战略知识产权管理形态结构及实施体系研究

形态是基于系统论视角研究组织系统结构,探讨一般结构及理想结构的理论与方法。战略知识产权管理的一般形态是由战略知识产权理念、战略知识产权规划、战略知识产权管理核心职能和战略知识产权管理平台等要素构成的有机系统,可用“6P”框架进行进一步描述和分析。战略知识产权管理的理想形态可用“三全一协同”来概括。战略知识产权管理的实施策略是“构建体系,战略引领与推动,协同融合,职能创新,策略应对”,具体实施方法包括优化投入、培育知识产权文化、培养价值观念和行为规范等。     

中国跨国经营企业如何从知识产权资产管理中获益更多

在中国企业跨国经营快速发展过程中,知识产权资产的保护和管理已经成为中国企业开拓国际市场的一个重要影响因素。中国跨国经营企业必须结合自身的国际化进程,在企业知识产权文化形成、知识产权保护体系建立、知识产权保护与利用结合、知识产权信息管理等方面作出战略高度的规划,而在专利、商业秘密、商标、版权等具体保护策略上,应针对企业所处行业、技术特点和企业跨国经营战略进行设计。     

我国企业国际化经营知识产权战略系统评价研究

企业国际化经营知识产权战略系统绩效评价,对科学测度企业国际化经营知识产权战略系统的有效性具有重要意义。结合我国企业国际化经营实际,从系统输入因素、转换因素、输出因素3个方面建立了由7个一级指标、26个二级指标、37个三级指标构成的评价指标体系,将层次分析法和模糊综合判断法相结合,对企业国际化经营知识产权战略系统绩效做出综合评判,并从宏观与微观两方面提出了若干建议。     

内蒙古企业创新特点及知识产权战略模式选择

企业知识产权战略是国家知识产权战略的基础和主要组成部分.随着社会主义市场经济体制的完善,企业竞争优势不仅体现在资本、管理和人才等方面,更来自于掌握核心技术和拥有自主知识产权.     

企业知识产权战略研究综述

知识产权战略在国外的研究与实施已有几十年的历史。如美国、日本、韩国非常注重视知识产权战略的研究和运用,使知识在经济增长中所占的比重达到70%以上,知识产权战略取得了很大的成功。我国于2005年1月成立了国家知识产权战略制定领导小组,2006年底即将启动国家知识产权战略计划。文章主要对国内外企业知识产权战略相关研究进行综述,以期能对我国企业知识产权战略的理论和实践有所启迪。一、国外企业知识产权战略研究知识产权战略主要包括知识产权的创造、保护和利用等几个方面。在Rom er(1990)研究的基础上,经济学家探究了知识产权保护在…     

试论传统会计的局限性及其改革方向

企业是一个有机的系统，其内容包含着许多不同层次以及具有不同功能的子系统。根据系统论研究的成果，企业作为一个系统得以有效发挥作用的前提是其内部各个子系统能够与企业这个总系统相互合作、协调利益和活动，并且必须服从总系统的统一要求。但是，作为一个有机的系统，企业总是处于动态的发展过程中，其内容的子系统因具有个体利益、     

地区知识产权形象评价研究

在国家知识产权战略纲要统领下,各地纷纷出台新政,力推自主知识产权战略,并取得一定成效。在各地知识产权战略实施过程中,一个重要问题被忽略了,即对地区知识产权形象进行研究与建设,从而导致某些地区知识产权实力富裕与知识产权形象贫困同时并存的现象。地区知识产权形象与地区知识产权战略之间既相互依存、相互独立,又相互依赖、相互促进。而科学地评价地区知识产权形象是设计和塑造地区知识产权形象的前提与基础。它涉及到评价主体、评价客体、评价指标和评价方法界定等问题。     

城市专利战略基本概念探析

一、城市专利战略的定义 1．城市专利战略的主体。吴汉东教授曾撰文指出：知识产权战略从主体的角度看,可以包括国家知识产权战略、地区知识产权战略、行业知识产权战略、企业知识产权战略四个方面。吴教授提到的地区知识产权战略对我们定义城市知识产权战略有很好的借鉴作用。作者认为在城市专利战略首先是地区知识产权战略的一部分,其次,城市专利战略的主体应当是城市所在的人民政府。     

