企业对利益相关者实施分类管理的定量模式研究

本文将企业对利益相关者的分类管理和分类管理的绩效评价结合起来，建立了具有绩效和管理双向信息反馈特征的分类管理的定量模式。一方面使企业对利益相关者实施分类管理变得定量与可控，另一方面使绩效评价真正起到对管理的导向作用，使利益相关者理论具有可操作性，并为企业通过对不同利益相关者实施分类管理来实现持续发展提供理论指导和策略依据。     

上市公司绩效多角度综合评价及其实证分析

本文认为，上市公司绩效评价指标体系应反映公司主要利益相关者的评价目的和需要，并据此提出一套多角度的综合评价指标体系。本文还运用我国电子行业有关上市公司的实际数据对本文提出的观点和方法进行了实证分析。结果表明：公司不同利益相关者对同一上市公司绩效的评价结果是不同的。     

基于利益相关者理论的职业经理人绩效评价研究

本文以利益相关者理论、综合评价理论和公司治理理论为基础,试给出职业经理人绩效评价模型、综合评价的指标体系和相应评价函数,以期为客观评价职业经理人绩效提供借鉴。     

绩效棱柱模型在创新型企业绩效评价中的应用

绩效评价是企业管理的核心问题之一,传统的绩效评价方法侧重于财务指标,仅仅关注股东和客户两个利益相关者需求的缺点,绩效棱柱模型克服了上述缺点,引入了全新的思维模式。贵州省创新型企业具有创新型企业的共同点,又具有地域性。本文将绩效棱柱模型应用到贵州创新型企业绩效评价中,构建具有一定针对性的绩效评价模型,以期为贵州省创新型企业进行绩效评价时提供一定的意见和建议。     

基于DEA模型的企业利益相关者关系经营效率评价研究——基于我国家电业上市公司的实证分析

随着利益相关者经营观念的不断深入,利益相关者关系影响企业财务绩效,良好的利益相关者关系是企业重要的优势资源,这一观点已得到了学术界和实业界的广泛认可,然而,对企业利益相关者关系经营的效率如何研究却较少.在深入揭示利益相关者关系与企业财务绩效之间的投入--产出关系基础上,本文以我国家电业上市公司为样本,运用DEA模型,对利益相关者关系与企业财务绩效之间的投入--产出效率进行了评价,以针对如何提高企业财务绩效提出合理化建议.     

企业绩效评价的理论基础

我国的企业绩效评价起步较晚,对企业绩效的研究还不深入,企业绩效的主体以各级政府部门为主,绩效评价的对象多为国有大中型企业,绩效评价以财务评价为主,方法比较单一,理论性和科学性还有待于进一步提高,与国外的企业绩效评价水平有一定差距.但目前企业绩效评价已越来越受到政府和理论界的重视,我国企业绩效评价正朝着更科学、更可行、更全面的方向发展.本论文通过对企业能力理论、产权理论、委托代理理论、利益相关者理论进行了论述,对企业绩效评价的理论基础进行了较深入的探讨.     

企业社会责任与财务绩效关系的实证研究——利益相关者视角的面板数据分析

本文按照资本形态的不同,将利益相关者划分为货币资本利益相关者、人力资本利益相关者、生态资本利益相关者、社会资本利益相关者,构建了企业社会责任的利益相关者模型。以46家上市公司2003—2007年的数据为依据,运用面板数据模型,研究了企业社会责任与财务绩效之间的关系。研究表明:我国上市公司已经开始关注其社会责任,但社会责任的披露信息仍然很少;大多数企业社会责任变量对当期财务绩效的影响为负;长期来看,企业履行社会责任对其财务绩效具有正向影响作用。     

企业发展能力指标浅析

企业发展能力是企业未来价值的源泉。企业的各利益相关者都十分关注企业的发展能力或成长性。因此，对企业发展能力作出正确的分析与评价十分重要。本文在对新旧国有资本金绩效评价体系中关于发展能力指标的变动作出对比分析与评价的基础上，提出了进一步改进的建议。     

