西方新政治经济学述评

新政治经济学是一门使用经济分析工具进行政治学与经济学整合研究的新兴交叉学科,具有独特特征及创新意义。新政治经济学的理论体系具有一定的局限性;但它拓展了传统政治学和经济学的研究范围,并为正处于转型时期的中国改革实践提供了可资批判地借鉴的理论与方法。     

公共选择理论与交易成本政治学的比较分析

作为当代西方新政治经济学的重要组成部分,公共选择理论与交易成本政治学存在着共识,但是,兴起于公共选择理论之后的交易成本政治学增进了对政治领域的交易及制度的理解,弥补了公共选择理论的不足。换言之,交易成本政治学提高了对于政治世界的理解水平。通过对公共选择理论与交易成本政治学的比较分析,厘清二者之间的共识与差异,有助于辨析政治学和经济学整合发展的趋势。     

论公共选择与会计政策选择及其存在的关系

20世纪70年代兴起的公共选择理论（public choice theory）是政策研究的经济学途径的典型，它是一个应用经济学的理论假定和方法来研究非市场决策或公共决策问题的新的研究领域。因此，可以把公共选择理论看作一个政策科学学派，看作政治学和经济学的交叉研究领域。     

小议企业会计政策选择的理论趋势及其发展趋势

20世纪70年代兴起的公共选择理论（public choice theory）是政策研究的经济学途径的典型，它是一个应用经济学的理论假定和方法来研究非市场决策或公共决策问题的新的研究领域。因此，可以把公共选择理论看作一个政策科学学派，看作政治学和经济学的交叉研究领域。     

公共选择与会计政策选择博弈论

20世纪70年代兴起的公共选择理论（public choice theory）是政策研究的经济学途径的典型，它是一个应用经济学的理论假定和方法来研究非市场决策或公共决策问题的新的研究领域。因此，可以把公共选择理论看作一个政策科学学派，看作政治学和经济学的交叉研究领域。     

经济学中的制度分析与政治学中的制度主义

制度分析是现代社会科学的研究前沿。关于什么是制度,如何理解制度,制度如何产生、存续与变迁等基本理论问题的探讨不仅在经济学界引起了高度重视,而且在社会科学其他领域特别是政治学界也进行了大量研究。本文通过对近年来经济学与政治学领域制度研究最新进展的考察,探讨了制度的基本概念以及如何理解制度的问题。     

声誉理论及其近期进展——一种博弈论视角

近年来,经济学中的声誉理论(reputation theory)已经越来越受到人们的普遍关注,在一些主流经济学刊物中该理论甚至被称为声誉经济学(economicsof reputation)。从20世纪80年代以来,声誉理论不仅在模型及研究方法上日臻成熟,而且在一些其他社会科学领域(如政治学、社会学等领域)中的成功应用,使得它正成为经济学乃至一些其它社会科学研究中强有力的一种分析方法和分析工具。     

“经济人”模式在政治学中的再现

公共选择理论把传统的相互隔离开的经济市场和政治市场统一起来,用经济人假定这一经济学的分析方法来研究政治学,打破了西方主流经济学分析政治问题时的传统观念。本文着重讨论经济人假定的分析在政治学中的应用,阐述政治学中的“经济人”模式。     

"经济人"模式在政治学中的再现

公共选择理论把传统的相互隔离开的经济市场和政治市场统一起来,用经济人假定这一经济学的分析方法来研究政治学,打破了西方主流经济学分析政治问题时的传统观念.本文着重讨论经济人假定的分析在政治学中的应用,阐述政治学中的"经济人"模式.     

基于新农村建设的农民合作研究:国内一个文献综述

文章从农民合作的定义、类型及必然性;农民的合作意愿及合作能力;培育和促进农民合作的模式与路径;政府与农民合作关系四个方面对当前国内农民合作的研究进行了综述,并做了简要评价,认为从研究视角看,应该放开视野,综合经济学、政治学、社会学等学科的理论方法,进行跨学科研究;从研究内容看,关于农民合作相关机制的研究、农民合作在新农村建设的作用将是今后较长一段时期的主要研究内容;从研究方法上看,新制度经济学的交易成本理论、产权理论以及俱乐部产品理论、集体行动的逻辑和博弈论方法应当是今后的研究方向。     

Why feminist,Marxist, and anti-racist economists should be feminist–Marxist–anti-racist economists

This paper argues for a feminist–Marxist–anti-racist economics. First, it puts forward a set of central defining features of Marxian economics. Then it argues that feminist and anti-racist economists need to work within the Marxist theoretical framework in order to realize their feminist and anti-racist goals. Next it argues that feminist economists should also be anti-racist. Finally, it argues that Marxist economists need to incorporate feminism and anti-racism into their theory and politics if they are to understand the dynamics of capitalism and adequately envision and advocate for a liberatory socialist alternative.     