企业知识产权战略与创新能力动态匹配

企业无论创新能力强或弱,都要注意运用知识产权战略推动自主创新,而且要根据创新能力的强弱,选择适当的知识产权战略.首先,分析了自主创新与知识产权战略的关系;接着,以跨国公司知识产权战略为例,构建企业知识产权战略和创新能力的动态匹配矩阵,并归纳企业实施的知识产权战略模式及适用条件;最后,提出我国企业现阶段实施知识产权战略的具体建议.     

企业知识产权战略实施中高层领导特征及其影响:基于科技人员满意度的视角

采取问卷调查、因子分析及多元回归等规范分析方法,从企业科技人员满意度的角度,对企业知识产权战略实施过程中高层领导特征及其对企业知识产权战略实施的影响等进行了实证分析。得出如下主要结论:在企业知识产权战略实施过程中,可将高层领导的特征概括为对内综合管理能力、对外及应急管理能力、知识产权专业意识和能力以及基本思想道德素养4个维度,其中对内综合管理能力是核心变量,而其他3个特征变量处于次要的同等地位;资源整合能力是众多高层领导心理和行为变量中的核心变量。最后,结合中国实际,给出了若干规范性政策性建议。     

基于国家知识产权战略的广西知识产权现状分析

2008年6月5日《国家知识产权战略纲要》正式发布,其中明确提出到2020年把中国建设成为知识产权创造、运用、保护和管理水平较高的国家奋斗目标[1]。此后的几年广西知识产权取得了较大的发展,但相对于经济较为发达的省市,广西知识产权的总体发展水平还较为落后,存在不少困难和问题。在对广西知识产权现状进行调查的基础上,分析广西知识产权发展存在的主要问题和影响因素,以及面临新的机遇和挑战。并由此提出广西知识产权发展战略及对策。     

南方最优知识产权保护水平与南方企业自主创新

构建了一个扩展的南北贸易模型,讨论了南方知识产权保护的决定因素及其对南北双方福利的影响。在模型中,南方政府内生决定知识产权保护水平,北方厂商内生决定研发投资水平和市场竞争策略,南方厂商内生决定自主创新或模仿。研究发现:南方的最优知识产权保护水平与北方存在差异;当南方厂商模仿北方厂商的技术时,南方执行最严格的知识产权保护对北方福利和南方福利都造成损害;当南方厂商的创新效率较高时,严格的知识产权保护能激励南方厂商进行自主创新、改善南方福利。     

知识产权保护、FDI与国际收入转移

"加强知识产权保护能吸引更多外商直接投资(FDI),并能使后发国受益"这一命题能否构成支持加强后发国知识产权保护的论据?文章将知识产权保护对FDI、自主创新、国内模仿和国外模仿的影响纳入三方参与的两阶段动态博弈模型,讨论后发国通过加强知识产权保护来吸引FDI的政策效应。分析认为后发国通过加强知识产权保护能吸引更多FDI,但并不一定能从中获益。因为:FDI偏向进入能够对后发国产生最小收益的产业;加强知识产权保护产生了大量国际收入转移;通过加强知识产权保护,由FDI进入新行业而增加的利润将被已有FDI产业利润的减少所抵消。根据各行业特征选择相应的最优知识产权保护才能使总体福利最大化。     

Enforcement of Intellectual Property,Pollution Abatement,and Directed Technical Change

We theoretically investigate the interaction between endogenous enforcement of intellectual property rights (IPRs) and tax-financed pollution abatement measures. IPRs affect dirty and clean intermediates alike such that higher IPR enforcement may promote the transition to the clean technology, if this technology is productive enough. If the green technology is relatively unproductive, higher IPRs promote the dirty technology while pollution is increasing. As households are due to subsistence consumption subject to a hierarchy of needs, the level of IPR enforcement as well as the level of abatement measures depends on the state of technology and is increasing during economic development. Thus, if the incentive to enforce IPRs is low the level of abatement measures is also low. This argument provides a theoretical foundation for the observed clash of interests in international negotiation rounds regarding the harmonization of IPR protection and actions to combat climate change.     

