首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到19条相似文献,搜索用时 93 毫秒
1.
张路  罗婷  岳衡 《金融研究》2015,425(11):142-158
本文利用中国上市公司公开披露的募集资金使用情况,探讨首次公开发行超募资金的不同投向对上市公司现金股利政策的影响。研究发现,上市公司现金股利支付水平随着超募资金补充流动资金的增加而提高,超募资金为现金股利的发放提供了“资金源”。而且,在大股东持股比例较高的公司中,超募资金补充流动性的程度和现金股利支付水平之间的正向关系更显著,说明大股东攫取上市公司、侵占中小股东利益的情况更严重。进一步研究发现,超募资金补充流动资金的程度和现金股利的市场反应负相关,而且在大股东持股比例高的公司中市场反应比大股东持股比例低的公司更为消极。作为少有的研究中国资本市场超募资金投向对上市公司股利分配影响的文章,本文的结论丰富了募集资金使用效率方面的文献,其研究结果对于政策制定者和投资者具有重要借鉴意义和参考价值。  相似文献   

2.
本文以2003-2007五年间存在控股股东的分红上市公司为研究样本,采用多变量回归分析方法对股权分置前后上市公司现金股利政策进行了比较研究。实证研究结果表明,股权分置改革前,上市公司每股现金股利与控股股东持股比例正相关,支持现金股利的"侵占"假说;股权分置改革后,存在控股股东的上市公司现金股利支付水平下降,并且每股现金股利与控股股东持股比例的正相关系显著减弱,从而证实股权分置改革后现金股利的"隧道"效应减弱。  相似文献   

3.
选取我国A股上市公司2012-2017间财务数据为研究样本,实证检验了控股股东、财务柔性与公司股利政策间的关系。结果表明,上市公司的财务柔性有利于提升公司分配现金股利的意愿和水平。进一步考察控股股东在财务柔性与现金股利政策间的调节作用,发现控股股东持股比例越高的企业,财务柔性储备越高,越能提升公司现金股利分配意愿和水平。  相似文献   

4.
上市公司的现金股利政策受到诸多因素的制约,而不同的股利派发政策又对投资者保护产生了不同的影响.本文以2005-2009年间沪深两市A股市场1063家上市公司为样本对公司股权结构、现金股利政策与投资者保护三者关系进行实证研究,研究表明:公司股权结构集中度越高、国有控股水平越高的上市公司越倾向于分配现金股利;现金股利政策是一把双刃剑,既可以是投资者寻求权益回报的一种渠道,也可以成为控股股东进行公司资源转移的隐蔽工具.  相似文献   

5.
顾小龙  李天钰  辛宇 《金融研究》2015,421(7):152-169
本文研究了上市公司在具有不同实际控股股东控制权结构下,现金股利与股价崩溃风险的关系。结果表明,过度支付现金股利会显著增加上市公司的股价崩溃风险;实际控制股东控制权与现金流权的分离程度会加剧现金股利与股价崩溃风险之间的正向关系。我们认为这一现象是现金股利中所蕴含的股东治理效应在资本市场上的体现。其现实意义在于,政策监管要着力于治“本”,通过提升公司治理水平以使股利分配真正立足于保护全体股东的利益。  相似文献   

6.
论文分析了金融危机对上市公司现金股利政策的影响。研究发现,在金融危机期间,上市公司会降低现金股利支付水平,以应对未来的不确定性。但是,相比非流通股比率低的公司,非流通股比率高的公司在金融危机期间更有可能支付更多的现金股利,以满足非流通股股东对于现金的需求。研究还发现,如果公司在金融危机期间发放现金股利,则市场反应更积极,这说明公司通过股利政策向市场传递了积极的信号。但是,非流通股比率高的公司支付现金股利的市场反应要显著小于非流通股比率低的公司,这可能是市场担心非流通股股东利用现金股利侵害中小股东利益。本文研究结论为完善上市公司的现金股利政策和保护中小投资者利益提供了现实启示。  相似文献   

7.
廖珂  崔宸瑜  谢德仁 《金融研究》2018,454(4):172-189
本文基于2003-2017年间A股上市公司的相关数据研究控股股东股权质押对上市公司在“高送转”与现金股利之间如何选择的影响。本文发现,当控股股东进行了股权质押时,上市公司更可能推出“高送转”的利润分配方案,回避或降低现金股利的倾向更高,这与我国资本市场投资者对“高送转”与现金股利之间偏好差异一致;这一关系在控股股东质押股份比例越高、质押股权面临的平仓风险越高时更为显著。本文的研究揭示了控股股东股权质押在公司股利政策选择方面的经济后果,并为市场投资者对“高送转”以及现金股利的不同偏好提供了增量证据。  相似文献   

