职校教师如何撰写高质量学术论文--基于重庆市经贸中等专业学校示范校建设论文撰写经验

本文以重庆市经贸中等专业学校为例，就如何遵守学术规范，从而写出一篇高质量的优秀学术论文提出了一些看法，以期为今后研究者撰写学术论文提供良好的借鉴和参考。     

从论文产量初探科研管理体制——华南理工大学2005-2009年科技论文统计与分析

学术论文是科研活动的重要表现方式之一,众多高校把学术论文作为提升学校学术水平、科研实力的一项重要内容,纷纷制定相关鼓励政策,鼓励科研人员发表高水平的学术论文,以此促进学校科研发展。本文对2005年-2009年间华南理工大学三大索引收录论文数进行分析,探讨华南理工大学现行科研管理体制对华南理工大学发表高水平论文的影响,进一步改进科技管理体制。     

关于研究生学术道德与学风建设分析

<正>一我国学术道德失范现象的现状1.学术论文抄袭现象严重。学术论文是检验学生在校学习成果的重要措施,也是反映教学质量的重要参考因素。论文的水平,反映着作者对其研究领域涉足的深浅程度及认识程度。因此,独立自主地完成论文是对每一个学生最基础的要求。但在我国却屡屡出现学术论文抄袭现象,而当今反映最强烈、最为严重的学术诚信缺失行为正是大学学术研究活动中的抄袭与剽窃行为。调查显示,54%的大学生在第一篇论文实践过程中,有拼凑行为。     

“万事兴杯”《中国房地产》(学术版)2012年度优秀房地产学术论文评选

为促进房地产理论与学术研究的不断发展,提高房地产学术论文质量,本刊决定举办"万事兴杯"《中国房地产》(学术版)2012年度优秀房地产学术论文评选活动。一、稿件要求1.在房地产领域具有前瞻性、领先性、应用性、实用性的学术成果。     

“万事兴杯”《中国房地产》(学术版)2012年度优秀房地产学术论文评选

为促进房地产理论与学术研究的不断发展,提高房地产学术论文质量,本刊决定举办"万事兴杯"《中国房地产》(学术版)2012年度优秀房地产学术论文评选活动。一、稿件要求1.在房地产领域具有前瞻性、领先性、应用性、实用性的学术成果。2.国家及省部级课题项目优先。     

“万事兴杯”《中国房地产》(学术版)2012年度优秀房地产学术论文评选

为促进房地产理论与学术研究的不断发展,提高房地产学术论文质量,本刊决定举办"万事兴杯"《中国房地产》(学术版)2012年度优秀房地产学术论文评选活动。一、稿件要求1.在房地产领域具有前瞻性、领先性、应用性、实用性的学术成果。2.国家及省部级课题项目优先。     

“万事兴杯”《中国房地产》(学术版)2012年度优秀房地产学术论文评选

为促进房地产理论与学术研究的不断发展,提高房地产学术论文质量,本刊决定举办"万事兴杯"《中国房地产》(学术版)2012年度优秀房地产学术论文评选活动。一、稿件要求1.在房地产领域具有前瞻性、领先性、应用性、实用性的学术成果。2.国家及省部级课题项目优先。     

“万事兴杯”《中国房地产》(学术版)2012年度优秀房地产学术论文评选

为促进房地产理论与学术研究的不断发展,提高房地产学术论文质量,本刊决定举办"万事兴杯"《中国房地产》(学术版)2012年度优秀房地产学术论文评选活动。一、稿件要求1.在房地产领域具有前瞻性、领先性、应用性、实用性的学术成果。2.国家及省部级课题项目优先。3.在《中国房地产》(学术版)2012年1-12期首次发表。     

“万事兴杯”《中国房地产》(学术版)2012年度优秀房地产学术论文评选

为促进房地产理论与学术研究的不断发展,提高房地产学术论文质量,本刊决定举办"万事兴杯"《中国房地产》(学术版)2012年度优秀房地产学术论文评选活动。一、稿件要求1.在房地产领域具有前瞻性、领先性、应用性、实用性的学术成果。2.国家及省部级课题项目优先。3.在《中国房地产》(学术版)2012年1-12期首次发表。     

“万事兴杯”《中国房地产》(学术版)2012年度优秀房地产学术论文评选

为促进房地产理论与学术研究的不断发展,提高房地产学术论文质量,本刊决定举办"万事兴杯"《中国房地产》(学术版)2012年度优秀房地产学术论文评选活动。一、稿件要求1.在房地产领域具有前瞻性、领先性、应用性、实用性的学术成果。2.国家及省部级课题项目优先。3.在《中国房地产》(学术版)2012年1-12期首次发表。二、评选方法由《中国房地产》(学术版)专家委员会对稿件进行评审,确定     

Rankings von Zeitschriften und Personen in der BWL

Rankings are of increasing importance in academia, but they are also criticised. In this article only research rankings are analysed, sorting either academic journals or academic authors publishing therein. Business administration and management is used as an example, whereas the analysis could be used for most social and other sciences. In business administration VHB-JOURQUAL 2 is a current example of a journal ranking, whereas the Handelsblatt ranking of management researchers is a recent ranking of persons. As an alternative to the latter one a citation-based ranking of researchers is developed and presented that possesses some advantages, especially in regard of evaluating individual academic performance, but exhibits some specific problems, too.     

Linguistic sleuthing for innovators

Quality & Quantity - For centuries “innovation” has been a topic of book authors and academic researchers as documented by Ngram and Google Scholar search results. In contrast,...     

