我国煤炭上市公司股利分配政策特点及影响因素分析

以27家煤炭上市公司为对象，分析煤炭上市公司股利分配政策的特点，并对其影响因素进行实证分析，研究表明：煤炭上市公司股利支付倾向于采用现金分红的方式，并趋于多元化；股利支付率5年来维持在20％左右；股利政策的连续性和稳定性相对较好；存在高额派现的情形。股利分配政策与企业的每股收益、非流通股比例和上年现金股利支付额有很大关系，而与企业规模、资本结构、每股经营现金净流量的相关性不大。     

基于企业生命周期理论的现金股利分配实证研究

本文在回顾西方股利政策理论的基础上,基于生命周期理论对股利政策的影响因素进行实证分析。我们以留存收益资产比作为企业生命周期的代理变量,选取沪市528家A股上市公司作为样本,采用2000—2008年间的数据,运用Logit模型、Tobit模型分别考察留存收益资产比和一些控制变量对上市公司是否支付现金股利、股利支付率的影响。研究发现,我国上市公司是否支付现金股利呈现生命周期特征,而现金股利支付率则不具有生命周期特征;在选取的控制变量中,增长率变量与股利发放显著负相关,从增长率这一角度看,暗合生命周期特征,资产收益率和公司规模变量与股利发放显著正相关。根据研究结论,本文建议证监会分行业制定公司的现金股利分配政策。     

股利监管政策与上市公司股利分配的探讨

本文以中国股利监管政策的演进历程为时间线,描述了2004-2014年中国证监会出台的一系列旨在保护投资者利益的股利监管政策,并梳理了国内外学者对于影响上市公司股利分配因素以及股利监管政策窗口期后政策效果评判的相关文献。通过梳理已有的研究为笔者后续研究上市公司股利问题提供研究思路和研究方法,并通过以往股利监管政策产生的效果来预期2017年再融资新规的发布对于上市公司股利分配政策的影响。     

企业股利政策的现实选择及影响因素探析

股利政策在股份制企业经营决策中占有重要地位,是企业的核心财务问题。股利政策的制定既关系到股东和债权人的利益,又关系到公司的未来发展,因而一直被公司的利益相关者所关注。与西方成熟市场相比,我国证券市场还处在起步阶段,立法、监管、规范等方面需要进一步加强,还有许多问题有待研究解决。从上市公司股利分配的现状入手,重点分析产生这些现实选择的影响因素,就此浅析健全我国上市公司股利政策的一些看法。     

我国上市公司股利政策现状及其成因

一、我国上市公司股利分配现状1.股利支付率不高,不分配的公司逐年增多一般来说,公司的股利政策主要是在以下两对关系中权衡:一是积累与分配的比例,二是现金股利和股票股利之间的比例。积累与分配的比例关系到投资者当前利益与未来利益,也关系到上市公司的可持续发展问题。只图     

浅谈我国上市公司股利政策的选择

股利政策作为上市公司的核心财务问题之一,一直受到各方面的密切关注。股利的发放既关系到股东和债权人的利益,又关系到公司的未来发展。公司在制定股利政策时应兼顾公司未来的发展对资金的需要和股东对本期收益的要求,施以适度的股利政策则有利于公司股权结构的稳定,从而有利于经营的稳定、持续发展,最终实现企业价值最大化。     

我国上市公司股利分配现状分析

股利政策是指公司税后利润在股东所得股利和企业内部留存收益之间的分配选择,其选择会受到诸多因素的影响,适当的股利政策有利于企业树立良好的企业形象,增强企业的竞争力。本文通过对我国上市公司股利政策的现状分析,意在准确把握现阶段我国股利政策的选择,找出股利政策的弊端,为寻求更为恰当的股利政策作理论准备。     

股利政策的选择与企业价值

股利政策在公司生产经营中起着至关重要的作用,恰当的股利政策在实现企业健康发展的同时,也有助于实现企业价值最大化。本文从股利政策与企业价值关系入手,分析了我国上市公司股利政策现状,现行股利分配的后果,并在此基础上提出了处于不同阶段的企业在实现企业价值最大化过程中应采取的股利政策。     

谈上市公司股利分配政策

<正>一、股利政策概述股利分配政策是现代公司的核心财务政策,是上市公司利润分配的核心,既关系到公司股东的经济利益,又关系到公司的未来发展。(一)股利政策现在的股利分配政策主要有:1.剩余股利政策剩余股利政策是指根据一定的目标资本结构或最佳资     

从上市公司分配方案看股利政策的特点

生产决定分配,分配反作用生产,这是经济学的一个基本理论。上市公司确定股东的收益分配方案即股利政策,会对投资者的投资决策起着重要的作用。因此,上市公司在确定股利政策时,往往会权衡所定的股利政策能否保证公司的效益增长与股本扩张同步,短期内是否会对股价造成影响,以及税收政策对股利分配的影响等等。一、我国上市公司采用的股利分配类型分析———利润以现金方式分配这是一种最直观的股利分配。它不扩大股本,只要公司有足够的现金支付能力就可实施。同时这种分配方式不会造成公司下一年度因净利润增长与股本扩大不同步而降低…     

投资者法律保护 超额现金与现金股利政策

从宏观和微观角度分析了投资者法律保护、超额现金与现金股利政策的关系。得出了投资者法律保护与现金股利支付率负相关,在分组样本中,投资者法律保护并没有差异;现金比例与现金股利支付率负相关,并且在超额现金样本组与非超额现金样本组中有显著性差异。实证表明我国股利政策支持替代假说。     

An Examination of REIT Dividend Payout Policy

This paper proposes a new methodology for decomposing real estate investment trust (REIT) dividends into discretionary and nondiscretionary components. By examining the tax characteristics of dividends, I am able to accurately measure the discretionary component of a REIT's dividend. This methodology provides new insights into our understanding of REIT dividend payout policy. Unlike previous studies that find limited explanations for discretionary dividend payouts, I find a systematic explanation. Discretionary dividends tend to be large on average making up between 18% and 35% of a REIT's total dividend and display considerable variation through time and across firms. The main determinant of these discretionary dividends appears to be dividend smoothing. There is an inverse relationship between discretionary and nondiscretionary dividends. Even if a REIT has excess cash flow it could distribute in discretionary dividends, it will tend not to do so if it has a high dividend payout due to its nondiscretionary dividends. In this sense, REITs appear to use discretionary dividends to smooth their payout ratios.     

