公安院校贫困生心身健康问题与教育策略探析

随着高等教育制度改革和社会经济体制转型的日益深化,社会各界越来越关注贫困大学生问题。随着我国高校学生数量的迅速增长,高校贫困大学生的人数也相应增加。与其他同学相比,贫困大学生承受巨大的精神压力和学习压力外,还要承受较大的经济压力,在多重压力的打压下,贫困大学生或多或少都出现了一定程度的心理问题,严重影响到了其身心健康发展和学业的顺利完成。本文首先分析了公安院校贫困生存在的主要心理问题及原因,同时,就南京森林警察学院加强贫困生心身健康教育措施进行探析     

高校贫困大学生心理问题研究

家庭经济贫困大学生是高校大学生群体中的一个特殊群体,由于直面竞争和经济贫困的心理压力,贫困大学生已经成了高校大学生心理病变的"高发群体"之一,加强对这一群体心理问题的研究,有的放矢地对其进行心理健康教育,是新时期摆在各个高校尤其是高校辅导员群体面前的一个紧迫的现实问题.     

高校贫困生心理健康的教育管理

贫困生是高校学生的一个特殊群体,近年来,贫困生数量呈明显的上升趋势,其心理问题日益突出。文章通过调查高校贫困学生最易表现出的心理问题,找出其根本原因,提出要有的放矢地针对问题原因,采取正确的教育管理对策,来解决高校贫困大学生心理问题。     

民办高校大学生心理健康状况研究及方法探讨

调查研究民办高校大学生心理健康状况,比较与探讨民办高校大学生与普通高校大学生心理健康状况的异同。得出结论：民办高校大学生心理健康水平与普通高校大学生基本持平,但影响民办高校大学生的心理障碍成因主要在于家庭贫困、心理落差等;而公办高校大学生的心理问题更多是由于学业方面的压力,同时对如何提高民办高校辅导员的心理健康教育工作水平提出建议。     

贫困大学生心理健康问题成因及对策研究

作为高校中的弱势群体,贫困大学生不仅承受着经济压力,也更容易产生心理健康问题.本文主要分析了影响贫困大学生心理健康的主要因素,并在此基础上探讨促进高校贫困生心理健康发展的对策.     

库区高职院校贫困生心理特点及心理健康教育探析

库区高职院校贫困生是一个弱势群体,他们不仅经济上贫困,而且存在诸多心理问题,由此导致心理贫困.本文对贫困大学生存在的心理特点及成因进行了探讨,并提出了加强贫困生心理教育的对策.     

浅谈高校贫困生资助问题

国家给与在校大学生的资助给贫困生送来了福音，不仅减轻了贫困家庭的负担，而且还为贫困生顺利完成学业提供了保障。但是，高校贫困资助体制仍然存在一系列的问题，同时，资助给贫困生的心理也带来了一些负面影响；如何完善高校贫困资助体制以及消除贫困生心理负担成为从根本上解决贫困生。读书难”这一问题的关键，从而可以更好地促进在校大学生顺利完成学业以及高校的稳定发展。本文通过以下四个方面探讨了如何做好高校贫困资助工作。     

高校贫困生状况的调查分析及对策

高校贫困生问题是当前中国高等教育改革中的一个突出问题。高校贫困生工作的好坏,直接关系到教育公平、以人为本实现,关系到和谐校园和和谐社会的构建。本文在对沈阳医学院贫困生调查的基础上,对贫困生对贫困的主观看法、贫困生结构、贫困成因、贫困生的思想状态等方面进行了分析,并从政策导向、社会支持、心理扶持、职业生涯规划与指导体系构建等方面提出对策。     

高校学生“心理贫困”研究综述

当前高校学生心理贫困问题不容忽视,由于物质和精神的双重贫困,导致高校贫困生的心理问题十分突出。当前很多学者在这个问题上已有相关研究,文章对其综述,并对该问题阐述具体观点。     

贵州省黔南州高校贫困大学生资助工作的分析研究

通过对黔南州三所高校的贫困大学生资助中心进行走访调查,研究分析了黔南州各高校在贫困大学生的资助项目、人数及金额、贫困生评选办法、勤工助学、学生贷款等工作的特点和基本状况,并对未来贫困生资助工作提出了一些建议.     

The impact of cost on the choice of university: evidence from Ontario

Abstract. This paper provides the first Canadian study of the link between cost to the student and the choice of university. Over the past two decades, there has been a substantial increase in the differences among Ontario universities in ‘net cost’ defined as tuition and fees minus the expected value to an academically strong student of a guaranteed merit scholarship. Our estimates generally indicate no relationship between net cost and the overall share of strong applicants that a university is able to attract. An increase in net cost is associated with an increase in the ratio of strong students from high‐income neighbourhoods to strong students from middle‐income and low‐income neighbourhoods in Arts and Science programs but not in Commerce and Engineering. Finally, more advantaged students are more likely to attend university, but merit aid is not of disproportionate benefit to those from more economically advantaged backgrounds, given registration. JEL classification: Health Education and Welfare     

Tuition fees and social segregation: lessons from a natural experiment at the University of Paris 9-Dauphine

Using a natural experiment, a sharp rise in tuition fees in some of the programmes at the University of Paris 9-Dauphine, we study the impact of tuition fees on students’ pathways, and outcomes. We apply an optimal matching method to the national database of students’ registrations (SISE) to define a typology of pathways. We then use a nonordered multinomial logit model to evaluate the impact of the rise in tuition fees on the types of pathways selected by the university. We show that there is a significant impact on these pathways. The increase in tuition fees reduces geographic and social mobility, thereby accentuating the phenomena of social segregation. Furthermore, contrary to what some of the studies assert, the rise does not appear to encourage greater effort: we find no impact on the graduation success rate.     

