共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 93 毫秒
1.
IPO折价是我国股票市场的一个普遍现象毒按照承销商声誉理论,认为高声誉的承销商为了维护自己的声誉,只会选择承销那些高质量企业的IPO.所以,承销商的声誉和IPO折价程度之间存在负相关. 相似文献
2.
《金融监管研究》2013,(2)
中国IPO新股发行市场排队上市和二级市场持续下跌形成鲜明对比。在IPO发行市场上,高发行价格和高IPO抑价率并存,表明中国IPO发行市场相对低效并且价格发现功能严重不足。本文运用Djankov等(2003)以及Shleifer(2005)建立的分析股票市场监管执行机制的理论框架,分析了中国保荐人制度在结合市场自律和政府监管的同时,缺乏法院诉讼机制的问题。而进一步的实证研究表明,在缺乏法院诉讼机制的条件下,证监会对保荐人的责任处罚并没有影响该保荐人所在证券公司承销股票发行的IPO折价率,也没有影响受处罚证券公司收取的承销及保荐费率。在理论与实证分析的基础上,本文讨论了保荐人制度失效的原因,并提出发行审核制度的改革建议。 相似文献
3.
IPO发行成本与中介机构声誉——来自中国创业板市场的证据 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
本文利用2009年10月23日中国创业板市场开板以来至2010年12月31日的153只IPO样本数据,研究了IPO发行成本与中介机构声誉之间的关系。实证结果表明:中介机构声誉对IPO直接成本有显著正影响,存在着明显的声誉溢价效应;中介机构声誉对IPO间接成本有显著负影响,承销商声誉越高,间接成本越低;由于间接成本占比较大,声誉的负向影响要大过正向影响,整体来看,中介机构声誉对IPO发行总成本有显著负影响。因此,从股票发行者成本控制的角度出发,本文结论支持发行者选择高声誉的中介机构。 相似文献
4.
IPO定价效率直接影响着股票市场资金融通和优化资源配置功能的发挥,以及资本市场的长期发展。本文从承销商视角出发,通过引入声誉成本因素,构建承销商IPO定价模型,模型实证分析显示:超额配售选择权和承销商声誉均能够提高IPO定价效率,但我国A股市场超额配售选择权对IPO定价效率的影响不显著,承销商声誉与IPO定价效率之间呈显著正相关关系,且影响系数较小。 相似文献
5.
伴随两次股票发行机制的改革,一级市场抑价率已经显著降低,个股特质信息含量在发行价格中的体现也在不断增加,但承销商声誉机制在IPO市场上还远没有发挥应有的作用。 相似文献
6.
7.
在我国特殊的T+1交易制度下,我国的IPO首日换手率偏高.分析发现,导致我国IPO股票发生高换手率的因素有:初始收益率、市场特征、承销商声誉、发行公司年龄和初始发行规模.并发现,如果公司的发行规模大于1.5亿元人民币时,换手行为与承销商的声誉不相关.应加强对不正常的新股首日高换手的监管,防范动机不良的交易者的违法乱市行为,以规范我国股市的良性发展. 相似文献
8.
科创板作为试点推行注册制,在询价定价机制改革的基础上,又进行了“券商跟投”等制度创新。本文从投资银行声誉角度出发,研究了科创板的跟投制度对新股定价的影响。研究发现:(1)相比主板,科创板公司IPO抑价率显著更低,定价效率更高;(2)科创板公司中,投资银行的声誉降低了信息不对称程度,从而显著降低IPO抑价率;(3)在跟投的制度背景下,投资银行同时也是“投资者”,跟投比例越高,其抬高发行价的机会主义行为更少;(4)进一步,对于高跟投比例的科创板公司,投资银行声誉机制发挥的作用更大。本文的研究结果表明,在当前全面推行注册制的背景下,投资银行声誉机制和市场的健康运行相辅相成,应强化投资银行在IPO过程中的信息认证功能,并通过跟投制度形成对投资银行定价的市场约束。 相似文献
9.