基于“三重绩效”理论的煤炭上市公司社会责任绩效评价

煤炭工业是国民经济的重要支柱,在追求利润的同时,还要注重平衡各利益相关者的诉求,即通过履行社会责任促进行业的可持续发展。以A股26家煤炭业上市公司为研究对象,基于"三重绩效"理论,构建了煤炭上市公司社会责任绩效评价指标体系,并运用因子分析法,对其社会责任绩效进行评价,研究结果显示:大部分煤炭上市公司社会责任履行效果不理想,不仅行业中不同企业间社会责任绩效表现参差不齐,且在同一企业内也未能平衡好经济、社会和环境3个方面的社会责任。     

营销价值观与组织绩效关系的实证研究:兼论企业所有制的影响

本文重点讨论了营销学中作为指导企业营销活动的价值观——市场导向与利益相关者导向的理论架构，并检验了利益相关者导向与组织绩效之间的关系。同时，还针对文献中欠缺的中国企业所有制的影响，进行了分析。研究结果发现，利益相关者导向对中国企业的组织绩效具有积极影响。但中国不同所有制的企业，在利益相关者导向和组织绩效上差异很大。     

Does corporate social responsibility influence the corporate performance of the U.S. telecommunications industry?

This study uses a two-stage approach to explore the relationship between the operational performance of U.S. telecommunications companies and their implementation of corporate social responsibility (CSR). In the first stage, this study adopts the dynamic data envelopment analysis model to measure the efficiency of the telecommunications industry in the U.S. from 2004 to 2008. The empirical results show that the corporate efficiency of those companies that implemented CSR was higher than that of those companies that did not. In the second stage, the study adopts OLS and 2SLS to explore the influence of the execution level of CSR on performance. The results show that the Kinder, Lyndenberg, and Domini & Co (KLD) social ratings indexes are significantly and positively related to corporate performance. Finally, this study suggests ways in which corporate policy makers can enhance CSR in order to improve corporate performance in the U.S. telecommunications industry.     

企业社会贡献对企业价值的影响研究——基于制造业上市公司的经验数据

目前我国正处于进一步深化改革的攻坚阶段，“供给侧改革”等一系列针对经济领域的改革举措正在大力开展。基于此，企业价值的可持续良性评价和对社会贡献度的评价，越来越引起关注。一些企业虽然可能有较高的经济效益和财富价值，但是其对生态环境的破坏、对公益福祉的忽视、对公众诉求的冷漠等行为，引发了社会各界的热议和质疑,企业创造价值的社会贡献因素逐渐引起人们关注。因此，本文将从社会贡献的视角研究企业价值，聚焦企业价值中的社会贡献动因，通过企业社会贡献这一特殊视角研究其对企业价值的影响。     

Performance implications of nonmarket strategy in China

Nonmarket strategy may have positive influences on a firm’s performance. How does nonmarket strategy influence a firm’s performance? This article addresses this important question by introducing two mediators: corporate social performance and adaptive capability. The empirical results based on a survey of 438 usable questionnaires from China indicate that “buffering” and “bridging,” being two kinds of nonmarket strategies, have a positive impact on a firm’s economic performance through enhancing its social performance and adaptive capability. The article not only documents the positive effect of nonmarket strategy on firm performance in emerging economies such as China, but also explains the indirect relationship between nonmarket strategy and economic performance, which generates both theoretical and practical implications.     

国有企业混合所有制改革对公司治理能力的影响路径及效果研究

国有企业是我国经济的重要组成部分,在社会主义国民经济体系中占有主导地位。随着我国经济的快速发展,市场经济体制不断完善,我国已经迈入经济转型的新阶段,而国有经济作为我国经济体制中重要的组成部分,由于体制等历史原因,存在着管理效率低下,管理过程中“政企不分”,现代企业制度浮于形式等问题,尤其国有企业的公司治理问题一直受社会各界的广泛关注。自本世纪以来,关于国有企业改革的方案便屡屡出台,其中,2013年国家发改委在十八届三中全会中提出要进一步深化国有企业改革,改善国有企业治理体制,最终提升国有企业的经营绩效。因此,研究国有企业在混合所有制改革中通过何种途径完善公司治理体制具有重要意义。     

The role of corporate image in business-to-business export ventures: A resource-based approach

Although a growing body of studies suggests that good corporate images have strategic value for the firms that possess them, no research to date has looked at the role of corporate image in export markets. To fill this gap in the extant literature, this study draws on the resource-based view and insights from qualitative interviews to develop a model that links an exporter's financial resources and relationship management capabilities with its corporate image advantage and its performance in the export market. Findings reveal that both financial resources and relationship management capabilities are significant contributors of corporate image advantage, which, in turn, is an important determinant of superior export performance. The study concludes with a discussion of the implications of the findings for marketing theory and practice and suggestions for future research.     

