定向增发整体上市、机构投资者与短期市场反应

整体上市的优越性早已引起关注,但关于机构投资者的参与对整体上市影响的研究仍较为缺乏。本文以2004—2013年通过定向增发实现整体上市的公司为研究样本,系统分析机构投资者的认购情况与短期市场反应之间的关系。研究发现:(1)定向增发整体上市的市场反应显著为正,且有机构投资者参与的公司市场反应更好;(2)券商、基金、投资公司等相对独立的机构投资者的认购比例与定向增发整体上市市场反应之间存在倒U形关系,信托、保险等公司与上市公司可能存在一定商业关系,其参与程度对市场反应不产生规律性影响。     

浅析定向增发整体上市

继股权分置改革后,整体上市作为我国证券市场上的又一里程碑,逐步成为证券市场的一个热点问题。随着武钢股份以定向增发模式实现整体上市以来,通过定向增发实现整体上市已经成为我国企业集团常用的方式。本文对此做些简要的分析。     

定向增发与整体上市的利益路径分析

通过定向增发完成整体上市是政府倡导的发展方向,其宗旨是鼓励优质资源向上市公司集中.笔者通过比较历史上公开增发和定向增发,试图探索参与定发增发的投资者牟利路径以及对资本市场的影响.     

上市公司定向增发融资收购研究

本文通过研究公司定向增发纳入资产后的绩效来对定向增发这一现象进行评述,并对该过程中存在的问题进行发掘,提出更趋完善的解决办法.     

上市公司定向增发融资收购研究

本文通过研究公司定向增发纳入资产后的绩效来对定向增发这一现象进行评述,并对该过程中存在的问题进行发掘,提出更趋完善的解决办法。     

投资者异质信念与定向增发股价长期市场表现

近年来,基于异质信念的行为金融理论已经成为国际学术界的重要研究前沿。本文结合中国资本市场特殊制度背景,首次从投资者异质信念视角实证检验了上市公司定向增发后股价长期市场表现。研究结果表明:投资者异质信念越大,上市公司实施定向增发后公司股价长期市场表现越差;当发行对象为机构投资者时,异质信念对定向增发后股价的负向作用更加显著。此外,本文还进一步发现公司定向增发后的经营业绩变化也与投资者异质信念呈显著负相关关系。本文的研究结论丰富了投资者异质信念假说在公司股权再融资领域中的研究范畴。     

定向增发新股折扣率的影响因素及其与公司短期股价关系的实证研究——来自中国上市公司的经验证据

本文分析了影响中国上市公司定向增发新股折扣率的因素,并研究了中国上市公司定向增发新股折扣率对公司短期股价表现的影响。本文认为,影响中国上市公司定向增发新股折扣率的因素与外国不同,中国上市公司定向增发新股折扣率的高低与股东的身份有关,向控股股东及关联投资者定向增发新股的折扣率要低于向非关联投资者定向增发新股的折扣率。并且,中国上市公司定向增发新股的折扣率越低,投资者获得的超额累积收益率越高。本文运用中国证券市场定向增发新股的数据,对影响中国上市公司定向增发新股折扣率的因素及中国上市公司定向增发新股折扣率对公司短期股价表现的影响分别进行了实证研究,实证研究结果证明了本文理论分析的结论。     

上市公司增发新股上市日与市场反应

根据证监会的规定,上市公司增发过程中必须发生若干次公告,进行信息披露,那么对于哪些事件市场反应表现得更为敏感呢?增发新股进程中典型事件有:年报披露、董事会预案公告、临时性股东大会公告、股东大会公告、证监会批准公告、新股上市。以上述事件发生日为基准日,构造[-10,10]时间窗口,如果上一周或下一周涨跌幅超过某个阈值     

上市公司增发新股信息与股票价格波动的实证研究

根据沪深两市的样本，实证研究我国资本市场增发新股信息对股坐的影响，结论是目前增发新股办法尚有许多值得改进之处。     

增发新股中的利益博弈和新股定价

本文将股票价格看作内在价值和一个美式看涨期权,对增发过程和IPO的区别之处--即时利益输送和股票价值两方面综合考虑,确定新老股东增发博弈中的支付函数,根据发行成功的纳什均衡条件得到增发定价合理值或合理区间,并利用该结果对69家增发公司实例进行分析,得出我国增发定价普遍高估,而现有的竞价机制具有一定的矫正功能的结论.     

The Effects of Private Investments in Public Equity on R&D Investment in Small and Medium-Size Enterprises

This paper provides evidence that small and medium-size enterprises (SMEs) use a portion of private investments in public equity (PIPEs) for current research and development (R&D) investment, hold the rest in liquidity reserves such as cash assets and working capital, and ultimately use these reserves to smooth R&D investment. That is, PIPEs may have a direct effect on R&D investment and an indirect or smoothing effect using liquidity reserves. This paper also shows that innovative SMEs such as venture businesses, inno-biz firms, and management innovative firms are more likely to use PIPEs for R&D investment than are noninnovative SMEs. The implications of this paper are that PIPEs can be used as an important source of external financing to fund R&D investment and can be particularly valuable for R&D investment in innovative SMEs.     