8.
关于股改前后现金股利影响因素的实证研究   总被引:20,自引:2,他引:18  
对股改前后影响现金股利水平的公司治理变量研究表明,虽然股改矫正了现金股利与增长机会之间的关系,使股改后当存在增长机会时,公司会减少现金股利的发放,但是我国上市公司的现金股利尚未呈现出全流通资本市场上作为降低控股股东与中小股东代理成本工具的现金股利政策应有的特征,突出表现在股改前后影响上市公司现金股利支付水平的股权结构变量并未发生变化,股改前后都存在股权集中度、第一大股东持股比例及第二到第十大股东持股比例与每股现金股利呈显著正相关、而流通(非限售)股比例与每股现金股利呈显著负相关的关系。  相似文献   

9.
本文基于公司现金股利政策的基本理论,分析我国上市公司现金股利政策特征,对影响我国上市公司现金股利政策的因素进行逐一分析,分析结果表明:我国上市公司现金股利政策受到国有股及法人控股比例、大股东控制、盈利能力、公司流动性、偿债能力、公司规模、行业属性、法律制度以及契约制度等因素影响.本文认为,我国上市公司的现金红利政策是一个公司治理问题,而不是一个单纯的财务问题.  相似文献   

10.
我国上市公司控股股东侵占上市公司以及中小股东利益的行为屡见不鲜。其主要途径包括:虚假招股说明书、关联交易、股利政策、定向增发以及利润操纵。上市公司中小股东与控股股东间存在着委托代理关系。控股股东的利益侵占行为不仅降低了上市公司的期望收益,还降低了控股股东自身的努力程度以及所享有的收益份额。通过推进上市公司股权分散化、完善上市公司信息披露制度、推进"以股抵债"等金融创新,可以纠正上市公司控股股东侵占中小股东利益行为。  相似文献   

11.
This paper examines the impact of ownership structure on executive compensation in China's listed firms. We find that the cash flow rights of ultimate controlling shareholders have a positive effect on the pay–performance relationship, while a divergence between control rights and cash flow rights has a significantly negative effect on the pay–performance relationship. We divide our sample based on ultimate controlling shareholders' type into state owned enterprises (SOE), state assets management bureaus (SAMB), and privately controlled firms. We find that in SOE controlled firms cash flow rights have a significant impact on accounting based pay–performance relationship. In privately controlled firms, cash flow rights affect the market based pay–performance relationship. In SAMB controlled firms, CEO pay bears no relationship with either accounting or market based performance. The evidence suggests that CEO pay is inefficient in firms where the state is the controlling shareholder because it is insensitive to market based performance but consistent with the efforts of controlling shareholders to maximize their private benefit.  相似文献   

12.
China has some unique institutional features. For example, the shares of listed firms are segmented into negotiable and nonnegotiable ones. The controlling shareholders, usually connected to the government, hold nonnegotiable shares. We examine how these institutional features affected cash dividend payments in China during the period 1994-2006. We find that dividend payments are positively associated with the proportion of nonnegotiable shares in a firm and the proportion of nonnegotiable shares held by the controlling shareholder; moreover, the 2001 China Securities Regulatory Commission stipulation requiring cash dividend payments does not benefit negotiable shareholders. However, we also find that dividend payments are downside flexible, and controlling shareholders cannot force firms to pay or to pay more dividends when firms' earnings decline significantly. The conventional factors, especially profitability or the capability to pay, still play an important role in determining the dividend policy. The propensity to pay and the payout ratio in China are not high compared to those of other countries.  相似文献   

13.
Using a sample of 1486 Chinese A-share listed companies for the period 2004–2008, this study empirically tests the impact of family control, institutional environment and their interaction on the cash dividend policy of listed companies. Our results indicate that (1) family firms have a lower cash dividend payout ratio and propensity to pay dividends than non-family firms; (2) a favorable regional institutional environment has a significant positive impact on the cash dividend payout ratio and propensity to pay dividends of listed companies; and (3) the impact of the regional institutional environment on cash dividends is stronger in family firms than in non-family firms. Somewhat surprisingly, we find that controlling family shareholders in China may intensify Agency Problem I (the owner–manager conflict) rather than Agency Problem II (the controlling shareholder–minority shareholder conflict), and thus have a significant negative impact on cash dividend policy. In contrast, a favorable regional institutional environment plays a positive corporate governance role in mitigating Agency Problem I and encouraging family firms to pay cash dividends.  相似文献   