股票发行监管制度是企业进入股票市场的第一道门槛,因此对于股票市场的发展至关重要。在总结国内外IPO监管制度经验的基础上.我们认为单一的市场层次、单一的核准制、监管宽松和定价机制不完善,是我国IPO制度的主要症结所在。发展活跃成熟的场外市场引入场外上柜注册制及转板机制,加强监管、严刑峻法,加大违法违规的发行人、保荐人及询价对象的处罚力度,才能够从根本上解决我国股票市场IPO中存在的一系列问题。 相似文献
10.
本文依据信息不对称理论对中国证券市场在询价制下IPO抑价的成因进行分析。本文结舍近期我国股市IPO的实际情况,对我国询价制下上市公司IPO抑价原因和应对策略进行探讨,以期为承销商提供有益的帮助。 相似文献
11.
Richard B. Carter 《The Journal of Financial Research》1992,15(4):341-354
A recent examination of underwriter reputation and initial public offerings (IPOs) suggests that one of the reasons prestigious underwriters market low-risk IPOs is to increase the expected present value of subsequent offerings. There is a greater likelihood that a firm issuing low-risk IPOs will be a viable future operation with the potential for subsequent offerings than a firm issuing high-risk IPOs. I examine the hypothesis that the likelihood of subsequent offerings is negatively related to IPO risk. In addition to finding support for this hypothesis, I show that the likelihood of subsequent offerings is positively related to the IPO underwriter's reputation and negatively related to the IPO gross spread. Finally, I find that the likelihood of firms switching IPO underwriters for subsequent offerings decreases with increasing IPO underwriter reputation. 相似文献
12.
In this article, the authors update and confirm the findings of a 2005 article that was the first to view corporate underwriter choices as the outcome of a two‐sided matching process in which issuers look to the abilities of the underwriters offering their services and underwriters focus on the quality of the issuers that wish to use their services. This view offers a contrast with both the conventional representation of issuer‐underwriter associations as one‐sided decisions (by either issuers or underwriters) and the classical economist's representation of a competitive market in which prices serve as the primary market‐clearing mechanism. In their examination of both initial public offerings (IPOs) and seasoned equity offerings (SEOs) during the period 1980–2010, the authors continue to find strong evidence that higher‐quality issuers associate with more reputable underwriters and lower‐quality issuers match with lower reputation underwriters. Moreover, when examining cases of underwriter switching between an IPO and SEOs by the same issuer, they find that cases involving the largest divergence in the relative rankings of issuer and underwriter were the most likely to produce a change of underwriter—and that issuers that experienced larger post‐ IPO increases in quality were more likely to find more reputable underwriters for their SEOs (than for their IPOs). The authors also find that the larger the number of offerings brought to market in a given year, the smaller the market share of the top‐tier underwriters, likely reflecting the willingness of the most reputable underwriters to turn down business to maintain quality and reputation. Finally, the most reputable underwriters appear to benefit from the fact that the issuers whose IPOs they underwrite end up raising larger amounts of capital, both at the time of the IPO and in the larger and more frequent seasoned offerings by such issuers that come after the IPO. This evidence in support of two‐sided matching suggests that, especially for high‐quality issuers, the reputation of the underwriters they contract with for security offerings is likely to be more important than the underwriting fees they incur. What's more, the authors' finding that the most reputable underwriters are less likely to lose high‐quality clients and have more stable market share—and that the higher‐quality issuers they attract end up raising larger amounts of capital over their lives as public companies—suggests that underwriters' investments in building and preserving their reputations have a large expected payoff. 相似文献
13.
This paper studies the relationships between underwriter reputation, underwriter spread, and IPO underpricing. We consider the information content of underwriter spread and find that it conveys information pertinent to IPO quality. Because underwriter spread is endogenous, underpricing and underwriter spread are jointly determined in a simultaneous equation system. Also, we examine the IPO market for evidence of segmentation, and our results suggest some market segmentation. Underwriter spread impacts initial underpricing for a group of medium-reputation underwriters, while underpricing affects underwriter spread for groups of low- and high-reputation underwriters. Consequently, high-risk IPOs may not be priced the same way as low-risk IPOs. We attribute this finding to regulation, competition, and/or market segmentation. 相似文献
14.