Innovation,Imitation and Intellectual Property Rights in Developing Countries

This paper sets up a vertically related market model in which imitation and innovation are endogenously determined to study the impact of intellectual property rights (IPR) protection on less‐developed countries. It shows how a less‐developed country switches from imitation to innovation as it develops. It is also found that the relationship between IPR protection and economic development is U ‐shaped. The IPR protection tends to go down and then go up as income rises. This finding also conforms with that in the empirical literature on IPR protection.     

DO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS MATTER TO TAIWAN'S EXPORTS? A DYNAMIC PANEL APPROACH

This article analyses whether and how Taiwan's exports are sensitive to national differences in intellectual property right (IPR) protection, as well as the degree of imitation threat. Applying a longitudinal IPR index developed by the World Economic Forum (WEF) and using the generalized method of moments dynamic panel data modelling technique to control for endogeneity and panel unit root problems, the empirical results show that the strength of importing countries' IPR protection has a positive impact on Taiwan's exports, supporting the standpoint of market expansion that stronger IPR protection will induce more trade. Under various classification systems to differentiate the degree of threat of imitation across countries, both positive and negative export effects of IPR are found in Taiwan's case. However, the pattern of threat of imitation–trade nexus seems to contradict theory predictions. Moreover, high‐tech exports are found be more IPR sensitive than non‐high‐tech exports.     

Heterogeneity of southern countries and southern intellectual property rights policy

Abstract.  We develop a model with one innovating northern firm and heterogeneous southern firms that compete in a final product market. We assume southern firms differ in their ability to adapt technology and study southern incentives to protect intellectual property rights. We find that, in a non-cooperative equilibrium, governments resist IPR protection, but collectively southern countries benefit from some protection. We show that, in general, countries with more efficient firms prefer higher collective IPR protection than those with less efficient firms. Given the aggregate level of IPR protection, it is more efficient if the more efficient countries have weaker IPR protection.     

SUSTAINING THE GOOSE THAT LAYS THE GOLDEN EGG: A CONTINUOUS TREATMENT OF TECHNOLOGICAL TRANSFER

This paper proposes a simple model of the trade-offs perceived by innovating firms when investing in countries with limited intellectual property rights (IPR). The model allows for a continuous treatment of technology transfer and production cost gains occurring through FDI. While it does not consider possible changes in rates of innovation caused by changes in IPR in developing countries, it allows one to uncover a potentially non-monotonic relationship between welfare and IPR in the recipient country.     

Intellectual property rights and diaspora knowledge networks: Can patent protection generate brain gain from skilled migration?

This paper studies the mechanism through which intellectual property rights (IPR) protection can influence the impact of skilled migration on innovation activities in developing countries. We argue that knowledge acquired by emigrants abroad can flow back to their country of origin through diaspora networks. IPR protection in the sending country facilitates this channel by increasing returns to skills and encouraging workers to move into the innovation sector. An expansion of the innovation sector allows diaspora knowledge to be absorbed by a larger range of workers. Strong IPR enforcement therefore makes it more likely for brain drain to be transformed into brain gain.     

Intellectual Property Rights and Economic Growth

Interest in links between protection of intellectual property and growth has been revived by developments in new growth theory and by the WTO’s TRIPS Agreement. The relationship between the strength of a country’s intellectual property rights (IPRs) regime and rate of growth is ambiguous from a theoretical standpoint, reflecting the variety of channels through which technology can be acquired and their differing importance at different stages of development. We investigate the impact of IPR protection on economic growth in a panel of 79 countries using threshold regression analysis. We show that whilst the effect of IPR protection on growth depends upon the level of development, it is positively and significantly related to growth for low‐ and high‐income countries, but not for middle‐income countries. This suggests that, although IPR protection encourages innovation in high‐income countries, and technology flows to low‐income countries, middle‐income countries may have offsetting losses from reduced scope for imitation.