装配式轻型房屋产品设计研究与实践

当前，装配式建筑迅速发展，采用装配式轻型房屋产品模式是提升新型建筑工业化发展水平的有效路径之一。文章探索了由全流程设计、协同设计团队和产品建造管理平台三要素构成的产品设计的实现路径，构建装配式轻型房屋产品系统结构，提出平台化设计策略和模块化设计、建造设计方法，进而展开六代装配式轻型房屋系列产品设计实践应用。该设计实现路径与设计方法可有效提高装配式轻型房屋产品质量、性能与制造建造效率，促进相关产业链的协同发展，推动传统建筑设计向新型建筑工业化模式转变。     

浅谈海洋工程中的模块化建造及质量管理控制

目前模块化建造在海洋工程设计和实践中得到应用,并且取得了较好的效果,模块化建造模式也在日益受到关注和认可。文章结合中海油海工项目实际情况,重点介绍了模块化建造在海洋工程中的应用,并结合近几年从事模块化建造积累的经验,从质量检验的角度对如何提高模块化建造中的质量控制水平提出了一些观点和意见。     

基于多Agent的供应链合作伙伴选择研究

为提高合作伙伴选择的效率和质量，将具有自治性的Agent应用于供应链的合作伙伴选择，提出了基于多Agent的合作伙伴选择系统的框架。该框架确定了多Agent合作伙伴选择过程，采用了基于规范的合同网协议作为协商协议，并确定了多Agent之间的交互作用方式。提出了基于效用函数的多Agent协商目标和Agent的决策模型。协商过程采用多轮协商模式，并采用了基于遗传算法的反报价。该方法能有效缩短供应链合作伙伴选择协商时间并能获取有效协商。     

基于BIM与精益建造的工程建设模式

随着信息技术的不断发展,以精益建造为指导思想,以BIM为手段,交互协调应用在工程项目管理活动中将会是建筑业以后发展的必经之路。论文通过分别对精益建造和建筑信息模型概念和特点的分析,提出了基于BIM和精益建造的工程建设模式。并且分析了如何在工厂建设管理中实现BIM与精益建造交互协同工作。最后提出了最适合"BIM与精益建造"共同发展应用的IPD模式。     

EPC工程总承包模式下对酒店项目的设计管理分析

在我国城市化迅猛发展的前提下，对于建筑工程项目的工程承包模式提出了全新的要求。EPC工程总承包模式相较于传统工程项目管理模式而言具备更高的应用优势，可有效降低工程建造成本，推动工程项目组织化发展进程。现如今EPC工程总承包模式在我国水利工程、电气功能以及土建工程等大型建筑项目中已获得较大的应用成效，并初步构建全新的项目管理机制。文章对EPC工程总承包模式下酒店项目设计管理的相关内容进行研究分析，旨在为我国EPC工程总承包项目设计管理工作开展提供参考。     

关于智能建造BIM技术的应用探索

智能建造是指在建造过程中充分利用物联网、大数据、BIM等智能技术和智能化系统，提高建造过程的智能化水平，减少对人的依赖，达到安全建造的目的，提高建筑的性价比和可靠性。随着建设项目的规模不断扩大和复杂度不断提高，技术难度和管理要求也日益增加，在数字化、智能化技术快速发展的背景下，BIM技术应用已成为智能建造的重要技术手段。     

基于遗传算法的4PL模式下物流合作伙伴选择研究

物流合作伙伴选择问题是4PL模式运作过程中的一个关键问题。在分析4PL模式下物流合作伙伴选择影响因素的基础上，结合第四方物流企业往往选择多个类型的多个物流企业结成合作伙伴关系的事实，提出了基于备选物流企业综合服务能力比较、按区域划分物流需求的4PL模式下物流合作伙伴选择问题的优化模型；运用遗传算法的基本原理，采用二进制编码、大种群尺度和较小交叉概率等方法，对该模型的算法进行了设计；最后给出一个典型算例，说明该模型和算法的有效性。     

PPP再生水项目合作伙伴的可拓评价研究

PPP模式能解决再生水回用项目资金短缺的问题,促进再生水项目的快速发展.选择合适的项目合作伙伴是PPP项目成功的重要环节.为有效评价潜在合作伙伴,选择合适的项目合作伙伴,在结合国内外PPP项目和再生水项目自身特点的基础上构建了潜在项目合作伙伴评价指标体系,应用可拓评价方法,建立项目合作伙伴物元评价模型,对合作伙伴进行可拓综合评价,优选项目合作伙伴.     

