中国制造业上市公司现金持有量影响因素

以我国制造业上市公司为研究样本,采用多元回归分析,从公司治理结构、公司层面因素这两个角度,对制造业现金持有量的影响因素进行了实证研究。结果显示:财务杠杆、现金替代物、银行债务与现金持有量显著负相关,管理者持股与现金持有量显著正相关。     

公司治理机制对公司现金持有量的影响——来自我国上市公司的经验证据

本文以我国部分上市公司为样本实证研究了公司治理机制对公司现金持有量的影响。结果表明,公司治理机制并未对公司现金持有量形成显著影响,从公司现金持有量的视角为我国上市公司治理机制的不完善性提供了经验证据。     

经济波动与上市公司现金持有行为关联性分析

公司在不同的现金持有动机下,经济周期波动对公司企业现金持有行为的影响是不一样的.本篇论文以连续10年且持续存在的上市公司为研究对象,实证研究它们的样本数据,结果表明,经济扩张时期,上市公司的现金持有行为体现在减少手中的现金持有量;经济下滑时期,上市公司的现金持有行为体现在增加手中的现金持有量.     

上市公司现金持有量影响因素研究

现金持有量是企业经营战略的一项重要理财行为,不但关系着企业日常交易和经营活动,而且还关系到企业其他财务决策.本文在回顾现金持有量的基本理论及现有文献的基础上,结合我国企业的特点,分析影响我国现金持有量的因素,并提出以降低我国上市公司现金持有量为目标,完善公司治理结构的政策建议.     

内部控制、现金持有量与企业价值关系实证研究

本文将公司内部控制、现金持有量、企业价值置于一个整体框架中.选取2009~2015年A股上市公司相关数据为样本,利用主成分分析法确定公司内部控制水平,同时对最佳现金持有量的确定、公司内部控制与现金持有量关系、现金持有量与企业价值的关系、公司内部控制对现金持有量与企业价值关系的影响进行深入研究.本文的研究结论有助于企业尤其是外贸企业持有现金量的科学化和规范化,提升企业价值.     

我国制造业上市公司现金持有量的影响因素研究

以沪深两市838家制造业上市公司2009-2013年的数据作为样本,实证检验了制造业上市公司现金持有量的影响因素。结果发现:公司规模、债务融资水平、资产流动性、银行债务水平与现金持有量负相关,债务期限结构、盈利能力、投资机会与现金持有量正相关,独立董事比例、经营者持股比例与现金持有量的相关关系不明显。     

旅游业上市公司现金持有影响因素的实证研究

我国旅游业发展迅速,现阶段处于旅游大国向旅游强国发展的转型时期。本文以旅游业A股上市公司为样本,采用多元线性回归方法,实证研究了资产结构、资本结构、增长机会、现金周转率、股利支付对公司现金持有量水平的影响。研究结果发现：旅游业上市公司现金持有量与资产结构、银行债务、现金周转率显著负相关,与股利支付显著正相关,而与资本结构的关系不显著。     

浅析上市公司现金持有水平影响因素

现金持有水平是衡量企业管理水平和财务状况的重要指标。现金作为流动性最强的资产,贯穿企业生存发展始终。由于信息不对称、税收等各类外部因素的存在,持有现金可以为企业提供日常生产经营的必要支出从而避免一定的外部筹资成本,也可以满足企业对外投资需求。但是,过量持有现金可能导致现金闲置或者是经理人的自利行为。本文主要对上市公司现金持有水平的影响因素进行简要分析并从公司内部治理的角度对现金管理提出政策性建议。     

股权结构、股东保护与上市公司现金持有量

我国上市公司的治理结构一直是各方关注的焦点，尤其是股权结构、中小股东保护等问题。本文选取了2000年上市公司样本991个，定义了基于股权结构的股东保护变量，并在此基础上研究了股东保护与现金持有量之间的关系。研究结果表明，上市公司现金持有量差异较大，并且在股东保护较好的情况下，现金持有量相对较小，二者之间呈现负相走的关系。由于影响现金持有量的因素较多，我们选取了相当数量的影响因素作为控制变量，检验在其进入模型的情况下，对股东保护与现金持有量之间关系的影响；结果表明，股权结构影响下的股东保护与现金持有量具有负的线性相关性。     

旅游业上市公司现金持有影响因素的实证研究

我国旅游业发展迅速,现阶段处于旅游大国向旅游强国发展的转型时期。本文以旅游业A股上市公司为样本,采用多元线性回归方法,实证研究了资产结构、资本结构、增长机会、现金周转率、股利支付对公司现金持有量水平的影响。研究结果发现：旅游业上市公司现金持有量与资产结构、银行债务、现金周转率显著负相关,与股利支付显著正相关,而与资本结构的关系不显著。     

The financial determinants of corporate cash holdings: Evidence from some emerging markets

This paper investigates corporate cash holdings in developing countries. In particular, we look into the effect of capital structure and dividend policy on cash holdings in Brazil, Russia, India, and China and compare our results with a control sample from the US and the UK. Our sample contains 1992 firms across these countries for the period 2002–2008. We employ Instrumental Variables analysis to control for the endogeneity of the financial policies (cash holdings, capital structure, and dividend policy). Our results show some evidence that capital structure and dividend policy affect cash holdings. There are similarities between developed and developing countries on the factors determining corporate cash holdings. The results of our cross-country model provide evidence that capital structure, dividend policy, and firm size are important factors in determining cash holdings. Finally, we show that firms operating in countries with low shareholder protection hold more cash.     

