论市场经济条件下财政政策与货币政策的结合

财政政策和货币政策是一个国家实施宏观调控的主要工具，但是怎样合理有效的搭配两种政策，使其更加适合市场经济的发展，为我国的经济发展扫除必要的障碍是我们的主要任务。本文分析了财政政策和货币政策的效益与机制，并对两者结合的机理进行了分析。在分析我国改革改革开放以来的宏观经济政策的基础上，提出了难点与必要性，还进一步分析了财政政策与货币政策协调配合的模式，并对我国进一步实施财政政策和货币政策的结合给出了建议。探讨适合我国国情的有效的政策组合。     

后危机时代我国货币政策与财政政策的协调

2008年金融危机以来,我国采取了积极的财政政策和适度宽松的货币政策以应对危机的蔓延。本文通过对我国货币政策和财政政策的特点以及金融危机期间宏观经济政策的分析,认为在后危机时代,我国更应该加强货币政策和财政政策的协调配合,进行经济结构调整,转变经济发展方式。     

我国货币政策和财政政策的效用比较研究

本文应用Hsiao提出的最终预测误差准则（FPE）检验Granger因果关系方法，对我国的货币政策和财政政策的效用进行了实证比较研究，并得出了有关结论，为我国的宏观调控政策提供理论分析和实证检验的依据。     

政策变动同家庭金融资产配置意愿关联性研究——基于SVAR的实证分析

货币政策和财政政策是否影响家庭金融资产选择?文章选取2003年第三季度—2017年第四季度、时间跨度涵盖58个完整季度的居民储户调查数据和货币、财政政策变量数据进行实证分析。结果表明,货币政策和财政政策会影响微观家庭的金融资产选择,尤其是对于家庭储蓄存款配置意愿和股票基金投资意愿具有影响。政策对于家庭金融资产选择意愿的短期冲击和长期影响均存在,政策制定者应对居民金融资产选择意愿进行充分关注,及时进行资本市场风险管控。     

财政政策、货币政策和产业政策对宏观经济作用的实证分析

财政政策、货币政策与产业政策三大政策并用,是我国推动经济发展的重要特征之一。2008年以来,中国政府为应对金融危机,实施了一系列宏观调控措施以稳定经济增长与治理通货膨胀。对财政政策、货币政策和产业政策这三大宏观调控政策对经济增长与通货膨胀的作用进行实证分析,得出结论并在此基础上提出政策建议。     

后危机时代我国宏观经济政策分析与价值取向

文章以此为视角,对后危机时代我国宏观经济政策进行了分析,阐述了财政政策和货币政策的理论依据,给出了后危机时代我国宏观经济政策的价值取向。     

我国财政政策和货币政策协调配合问题研究

本文基于财政政策和货币政策是政府宏观调控的两大支柱工具的认识,分析了1998年以来我国政府在运用财政政策和货币政策进行宏观调控时存在的不够协调配合问题,认为:为了充分发挥两大政策的效力,有必要在财政政策和货币政策的目标、相对作用、实施主体以及搭配方式等方面建立协调配合机制。     

我国财政政策和货币政策协调性研究

院财政政策和货币政策是一个国家宏观调控的两大手段,两者能否有效配合决定了宏观调控的有效性.文章以1999 年1 月到2014 年1 月全国月度财政收支和广义货币供给量M2 为样本,通过建立VAR 模型研究了财政政策和货币政策之间的协调性问题,实证结果表明,我国的财政政策和货币政策之间存在相互促进的互补关系,并且财政政策对货币政策的影响效果要大于货币政策对财政政策的影响效果.     

我国财政政策和货币政策协调配合问题研究

本文基于财政政策和货币政策是政府宏观调控的两大支柱工具的认识,分析了1998年以来我国政府在运用财政政策和货币政策进行宏观调控时存在的不够协调配合问题,认为：为了充分发挥两大政策的效力,有必要在财政政策和货币政策的目标、相对作用、实施主体以及搭配方式等方面建立协调配合机制。     

转型时期财政政策与货币政策的协调与配合

财政政策与货币政策是国家宏观经济管理的两大政策工具。财政政策与货币政策,对社会经济诸多方面,渗透和影响较多、较大,两无论是在微观经济领域还是在宏观经济领域或某项特殊的经济政策执行都互相影响、互相制约,也互相促进、相辅相成。因此,在社会经济生活中,做好财政政策与货币政策协调配合,对国民经济的发展有着十分重要的意义。本人仅就当前我国经济转型时期财政政策与货币政策的协调与配合的几个问题谈几点认识。     

Fiscal Policy in the New Open Economy Macroeconomics and Prospects for Fiscal Policy Coordination

Abstract.  This paper reviews the literature on the effects of fiscal policy in new open economy macroeconomics (NOEM) models, complementing it with additional results that attempt to clarify the importance of the exchange rate regime (fixed or flexible) and of the type of policy (balanced budget or debt‐financed). Fixed exchange rates only seem to postpone the costs from the short to the long run, but the type of policy is crucial in determining the welfare impact of fiscal expansions. The paper also reviews the recent literature on fiscal policy coordination and shows that there is already some evidence that the gains from coordination in this area can be potentially large but draw attention to the need for reflecting more on the role of fiscal policy as a stabilization tool and on possible interactions between fiscal and monetary policy.     

