我国涉外税收优惠政策的利弊分析

当前,我国涉外税收优惠政策有利有弊,对涉外税收优惠政策进行合理调整从而将弊端转化为优势是现阶段的主要任务。本文对我国涉外税收优惠政策的利弊进行分析,并提出相关完善对策,希望对发挥我国涉外税收优惠政策的积极作用有所帮助。     

涉外税收优惠政策调整研究

市场经济要求公平竞争,加入世贸是要求国民待遇,我国涉外税收优惠政策,存在许多问题,我们应该调整税收政策,理顺税收体制,促进民族工业发展,推动整体经济进步。     

中国涉外税收优惠政策面对WTO之思考

中国加入WTO ,国内各行业机遇与挑战并存 ,营造一个公平、透明的市场环境的任务十分紧迫。我国现行的税收优惠政策缺乏统一性、目的性、计划性、多样性 ,不利于市场主体公平税负 ,平等竞争 ,改革涉外税收优惠政策非常必要。     

“两税合并”后我国涉外税收优惠政策初探

两税合并以后,专门针对外资企业的所得税优惠已经基本不存在(为了分析的简捷,只考虑企业所得税中的税收优惠政策)。但是这并不意味着我国就不再实行涉外所得税优惠政策,只是我国将在内外资公平竞争的条件下,兼顾内外资的利益实行共同优惠政策。通过分析"两税合并"后涉外税收优惠变化以及外商投资企业受到的影响,试图寻找完善我国涉外税收优惠政策的途径。     

对我国涉外税收优惠政策弊端的思考

涉外税收优惠对我国引进外资起到了不容忽视的作用,但随着我国经济的发展,涉外税收优惠政策的弊端也日益显现,本文对这些弊端进行了分析,并提出了改革的思路。     

对我国涉外税收优惠政策弊端的思考

涉外税收优惠对我国引进外资起到了不容忽视的作用,但随着我国经济的发展,涉外税收优惠政策的弊端也日益显现,本文对这些弊端进行了分析,并提出了改革的思路.     

试论我国涉外税收优惠政策的精细化

发展中国家由于国内资本相对不足,要发展经济必须引进国外资本.但这些国家投资环境普遍不如发达国家,投资盈利率不高,因此为了吸引外资,都不约而同地给予外商一定的优惠政策,包括税收优惠,以期抵补投资环境之不足.我国属于发展中国家,实行改革开放以来也陆续地(?)布了一系列吸引外资的税收优惠政策.实践证明:十多年来,我国的涉外税收优惠政策对引进外资所取得的巨大成就起到了不可或缺的作用,功不可没.但是不容置疑,现行的税收优惠政策在引导外资流向等方面存在一些问题,往往事与愿违,跟不上引资工作发展的需要,亟待完善.现就有关政策择例分析如下.     

浅谈涉外税收优惠与无差别待遇原则

加入WTO后，我国对外开放程度进一步提高，国际经贸往来显加强，相关法律也相应需要不断完善，尤其是涉外税收法制更面临着新的机遇和挑战，其中之一就是无差别待遇原则。有许多人提出为更好地贯彻无差别待遇原则，应该取消涉外税收优惠。我认为不应该这样。     

我国涉外税收优惠政策存在的问题及对策

我国的涉外税制从80年代建立后，经过1991年和1993年两项重大改革，目前已经形成了以流转税和企业所得税为主体，辅之以其他税种的多层次、多环节的格局。我国的涉外税具有税率结构简单、税负较低、优惠层次分明、征纳手续简便的特点，因此我国的涉外税制可归结为典型的以吸引外资，引进技术，发展对外经济技术合作为核心的涉外税收优惠政策。     

认清中小企业战略地位完善税收优惠政策

目前中小企业在我国国民经济中的地位日益突出，然而与之极不适应的是，我国给予中小企业的税收优惠很少。从国际上看．西方国家运用税收优惠政策成功地支持和促进了中小企业的发展。我国应借鉴其经验，逐步完善对中小企业的税收优惠政策，加大税收支持中小企业的发展力度．以良好的税收环境促进中小企业的发展。     

Harmonization of company taxation systems

The author of the following article gives a survey of the different corporation tax systems and rates in the individual EC-member countries, explains the need for a harmonization of direct company taxation within the Community, and discusses the Commission’s recent proposal as compared with other possible approaches.     

简论俄罗斯的税制改革

俄罗斯几乎用了整10年的时间,付出了沉重的代价,打破了原苏联的计划经济体制,建立起了市场经济,但俄罗斯的市场经济还不是完善的、文明的市场经济,其间充满了投机、豪夺、犯罪和灰色经济,根本说不上公平、公正,经济因此濒于崩溃。普京执政后,立即开始制定市场规则,建立必要的法律制度,着手实现向文明市场经济的转变,维护经济秩序,调整市场环境,为市场自由化和公平竞争提供必要的保障。     

Development aid taxation act amendment

One of the important tasks which the new Federal Government will have to tackle during 1973 is the amendment of the Entwicklungshilfe-Steuergesetz (Development Aid Taxation Act). The following article reviews the aims of the Act and suggests modifications necessary for improving its effectiveness.     

New impetus for EU taxation policy

The financial crisis has exposed all EU Member States ??to different degrees ??with a double economic policy challenge: to foster sustainable economic growth and to consolidate public finances. Can the governments in the EU afford to forego the benefits of targeted tax measures at EU level ??tapping the growth potential of the internal market by reducing tax obstacles and improving tax collection on cross-border activities within the EU? This paper provides a short review of the varying tax structures in the EU Member States, discusses the interdependencies as well as the EU dimension of their tax policies and gives an overview on current and future tax initiatives at EU level.     

Entrepreneurship and the theory of taxation

A review of the literature on firm taxation reveals that the economics of entrepreneurship has not sufficiently been taken into consideration. We discuss how this affects conclusions derived from standard models of capital taxation when applied to entrepreneurial income. Some defining features of entrepreneurship important for analyzing the effects of taxation of owner-managed firms are identified. These include the lack of a well-functioning external market for entrepreneurial effort, limited access to external capital and complementarities between entrepreneurial innovation, effort and capital. Due to these constraints, the entrepreneurial project is tied to the individual owner–manager. The entrepreneur is unable to decouple saving decisions from investment decisions, and makes joint decisions on the supply of effort and capital. The return from successful entrepreneurial ventures can therefore not be readily divided into labor and capital income, in deep contrast to what is typically assumed in taxation theory. It is argued that when distinct attributes of entrepreneurship are taken into account, certain conclusions of capital taxation models may no longer hold, including the neutrality of capital taxation in owner-managed firms. Cost of capital formulas derived from the behavior of public firms could underestimate distortions when applied to the investment behavior of entrepreneurial firms. For tax purposes and otherwise, it becomes useful to analyze return to entrepreneurial activity as income of a distinct factor of production. In this context, conceptual issues and the difficulties of measuring entrepreneurial income are discussed.