对新时期金融支持精准扶贫工作的几点认识

文章简要论述了金融支持精准扶贫的重要意义,之后从发挥货币政策工具引导作用、探索创新多种金融模式、启动专项贷款工程、完善普惠金融服务功能四个方面总结了甘肃省金融支持精准扶贫做出的有益探索,提出新时期金融支持精准扶贫的着力点在于创新运用货币政策工具,引导金融资源向贫困地区聚集;发展普惠金融,增加贫困地区金融服务的可获得性;建立健全风险分散补偿机制,推动金融扶贫可持续发展;加强金融基础设施建设,优化金融生态环境;整合扶贫资源和力量,构筑脱贫攻坚强大合力.     

关于创新发展普惠金融策略的思考

发展普惠金融是我国金融改革和转型的重要方向之一,然而供给侧改革背景下其发展受限于多重不利因素。金融排斥导致其“普惠性”与“盈利性”目标相悖是普惠金融发展受限的内在原因;监管错位构成了阻碍普惠金融发展的政策阻碍;共享性征信体系尚未完成是普惠金融发展不足的环境壁垒,寻求普惠金融创新发展路径迫在眉睫。而互联网金融的蓬勃发展以及金融技术的不断革新为我国普惠金融创新发展带来了新的契机,因此本文基于上述两个视角研究我国普惠金融创新发展路径,从发挥政府引导与支持作用、引导互联网金融回归普惠之道、加大商业性金融机构普惠资源投入、依靠金融技术建设普惠金融发展服务机制四个角度探索我国普惠金融体系建设之道。     

发展数字普惠金融提升脱贫攻坚效能

数字普惠金融作为数字技术和普惠金融融合的产物,为贫困和长尾人群提供了相对公平的共享金融服务契机和增收脱贫的可能性.文章概述了我国普惠金融发展现状,总结了贫困地区金融脱贫的实践.在此基础上,对新常态下如何把数字普惠金融与扶贫攻坚结合起来进行了探讨,提出重视数字技术在普惠金融中的应用,缓解金融排斥问题;建立数字普惠金融监测与评价体系,关注扶贫效率问题;继续实施"八精准"战略行动,解决联动问题;优化农村生态环境建设,解决内生动力问题;推广与普及农业保险,熨平短板掣肘问题;坚持风险底线思维,规避安全隐患问题.     

新金融业态视角下我国普惠金融发展研究

依托以互联网金融和金融科技为代表的新金融业态模式创新作为切入点,形成"政府主导、商业银行等金融机构主动参与、全民普惠金融理念和风险意识培植"相契合的方式,来解决传统普惠金融实践过程中暴露的"短板"问题是我国发展普惠金融的必由之路。具体操作上,需要在政府主导普惠金融体系顶层设计的基础上,依靠法律法规体系和政策支持体系的建设及其内容的细化和可操作化为突破口,来营造普惠金融发展的良好金融生态环境;依托互联网金融、金融科技等为代表的新金融业态发展带来的模式变革和创新,来激发金融机构自身比较优势的发挥,渠道的拓展和产品、服务等方式的创新,去主动对接普惠金融发展的机遇;通过对全民普惠金融理念和风险意识的培植,激发全员主动参与普惠金融实践的活力。     

数字普惠金融减贫:理论逻辑、模式构建与推进路径

数字普惠金融是金融供给侧结构性改革的重要手段和方式,为深入推进金融普惠和贫困减缓提供了新思路。数字普惠金融借助金融科技优势可突破传统金融扶贫的现实难点,在促进城乡金融资源均衡配置基础上,有效破解金融扶贫的双重目标矛盾,将更多贫弱群体纳入精准画像目标,有效提升贫困及偏远地区的金融可获得性。金融扶贫长效机制的形成必须与贫困地区扶贫产业相联结,运用数字技术将普惠金融资源有效嵌入地方特色产业链条,进而构建基于市场化机制的数字产业链金融减贫模式,促使参与金融扶贫的主体从分散单体向链式团体转变,从而提升金融扶贫风险的可控性。为保障数字普惠金融减贫模式的有效运行,充分发挥数字普惠金融减贫优势,实现全面消除绝对贫困的目标,要加强贫困地区数字基础设施建设,优化贫困地区数字金融服务环境,强化贫困户的数字金融能力建设,夯实数字普惠金融扶贫产业基础。     