14.
We examine how the market values operating assets in the presence of time-varying ex ante risk that these assets may be tunneled away. We analyze pairs of Chinese publicly listed firms and their non-listed parents and examine the market valuation of current assets (cash balances, trade receivables, receivables due from the controlling shareholders, inventories) and fixed assets on the publicly listed firm's balance sheet. Our results show that in periods when the risk of tunneling from the publicly listed firm to its controlling shareholder increases, operating assets that are easy to tunnel (cash and receivables due from the controlling shareholder) are valued at larger discounts, while operating assets that are not easy to tunnel (trade receivables, inventories, fixed assets) are not valued at such discounts.  相似文献   

15.
This paper examines the effect of entrenched insiders’ reputational concerns on corporate payout policy in Taiwan, a market in which typical public firms are controlled by a single dominant shareholder who is subject to weak takeover threats and has incentives and abilities to extract private benefits by oppressing minority equity holders. The reputation‐building hypothesis predicts that firms with higher expropriation risk by a controlling shareholder make more payouts to credibly commit not to expropriate minority shareholders, thereby establishing reputation in the capital market for risk diversification and low‐cost external financing. I show that corporate payout intensity is significantly and positively correlated with measures related to the moral hazard of dominant owners. The reputation effect manifests in firms that most value it; the interaction analyses indicate that younger, smaller, or growth firms with higher controlling shareholder expropriation risk pay more cash dividends. Moreover, firms are less likely to omit dividends and more likely to resume dividends when their controlling shareholders are more entrenched. Finally, I show that the value of cash dividends is higher for firms with higher controlling shareholder expropriation risk and that expected dividend increases in these firms are value enhancing.  相似文献   

16.
According to classic corporate governance theory, strengthening large shareholders’ cash flow rights without changing their control rights should reduce expropriation incentives by better aligning their interests with those of minority shareholders. However, due to the weaker investor protections and low dividend payouts of listed firms in China, large shareholders typically extract private benefits instead of seeking shared benefits through dividends. They therefore care more about control rights than cash flow rights. An empirical study using the exogenous changes of two rounds of dividend tax reductions reveals that strengthening the largest shareholders’ cash flow rights leaves their expropriation activities unchanged and firm value does not increase. However, when other shareholders supervise the largest shareholder, expropriation activities ease significantly.  相似文献   

17.
This article examines how controlling shareholders may affect the relationship between the level of corporate social responsibility (CSR) and earnings quality. We find that controlling shareholders have a significant impact on the relationship between the level of CSR and earnings quality; the relationship between the level of CSR and earnings quality is significantly positive in privately owned enterprises but not state-owned enterprises; and, among state-owned enterprises, the relationship is weaker at enterprises controlled by the central government than at those controlled by local governments. Our article highlights the differential impacts of controlling shareholders on the relationship between CSR and earnings quality.  相似文献   

18.
本文以截至2011年底完成股改并满足一定条件的788家上市公司为研究样本,以2004-2011年为时间窗口,研究了控股股东的现金积累偏好在股改前后的差异。按照股权性质分组的研究结论表明,非国有企业控股股东的现金积累偏好在股改后明显减弱,而国有企业前后没有明显变化。按照股改批次分组研究结论表明,控股股东对公司持现比率的影响在股改后存在明显减弱的证据,证实了股改对控股股东侵占动机的缓解作用。  相似文献   

19.
We investigate the relation between the internally generated cash flows and fixed asset investments of Chinese firms and find that it is U-shaped. Cash flow and investment are negatively related for low levels of cash flow but positively related for high levels of cash flow. We find that government controlled listed firms have greater investment–cash flow sensitivities than do privately controlled listed companies, especially on the left-hand side of the U-shaped curve where cash flow is negative. However, the difference in sensitivities appears only among firms that possess few profitable investment opportunities. We attribute this finding to the government having multiple socio-economic objectives, which leads to increased capital expenditures by the firms it controls when internal funds are abundant and when internal funds are negative. There is no evidence that access to finance and soft budget constraints explain the differences between the investment–cash flow sensitivities of government controlled and privately controlled listed firms.  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号