Corporate reputation in the People’s Republic of China: A B2B perspective

How B2B firms in the People's Republic of China [PRC] view, value and manage their corporate reputation has received little research attention. Drawing on multiple case studies, our findings confirm that firms are utilizing certain Western conceptualizations of corporate reputation, including the leveraging of intangible forms of corporate reputation. However, many of the firms were also using the hitherto underemphasized elements of firm-government relationships and government regulatory policies to create positive assessments of a firm's reputation among key stakeholders. Notwithstanding our findings that corporate reputation is valued as a means of gaining competitive advantage and dispelling perceptions that Chinese products/services are low-cost and low-quality, concern remains that building reputation capital among stakeholders may result in a loss of price competitiveness. Finally, unlike the framework proposed by Barnett, Jermier, and Lafferty (2006), our results suggest that B2B firms in China do not impose clear boundaries between reputation and ‘corporate reputation capital’. Nor does there appear to be an emphasis on disaggregating the constructs of identify and image from that of reputation.     

Are social media companies motivated to be good corporate citizens? Examination of the connection between corporate social responsibility and social media safety

This paper explores the connection between corporate social responsibility and social media safety. By examining the legal framework governing social platforms in the United States and case studies of online harms, we explore whether current U.S. laws and company content moderation policies are effective in eliminating content (revenge porn and acts of terrorism) that is universally agreed to be harmful. Finally, the paper makes a number of suggestions for improvements in policy.     

Does country matter?

Previous studies have explored the predictors of business unit performance in multiple‐business firms and investigated the extent of the effect of industry, corporate, and business unit on the performance of a business unit. These studies have focused almost exclusively on examining performance differences within a single country, thus treating country effects as external to business unit performance. In contrast, this study focuses on multinational corporations and examines the extent to which country effects explain the variation in the performance of foreign affiliates. Our findings show that country effects are as strong as industry effects, following affiliate effects and corporate effects. Our results also suggest that corporate and affiliate effects tend to be more critical in explaining the variation in foreign affiliate performance in developed countries, whereas country and industry effects are more salient in developing countries. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

企业绩效评估及其对公务员绩效考核的启示

公共部门和私营部门（企业组织）是社会组织的两种基本类型,是管理的两个基本领域,都属于组织与管理的研究对象,因而对这两个部门的管理有共同之处,其理论、方法及管理模式可以相互借鉴。在分析企业绩效评估制度的特色及国外将企业绩效评估引入政府评估的主要做法的基础上,结合我国公务员绩效考核制度存在的主要问题,就我国政府如何引入企业绩效评估制度提出了建议。     

Higher Highs and Lower Lows: The Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in CEO Dismissal

Research summary: Investing a firm's resources in corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives remains a contentious issue. While research suggests firm financial performance is the primary driver of CEO dismissal, we propose that CSR will provide important additional context when interpreting a firm's financial performance. Consistent with this prediction, our results suggest that past CSR decisions amplify the negative relationship between financial performance and CEO dismissal. Specifically, we find that greater prior investments in CSR appear to expose CEOs of firms with poor financial performance to a greater risk of dismissal. In contrast, greater past investments in CSR appear to help shield CEOs of firms with good financial performance from dismissal. These findings provide novel insight into how CEOs' career outcomes may be affected by earlier CSR decisions. Managerial summary: In this study, we examined a potential personal consequence for CEOs related to corporate social responsibility (CSR). We explored the role prior investments in CSR play when a board evaluates the firm's financial performance and considers whether or not to fire the CEO. Our results suggest that while financial performance sets the overall tone of a CEO's evaluation, CSR amplifies that baseline evaluation. Specifically, our results suggest that greater past investments in CSR appear to (a) greatly increase the likelihood of CEO dismissal when financial performance is poor, and (b) somewhat reduce the likelihood of CEO dismissal when financial performance is good. Thus, striving to deliver profits in a socially responsible manner may have both positive and negative personal consequences. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.