贸易区战略、"一带一路"战略、二十国集团战略等的联动机制,完善中国伙伴关系战略的合作深化机制与矛盾解决机制,推动伙伴关系战略在地区和全球层面的运用。     

特别关注——宁波发展之国家战略：“港桥”篇：“点”：强化国际航运中心优势功能

当前，随着科学发展、和谐发展的不断推进，国家在区域发展战略、对外开放战略、港口发展战略、产业发展战略等方面出现了积极调整的新趋势。这些战略相互融合、彼此促进，将使全国区域发展与城市地位发生相当深刻的变化。[编者按]     

浅论毛泽东国家利益观

毛泽东国家利益观主要包括安全利益、政治利益、经济利益三个方面。安全方面重视国防建设、主权独立、领土完整;政治方面主要从坚持人民民主专政,坚持马克思主义的主导地位出发,维护和发展社会主义制度;经济方面不仅重视国内经济的发展,探索适合中国的工业化发展道路,而且注重与其他国家发展平等互利的对外贸易。正是毛泽东对国家利益的捍卫,使新中国顶住了不同时期美国的敌视、苏联的干涉,重塑了中国在国际社会中的形象。     

江泽民国家利益思想探析

江泽民国际战略利益思想是江泽民国际战略的重要组成部分，本文试对江泽民国际战略利益思想从国家安全利益、经济利益、政治利益和文化利益四个方面进行阐述。     

美国国家安全战略与中美安全关系

安全关系是中美关系中的重要组成部分 ,在很大程度上决定了中美关系的走向。国家安全战略具有稳定性和延续性 ,克林顿政府和布什政府的国家安全战略有不同 ,但没有根本的区别。未来要确保中美关系的稳定发展 ,中国必须建立自己明确的国家安全战略 ,与美国展开同一水平的安全对话 ,明确彼此战略定位 ,促进双边关系趋向稳定     

影响中日经济关系进程的几个问题——‘98中日经济关系展望

1997年江泽民主席访问美国，与美国总结克林顿宣布：中美之间致力于建立“建设性战略伙伴关系”；一年前中俄之间建立了“面向21世纪战略协作伙伴关系”，中法之间也早已建成“全面合作的战略伙伴关系”。国家之间的关系从本质上讲是一种国家利益相互协调的关系。作为亚洲两大国－中国和日本应当结成一种什么样的关系？是一种基于国家长远利益的战略伙伴关系？还是囿于眼前需要的权宜伙伴关系？这是两国政府应当深思的问题。     

On forecasting the relations between the People’s Republic of China and the United States

The article discusses the prospects of relations between China and the United States compared to the relations that have taken place between the superpowers of the United States and the Soviet Union. A comparison of relations between the two pairs of superpowers is made in the article based on the following parameters: the interaction of the superpowers in economic and financial sectors, the struggle for the world’s mineral resources, relations in the strategic nuclear sphere, naval rivalry, relationship in the land theaters, and conflicts in cyberspace.     

构建中美战略互信

中美关系正面临严重考验和战略互信的缺失,两国关系的不稳定将造成双方都难以承受的巨大利益损失,并危害世界经济的发展和全球安全。国际形势的深刻变化和两国间日益增加的共同利益,也为双方提供了前所未有的战略机遇。必须坚持"中美关系的本质是互利共赢"的新型战略思维,既正视双边关系中的困难与障碍,又努力摈除不利于发展共同利益的陈旧思维,逐步建立积累战略互信。经贸合作是中美关系的核心,也是中美战略合作的重要基础和"稳定器",中美经贸关系一直在合作与摩擦中向前发展。新形势下,中美双方应以战略眼光精心培育、构筑两国经贸合作的四大坚实基础:自由贸易根基、互利共赢根基、结构平衡根基、平等公正根基。     

Changing faces of Japanese defense policy: Past and future 1

During the Cold War, Japan played a strategic role by contributing to the global containment against the Soviet Union. After the Cold War, Japan became more active operationally and better prepared legally. However, it did not play significant strategic roles in shaping the post‐Cold War international order. The question now is whether Japan will play strategic roles in the future. Given the changes in the domestic political outlook, political capital necessary for redefining Japanese defense policy seems to be forthcoming. Japan could play strategic roles particularly in ballistic missile defense and U.S.‐Japan defense cooperation.     

越日双边贸易发展的实证研究:1990～2010年

1973年越南与日本建交,两国高层互访频繁,政治互信日益加深,双方在各领域合作均取得了令人瞩目的成效。尤其自20世纪90年代以来,两国政府高度重视双边关系,积极推进经贸合作,基于两国经济和资源的互补优势,双边贸易合作实现了迅猛发展。2006年越日两国政府宣布建立战略合作伙伴关系,两国关系由此迈入新的历史阶段。2007年1月11日越南成功加入世贸,WTO为越日双边经贸合作发展提供了一个良好的制度平台,未来双边经贸合作具有广阔的发展前景。     

中美关系正常化过程中的苏联因素

20世纪70年代很多因素促成了中美关系的正常化。苏联作为社会主义阵营的领导者,在中美关系正常化的过程中发挥了重要的作用。本文将用史论结合的方法对中、美、苏三国关系进行分析,探索中美关系正常化过程中的苏联因素。     

New borders: Evidence from the former Soviet Union

New Borders: Evidence from the Former Soviet Union. — We study the effects of trade barriers and the persistence of past linkages on trade flows in the former Soviet Union (FSU). Estimating a gravity equation on 1987–1996 trade between nine Russian regions and fourteen FSU republics, we find that Russian regions traded nearly twice as much with each other as with republics in the reform period (1994–1996). In contrast, they did not trade significantly more with each other than with republics in the prereform period (1987–1990). Our results suggest that the bias towards domestic trade in the reform period is primarily a result of tariffs. We also find that past linkages, such as infrastructure, production and consumption chains, and business networks, have limited the reorientation of trade.     

From strategic urban planning to strategic urban management: Problems and solutions

This paper provides a short review of the history of urban development planning at different stages of urbanization, of the discussions and visions of the future of cities. It considers the urban planning doctrines in the Soviet Union and in today’s Russia (transition to strategic planning) and justifies the project of the system for managing the implementation of these strategic plans.     

New Borders and Trade Flows: A Gravity Model Analysis of the Baltic States

The objective of this paper is to provide evidence on the effects of an economic and political union by studying the trade flows of the three Baltic countries of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania after the breakup of the Soviet Union. We specify and estimate a gravity model of exports for the Nordic countries which enables us to determine the size and direction of trade flows in the Baltic states had they not been affected by the political institutions of the Soviet Union. Our results suggest that Baltic foreign trade was not only reduced significantly but also diverted to the members of the former Soviet Union. Consistent with our estimates, we also find that these consequences of the former political union are quickly dissipating, and the Baltic countries are increasing their share of exports to the European Union and the U.S.     

The bases of Soviet power in the Third World

This paper examines the process by which the Soviet Union has attempted to establish, maintain and extend its influence in the various regions of the Third World. The author traces the evolution of these relations through the stage of establishing diplomatic relations during the decolonization period and that of the USSR's attempts to harmonize its approach to trade relations with its own strategy of economic development. However, the USSR's natural economic ties with the South were very weak and it therefore chose to favour military assistance over economic aid – an option which it felt would create stronger links of dependency between the recipient countries of the South and the USSR, and thus would reinforce the bases of Soviet power around the world.