国外个人所得税纳税申报的比较及对我国的借鉴

研究我国个人所得税自行申报制度,应当同时研究国外个人所得税的自行申报制度,进行个人所得税自行申报制度的比较研究。本文通过分析各国在个人所得税自行申报上的不同法律规制,总结制度上的共同优点,对我国可以起到借鉴作用。     

完善我国个人所得税自行申报制度的思考

2006年11月6日《个人所得税自行纳税申报办法（试行）》颁布,使一直以来形同虚设的个人所得税自行申报制度终于有了规制,但《个人所得税自行纳税申报办法（试行）》还存在不尽如人意之处。本文从我国现状入手,提出自行申报在税收征管领域的完善思路,即加强申报管理要有效控制纳税人税源,增设申报激励措施,加大违法申报的处罚力度,强化税收申报服务。     

论个税自行申报——导引价值、制度障碍与对策

个税自行申报具有培育纳税人权利与责任意识、收集纳税人信息,有效监控税源和倒逼税制改革等导引价值。然而,现行个人所得税制的分类征收方法、"一刀切"扣除项目以及完税凭证协查机制等与个税自行申报存在诸多矛盾,这是个税自行申报元年遇冷的根本原因。因此,应把个税税制改革作为个税自行申报有效运行的突破口。     

个税自行申报将给我们带来什么

从表面看,个人所得税自行申报的实施,只不过是纳税人向税务部门报送收入信息或税务部门采集纳税人收入信息的渠道增加了一条:由以往代扣代缴的“单一”渠道变为代扣代缴加自行申报的“双重”渠道。然而,透过表面现象而深入到它的实质内容,人们便会发现,个人所得税的自行申报有着十分深刻的意义。     

完善我国个人所得税自行申报制度的再思考

我国个人所得税目前受到越来越多的重视，2006年11月6日《个人所得税自行纳税申报办法（试行）》的颁布，人们的焦点又一次集中到了高收入群体上。自行申报一时间成为点击率和话语出现率最高的词语。能够引起社会的如此关注，不仅仅是因为一直以来形同虚设的个人所得税自行申报制度终于有了新规制，更多的在于《个人所得税自行纳税申报办法（试行）》还存在不尽如人意之处。在提出税收监管制度完善措施的基础上，本文进一步提出自行申报在税收立法和税制要素方面的完善思路，即完善税收立法和完善税制要素．     

将给我们带来什么个税自行申报

从表面看，个人所得税自行申报的实施，只不过是纳税人向税务部门报送收入信息或税务部门采集纳税人收入信息的渠道增加了一条：由以往代扣代缴的“单一”渠道变为代扣代缴加自行申报的“双重”渠道。然而，透过表面现象而深入到它的实质内容，人们便会发现，个人所得税的自行申报有着十分深刻的意义。     

国税总局：股票转让暂不征个人所得税

1月1日，《个人所得税自行纳税申报办法（试行）》开始正式实施。国家税务总局去年12月15日发布的《关于明确年所得12万元以上自行纳税申报口径的通知》明确了股票转让所得的自行申报标准，有人因此开始担心国家将对股票转让所得恢复征收个人所得税。国家税务总局有关负责人日前明确表示，对于年所得12万元以上的纳税人而言，虽然其取得的股票转让所得需进行自行申报，但对这部分股票转让收入仍不征收个人所得税。     

个人所得税自行申报制约因素分析与对策建议

本文针对个人所得税自行申报的数字统计结果及申报对象仍以工薪阶层为主的现象,从国人的藏富心理、税源信息的对称性、税收负担的公平性、税收用途的透明性等方面对制约个人所得税自行申报的因素进行了分析,并在此基础上提出了建立完善的纳税人档案体系、改革现行税收体制,强调税负公平、增强纳税责任感和自豪感、预防纳税人心理不平衡等对策建议.     

我国个人所得税自行纳税申报制度中存在的问题及建议

在我国目前情况下,个人所得税自行申报出现一些问题是难以避免的,而且这些问题也不可能一次性地或在短时期内加以解决。因此,需要不断完善自行申报纳税的制度和依法构建有利于促进纳税人依法申报纳税的社会氛围。     

个税自行申报实施困难的原因探析

高收入者自行申报纳税是我国个人所得税改革的重要举措,保证这一政策的贯彻落实意义重大。但从实际执行情况看,个税自行申报在很多地方遭遇尴尬,自行申报纳税面临实施困难。本文以美国为例,从多个角度分析了导致个税申报率低下的原因。并在此基础上提出了从理清申报渠道、提高申报兴趣、加大处罚力度、加快个税改革等方面提高个税申报率的基本思路。     

Health, Wealth, Fertility, Education, and Inequality

The authors use a new cross-country dataset to estimate the strength of the links between different dimensions of social and economic development, including indicators of health, fertility, and education, as well as material wellbeing. This differs from previous studies in employing data for different income groups in each country in order to provide direct evidence on factors driving inequality, and in using a unique measure of material wellbeing that does not rely on PPP comparisons.     

Inflation,money, interest rate,exchange rate,and casuality: the case of Egypt,Morocco, and Tunisia

This study provides further evidence of the inflationary efects of the rates of growth of money supply, gross domestic product, efective exchange rate, and imported inflation for Egypt, Morocco, and Tunisia using quarterly data from 1964 to 1990. In addition, it examines the Granger causality between inflation and money supply as well as between inflation and the real exchange rate in the countries under consideration. Most of the results are consistent with extant theory and empirical evidence.     

IPR,Trade, FDI,and Technology Transfer

In this survey, we discuss how intellectual property rights （IPR） protection in the South affects trade flows, foreign direct investment （FDI） flows, and technology transfers from the North to the South. We also discuss optimal IPR policies and their effect on innovation. Our discussion covers both theoretical studies and empirical evidence. This survey is both comprehensive and critical. It aims to give readers the current state of IPR and globalization literature. Some issues have been studied more thoroughly, whereas for others the surface has only been scratched upon. This survey gives readers a clearer picture of the literature and may help them find future research topics.     

Trade,Remittances, Institutions,and Economic Growth

This paper empirically investigates the role of trade, remittances, and institutions in economic development in a large sample of developing countries using recently developed instruments for all these variables. Both cross-country (over 30 years) and dynamic panel data (over 5-year periods) regressions of growth rates on instrumented trade, remittances, and institutions provide evidence of a significant impact of trade, institutions, and remittances on growth. While institutions foster growth, remittances hamper it. The effect of trade on growth is positive in cross-sectional regressions but ambiguous in dynamic panel data regressions. These results are indicative of a more important role for trade in explaining growth in the very long run compared with over shorter horizons.