我国商业银行流动性过剩对策分析

近几年,我国商业银行流动性过剩问题日益突出,并成为我国宏观经济诸多矛盾的焦点。本文从当前我国商业银行流动性过剩的表现及形成原因分析入手,阐述流动性过剩对我国国民经济和商业银行经营造成的不利影响,提出治理商业银行流动性过剩的途径和对策。     

我国商业银行流动性过剩问题初探

近年来,我国商业银行流动性过剩问题日渐突出。基于此,本文在分析我国商业发行流动性过剩表现和影响的基础上,探讨了我国商业银行流动性过剩的成因,并提出了解决我国商业银行流动性过剩问题的政策建议。     

我国商业银行流动性过剩问题分析

针对于此,本文首先概述了有关商业银行流动性的理论然后分析了我国商业银行流动性过剩的成因,并探讨了流动性过剩引起的问题,在此基础上试图提出一些缓解我国商业银行流动性过剩的对策。     

我国商业银行流动性过剩现状分析和控制策略

商业银行流动性过剩是全球经济都会面临的危机,我国在面对商业银行流动性问题时,采取了货币紧缩政策,收到了较好的效果。本文主要研究了我国商业银行流动性过剩现状,并提出了几点解决商业银行流动性过剩的策略。     

当前商业银行流动性过剩问题研究

当前我国商业银行面临严峻的流动性过剩问题,主要是由于汇率水平维持、商业银行不良贷款控制、资本充足率限期达标等因素起了作用。考虑到仍在发挥作用的因素,我国商业银行流动性在2006年不会有显著的变化,但随着商业银行内外部条件的变化,2006年以后我国商业银行流动性过剩问题会得到逐步缓解。     

我国商业银行的流动性过剩问题及解决对策

商业银行流动性是商业银行的生命线。流动性不足会引发商业银行挤兑现象，严重的还会导致商业银行破产。流动性过剩则意味着商业银行持有的资金超过维持必要流动所需的资金并为此承担较高的资金成本。近年来，我国商业银行流动性过剩问题日趋严重并引起了各方面的关注。本文通过分析商业银行流动性过剩的表现和成因，对于如何解决商业银行流动性风险问题提出几点对策和建议。     

商业银行流动性过剩问题的探析

近几年来,我国商业银行流动性过剩问题愈演愈烈,具体表现为商业银行的存贷差加大、超额准备金攀升、金融市场利率走低等。本文通过对流动性过剩的现状描述,作出对流动性过剩的成因分析,并提出相应的应对对策。     

“双过剩”下商业银行的困境与出路刍议

本文从我国商业银行流动性过剩和企业产能过剩的表现及成因入手,对"双过剩"进行定性、定量分析,阐明了产能过剩对商业银行流动性过剩的影响。在此基础上,提出应对"双过剩"问题的对策思路。     

"双过剩"下商业银行的困境与出路刍议

本文从我国商业银行流动性过剩和企业产能过剩的表现及成因入手,对"双过剩"进行定性、定量分析,阐明了产能过剩对商业银行流动性过剩的影响.在此基础上,提出应对"双过剩"问题的对策思路.     

其他存款性公司流动性影响因素实证研究

一、引言流动性问题是我国当前学界研究的热点问题。然而学界更多的是讨论流动性过剩问题,对于流动性过剩我们并没有一个统一的判断标准,而流动性受什么因素影响学界也没有很好的结论。对于过剩的判断属于规范研究,而本文将从流动性本义出发,分析对流动性的影响因素。二、文献回顾李成、姜柳(2006)将商业银行存差作为流动性衡量指标,得出外汇储备与商业银行流动性过剩存在正相关关系;谢罗奇、龚伟强(2006)用商业银行存款-商业银行贷款-商业银行投资来衡量流动性,在此基础上,他认为我国商业流动性的影响因素主要是国内储蓄率较高和大量外汇流入引起的。刘锡良、董青马、王丽娅(2007)认为流动性最初的含义是指商业银行能够在不遭受损失的条件下,满足存款人提存及支付需要资产的变现能力,即所谓的资产流动性。学术界将其扩展为资产流动性和负债流动性。接着,他们从银行储备需求的角度对我国的流动性过剩进行分析,得出我国商业银行流动性过剩的原因是金融创新和银行在约束条件下的优化资源配置的结果。朱庆(2006)认为我国市场流动性过剩问题主要体现在超额货币供给、存贷差扩大、超额存款准备金率居高不下以及市场利率持续走低,原因主要在于经济金融结构失衡、不完善...     