The Effect of Governance Mechanisms on Small and Medium‐Sized Enterprise Cash Holdings: Evidence from the United Kingdom

This paper investigates the impact of governance mechanisms on small and medium‐sized enterprise (SME) cash holdings from 2000 to 2009, employing static and dynamic panel data analyses. We find no evidence that firm governance index and insider ownership affect cash holdings. This might indicate that governance mechanisms in SMEs are relatively weak. We also report that chief executive officer compensation has a positive effect on cash holdings. Firm‐specific factors such as firm size, leverage, and liquidity negatively affect cash holdings, whereas the research and development ratio and operating risk are positively associated with them. Finally, SMEs have target cash holdings and adjust to these.     

Why Greater Cash Holdings and Short-Term Debt Simultaneously Persist? The Case of Transition Economy

This study observes and explores a puzzle in Chinese firms whereby both cash holdings and short-term debt simultaneously account for more than 20% of total assets for at least two consecutive years over the sample period. This phenomenon conflicts with the principle of corporate value maximization, and is not clearly explained by the classical theories in corporate finance. Based on the implications in the extant literature and discussions of institutional constraints of the transition economy in China, this paper develops four hypotheses that are involved with agency conflicts between the largest shareholders and creditors and the formation of this puzzling financial structure. The empirical analyses suggest that the largest shareholders with tunneling motives seek to hold more cash to serve their private interests and/or the consequent operational deficit of the listed corporations. To the ends, these corporations tend to manage the timing of short term debt financing to increase cash reserves temporarily at the end of year. Essentially, greater cash holdings on the balance sheet of these corporations related with the puzzle become a misleading signal for potential creditors, possibly contributing to the refinancing of short-term debt of these listed firms for the following year. Hence, the puzzling financial structure is connected with the timing of debt financing and adverse selection of creditors. This study enriches the stream of literature on cash holdings and debt maturity, and provides new evidence on the impact of agency problems of the largest shareholders on the association between cash holdings and debt maturity in the context of a transition economy.     

Governance mechanisms, investment opportunity set and SMEs cash holdings

This study analyses the effect of firm characteristics and governance mechanisms on cash holdings for a sample of UK SMEs. The results show that UK SMEs with greater cash flow volatility and institutional investors hold more cash; whereas levered and dividend paying SMEs with non-executive ownership hold less cash. We also find that ownership structure is significant only in explaining the cash holdings for firms with high growth investment opportunities, and leverage is only significant in explaining the cash held by firms with low growth investment opportunities. Our findings suggest that internal governance mechanisms are more effective for SMEs with high growth investment opportunities, while external governance mechanisms, such as capital market monitoring, are more effective for firms with low growth investment opportunities.     

高管的银行背景、所有权性质与企业现金持有决策

本文分析高管的银行背景是否影响企业现金持有决策,以及这种影响在国有企业和民营企业之间是否存在显著差异。基于中国非金融类上市公司2003－2013年的数据,检验发现,那些聘请具有银行背景的人士担任高管的企业具有显著更低的现金持有水平和更快的现金持有调整速度。相对于国有企业,高管银行背景对企业现金持有决策的影响在民营企业显著更强。上述研究结论有助于揭示社会资本在促进企业发展中的具体运行机制,为上市公司做出更优的现金持有决策具有重要的启示意义。     

现金持有、融资约束与企业价值——基于门槛回归模型的实证检验

文章基于门槛回归模型,对融资约束是否会影响现金及超额现金与企业价值的关系进行实证检验。结果表明,现金及超额现金与企业价值的关系均存在显著的门槛效应。在弱融资约束企业,现金及超额现金的账面价值高于其市场价值,而在强融资约束企业,现金及超额现金的账面价值低于其市场价值,这支持了代理理论和融资约束理论,说明弱融资约束企业滥用现金的代理问题较为严重,现金持有对企业价值具有负向影响,强融资约束企业持有现金,能够抓住更多投资机会,现金持有对企业价值具有正向影响。     

现金持有量决策具有战略效应吗?——基于现金持有量的平均效应与区间效应的研究

文章根据掠夺理论来考察现金持有量是否具有增加产品市场业绩的战略效应。研究结果表明,就平均效应而言,现金持有量能够增加企业的产品市场业绩;就区间效应而言,现金持有量的战略效应呈现出随着现金持有水平的提高而逐渐增加的趋势。进一步地检验结果表明大量持有现金引起的投资是造成现金持有量的区间效应呈增加趋势的主要原因,且最终也增加了企业价值。文章还发现行业的竞争强度以及整体财务状态也会影响现金持有量的战略效应。     

股权结构与企业股利政策选择关系:理论与实证分析

本文从公司治理视角出发,以中国上市公司为样本,对股权结构与企业股利政策关系进行了理论与实证分析。结果表明,管理者持股比例、股权集中度(包括第一大股东持股比例)与现金股利支付率显著正相关;国有股比例与现金股利支付率正相关;法人股比例和流通A股比例对现金股利支付率的影响可能是负向的,且极不显著。