Private Equity Performance and Liquidity Risk

Private equity has traditionally been thought to provide diversification benefits. However, these benefits may be lower than anticipated as we find that private equity suffers from significant exposure to the same liquidity risk factor as public equity and other alternative asset classes. The unconditional liquidity risk premium is about 3% annually and, in a four‐factor model, the inclusion of this liquidity risk premium reduces alpha to zero. In addition, we provide evidence that the link between private equity returns and overall market liquidity occurs via a funding liquidity channel.     

我国私募股权投资的差别化发展

私募股权投资在我国作为一种新兴的投融资方式,对我国企业的发展有很大的促进作用.文章依据我国私募股权投资的区域数据分析,研究区域私募股权幕金发展的差异,并提出加快我国三人区域私募股权投资发展的建议.     

私募股权投资花落谁家?

成功融资案例的启示 银泰百货集团是1996年成立的以年轻人和新型家庭为主要客户群的区域性百货连锁店.枫谷投资作为银泰百货的财务顾问,为其提供了国际重组的战略框架,在此基础上,枫谷投资帮助银泰百货在2005年成功地获得了华平国际投资集团约7亿元人民币的投资,推动了银泰百货的快速增长.     

Public vs. Private Equity*

Many corporate executives view private equity as a last resort, as expensive capital that should be tapped only by companies that don't have access to presumably cheaper public equity. The reality of private equity, however, is more complex, and potentially quite rewarding, for both shareholders and management. This paper surveys some of the academic work on the costs and benefits of public vs. private equity, contrasting the private equity investment process with its public counterpart and exploring how such a process may add value. The importance of public equity, particularly for very large companies and growth companies with large capital requirements, is indisputable. But as investment bankers and other practitioners have noted, under certain circumstances the public markets effectively become “closed” to some public companies. Moreover, the cost of equity raised in public markets involves much more than the direct costs of underwriters, attorneys, and accountants. Some indication of the indirect costs is provided by the market's typically negative reaction to announcements of seasoned equity offerings. Although the negative reaction averages about 3%, in some cases stock prices drop by as much as 10%, thereby diluting the value of existing stockholders. Most academics attribute this reaction to the informational disadvantage of public stockholders. Private equity is designed in large part to overcome this information problem by replacing the monitoring performed by the typical public company board with the oversight of better informed and more highly motivated owners. A growing body of academic research suggests that private equity investors add value to the companies they invest in, and that the best investors are consistently effective in so doing. What's more, even public companies that tap private equity seem to benefit. As the author found in his own research on PIPES (Private Investment in Public Equity Securities) transactions, even though such securities are issued to private equity investors at a discount to the prevailing market price, the average market response to the announcement of such transactions is a positive 10%. In short, the participation of private equity investors is perceived to create value, and some of this value is shared with the rest of the market.     

Private Equity and Investment in Innovation: Evidence from Patents

The authors' analysis of the patenting activity of 472 companies that received private equity investments between 1986 and 2005 provides suggestive evidence of an increase in the effectiveness (though not necessarily the quantity) of their innovative activities. After such companies received private equity backing, the patents they applied for received more frequent citations than patents awarded before the involvement of PE firms. Companies acquired by private equity also show no sign of deterioration in patent “originality” and “generality,” which have been shown to be fairly reliable indicators of the fundamental nature of the research. And while there is no clear pattern of change in the level of patenting activity, corporate patent portfolios become more focused in the years after the private equity investments. The increases in our measure of patent “impact” are greatest in the areas that constitute the companies' historical core strengths. These findings are likely to prove increasingly important as private equity continues its incursions into growth areas of the economy.     

政府背景私募股权投资机构的联合投资行为分析

具有政府背景的私募股权投资机构是当前我国私募股权投融资市场中独具特色的积极参与者,他们的参与旨在发挥引导作用,扶持私募产业的发展,而联合投资便是理想方式之一.文章通过实证的方法,从联合投资行为和投资方式两方面探讨政府背景与非政府背景私募股权投资机构的投资行为差异,考察引导作用的实践.研究发现政府背景私募股权投资机构在投资时具有优势,联合投资的形式已得到较为广泛地应用,但引导作用的实现还有待各方共同努力.     

私募股权投资基金委托代理关系分析

本文研究了私募股权投资基金中委托-代理关系的三个方面,一是私募股权投资基金委托-代理关系的主体及其成因,二是有限合伙制基金解决委托代理问题、降低代理成本的定性分析,三是有限合伙制私募股权基金解决委托代理问题、降低代理成本的博弈分析。研究结果表明:我国私募股权投资基金的发展方向应为有限合伙制,其操作的关键在于加强信息披露和信息沟通,增强基金管理人的信用,注重成熟代理人市场的培育。     

Long-Run Performance following Private Placements of Equity

Public firms that place equity privately experience positive announcements effects, with negative post-announcement stock-price performance. This finding is inconsistent with the underreaction hypothesis. Instead, it suggests that investors are overoptimistic about the prospects of firms issuing equity, regardless of the method of issuance. Further, in contrast to public offerings, private issues follow periods of relatively poor operating performance. Thus, investor overoptimism at the time of private issues is not due to the behavioral tendency to overweight recent experience at the expense of long-term averages.