Income diversification and risk: Does ownership matter? An empirical examination of Indian banks

We examine the impact of ownership on income diversification and risk for Indian banks over the period 2001–2009. We investigate both the determinants of non-interest income and the impact of diversification on various profitability and insolvency risk measures for public sector, private domestic, and foreign banks. We document that ownership does matter in the pursuit of non-interest income. Relative to private domestic banks, public sector banks earn significantly less fee-income, while foreign banks report higher fee income. Public sector banks with higher levels of governmental ownership are significantly less likely to pursue non-interest income sources. Fee-based income significantly reduces risk, measured by profitability variables, for public sector banks. Default risk is also reduced for these banks. From a regulatory perspective, it appears that diversification benefits India’s public sector banks. Our research has implications for the changes in the risk profile for banks in emerging banking markets pursuing non-interest revenue sources.     

Banks and sovereign risk: A granular view

We investigate the determinants of sovereign bond holdings of German banks and the implications of such holdings for bank risk. We use granular information on all German banks and all sovereign debt exposures in the years 2005–2013. As regards the determinants of sovereign bond holdings of banks, we find that these are larger for weakly capitalized banks, banks that are active on capital markets, and for large banks. Yet, only around two thirds of all German banks hold sovereign bonds. Macroeconomic fundamentals were significant drivers of sovereign bond holdings only after the collapse of Lehman Brothers. With the outbreak of the sovereign debt crisis, German banks reallocated their portfolios toward sovereigns with lower debt ratios and bonds with lower yields. With regard to the implications for bank risk, we find that low-risk government bonds decreased the risk of German banks, especially for savings and cooperative banks. Holdings of high-risk government bonds, in turn, increased the risk of commercial banks during the sovereign debt crisis.     

The International Transmission of Bank Liquidity Shocks: Evidence from an Emerging Market

I exploit the 1998 Russian default as a negative liquidity shock to international banks and analyze its transmission to Peru. I find that after the shock international banks reduce bank‐to‐bank lending to Peruvian banks and Peruvian banks reduce lending to Peruvian firms. The effect is strongest for domestically owned banks that borrow internationally, intermediate for foreign‐owned banks, and weakest for locally funded banks. I control for credit demand by examining firms that borrow from several banks. These results suggest that international banks transmit liquidity shocks across countries and that negative liquidity shocks reduce bank lending in affected countries.     

Bailouts and the modeling of bank distress

In this article, we develop a model for predicting distress events among large banks. We show that a bailout possibility induces different behaviors among small and large banks, and the proposed failure prediction model for large banks is thus considerably different from that for small banks. Major bank-level fundamentals show opposite conjecture directions for large versus small banks. The Tier 1 capital ratio, which is under the scrutiny of regulators and investors, has almost no distress prediction power among large banks. However, banks rescued by governments tend to maintain a lower Tier 1 ratio. The cost of funding in large banks is negatively correlated with the probability of failure, reflecting the fact that lenders internalize the too-big-to-fail (TBTF) policy and demand a lower interest rate from TBTF banks.     

基于随机前沿分析的贷款定价效率研究

在同等条件下,高效率的贷款定价能够给银行带来更多的收益。本文将影响贷款定价的因素分成两部分：将成本因素设定为随机前沿生产函数的投入指标,将风险和其他因素设定为影响商业银行贷款定价效率的指标。通过建立商业银行贷款定价的随机前沿生产函数,研究商业银行的贷款定价效率。对中国33家商业银行2003--2012年的面板数据进行实证研究发现：大型商业银行因规模优势表现出了较高的效率;股份制银行和城市商业银行的贷款定价效率差异最大;在利率管制下,外资银行的技术优势没有体现出来。     

What explains the low profitability of Chinese banks?