Is UK economics teaching changing? Evaluating the new subject benchmark statement

This paper evaluates the recent reform to the curricular governance framework for UK Economics teaching: the revised Subject Benchmark Statement document for Economics (SBSE). The crisis of confidence in economics which was amplified by the global financial crisis presented an opportunity for fundamental change in economics teaching. The paper asks whether the new SBSE represents change. We ask whether the new SBSE is pluralist with regard to economic theory and method; how it treats the economy and its wider socio-political dimension; what are its educational goals and approach; and overall, how much change has it brought? The paper concludes that the new SBSE does not constitute change: it still exhibits limited pluralism, ignores ethics, power and politics and ignores key educational goals.     

Political Economy*

The term 'political economy' has a long and curious history, from its 17th-century meaning of statecraft to the classical economists' use of it for what later came to be called economics and its recent appropriation by neo-Marxists for social theory which, in contrast to 'orthodox' economics, goes into history, politics and sociology, focuses on power relationships and combines positive analysis with advocacy. This article points out that there are now at least two schools of political economy in this tatter sense, the neo-Marxist and the 'Chicago' school. The concluding section distinguishes sensible and not so sensible uses of the term.     

Behavioral political economy: A survey

In explaining individual behavior in politics, economists should rely on the same motivational assumptions they use to explain behavior in the market: that is what Political Economy, understood as the application of economics to the study of political processes, is all about. In its standard variant, individuals who play the game of politics should also be considered rational and self-interested, unlike the benevolent despot of traditional welfare economics. History repeats itself with the rise of behavioral economics: Assuming cognitive biases to be present in the market, but not in politics, behavioral economists often call for government to intervene in a “benevolent” way. Recently, however, political economists have started to apply behavioral economics insights to the study of political processes, thereby re-establishing a unified methodology. This paper surveys the current state of the emerging field of “behavioral political economy” and considers the scope for further research.     

James M. Buchanan: An appreciation

James M. Buchanan co-founded the field of Public Choice. He was influenced by Austrian economics, and in turn influenced Austrian economics. In particular, he advanced the understanding of subjectivist cost theory. His individualist approach to public policy making has been adopted by many Austrian economists. With Richard Wagner, he analyzed the politics of Keynesian economics. They explained why Keynesianism in practice led to a larger government, permanent deficits and inflationary monetary policy.     

马克思经济危机理论及其在当代的发展

马克思经济危机理论是马克思主义经济学说的重要组成部分,是研究自由资本主义现实经济危机的产物,它将随着经济危机实践的发展而不断发展。对马克思经济危机理论在当代发展的研究,具有重要的理论意义。     

Political Learning: The Neglected Precondition of Constitutional Reform

This paper analyses the claim of constitutional economics that liberal economic policy requires far-reaching constitutional reform. The paper starts with a restatement of this claim and reinforces the rationale of the currently most influential variants of constitutional economics as represented by contractarian constitutional economics (Brennan, Buchanan), on the one hand, and Hayek s evolutionary theory, on the other. However, these constitutional proposals have shortcomings because the institutional preconditions of constitutional reform are not sufficiently reflected. Instead, I argue that, in face of economic crisis, a revision of in-period politics requires no more collective rationality than constitutional reform does. As a consequence, the introduction of new constitutional rules depends on political learning. The article concludes that constitutional rules in the sense of CPE can stabilise political learning but they cannot replace it.     

实验经济学的兴起与公共产品理论的发展

实验经济学是经济学的一个新的分支,其研究内容主要包括个人决策、市场交易、博弈论、学习理论和方法论。它的兴起对公共财政论的核心理论——公共产品理论产生了影响,加深了搭便车问题的研究,对如何有效提供公共产品从实验角度给出了有益的启示,推动了公共产品理论的研究。     

Black Education: Myths and Tragedies

This article explores elements of apologetics in conventional economics. It argues that much of the latter is apologetics in the form of the ideology or utopia of laissez-faire, and many of its representatives are apologists of the latter. The article first examines instances of unconditional laissez-faire apologetics and extreme apologists. Then it presents cases of qualified laissez-faire apologetics and moderate apologists. Lastly, it identifies some examples of laissez-faire non- and anti-apologetics and critics expressing discontent with apologetic economics. The article aims to contribute to a fuller understanding of the relationship between economics and social science overall and ideology, politics, and related non-scientific elements.