基于BIM技术的装配式建筑在绿色建造中的应用研究

在“双碳”目标背景下，装配式建筑凭借其良好的环境效益和社会效益，有效地推动了建筑工业化发展。采用BIM技术和绿色建造相结合的手段，真正实现建筑数字化和建造信息的集成化管理，可最大限度减少资源消耗，为绿色建造提供技术支持和保障。笔者通过对装配式建筑绿色建造的重难点进行分析，对建筑全生命周期（设计-生产-施工-运维）的BIM实施应用进行归纳总结，提出建筑工业化、建造数字化与绿色建造相结合的新型建造模式，以期推动我国装配式建筑可持续发展。     

基于合作关系的供应链信息共享模式研究

首先研究了供应链上下游合作伙伴间信息共享博弈情况，并分析了影响信息共享的障碍因素。然后，从合作伙伴合作关系的视角探讨了供成链中合作伙伴的类型及合作目的，最后以此为基础构建出供应链合作伙伴的信息共事模式及技术支撑体系。     

Partnering in the construction industry—Problems and opportunities

During recent years partnering has been on the top of the management agenda in the construction industry. Despite this attention there is limited and partly contradicting evidence of the impact of these efforts. The objective of this literature-based paper is to explore why it has been difficult to realise potential partnering benefits on the strategic level, while partnering in individual projects has improved construction performance. The analysis builds on a comparison of the features of business relationships in construction with the characteristics of so called ‘high-involvement relationships’ based on close cooperation. It is concluded that prevailing supply arrangements established to handle the particular conditions in the construction industry makes it unlikely for partnering to reach outside the individual project. Taking the step to strategic partnerships would require modification of some of the basic assumptions and norms of industry efficiency. On the basis of this analysis we explore potential consequences of modifications of current behaviour with respect to decentralisation and competitive tendering. The paper is finalised with a suggestion for a differentiated approach to partnering.     

Partnering relationships in construction: A literature review

There is no unified view as to what partnering relationships are in the construction industry. The purpose of this paper is to examine the literature in order to identify the main assumptions about partnering relationships in construction research and practice. The literature is compared to the Construction Industry Institute’s (CII, 1991) frequently cited definition of partnering as a long-term commitment between two or more parties in which shared understanding and trust develop for the benefits of improving construction. The literature review reveals a tendency to focus on project partnering in dyads between clients and contractors and there is also an emphasis on formal tools to develop these relationships, even if social aspects and relationship dynamics are recognised. The paper discusses these findings and suggests that, in order to increase the understanding of the substance and function of partnering relationships, it could be useful to incorporate knowledge from theoretical perspectives that are more in line with the CII definition. Two perspectives that seem particularly interesting in this respect are Supply Chain Management (SCM) and the Industrial Network Approach (INA), both of which focus on long-term relationships between actors beyond the dyad. INA also emphasises the informal aspects of relationship development. Incorporating these dimensions of partnering relationships requires processual and longitudinal studies, which are relatively rare in the contemporary partnering literature.     

An Inquiry to Move an Underutilized Best Practice Forward: Barriers to Partnering in the Architecture,Engineering, and Construction Industry

There is an obvious need in the architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) industry for improved project team integration through project delivery to ensure improved project outcomes. The literature reports that, among other methods, project partnering, when followed successfully, provides a great opportunity to improve project performance via improved collaboration among key project stakeholders (e.g., owner, designer, contractor) and reduce claims as a result while letting all project members stay in their traditional roles and work under any contractual framework, including design‐bid‐build. Despite its potential and history in the United States since the late 1980s and being classified as one of the best practices by the Construction Industry Institute in 1996, partnering continues to be underutilized. Existing research on partnering is mostly limited to public projects such as mega roadway and bridge projects. Guided by the literature, the aim of this research is to understand and report barriers to project partnering in the United States from both vertical/horizontal and public/private construction sectors. Via a comprehensive literature review, followed by a Delphi survey of partnering experts, this study systematically classified barriers to project partnering. In study results, implementation barriers to partnering during project delivery are more frequently pronounced than the barriers to its adoption. Of the top reported barriers to project partnering, the majority are cultural; project team related barriers show the greatest area of potential for improvement; and contrary to the literature, none is legislative. The study contributes to the body of knowledge by drawing attention to project delivery and management practices in the AEC industry to improve team collaboration and chances of successful implementation and adoption of integrative practices.     

