共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 181 毫秒
1.
政府会计概念框架有助于丰富政府会计理论、指导政府会计准则、促进政府会计国际趋同。因此,有必要对政府会计概念框架进行评价,找出关键因素并予以重视,以保证政府会计概念框架的质量,为我国形成完善的政府会计准则奠定基础。首先分析影响政府会计概念框架的因素,构建政府会计概念框架评价指标体系,再采用模糊综合评价法进行评价,基于评价结果提出完善概念框架的建议。 相似文献
2.
政府会计概念框架有助于丰富政府会计理论、指导政府会计准则、促进政府会计国际趋同。因此,有必要对政府会计概念框架进行评价.找出关键因素并予以重视,以保证政府会计概念框架的质量.为我国形成完善的政府会计准则奠定基础。首先分析影响政府会计概念框架的因素,构建政府会计概念框架评价指标体系,再采用模糊综合评价法进行评价,基于评价结果提出完善概念框架的建议。 相似文献
3.
4.
关于基本会计准则与财务会计概念框架的思考 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
我国的会计准则体系分为两个层次:基本会计准则和具体会计准则。基本准则是制订会计核算制度的依据,也是制定具体准则的依据。具体准则是根据基本准则制订的有关企业会计核算的具体要求,到目前为止已发布了近十几个具体准则。西方的财务会计概念框架实质上是指会计准则的理论结构,即制订会计准则的理论依据。它主要研究的是与会计和财务报告准则相关的会计理论问题,可以说,财务会计概念框架是会计理论体系的一个主要组成部分。目前,我国业内人士认为基本准则即相当于西方的"财务会计概念框架",那么,能否将基本准则当作是我国的财务会计概念框架呢? 相似文献
5.
政府会计是国家治理的基石和重要组成部分,其概念框架要服从和服务于国家治理。政府会计概念框架中的政府会计目标、政府会计信息质量特征、政府会计主体、政府会计基础、政府会计对象与要素、确认与计量、政府会计财务报告等都应该依据服从和服务于国家治理的要求加以界定。 相似文献
6.
政府会计概念框架结构研究 总被引:5,自引:1,他引:4
本文从基本理论上探讨政府会计概念框架应该回答的问题,从多个国家及国际组织公共部门会计概念框架的对比中寻找灵感,从企业会计概念框架中吸取养分,借助政府会计概念框架整体分析模型构建我国政府会计概念框架结构,试图为我国政府会计概念框架的建设提供有益的借鉴。 相似文献
7.
8.
政府会计与企业会计:概念框架差异与启示——基于IPSASB与IASB最新研究成果的分析 总被引:4,自引:2,他引:2
政府会计与企业会计在技术层面具有较多的共性,因此,政府会计概念框架的研究可以借鉴企业会计已有的成果。然而,由于政府(公共部门)环境与企业环境存在显著的差异,政府会计概念框架体系的构建不能直接移植企业会计的相关理念。本文以国际公共部门会计准则理事会与国际会计准则理事会最新发布的关于会计概念框架的有关文献为基础,试图比较并分析政府会计与企业会计之间的共性与特性,为我国未来政府会计改革借鉴企业会计改革经验提出建议与启示。 相似文献
9.
10.
正一、政府会计要素国际研究概况(一)国际公共会计准则理事会关于政府会计要素的主要观点国际公共部门会计准则理事会(IPSASB),隶属于国际会计师联合会(IFAC),致力于制定公共部门会计概念框架项目。IPSAS将权责发生制下公共部门报表中的会计要素分为6类:资产、负债、净资产/权益、收入、费用和所有者投入保全调整(类似于IASB中"资本保全调整"要素)。2012年10月8日的征求意见稿"公共部门主体通用目的财务报告的概念框架:财务报表的要素和确认",与国际会计准则理事会(IASB)的概念框架相比, 相似文献
11.
论改进我国政府会计与财务报告 总被引:57,自引:0,他引:57
政府会计与财务报告关系到政府向社会公众及其他各方提供的财务信息是否具有真实性、完整性和可靠性的问题。本文认为 ,政府会计作为反映政府财务活动的信息系统 ,应当根据我国政府的职能及政府财务活动的内容 ,全面、完整地反映政府财务活动情况及结果。随着我国预算管理体制改革、政府职能转换 ,政府会计与财务报告应当借鉴国际公共部门会计与财务报告的通常做法 ,吸收我国企业会计与财务报告改革的成功经验 ,进行改进和完善 ,并着重从政府会计名称、政府会计对象 (内容 )、政府会计模式、政府会计基础及政府财务报告等方面进行改革 ,真正建立具有中国特色、与国际公共部门会计可比的、科学规范的政府会计与财务报告体系 ,保证政府向社会公众提供的财务信息的真实性和完整性 相似文献
12.
石英华 《中央财经大学学报》2007,13(2):85-90
政府会计改革是未来我国财政管理改革的重要内容,西方国家的相关改革探索和实践为我国提供了有益的借鉴和启示。论文对国外政府会计改革的总体情况和主要会计模式进行比较分析,提出我国推行政府会计改革,应更新理念,积极创造政府会计改革的基础条件;循序渐进,审慎推进权责发生制改革;明确政府会计体系范围,建立政府会计概念框架和具体准则体系;改革和充实现有决算报表体系,建立政府财务报告制度。 相似文献
13.
14.