Determinants of knowledge-based entrepreneurship: an exploratory approach

We intend to further the research related to the factors that determine successful entrepreneurial endeavours by academic researchers, and thus put forth an exploratory model of Knowledge-Based Entrepreneurship (KBE). Given the lack of extant adequate indicators, a new scale was developed based on the most frequently cited constructs in the literature. A sample of 1,401 researchers from Portuguese universities was administered a questionnaire and the data collected permitted a validation with regards to the psychometric properties of the questionnaire, to see its applicability to the study. The findings suggest that the absence of a patenting history or start-up portfolio act as significant barriers to academic entrepreneurship. However, when the institutional strategy is to increase patenting and spin-off activities, the university should begin investing in creating a networking environment capable of reinforcing the researchers’ Social Capital. Observing the example of successful entrepreneurs motivates other researchers to consider the possibility of developing their own ventures. The Structural Equations Modelling (SEM) approach allowed for us to identify and measure the non-linear relationships that shape the core of KBE and influence the attainment of measurable outcomes aimed at encouraging entrepreneurship. A relatively high share of the variance of the dependent variables is explained by the model, ensuring their representativeness and contributing to the state-of-art of the knowledge in this research field.     

Monetary incentives and social ties in academic publications

Monetary incentives underlie academic publications, especially in countries where many researchers' incomes are performance-based. Evidence has documented that social ties improve the chances of publication in journals, whereas building and maintaining social ties require resources. We develop a simple model to investigate the consequences of monetary investment on the probability of publication through social ties. The results indicate that monetary incentive can stimulate researchers to make more efforts regarding publication. Through social ties, monetary investment in the process of academic publication distorts researchers' incentive. Monetary investment through social ties improves the probability of publication and then disables the signaling function of publication in terms of researchers’ abilities. Depending on the contribution of different types of researchers to society and the ability of the latter to differentiate the quality of publication in journals, the improvement in publication probability by monetary investment through social ties may improve or reduce the level of social welfare.     

Academic leadership and commercial activities at research institutes: German evidence

This paper focuses on entrepreneurship by academic leaders. With the use of patents, inventions, and spin‐offs to measure commercialization, and directors, research group leaders, and business owners as academic leaders, results, using a sample of more than 2,500 German researchers, show differences across academic leaders and commercialization. Findings for spin‐offs are different from those for patents and inventions. Academic leaders in sciences were more likely to commercialize. Doctoral degrees helped patents by business owners and spin‐offs by group leaders, whereas female business owners and female group leaders faced challenges patenting and inventing, respectively. For business owners, age increased the likelihood of patenting but lowered spin‐offs.     

Gentrifier? Who,Me? Interrogating the Gentrifier in the Mirror

Schlichtman and Patch suggest that there is an elephant sitting in the academic corner: while urbanists often use ‘gentrification’ as a pejorative term in formal and informal academic conversation, many urbanists are gentrifiers themselves. Even though urbanists have this firsthand experience with the process, this familiarity makes little impact on scholarly debate. There is, Schlichtman and Patch argue, an artificial distance in accounts of gentrification because researchers have not adequately examined their own relationship to the process. Utilizing a simple diagnostic tool that includes ten common aspects of gentrification, they compose two autoethnographic memoirs to begin this dialogue.     

Desingularization and Dequalification: A Foray Into Ranking Production and Utilization Processes

Abstract

Although some authors highlight the benefits of journal rankings, previous research is often highly critical of them, insinuating that they can lead to desingularization of academic journals (i.e. their impoverishment and standardization) and dequalification of researchers (i.e. a weakening of researchers’ ability to evaluate academic research). However, as very few authors have empirically assessed these presumptions, we aim to address this gap in the literature. Based on Lucien Karpik’s notions of singularities, judgment devices, forms of involvement, and emulation and rivalry, we assess whether the processes surrounding the production and use of journal rankings might lead to desingularization and dequalification. Our findings support previous research by highlighting that processes where passivity and heteronomy (i.e. lack of autonomy) prevail are conducive to desingularization, rivalry and dequalification. Our findings, however, introduce some nuances into the debate by underscoring instances where emulation logic is employed instead of mere rivalry logic, and where substantial judgment devices and active involvement are mobilized in the production and use of rankings, thereby somewhat alleviating the spread of desingularization and dequalification. Ultimately, our study raises questions that point to a need for serious collective reflection within the academic community on the processes by which published research is evaluated.     

Publishing? You can count on knowledge,experience, and expectations

Quality & Quantity - The study based on an online survey covering 655 researchers from hard and soft sciences addresses the influence of different conditions on academic publishing. Results...     

The discourse of entrepreneurial masculinities (and femininities)

The overarching concern of this paper is the dominant discourse of entrepreneurship portrayed as a form of masculinity. It argues that this discourse is perpetuated by academic research and by media representations of the entrepreneur. The entrepreneur is represented in the media by a narrow range of male stereotypes, whilst women are under-represented and often that representation is linked to domestic concerns. At the same time, academic studies persistently rely on male experience to theorize entrepreneurship, and women are studied in terms of their difference. This enduring discourse results in entrepreneurial femininities being rendered invisible. This paper argues that studies in entrepreneurship should remain alert to the denial and masking of gender. It calls for entrepreneurship researchers to engage with contemporary debates in gender, culture and media studies and proposes a research agenda to challenge the dominant discourses.