首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 140 毫秒
1.
金融危机后,全球主要资本市场相继推出相应立法,如美国的《多德-弗兰克法案》、欧盟的《欧洲市场基础设施条例》等;同时新设或改革原有监管机构,调整多层次资本市场体系,以及通过建立交易报告库等市场基础设施加强对场外衍生品市场的监管。印度在加强场外市场集中清算和交易报告库等制度的建设方面,采取了通过交易报告库增加市场透明度、利用集中清算转移化解场外市场风险等措施。印度在充分了解和认识本国场外衍生品市场发展的基础上,选择了政府发起、本地设立以及单一管理的交易报告库模式。这符合印度场外衍生品的发展阶段和发展规模,能够满足阶段性场外衍生品交易透明性的需求,同时具备经济上的可行性。随着我国场外衍生品市场监管的推进,通过设立交易报告库使监管机构有效获取市场信息,并以此提高市场透明度、降低系统性风险日显重要。对此,印度场外衍生品交易报告库的设立模式具有一定的借鉴和启发意义。  相似文献   

2.
农业自然风险的金融管理:天气衍生品的兴起   总被引:4,自引:0,他引:4  
天气衍生品是农业保险创新的产物,它将金融工具的理念用于自然灾害的风险管理,为农业生产者的风险转移提供了新途径。天气衍生品的推出可以增强保险公司和再保险公司分散风险的能力,有助于提高农业自然风险的管理水平。本文介绍了全球天气衍生品发展的产品与市场状况,并提出了相关的政策建议。  相似文献   

3.
金融衍生品的经济功能是提供一个经济“安全网”,将业务的内在风险加以归类,或将风险分解为几个基本组成部分,进行分类交易,将它们转给能够并愿意管理这些风险的人。它就像是一个巨大的保险公司,使得金融市场风险可以更快速、准确地进行调整。在中国发展金融衍生品市场,将有助于管理新兴的、欣欣向荣的金融系统的风险。  相似文献   

4.
作为保险业分散风险、提高承保能力而在资本市场推出的创新工具,保险证券化通过建立保险支持证券,使资本市场的资金顺利地进入保险市场,从而更好地帮助保险公司和再保险公司转移承保风险,并且同时可以满足资本市场上广大投资者强烈的投资愿望.从保险业的内在动力以及开展的现实必要这两方面看,它在我国的保险业中也应该得到相应的发展.由于我国目前的金融、经济、法律等环境还不够完善,现阶段应从保险资产证券化开始.  相似文献   

5.
巨灾造成的损失巨大,一次巨灾的发生,往往给所在地区带来毁灭性的打击,单纯依靠传统保险和再保险已经难以承受巨灾带来的损失赔偿.而资本市场的资金量远远大于保险市场,其巨大的储备可以为巨灾风险的分散和转移提供充足的资金支持.因此,如何将巨灾风险分散和转移到资本市场成为近年来的研究热点.“侧挂车”是国际保险市场最新兴起的创新性巨灾风险管理工具之一.作为对(再)保险和巨灾债权的有力补充,“侧挂车”的出现,为保险业借助资本市场来进行融资提供了有力支持,极大地拓宽了(再)保险公司的风险转移渠道,提高了(再)保险公司的承保能力.  相似文献   

6.
金融体系风险分担机制比较研究   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1  
金融体系风险分担机制分为金融市场的横向风险分担机制与银行中介的跨期风险分担机制。横向风险分担机制在规避非系统性风险方面占有优势,而跨期风险分担在规避系统性风险方面占有优势。两种风险分担机制是一种互补关系,适度结合才能更好地发挥金融体系的风险分担功能。在经济全球化的过程中,金融体系的两种风险分担机制都会受到损害,对经济稳定形成威胁,因此我们在金融改革和对外开放的过程中应该从风险分担的视角来进行金融体系设计,保持一个健全的风险分担机制。  相似文献   

7.
风险分担是金融体系的核心功能之一,主要包括金融市场的横向风险分担和银行中介的纵向跨期风险分担两种方式.横向风险分担方式在规避非系统性风险方面占有优势,而纵向跨期风险分担在规避系统性风险方面占有优势.风险分担功能的实现依附于各种具体的资金配置形式,而有效的资金配置的最终实现也必须以有效的风险分担为条件和保障.  相似文献   

8.
随着银行贷款管理"发放——分销"模式的兴起以及信用风险转移市场的指数化增长,保险公司也成为这一市场的重要参与者,但其在次贷危机的系统性风险中的角色也饱受质疑。本文分析了保险公司承担信用风险的动因和面临的挑战,并结合次贷危机剖析了保险公司对系统性风险的影响,结论是传统型保险公司并不具备系统重要性,而保险公司参与CRT交易却有可能引发系统性风险。只有通过建立全面的风险管理制度、充分预期信用损失、拥有充分的资本和适当的杠杆率,才能充分发挥保险公司通过参与CRT市场增强金融体系稳定和提高效率的正面效应。  相似文献   