Alland D. Barton 《Abacus》1999,35(2):207-222
One of the problems encountered in implementing accrual accounting in the government sector is that of accounting for natural capital assets provided freely to government and which are used as public goods. Professional accounting standards require that these assets be valued and included in the government's statement of assets and liabilities. The problem is not encountered in business accrual accounting because business neither acquires assets freely nor provides services to the public on a non-commercial basis.
Various issues surrounding accrual accounting for natural capital assets used as public goods are examined in this article. The nature and characteristics of such assets, and the distinctions between private goods and public goods markets, are first explained to set the context for examination of the issues. Then the issues as to whether natural capital assets should be treated as assets for accounting purposes and included in the government's statement of financial position are analysed according to FASB standards; it is concluded that they are not assets. Rather, it is proposed that these assets used for the provision of non-commercial services to the public should be treated in a separate category as public goods assets which are held in trust by the government on behalf of the nation, for the benefit of current and future generations and for the preservation of the natural ecology of the nation. Commercial valuations are not relevant for these assets and they need not be valued in financial terms for their good management. 相似文献
Various issues surrounding accrual accounting for natural capital assets used as public goods are examined in this article. The nature and characteristics of such assets, and the distinctions between private goods and public goods markets, are first explained to set the context for examination of the issues. Then the issues as to whether natural capital assets should be treated as assets for accounting purposes and included in the government's statement of financial position are analysed according to FASB standards; it is concluded that they are not assets. Rather, it is proposed that these assets used for the provision of non-commercial services to the public should be treated in a separate category as public goods assets which are held in trust by the government on behalf of the nation, for the benefit of current and future generations and for the preservation of the natural ecology of the nation. Commercial valuations are not relevant for these assets and they need not be valued in financial terms for their good management. 相似文献
15.
英国政府会计管理与改革情况及对我国的启示 总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2
本文按照英国政府会计的历史沿革、管理现状、现行特点,以及对我国推行政府会计改革的启示这一逻辑顺序,较为系统、详细地介绍了英国中央政府会计改革的基本历程、会计法律体系、中央政府会计规范的制定、地方政府会计管理情况、英国政府整体财务报告编制情况等,对英国政府会计管理的特点进行了总结,得出了对我国推行政府会计改革的若干启示。 相似文献
16.
在7月底召开的全国财政厅(局)长会议上,政府会计改革再次成为焦点。谢旭人部长指出,推进政府会计改革,改进现行以收付实现制为基础的预算会计体系,研究部分支出采用权责发生制,研究构建政府会计准则和制度体系,建立政府年度财务报告制度。 相似文献
17.
现阶段,我国政府会计改革已进入到了深水区,众多专家学者结合国内外的相关经验,提出了包括采用基金会计核算法,重视资产及负债的确认、计量、记录等应对措施。作为政府会计改革最急需解决的问题之一——政府资产及负债如何精确得确认、计量、记录,政府在日常管理服务过程中的业绩如何确认已成为政府会计改革过程中必须逾越的一道鸿沟。本文通过引企业财务精细化管理理念于政府财务管理过程中,并通过分析政府财务精细化管理中的关键点,结合A政府机关的探索实践,拟对我国政府会计改革提出探索性的应对措施。 相似文献
18.
Building on the argument that justice should be the transcendent principle in accounting, we argue that social accounting invokes notions of community, shared social values, and fairness in the distribution of social resources. These ideas are elaborated in relation to local government, which provides a window on how communities make decisions about distributing their social resources and the accounting processes which guide these decisions. Fieldwork in two large but contrasting English local authorities suggests that the potential of social accounting is not reflected in the predominant accounting systems in local government organisations, but in more subtle and successful forms of ‘enacted social accounting’. Its utility relates to the achievement of short-term social goals where social injustices persist and accountants, managers and politicians seek to accommodate financial pressures to protect the most vulnerable members of the community. We identify local government accountants as morally responsible for the further development of social accounting which envisions a future for local government, and establishes links between social justice, environmentalism and localism. 相似文献
19.
Infrastructure service provision by government creates huge distributional issues about service availability and performance over time and the relative funding burdens borne by successive generations of consumers across time. But providing financial disclosure on these issues through inter-generational accounting pre-supposes that accounting measurement is both generationally neutral (temporal neutrality) and does not legitimate any particular pattern of distribution. At the very least, accounting measurements of service provision costs should possess the attribute of distributional fairness. They should not bias the inter-generational allocation of cost or funding burdens. We argue that the forced application of inappropriate commercial accounting concepts of asset valuation, depreciation and capital maintenance does produce significant generational bias. More flexibility is required to produce the necessary accounting measurement attributes for financial disclosure on whether government has discharged its continuing accountability for inter-generational equity in burden sharing. We discuss three conceptual issues and illustrate the need for flexibility by proposing an alternative 'flow of obligations' approach which does not require reference to valuations of community service resources or arbitrary cost allocations under depreciation. 相似文献
20.
Rowan Jones 《Financial Accountability and Management》2000,16(2):101-116
National accounting and government budgeting include two kinds of financial reporting that are not influenced by, but have an increasing influence on, the accounting discipline. The government budget has changed, over the last sixty years, from a financial statement that was recognisably part of the accounting discipline to one in which national accounting and government budgeting have the dominant influence. There were early attempts to reconcile national accounting and the discipline but these have largely disappeared. Although the three forms of accounting measure the same phenomena, each is different in fundamental ways, in terms of both relevance and reliability. 相似文献