内蒙古普惠金融支持精准扶贫的问题与对策研究

近年来,普惠金融发展迅速,其主要目的是让我们每个人都能够享受到平等的金融服务。现如今贫困问题仍然是内蒙古经济发展的一个短板,内蒙古脱贫攻坚的任务依然严峻。那么,普惠金融的发展是否在精准扶贫中起到了重要作用就成为一个迫在眉睫的重要课题。本文从普惠金融支持精准扶贫的理论基础入手,探讨了普惠金融与精准扶贫的关系以及扶贫模式;分析了内蒙古普惠金融发展的现状和普惠金融支持精准扶贫的发展现状与存在的问题;最后针对存在的问题提出了普惠金融更好地支持精准扶贫的政策建议。     

深化农村普惠金融供给侧改革的内涵辨析

普惠金融实质上更多表现为农村普惠金融,这决定了农村金融改革的主要任务是 推动农村普惠金融供给侧结构性改革,即按照商业化可持续发展原则,激励金融机构创新符 合弱势群体金融需求、成本适度的金融产品。普惠金融和扶贫金融的服务对象虽然都是弱势群 体,但扶贫金融更加关注较为贫困的弱势群体,决定了前者具有商业性金融属性,后者具有政 策性金融属性。但鉴于普惠金融和扶贫金融的金融属性,不能寄望于通过发挥两者作用推动所 有弱势群体尤其是极度贫困人口实现脱贫攻坚目标和发展壮大。     

我国普惠金融发展路径创新研究

近几年,在国家高度重视和一系列政府扶持政策的支撑下,我国普惠金融得到了很大发展,但是在普惠程度上与理想目标还有较大差距,为了缩小这种差距,创新普惠金融发展路径,真正实现金融为实体经济发展服务的目标具有重要意义。为此文章首先阐述了普惠金融的概况;然后总结出普惠金融发展过程中存在着政策不系统、信息不健全、供需不匹配、资金配置不对称和成本收益不合理等主要问题;最后从制度创新、产品创新、机构创新和科技创新四个方面提出了促进我国普惠金融科学发展的创新路径。     

后脱贫时代金融扶贫模式的转型探索--以河北阜平县为例

以金融扶贫的阜平模式为例,探索了后脱贫时代金融扶贫向普惠金融的转型问题。指出阜平模式的核心经验在于政府主导,以联办共保模式为农业产业风险兜底,建立风险共担机制撬动金融资源扶贫,打造县、乡、村三级金融服务网络与金融机构协同推进线下普惠金融发展等;发现阜平模式的脱贫成效显著,但在可持续发展方面,受到县级政府财力薄弱、保险公司运营亏损、担保公司代偿比例过高及金融服务网络效率低下等因素的困扰。最后从脱贫攻坚与乡村振兴衔接和可持续发展的角度提出发展数字普惠金融和探索"保险+期货"模式、建立稳固的农业产业链、加大代偿贷款的清收力度、完善三级金融服务体系和农村信用体系等对策建议。     

普惠金融与精准扶贫调查研究——以河北省为例

在国家和全社会的共同努力下,经过30多年的扶贫开发,扶贫工作取得了举世瞩目的成就,但随着全面实现小康社会目标的临近,扶贫工作的艰巨性、紧迫性更为突出,寻求更为有效的扶贫工作模式成为重要课题.从国内外金融扶贫实践入手,阐明了普惠金融与精准扶贫的关系,针对河北省精准扶贫、普惠金融建设现状,较为深入地分析了当前河北省贫困地区普惠金融建设存在的困难和问题,并针对困难和问题提出了对策建议.     

跨行查询收费:替银行说几句话

银行卡跨行查询收费一经推出即遭到铺天盖地的反对,有的消费者甚至诉诸法庭。银行收取跨行查询费的行为究竟是出于对市场化原则的尊重还是蔑视?     

Trust for accounting and accounting for trust

This paper combines insights from the sociology of knowledge and the emerging practice-based literature on learning and knowing to extend the institutional framework of accounting change developed by Burns and Scapens [Burns, J., Scapens, R.W., 2000. Conceptualising management accounting change: an institutional framework. Manage. Acc. Res., 11, 3–25]. In particular, it explores how management accounting systems (MAS) can be implicated in processes of learning and culture change, and used to identify ‘trustworthy’ solutions in the face of organisational crises. A case study of an Italian company, which was subject to massive change following its acquisition by General Electric, is used to discuss how, when crises arise and organisation members find themselves under intense pressure for change, their rationales and routinised behaviour, which are driven by the existing knowledge and cultural assumptions, are challenged. The case illustrates how MAS can act as sources of trust for the processes of change – i.e., accounting for trust; while at the same time being socially constructed objects of trust – i.e., trust for accounting. Drawing on the concept of personal trust and the notion of roles as access points to organisational (expert) systems, the paper discusses how, in this case, finance experts facilitated the acceptance and progressive sharing of new rationales and routines. Clearly, this does not guarantee that change will occur or occur in some ‘desired’ direction in other cases, but it increases the possibility of replacing trust in the predictability of routines with feelings of trust for change.     

