我国房地产价格与货币政策关系研究

近年来我国房地产价格迅猛发展,对国家的宏观和微观经济都产生了重要影响.国家也制定了相应的货币政策来引导房地产价格走势.本文主要通过关注运用货币政策的传导机制来影响房地产价格,同时探讨房地产价格变化对贷币政策的影响.最后结合本文研究提出完善我国贷币政策的几点建议.     

货币政策与河南房地产价格的关联性研究

货币政策频繁变动和房地产价格呈现持续上涨的趋势已经成为河南近年来的一个重要经济特征,特别是房地产价格的不断上涨导致了房地产市场和房地产价格越来越受到河南政策层面的调控和研究的关注.通过对货币政策对影响房地产价格的传导机制和有效性的分析,针对河南房地产价格的调控提出了可行性的政策建议.     

货币政策对房地产市场的区域效应探讨

货币政策的区域效应主要是指同一货币政策作用于不同经济区域会产生的不同政策效果,侧重于探讨货币政策统一性与货币政策调控效果区域差异性间的协调.文章对货币政策在房地产市场上的区域效应的相关文献进行了梳理和分析,表明货币政策的区域效应在房地产市场上表现显著,在我国表现为货币政策在东中西部的房地产市场上表现出不同的调控效果和区域差异.因此,政府调控房地产市场时,应该实行差别化的货币政策.     

货币政策量价工具的房地产市场效应分析

基于国房景气指数对中国房地产市场进行收缩期和扩张期划分,据此运用SV-TVP-FAVAR模型分析中国货币政策对不同阶段房地产市场发展的动态调控效应.结果表明:房地产市场的阶段性特征较好地印证了中国宏观经济的基本面特征及房地产市场的政策颁布和落实情况,但也存在房地产市场响应的理性"毗邻"错位现象;无论是房地产市场收缩期抑或是房地产市场扩张期,数量型货币政策的调控效果均优于价格型货币政策,存在房地产市场调控多指标"占优"选择,但货币政策量价工具的房地产市场调控效果差距不大;价格型工具的房地产市场调控效果逐步优于数量型工具,其调控地位正在逐步凸显.     

货币政策对房地产行业发展的影响

随着我国经济的快速增长,房地产业也得到了空前的发展,而房地产业的资金密集性特点使得其受国家货币政策调整的影响较大.货币政策包括利率、汇率和物价都能作用于房地产价格,分析了货币政策对房地产市场的影响,特别是2007年以来国家实行从紧的货币政策对我国房地产行业发展的影响,指出了货币政策对房地产行业宏观调控的局限性,并提出了相应的对策和建议.     

谈房地产泡沫下的货币政策

房地产泡沫,是指房地产价格脱离市场基础的持续上涨.我国房地产价格总的来说已经大大超过了人们的购买力水平,整体泡沫确定无疑.原因有内部因素外部因素两种.针对此种情况,我国的货币政策也应作出相应调整.     

货币政策调控房价的有效性分析

本文运用VAR模型进行分析,检验了2000～2008年货币政策调控房地产价格措施的效果,得出短期内利率的提高并不能有效地调控房地产价格,长期来看,利率与房地产价格负相关。货币供应量与房地产价格正相关,短期内,通过货币供应量调控房地产价格能得到较好效果。     

货币政策与房地产市场关系实证研究

利用1996年第一季度至2006年第四季度的数据,运用计量经济方法对货币政策与房地产市场的关系进行了实证分析。实证分析主要运用统计学软件SPSS13.0对变量一年期贷款利率,货币量,国房景气指数进行回归分析。得出了货币政策影响房地产市场发展,其中货币供应量教利率对房地产市场发展更为显著的结论。     

棚户区改造、非常规货币政策与房地产价格

本文基于2002年1月-2018年3月的时间序列数据,采用TVP-SVAR模型实证检验了棚户区改造背景下非常规货币政策对房地产价格的影响及其机制。研究发现:2013年之后,常规货币政策数量型工具对房地产价格的影响基本是失效的,非常规货币政策中的抵押补充贷款逐渐取代M2成为影响房地产价格的主要货币政策工具;从政策效果来看,虽然抵押补充贷款是房地产价格短期上涨的主要因素,但其长期影响并不明显;从影响机制来看,抵押补充贷款不仅能够直接影响房地产价格,还能够通过降低实际利率间接地影响房地产价格;分城市来看,抵押补充贷款对大城市的影响是非结构性的,但对中等城市的影响是结构性的,意味着通过抵押补充贷款支持棚户区改造的做法很可能导致中等城市房地产市场蕴含更大的价格波动风险。本文的研究加深了对非常规货币政策与房地产价格关系的理解,从而能够为棚户区改造与维护房地产市场平稳健康发展提供有益的政策启示。     

货币政策的房地产价格传导机制研究

本文利用结构VAR模型对我国房地产价格的货币政策传导机制进行探讨,通过经验分析得出,货币政策对房地产价格的传导比较顺畅,但房地产价格对投资和消费的传导却存在阻塞,即我国房地产市场的财富效用和投资效用不显著。随着房地产业在我国经济中的地位日益增强,货币政策的房地产传递渠道将越来越重要,而货币政策房地产价格传导渠道的不完整,必将导致房地产市场风险聚集。为了更好地发挥货币政策干预市场、调控经济的积极作用,我国必须加快房地产价格传导渠道建设,保证我国货币政策传递的有序和高效。     