9.
中国汇率风险分担机制与人民币外汇衍生品市场   总被引:3,自引:0,他引:3  
虽然中国经济规模的扩大和对外开放程度的提高,境内企业面临的汇率风险越来越大,但是我国企业难以通过价格博弈向国外需求方转嫁部分汇率风险.在现行汇率制度和升值预期背景下,向银行结汇并转移汇率风险是企业处理外汇收入的优先选择.而中国外汇衍生品市场实际发展状况与理想状况存在较大反差,企业结汇和购汇以即期交易为主,远期和掉期等衍生品交易规模相对较小.产生上述情况的原因在于,商业银行受主客观因素限制,在中国外汇衍生品市场未能发挥应有的作用,存在较大的局限:在人民币升值预期下,银行远期外汇报价导致企业参与外汇衍生品交易缺乏足够激励,并且具有单边性;银行外汇衍生品交易风险控制手段不足;市场供求不平衡.在强烈的本币升值预期下,商业银行通过向央行结汇实现了汇率风险进一步向上转移,而央行以外汇储备增加的形式被动承担了风险,为此付出了巨大的成本,宏观政策因此受到极大制约.  相似文献   

10.
金融创新产品主要表现为衍生品,金融衍生品由于其非标准化主要在OTC市场交易.OTC衍生品市场巨大的风险通常认为转移给了那些有能力承担风险的投资者,实际上它是本轮危机风险的传染源.对此,美国监管当局建议对OTC衍生品市场和资产证券化(ABS)进行连贯和协调的监管,以提升市场透明度和市场纪律的作用,并要求所有对OTC衍生品保持交易记录并定期报告.  相似文献   

11.
起源于美国的上市公司内部人短线交易(short-swing trading)收益归入权制度,是证券内幕交易法律规制制度的一个重要组成部分,其立法目的在于通过对上市公司内部人的短线交易收益予以归入这一威慑手段,建立内幕交易的事先防范和吓阻机制,以维持投资者对资本市场公正性和公平性的信赖,保障资本市场的健康、有序发展。本文试从投资者权益保护的视角,在对我国现行的相关法律制度、司法和监管实践进行研究分析的基础上,借鉴美国、日本、韩国、台湾地区等境外成熟市场的成功经验,提出了完善我国短线交易法律规制制度的若干建议与对策。  相似文献   

12.
The study of risk management began after World War II. Risk management has long been associated with the use of market insurance to protect individuals and companies from various losses associated with accidents. Other forms of risk management, alternatives to market insurance, surfaced during the 1950s when market insurance was perceived as very costly and incomplete for protection against pure risk. The use of derivatives as risk management instruments arose during the 1970s, and expanded rapidly during the 1980s, as companies intensified their financial risk management. International risk regulation began in the 1980s, and financial firms developed internal risk management models and capital calculation formulas to hedge against unanticipated risks and reduce regulatory capital. Concomitantly, governance of risk management became essential, integrated risk management was introduced, and the chief risk officer positions were created. Nonetheless, these regulations, governance rules, and risk management methods failed to prevent the financial crisis that began in 2007.  相似文献   

13.
冲销与电子化交易确认是当今国际场外衍生品市场的新兴交易管理业务,代表着危机后场外衍生品市场信息更透明、更集中的发展趋势。随着国内利率互换交易规模的扩大,制约利率互换市场发展的因素逐渐显现。为此,中国外汇交易中心在中国人民银行金融市场司的指导下深入研究国际经验,在充分调研的基础上积极筹备推出了利率互换冲销和电子化交易确认业务。相关业务的推出与不断完善有效提高了银行间利率互换交易的标准化程度,降低了市场整体风险,提高了市场成员的资本利用效率和授信管理效率,是银行间市场基础设施建设的重要进展。  相似文献   

14.
The Dodd-Frank Act mandates the widespread adoption of centralized clearing of OTC derivatives and also includes measures designed to move more derivatives trading onto exchanges. But, as the author points out, such a clearing mandate appears to be based on the premise that the recent experience in OTC derivatives represents a major market failure and that participants in what is now the world's largest financial market have been systematically choosing the wrong institutions for risk management and trading. In this article, the author begins by explaining why all derivatives are not cleared or exchange-traded, and why the attempt to mandate such practices (as opposed to encouraging voluntary adoption through differential capital requirements) could have serious unwanted consequences. Among such consequences is a possible increase in the very systemic risk that such mandates are supposed to prevent.  相似文献   