This paper analyzes empirically what explains the low profitability of Chinese banks for the period 1997–2004. We find that better capitalized banks tend to be more profitable. The same is true for banks with a relatively larger share of deposits and for more X-efficient banks. In addition, a less concentrated banking system increases bank profitability, which basically reflects that the four state-owned commercial banks – China’s largest banks – have been the main drag for system’s profitability. We find the same negative influence for China’s development banks (so-called Policy Banks), which are fully state-owned. Instead, more market-oriented banks, such as joint-stock commercial banks, tend to be more profitable, which again points to the influence of government intervention in explaining bank performance in China. These findings should not come as a surprise for a banking system which has long been functioning as a mechanism for transferring huge savings to meet public policy goals.     

Islamic vs. conventional banking: Business model,efficiency and stability

How different are Islamic banks from conventional banks? Does the recent crisis justify a closer look at the Sharia-compliant business model for banking? When comparing conventional and Islamic banks, controlling for time-variant country-fixed effects, we find few significant differences in business orientation. There is evidence however, that Islamic banks are less cost-effective, but have a higher intermediation ratio, higher asset quality and are better capitalized. We also find large cross-country variation in the differences between conventional and Islamic banks as well as across Islamic banks of different sizes. Furthermore, we find that Islamic banks are better capitalized, have higher asset quality and are less likely to disintermediate during crises. The better stock performance of listed Islamic banks during the recent crisis is also due to their higher capitalization and better asset quality.     

Bank incentives and suboptimal lending decisions: Evidence from the valuation effect of bank loan announcements in Japan

Using a sample of bank loan announcements in Japan, we examine whether or not banks have incentives to engage in suboptimal lending that results in wealth transfer from the banks to the borrowing firms. We find that abnormal returns for borrowing firms are significantly positive, but those for lending banks are sometimes significantly negative. Furthermore, the announcement returns for borrowing firms are negatively related to those for lending banks, especially when poorly performing firms borrow from financially healthy (low-risk) banks. Our results suggest that the positive valuation effect of bank loan announcements for borrowing firms is mainly due to a wealth transfer from lending banks.     

The governance,risk-taking,and performance of Islamic banks

We examine whether the difference in governance structures influences the risk taking and performance of Islamic banks compared to conventional banks. Using a sample of 52 Islamic banks and 104 conventional banks in 14 countries for the period from 2005 to 2013, we conclude that the governance structure in Islamic banks plays a crucial role in risk taking as well as financial performance that is distinct from conventional banks. Particularly, we show that the governance structure in Islamic banks allows them to take higher risks and achieve better performance because of product complexities and transaction mechanisms. However, Islamic banks maintain a higher capitalization compared to conventional banks. These results support the research on Islamic investment and risk taking. Our results add a new dimension to the governance research that could be a valuable source of knowledge for policy makers and regulators in the financial services sector.     

Do European Primarily Internet Banks Show Scale and Experience Efficiencies?

Empirical evidence shows that Internet banks worldwide have underperformed newly chartered traditional banks mainly because of their higher overhead costs. European banks have not been an exception in this regard. This paper analyses, for the first time in Europe, whether this is a temporary phenomenon and whether Internet banks may generate scale economies in excess of those available to traditional banks. Also do they (and their customers) accumulate experience with this new business model, allowing them to perform as well or even better than their peers, the traditional banks? To this end, we have generally followed the same analytical framework and methodology used by DeYoung (2001, 2002, 2005) for Internet banks in the USA although the limitations in the availability of data, as well as the existence of different regulatory frameworks and market conditions, particularly in the retail segment, in the 15 European Union countries have required some modifications to the methodology. The empirical analysis confirms that, as is the case for US banks, European Internet banks show technologically based scale economies, while no conclusive evidence exists of technology based learning economies. As Internet banks get larger, the profitability gap with traditional banks shrinks. To the extent that Internet banks are profitable, European authorities may encourage a larger number of consumers to use this delivery channel, by tackling consumers security concerns. This would allow Internet banks to capture more of the potential scale efficiencies implied in our estimations.