Elective Stock Dividends and REITs: Evidence from the Financial Crisis

In response to the recent financial crisis, the U.S. Government introduced new rules which allow Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) to issue elective stock dividends (ESDs), i.e., noncash dividends, to satisfy their distribution requirements. The purported goal of these rules was to provide temporary relief to REITs facing cash flow problems. We investigate how the introduction of these rules affects dividend policy of REITs. Surprisingly, we document that only 17 REITs chose to issue elective stock dividends. We examine the characteristics of these REITs and find that their cash flows are similar to REITs that do not select these dividends. This suggests that cash flow problems are unlikely to be the primary determinant of the ESD issuance decision. Instead, our findings indicate the decision to pay ESDs is related to the level of loans that are close to maturity, REIT size, growth prospects and poor performance during the financial crisis. Furthermore, we find that the same factors determine the ratio, amount and frequency of stock dividends issued by these REITs. We also examine the response of shareholders to ESDs announcements and find positive abnormal returns surrounding these dividend announcements.     

市场化进程 控股股东与现金股利政策研究综述

首先梳理了国外有关现金股利政策的一些最新研究文献,并结合当前我国经济和社会发展的地区间的不平衡,探讨了市场化进程与控股股东对现金股利政策的影响,并提出了今后研究的一些方向。     

股份流动性、股权制衡机制与现金股利的隧道效应--来自1999-2003年中国上市公司的证据

本文基于国内外的相关研究，从公司治理的角度提出六个研究假设，然后构建回归模型研究因为我国股市“同股同权不同价”的股权分置现象而导致的现金股利的“隧道效应”，具体探讨非流通股和流通股流动性、股权监督制衡机制对于上市公司派发现金股利的影响。实证结果显示．非流通股股东（通常为控股股东）和流通股股东（通常为中小股东）之间的确存在严重的利益冲突。各类非流通股和流通股股东的持股比例、所持股份类型以及他们之问的监督制衡作用对派发现金股利的“隧道效应”存在重要影响。本文最后给出六点建议试图限制非流通股股东通过现金股利的“隧道效应”谋取私利．     

Corporate governance in Taiwan: The nonmonotonic relationship between family ownership and dividend policy

This study considers an important aspect of corporate governance: the relationship between cash flow rights and dividend payout policy of listed family firms in Taiwan, an economy characterized by a predominance of family-controlled firms. Dividend payout levels are important because they are crucial to governing the firm and managing its investments. The empirical results show that at a low level of controlling families’ cash flow rights, the threat to lose control at any time makes controlling families claim more in dividends. This yields a positive relationship between dividend payout and the cash flow rights of controlling families at this level. Meanwhile, at a moderate level of controlling families’ cash flow rights, the entrenchment effect becomes more robust and creates a negative relationship with dividend payout. Finally, at the very highest level of controlling families’ cash flow rights, excessive firm-specific risk again helps to again create a positive relationship. This nonmonotonic relationship between controlling family cash flow rights and dividend payout also holds for financially mature firms that have a high earned to contributed capital mix.     

关于股票分割原因的研究综述

上市公司在派发股利时,既可以派发现金股利,也可以派发股票股利,也有的公司进行股票分割。随着我国证券市场的不断发展和完善,上市公司为了各种不同的目的而运用股票分割日益增多。上市公司为什么要进行股票分割呢?本文的目的是对上市公司股票分割原因作一述评,了解这些内容对上市公司股利分配政策的研究是有利的。     

Dividend Policy and Cash-Flow Uncertainty

We explore the role of expected cash-flow volatility as a determinant of dividend policy both theoretically and empirically. Our simple one-period model demonstrates that, given the existence of a stock-price penalty associated with dividend cuts, managers rationally pay out lower levels of dividends when future cash flows are less certain. The empirical results use a sample of REITs from 1985 to 1992 and confirm that payout ratios are lower for firms with higher expected cash-flow volatility as measured by leverage, size and property-level diversification. These results are consistent with information-based explanations of dividend policy but not with agency-cost theories.     

REIT Dividend Policies and Dividend Announcement Effects During the 2008–2009 Liquidity Crisis

Real estate investment trust (REIT) dividend policies and dividend announcement effects during the 2008–2009 liquidity crisis are examined. Multinomial logit results indicate that REITs with higher market leverage or lower market‐to‐book ratios are more likely to cut dividends, suspend dividends or pay elective stock dividends. These results imply that mitigating going‐concern risk is an important motive for REITs adjusting dividend policies during the crisis and support dividend catering theory where investor demand for dividends impacts corporate dividend policies. Moreover, REITs that cut or suspend dividends experience positive cumulative abnormal returns during the post‐announcement period after controlling for the potential influence from simultaneous funds from operation announcements. The positive market response over the post‐announcement period supports the notion that dividend decisions convey information to investors and is also consistent with the broad catering theory of dividend policy.