Accounting for decisions and decisions for accounting

Behavioral decision theory (BDT) is concerned with “accounting for decisions”. The development of this interdisciplinary field is traced from the appearance of several key publications in the 1950s to the present. Whereas the 1960s saw increasing theoretical and empirical work, the field really started to flourish in the 1970s with the appearance of the review by Slovic & Lichtenstein (Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, pp. 549–744, 1971), and key papers on probabilistic judgment (Tversky & Kahneman, Science, pp. 1124–1131, 1974), and choice (Kahneman & Tversky, Econometrica, pp. 263–291, 1979). From the early 1980s to the present, BDT has seen considerable consolidation and expansion and its influence now permeates many fields of enquiry. After this brief history, eight major ideas or findings are discussed. These are: (1) that judgment can be modeled; (2) bounded rationality; (3) to understand decision making, understanding the task is more important than understanding the people; (4) levels of aspiration/reference points; (5) use of heuristic rules; (6) the importance of adding; (7) search for confirmation; and (8) thought as construction. Next, comments are addressed to differences between BDT and problem solving/cognitive science. It is argued that whereas many substantive differences are artificial, two distinct communities of researchers do exist. This is followed by a discussion of some major shortcomings currently facing BDT that include questions about the robustness of findings as well as overconcern with a few specific, “paradoxial” results. On the other hand, there are many interesting issues that BDT could address and several specific suggestions are made. Moreover, these issues represent opportunities for accounting research and several are enumerated. Finally, BDT presents “decisions for accounting” in the sense that scarce resources need to be allocated to different types of research that could illuminate accounting issues. The argument is made that BDT is one research metaphor or paradigm that has proved useful in accounting and that should be supported. Such support, however, may mean that some researchers may work on issues that, at first blush, might seem distant from accounting per se.     

微笑传递快乐 激情奉献奥运

前言：在2008年北京奥运会上,奥运志愿者成为了一道亮丽的风景线,他们用自己最美的微笑和热情的服务给世界留下了深刻的印象。在这个充满青春朝气的群体中,也活跃着财政青年的身影,他们以40天辛勤付出和无私奉献,圆满完成使命,为北京奥运的成功举办贡献了力量,也留下人生中美好的回忆。现刊载中评协奥运志愿者——李念辰和崔新园的文章,将他们辛苦工作的经历再现,让他们的欢乐与广大读者共享。     

寿险产品评价体系研究

中国保险市场的发展,迫切需要建立保险评价体系.保险产品的评价体系是保险评价的核心,其主要目标是以保险产品相对透明为目的进行的.在所有的保险产品中,人身保险产品与社会大众关系最为密切,人身保险在保险业的保费收入中也占有决定性地位.所以,当务之急是首先建立人身保险产品的评价体系.寿险保单的保障程度、投资价值以及附带的服务水平是寿险产品的核心问题,应当成为寿险产品评价的主要内容.本文重点从寿险产品保障程度进行评价研究.     

Managing for efficiency, managing for equity

It is a truism that not all managers do the same things in the same ways. Less often recognized, however, is the fact that the essential tasks and goals of management are not everywhere the same. Indeed, so unlike each other are the two primary systems of management--the "technocratic" and the "political"--that they consistently vary in the implicit contract offered to participants, the career path of members, the use of organizational structure, the choice of purpose, and the allocation of resources, but also provides a conceptual framework for understanding why they happen and what can be done to prevent their happening in the future.     

关于《以财务报告为目的的评估指南（试行）》的起草说明

为适应新兴评估市场领域的发展,规范注册资产评估师执行以财务报告为目的的评估业务,保证评估执业质量,维护社会公共利益和资产评估各方当事人合法权益,中评协在财政部有关司局的帮助和指导下,组织有关专家起草了《以财务报告为目的的评估指南（试行）》（以下简称《指南》）。为便于评估机构和注册资产评估师以及相关部门、人士全面理解《指南》,现将有关起草情况说明如下。