Political Macroeconomics: A Survey of Recent Developments

The paper surveys political macroeconomics, covering its development from Rogoff's conservative central banker to the most recent discussions of monetary policy and institutional design. Topics include the inflation-stabilization trade-off, central bank independence with escape clauses and overruling with costs, inflation targets, performance contracts for monetary authorities, and the consequences of output persistence for these issues. Further topics are the political business cycle when output is persistent, the political macroeconomics of fiscal policy, the government spending bias, and the game-theoretic interaction between fiscal and monetary policy. All work is discussed within a coherent analytical framework.     

Monetary policy with interest on reserves

I analyze monetary policy with interest on reserves and a large balance sheet. I show that conventional theories do not determine inflation in this regime, so I base the analysis on the fiscal theory of the price level. I find that monetary policy can peg the nominal rate, and determine expected inflation. With sticky prices, monetary policy can also affect real interest rates and output, though higher interest rates raise output and then inflation. The conventional sign requires a coordinated fiscal–monetary policy contraction. I show how conventional new-Keynesian models also imply strong monetary–fiscal policy coordination to obtain the usual signs. I address theoretical controversies. A concluding section places our current regime in a broader historical context, and opines on how optimal fiscal and monetary policy will evolve in the new regime.     

Adoption of inflation targeting and tax revenue performance in emerging market economies: An empirical investigation

This paper investigates whether the adoption of inflation targeting (IT), by strengthening central bank independence and maintaining inflation at low levels, has encouraged the governments of emerging economies to improve the collection of domestic tax revenue in order to recoup the loss of seigniorage revenue. Using the propensity score matching methodology, a micro-econometric methodology recently used in macroeconomics, we evaluate the ‘treatment effect’ of IT on fiscal mobilization in emerging countries that have adopted this monetary policy framework. Our empirical analysis, conducted on a sample of 59 countries (19 IT and 40 non-IT countries) for the period from 1980 to 2009, shows that on average IT adoption has had a large and significant positive effect on public revenue collection. Our results are confirmed by extensive robustness tests.     

Fiscal and monetary policies in complex evolving economies

What is the most appropriate combination of fiscal and monetary policies in economies subject to banking crises and deep recessions? We study this issue using an agent-based model that is able to reproduce a wide array of macro- and micro-empirical regularities. Simulation results suggest that policy mixes associating unconstrained, counter-cyclical fiscal policy and monetary policy targeting employment is required to stabilise the economy. We also show that “discipline-guided” fiscal rules can be self-defeating, as they depress the economy without improving public finances. Finally, we find that the effects of monetary and fiscal policies become sharper as the level of income inequality increases.     

财政货币政策、房价波动与宏观杠杆——基于信心传导机制的分析

利用市场主体信心的微观调查数据,借助仿真情景模拟下的反事实实验方法对信心能否在财政政策和货币政策调控杠杆与房价的过程中发挥作用进行实证分析,而后利用TVP-VAR模型对其内在机制展开深入探讨。研究表明,当信心被虚拟冲击抵消后,政策效果与基准结果呈现明显分化。即信心能够显著影响财政货币政策对杠杆与房价的作用效果,且经进一步实证分析得知信心正向影响于房价、负向影响于宏观杠杆。因此,政府在实施政策调控时,应注意市场预期的引导,在借助信心渠道强化房价调控政策效果的同时,也要关注信心对杠杆调控政策效果的干扰,并注意政策制定的连贯性与稳定性,以及财政货币政策的协调搭配。     

Monetary and fiscal policy under deep habits

Allowing habits to be formed at the level of individual goods – deep habits - can radically alter the fiscal policy transmission mechanism as the counter-cyclicality of mark-ups this implies can result in government spending crowding-in rather than crowding-out private consumption in the short run. We explore the robustness of this mechanism to the existence of price discrimination in the supply of goods to the public and private sectors. We then describe optimal monetary and fiscal policy in our New Keynesian economy subject to the additional externality of deep habits and explore the ability of simple policy rules to mimic fully optimal policy. We find that the presence of deep habits at empirically estimated levels can imply large externalities that significantly affect the conduct of monetary and tax policy. However, despite the rise in government spending multipliers implied by deep habits, government spending is barely used as a stabilisation tool under the optimal policy.     

解读从紧的货币政策

2007年12月中央经济工作会议提出,2008年要实施稳健的财政政策和从紧的货币政策。文中根据从紧的货币政策的背景及内容,分析央行采取的从紧货币政策措施,并指出在实行从紧货币政策中应注意的问题。     

ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF FISCAL POLICY AS AN INSTRUMENT OF MACROECONOMIC POLICY

This paper demonstrates that fiscal policy is an effective and essential instrument of stabilisation macroeconomic policy. This is particularly so if it is co-ordinated with monetary policy, especially in the current worldwide economic situation.     

The policy mix in the US and EMU: Evidence from a SVAR analysis

We use a SVAR approach to the effects of fiscal and monetary policies, as well as their interactions (policy mix) for the US and the Euro Area (EMU). Overall, our results show that these two cases are different from each other. First, while in the case of the US there is evidence of Keynesian monetary policy, the same is not true in the case of the EMU. Second, considering the effects of the global economic and financial crisis, there is evidence of non-Keynesian fiscal policy in the case of the EMU (expansionary fiscal consolidation), while it does not hold in the case of the US. Third, there is evidence supporting the traditional inverse relationship between monetary policy interest rates and inflation in the case of the US, whereas in the case of the EMU there is a price puzzle (frequent in SVAR studies). Fourth, the baseline model seems to be robust in the case of the US, when considering the effects of the economic and financial crisis 2007–2009, while the opposite holds in the case of the EMU. However, in both cases, the policies seem to act as complements. Another similarity appears when analysing the relationship between public spending and taxation, where there is evidence supporting a fiscal retrenchment.