货币政策传导机制与我国货币政策效力分析

货币政策传导机制主要有:信贷配给渠道、传统利率渠道、汇率渠道、资产价格渠道和心理预期渠道。通过实证研究,在我国务渠道发挥作用与西方不同,但货币政策传导效力是明显的。我国货币政策传导机制尚不完善,还应构造新体系。     

The Monetary Policy Model

Most monetary economists today conduct their analysis within some version of a rational expectations model. A well-defined equilibrium in such a model requires that the private sector understand policy goals and the policymakers' model of the economy. An austere version of the model, with no information asymmetries, is valid only to a first approximation but nevertheless provides core insights to short- and long-run monetary policy. In this model, effective policy requires clarity of policy goals and clarity of the policy model as to how the economy works. The central bank must enjoy sustained credibility in the markets. Communication should focus on policy fundamentals and the monetary authorities’ understanding of the economy, both of which are enhanced by continued research by monetary policy experts. JEL Classification E5     

试析基于金融资产价格的货币政策调控

随着以金融为核心的符号经济的不断发展 ,货币政策的传导机制变得日趋复杂 ,由此产生的一个问题是 ,货币政策是否需要把包括金融资产价格在内的广义价格指数作为调控目标。通过分析可知对于一个证券市场波动可能对宏观经济稳定产生重大影响的经济体而言 ,货币政策应该对资产价格变动保持密切关注 ,但不宜作为货币政策的调控目标     

Government Lending and Monetary Policy

The financial dimension of the current contraction has brought a historic expansion in government lending to financial market participants, mostly through an expanding array of Federal Reserve (Fed) initiatives. This contrasts with the Fed's typical response to recent recessions that has been limited to adjustments of the target Fed funds rate. Restrictions on credit supply and declines of creditworthiness have both contributed to the contraction in lending, although the latter cause has probably been underestimated relative to the former. Fed and other government lending programs have targeted particular sectors, altering the allocation of credit across markets. Also, targeted credit programs contribute to the moral hazard problem inherent in the provision of government-funded credit or guarantees. An alternative approach to monetary policy where the Fed funds target is essentially zero is purchasing Treasuries, which is likely to have little effect on the relative credit spreads on different financial instruments. However, given that targeted lending has taken place, it is critical that regulatory mechanisms be installed so that government regulation matches the scope of government support. Also, targeted lending by the Fed is in effect fiscal policy. Is this a legitimate role for a central bank, or should such lending be subject to legislative approval, with the Fed's role limited to monetary stability?     

Labor Markets and Monetary Policy

Headline employment numbers have been consistent with previous recoveries from recession. Behind the headlines, however, there are troubling data that suggest that the recovery of labor markets is weaker than what would be suggested by prior experience. In particular, labor force participation is weaker than expected, and the duration of unemployment has been longer. This paper describes the dimensions of the problems, their implications, and issues concerning whether the U.S. Federal Reserve could have done more to forestall them—particularly with respect to its Large Scale Asset Purchases program.     

The Depoliticization of Monetary Policy

In the past thirty years, it has been claimed that Republicans tend to favor relatively restrictive monetary policy while Democrats favor relatively accommodative monetary policy. Another claim is that, regardless of which political party is in power, monetary policy tends to be relatively restrictive during the first two years of an administration and relatively accommodative during its final two years. The present paper finds an absence of empirical evidence supporting either claim by restricting the sample period to the past quarter century (1982–2006). The depoliticization of monetary policy decisions probably reflects, among other factors, both the post-1970s new-Keynesian consensus in macroeconomic theory and the realization of political independence of the Federal Reserve System during the Volcker-Greenspan years. Editor’s note: After this article was submitted and accepted for publication by Business Economics, Mr. Tempelman took a position with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. The views expressed are strictly those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System.     

开放经济条件下我国货币政策目标

在经济金融对外开放条件下,我国货币政策面临来自国外更多的机遇与挑战。为确保货币政策对我国经济金融的有效调控,必须研究新形势下货币政策各目标之间的相互关系,弄清楚各目标之间产生矛盾的原因,然后在现实基础上对我国传统的货币政策目标进行取舍。     

Integrating Financial Stability into Monetary Policy

The global financial crisis has highlighted the importance of integrating financial stability concerns into monetary policy. In the Bank of Canada’s view, monetary policy should be the last line of defence against threats to financial stability, behind the joint responsibility of borrowers and lenders, appropriate regulatory oversight, and sound macroprudential policies. Still, it is critical to understand the interlinkages between monetary policy and financial stability, given that the objectives are not always consistent. This implies the necessity of trade-offs. At the Bank of Canada, this is regarded as a problem of risk management rather than policy optimization. That is why the Bank operates a risk-management approach to monetary policy—keeping inflation control as its primary mission.