This paper investigates the correlation between pre‐initial public offering (pre‐IPO) earnings management and underwriter reputation for issuers with different ownership structures in China. We document a significantly inverse relationship between underwriter reputation and pre‐IPO earnings management for non‐state‐owned enterprises (NSOE) issuers only, while no significant association is found for state‐owned enterprises (SOE) issuers. We also find that for the NSOE new issue market, underwriter reputation is positively correlated with issuer post‐IPO performance indicating that prestigious underwriters can incrementally improve issuer post‐IPO performance. 相似文献
15.
The extant literature offers extensive support for the significant role played by institutions in financial markets, but implicit regulation and monitoring have yet to be examined. This study fills this void in the literature by employing unique Chinese datasets to explore the implicit regulation and penalties imposed by the Chinese government in regulating the initial public offering (IPO) market. Of particular interest are the economic consequences of underwriting IPO deals for client firms that violate regulatory rules in China’s capital market. We provide evidence to show that the associated underwriters’ reputations are impaired and their market share declines. We further explore whether such negative consequences result from a market disciplinary mechanism or a penalty imposed by the government. To analyze the possibility of a market disciplinary mechanism at work, we investigate (1) the market reaction to other client firms whose IPO deals were underwritten by underwriters associated with a violation at the time the violation was publicly disclosed and (2) the under-pricing of IPO deals undertaken by these underwriters after such disclosure. To analyze whether the government imposes an implicit penalty, we examine the application processing time for future IPO deals underwritten by the associated underwriters and find it to be significantly longer than for IPO deals underwritten by other underwriters. Overall, there is little evidence to suggest that the market penalizes underwriters for the rule-violating behavior of their client firms in China. Instead, the Chinese government implicitly penalizes them by imposing more stringent criteria on and lengthening the processing time of the IPO deals they subsequently underwrite. 相似文献
16.
Underpricing and long-run performance of Chinese IPOs: the role of underwriter reputation 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
This study examines the impact of underwriter reputation on IPO underpricing and long-run performance in the China stock market
over the period 2001 to 2006. This sample period is notable for the implementation of a verification and approval system that
occurred during it, which provided underwriters more freedom to price IPOs. We develop two alternative proxies to measure
underwriter reputation based on either the ratio of the total gross proceeds raised or the number of IPOs managed by each
underwriter. We find that underwriter reputation does not affect the level of underpricing, but that the level of long-run
underperformance is significantly mitigated when IPOs are managed by more prestigious underwriters. 相似文献
17.
18.
This study contributes to the extant literature on the nature of earnings management surrounding initial public offerings (IPOs) by investigating the role of underwriter reputation. We argue that prestigious underwriters will protect their reputation by carefully monitoring and certifying financial information on IPO firms, thereby limiting any potential earnings manipulation. As a result, those IPO firms that are associated with more prestigious underwriters are likely to exhibit substantially less‐aggressive earnings management. Conversely, we find the existence of a negative relationship between earnings management and the post‐offer performance of an IPO firm’s stocks only for those firms associated with less‐prestigious underwriters. 相似文献
19.
Underwriter Reputation, Initial Returns, and the Long-Run Performance of IPO Stocks 总被引:22,自引:0,他引:22
We find that the underperformance of IPO stocks relative to the market over a three-year holding period is less severe for IPOs handled by more prestigious underwriters. Consistent with prior studies, we also find that IPOs managed by more reputable underwriters are associated with less short-run underpricing. Among the various existing proxies for underwriter reputation, the Carter–Manaster measure is the most significant in the context of initial returns and also in the context of the three-year performance of IPOs. The study also provides an updated list of the Carter–Manaster measure for various underwriters. 相似文献
20.
新股破发是目前中国股市目前面临的一个重要现象。本文基于2004年至2010年上市的A股IPO,研究合资承销商对新股破发率的影响。研究发现,合资承销商所承销的新股破发率显著低于本土承销商。合资承销商的低破发率主要归功于更加有效且符合市场预期的一级市场发行定价能力,其表现为合资承销商发行的股票的短期市场价格相对发行价的偏离程度显著低于本土承销商发行的股票。另外,我们还发现合资承销商采取了一定的托市行为,该行为也减小了短期内新股跌破发行价的概率。本文的发现从新股发行的角度提供了开放金融市场对我国资本市场影响的新现象。 相似文献