The determination of public tuition fees in a mixed education system: A majority voting model

We study the determination of public tuition fees through majority voting in a vertical differentiation model where agents' returns on educational investment differ and public and private universities coexist and compete in tuition fees. The private university offers higher educational quality than its competitor, incurring higher unit cost per trained student. The tuition fee for the state university is fixed by majority voting while that for the private follows from profit maximization. Then agents choose to train at the public university or the private one or to remain uneducated. The tax per head adjusts in order to balance the state budget. Because there is a private alternative, preferences for education are not single‐peaked and no single‐crossing condition holds. An equilibrium is shown to exist, which is one of three types: high tuition fee (the “ends” are a majority), low tuition fee (the “middle” is a majority), or mixed (votes tie). The cost structure determines which equilibrium obtains. The equilibrium tuition is either greater (majority at the ends) or smaller (majority at the middle) than the optimal one.     

高校收费标准与我国居民的支付能力

我国当前高等学校的收费问题,是一个颇受关注的社会问题。就收费标准而言,超过了绝大多数居民的负担能力。为此,提出以下改革建议:科学计算高校运营成本,以人均可支配收入为依据,重新审定并适当降低收费标准,采用略有差别的收费标准,城镇居民不多收,农村学生要少收。     

University fees and the demand for STEM degrees

The 2006 increase in university tuition in the UK was followed by a 3–4% reduction in the proportion of students choosing STEM degrees, due either to a change in the composition of students, or to similar students selecting away from STEM subjects. This article tests the latter hypothesis, estimating the effect of the fees for comparable students using propensity score matching on a rich set of covariates. Results suggest that the change was entirely driven by compositional changes.     

Scholarships or Student Loans? Subsidizing Higher Education in the Presence of Moral Hazard

An income-contingent loan scheme can at best replicate the allocation brought about by a scholarship scheme financed by a graduate tax, and only on condition that there is nothing to stop the policy maker from using tuition fees as if they were taxes. If that is not possible, even the best loan scheme will exclude some well-qualified school leaver from university. Even if individual study effort is observable, but more so if it is not, it is not socially desirable that all students should specialize in the subjects that promise the highest graduate earnings.     

基于层次分析法的高等学校学费模型研究

本文分析了影响高等学校学费的众多因素,确定出生均拨款、培养费用、家庭收入和社会资助这四个主要的影响因素,并且基于层次分析法建立了影响因素之间的层次模型。通过构造出成对比较判断矩阵,对矩阵结果进行归一化处理、层次单排序及一致性检验,得到高校学费影响因素在影响程度上的排序,GDP、地区、学校类型和专业对学费的影响较大,而人员经费、设施折旧费和社会资助对学费影响较小。本文结合搜集整理的高校学费标准的相关数据,建立学费的预测模型,对学费标准进行了定量分析。结果表明：2010年学费有所增加,平均学费基本稳于4500元左右,且艺术专业学费最高。     

State appropriations and undergraduate borrowing: more debt,less money

When state appropriations decrease, public universities respond by raising tuition. Students borrow more in response to both tuition increases and appropriation cuts. This article investigates the feedback of how borrowing and tuition influence state appropriations. Using a panel data set of 450 four-year public universities from 1999 to 2012, we employ three-stage least squares techniques to control for the endogeneity between state appropriations, tuition and student borrowing. There is evidence that state policy-makers respond to increases in university tuition and student borrowing by decreasing future appropriation levels. After controlling for the effect of appropriations on tuition and borrowing, a one-dollar increase in student borrowing reduces state appropriations per student by $0.06, and a one-dollar increase in tuition results in a decrease of $0.45 in state appropriations per student. When universities increase tuition for reasons other than a reduction in state appropriations, policy-makers respond with a significant cut in future appropriations which could signal an incentive strategy.     

Tuition fees and equality of university enrolment

Abstract .  The relationship between tuition fee changes and the university enrolment of youth by parental income group in Canada is investigated. Comparisons between youth from Canadian provinces that increased tuition fees sharply in the 1990s and youth from provinces that instituted fee freezes were integral to identifying the relationship. Tuition fee increases coincided with reductions in the university enrolment of low-income youth, but with significantly smaller changes in the university enrolment of other youth. The relationships between government funding of universities and cohort size and university enrolments are also analyzed.     

Distributing Student Places in Australian Higher Education

Higher education systems need policies for distributing student places between higher education providers, courses and students. In supply‐driven systems, government and university decisions dominate. In demand‐driven systems, student choices play a larger role. Over the last 35 years Australia has moved from a supply‐driven to a largely demand‐driven university system and then partly back again. When students pay their own costs, both major political parties have supported market distribution of student places for decades. But for subsidised student places there is policy instability, due to fluctuating priorities for containing public expenditure and responding to demographic and labour market changes.