试论中国文化对实施PARTNERING模式的影响

Partnering模式于20世纪80年代起源于美国,目前已经在美国、澳大利亚、日本、欧洲、新加坡以及中国香港的建筑界得到了广泛使用。业界人士普遍认可Partnering模式的优势,如:有利于改善项目参与各方之间的关系,有利于降低工程费用、缩短工期、提高工程质量、减少合同纠纷和诉讼方面,收益非常明显。从本质而言,Partnering模式是古老的“握手”式的商业模式,这种模式在全世界,特别是在东方获得广泛的应用。本文旨在讨论中国文化及其对实施Partne- ring模式的影响。研究结果表明,中国文化与Partnering模式的一些要素吻合,因此能够促进其在建筑界的实施。     

论绿色施工背景下的公路桥梁施工技术

绿色施工是当前世界建筑施工的发展方向,绿色施工技术(Green construction technology)是目前世界各国土木工程行业所面临的重要研究课题之一。近些年来,我国在绿色施工领域也作出了许多创新和发展。公路桥梁工程作为土木建筑工程中的重要组成部分,在绿色施工的背景下也应该研究和发展。本文将简要阐述公路桥梁工程中绿色施工理念的实施。     

基于单项Partnering模式的建设项目供应链

借鉴Partnering模式,将原有的供应链模刑进行完善,建立基于Partnering模式的建设供应链模型,从而改善业主、设计商、承包商的关系,使项目各参与方达到共同赢利的目的。     

The reluctance of construction purchasers towards project partnering

While the literature argues that there are several benefits for construction purchasers who join forces to co-develop the project with contractors and to increase cooperation between the various project stakeholders (construction partnering), little research has been done on the reasons for the lack of extensive diffusion of such methods in the construction industry. This paper aims at understanding the rationale behind the reluctance of construction purchasers for this coordination mechanism in France. In particular the paper investigates the impact of the characteristics of the project but also of the characteristics of the purchasing companies in their project procurement behaviour. The findings reveal that the characteristics of the purchasing companies in terms of purchasing strategy, structure and culture seem more explanatory of their procurement behaviour than of the project characteristics. The paper suggests that the lack of diffusion and understanding of construction partnering may be due to the resistance of purchasers who feel threatened by the structural changes it involves in their purchasing habits.     

建筑伙伴的机理与实施的研究

建筑伙伴是国际建设的先进管理模式之一,其理念与传统的设计－投标－建设模式不同,它不是从对立的角度去观察和解决问题,而是强调理解,合作和信任,已成为当前国际建筑管理和重要研究课题和实践之一。本文在分析,叙述伙伴产生背景的基础上,讨论建筑伙伴的创建,实施和成功机制。针对建筑项目的碎片性质,建立了一种基于“防护屏罩”概念和预防争端的协议体系,对现行建设伙伴架构进行了必要的补充,使建设伙伴更加充实和完善。     

Strategic Groups and Inter-Firm Networks In International High-Tech Industries

Strategic partnering and the analysis of strategic groups are two issues which enjoy a growing interest from industrial economists as well as from strategic management scholars. This contribution focuses on two related topics in the discussion on strategic group formation. the first subject addresses the relevance of strategic groups for understanding industry heterogeneity. the other topic covers the question whether companies from particular strategic groups establish strategic links with each other, or whether intra-group rivalry leads to inter-firm cooperation across strategic groups. Although it appears neglected in the literature the possible linking of the analysis of strategic groups with corporate network studies could generate further understanding of the process of strategic group formation. the present contribution focuses on the international information technology industry in order to study the possible symmetry of the structure of strategic group formation and parallel inter-firm networks of strategic partnering empirically.     

Collaboration in Multi-Partner R&D Projects: The Impact of Partnering Scale and Scope

How can firms design collaboration structures for effective performance in R&D projects that involve multiple partners? To address this question, we examine the theoretical underpinnings of collaboration structures in multi-partner R&D projects—i.e., the scale and the scope of partnering efforts. Partnering scale captures the extent of resource interdependencies between a firm and its partners; partnering scope captures both the breadth and depth of the interdependencies between a firm and its partners. Using primary data from 147 multi-partner R&D projects, we develop and test hypotheses that examine the impact of partnering scale and scope decisions on partnering performance. Results indicate that partnering scale has a curvilinear relationship with partnering performance. That is, intermediate levels of partnering scale are associated with higher partnering performance, compared to low or high levels of partnering scale. However, we also find that the nature of this relationship is moderated by the sub-dimensions of partnering scope. Specifically, increase in partnering breadth appears to magnify the negative effect of partnering scale on performance. In contrast, increase in partnering depth appears to overcome this negative effect, allowing firms to operate at higher levels of partnering scale. Taken together, these results highlight the importance of adopting a comprehensive approach to designing collaboration structures for multi-partner R&D projects.