15.
The author uses the case of Constellation Energy to show the challenges, and pitfalls, of running an energy and power trading unit as a profit center within a large power company. Sophisticated trading and risk management operations do play important supporting roles in power companies that face competitive wholesale markets. The complicated dynamics of power prices and the complex operations of generation assets and supply obligations require careful assessment of risks and returns. Trading operations can help extract more value from physical assets and supply obligations. But problems are bound to arise when companies attempt to manage the trading function as a stand‐alone profit center. Determining the amount of capital required for proprietary trading portfolios and other elements of trading businesses is complicated. It is easy to underestimate the capital required and so exaggerate the profitability of trading. When profit center trading operations share a balance sheet with other business units—especially units with physical assets like generation—the natural tendency is for the trading operation to piggyback on the capital of the other units. The actual amount of capital consumed becomes apparent only in times of crisis. We have seen this mistake made repeatedly in the short history of trading operations in U.S. power companies. Only truly independent trading operations, with their own balance sheets, can be evaluated clearly and held accountable.  相似文献   

16.
随着近年来中国成为全球最大的碳减排量国家,以英国气候变化资本集团为首的外资企业开始将资金投入中国的清洁发展机制(Clean Development Mechanism,以下简称CDM)市场。外资大量进入中国碳交易市场,在推动中国CDM市场发展的同时,也危及了中国碳交易市场的发展安全,不利于中国推进节能减排战略目标的进程。对此,中国应加快碳交易机制建设,建立国内统一的CDM市场交易体系,利用碳交易市场推进人民币国际化,鼓励金融机构开发碳金融产品,加强对碳排放权交易资源综合管理进行战略储备等等。  相似文献   

17.
Abstract

Insurance derivatives facilitate the trading of insurance risks on capital markets, such as catastrophe derivatives that were traded on the Chicago Board of Trade. Simultaneously, insurance risks are traded through reinsurance portfolios. In this paper we make inferences about the market price of risk implied by the information embedded in the prices of these two assets.  相似文献   

18.
Banks hold capital to guard against unexpected surges in losses and long freezes in financial markets. The minimum level of capital is set by banking regulators as a function of the banks’ own estimates of their risk exposures. As a result, a great challenge for both banks and regulators is to validate internal risk models. We show that a large fraction of US and international banks uses contaminated data when testing their models. In particular, most banks validate their market risk model using profit-and-loss (P/L) data that include fees and commissions and intraday trading revenues. This practice is inconsistent with the definition of the employed market risk measure. Using both bank data and simulations, we find that data contamination has dramatic implications for model validation and can lead to the acceptance of misspecified risk models. Moreover, our estimates suggest that the use of contaminated data can significantly reduce (market-risk induced) regulatory capital.  相似文献   

19.
The purpose of this monograph is to survey the academic literature on the economic implications of the corporate decision to list shares on an overseas stock exchange. My focus is on the valuation and liquidity effects of the listing decision, and the impact of listing on the company's global risk exposure and its cost of equity capital. The evidence shows:
(1) share prices reacts favorably to cross-border listings in the first month after listing;
(2) post-listing price performance up to one year is highly variable across companies depending on the home and listing market, its capitalization, capital-raising needs and other company-specific factors;
(3) post-listing trading volume increases on average, and, for many issues, home-market trading volume increases also;
(4) liquidity of trading in shares improves overall, but depends on the increase in total trading volume, the listing location and the scope of foreign ownership restrictions in the home market;
(5) domestic market risk is significantly reduced and is associated with only a small increase in global market risk and foreign exchange risk, which can result in a net reduction in the cost of equity capital of about 126 basis points;
(6) American Depositary Receipts represent an effective vehicle to diversify U.S.-based investment programs globally;
(7) stringent disclosure requirements are the most important impediment to cross-border listings.  相似文献   

20.
陆蓉  兰袁 《金融研究》2021,490(4):169-186
资本运作一方面可以提高股价,另一方面可以让公司股票停牌,那么是否会成为大股东度过质押风险的方式呢?基于此,本文以2007—2018年我国A股上市公司为研究对象,考察了大股东股权质押对上市公司资本运作的影响及其作用机制。研究发现:(1)大股东股权质押比例越高,上市公司进行资本运作的可能性越大; 这一关系在质押股权面临的平仓风险越高和非国有控股的上市公司中更为显著。(2)机制检验发现,随着质押比例的提高,上市公司进行资本运作后的停牌时间越长;从股价提升的效果来看,资本运作在短期内能提高股价,缓解质押风险,但从长期来看效果并不显著。(3)上市公司进行资本运作的方式主要为股权转让、资产收购和资产剥离;其中,大股东主要利用资产收购和资产剥离增加停牌时间,利用股权转让助推股价。在控制了潜在的内生性问题影响以及各种稳健性检验下,上述结论仍然成立。  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号