建立中央高校教育经费拨款新机制

目前,我国中央高校教育经费投入构成以中央教育经费拨款为主,主要采取综合定额加专项补助的方式,经费由财政、教育部门根据不同层次、不同类型和不同地区学生的生均拨款定额标准和高校在校生数核定下达,     

从性价比视角论高校学费定价

学费是高校办学水平和专业前景的价格反映。目前,我国高等教育各层次之间、各高校之间的学费标准差别不大,学费定价不能体现求学价格与教育服务质量、专业前景的正比例关系。本文从性价比视角来谈高校学费定价问题,目的是改进学费定价模式,实现学生读书的性价比基本相同。物价部门定期测定基准学费标准。基于性价比相同原则,依据学费听证会成果和基准学费标准,物价部门再测定各高校（专业）学费标准。在测定学费标准的过程中,要科学核算办学成本、合理划定国家和学生对办学成本的承担比例、统一学费性价比的考核口径。     

自费来华留学生高等教育学费定价原则研究

自费来华留学生高等教育学费定价有别于国内学生高等教育学费定价.不仅仅需要考虑高校办学成本、教学质量等因素,还需要考虑更多国际市场因素,本文从定价原则的角度分析了自费来华留学生学费该如何定价.     

高等学校财政专项经费管理研究

随着我国社会经济发展对人才的需要,增加教育经费的投入已经纳入国家中长期教育改革和发展规划纲要,高校财政专项经费作为财政性教育经费的组成部分,科学合理高效的使用,对高校健康、持续发展起着重要促进作用,但在实际执行过程中存在不少问题,文章通过对目前高校财政专项经费管理和执行过程中存在的问题进行分析和梳理,并针对性的提出了加强高校财政专项经费管理的对策和建议。     

普通高等学校经费收入预测模型

本文选取1997至2003年的数据,在对普通高等学校教育经费来源结构进行分析的基础上,构建了高等学校教育经费收入预测模型,并分别对教育经费组成中的财政经费和学费、社会团体和公民个人办学经费、社会捐资和集资办学经费及其他教育经费四种主要经费的预测方法进行了探讨。     

谈谈高校收费现有的问题和解决的办法

<正>高校学费收入,现在已发展为仅次于财政拨款的重要稳定的经费来源,它对解决和缓解教育经费不足起到了积极的作用。但是我国各高校学费欠费现象日趋严重,欠费已成为高校发展过程中急需解决的一个现实问题,如何更好地管理学费已经是不容忽视的问题。本文分析了高等学校学生收费存在的问题,并提出了加强学费管理的办法。     

后金融危机时代高校贷款风险控制

我国高校贷款规模巨大,在后金融危机下面临着严峻的债务危机风险。办学规模的急剧膨胀．教育经费来源单一,财政性教育经费投入不足和资金使用效益不高是导致贷款风险产生的主要因素。为保证高校人才培养质量,提高自主创新能力,政府应加大财政对教育的投入,高校要准确定位,科学控制贷款规模,多渠道筹集教育经费,依法理财,提高贷款资金的使用效益,有效控制高校贷款风险。     

基于项目库的公立高校预算管理问题研究——以N大学为例

完善的现代化教育投入机制和高效的资金使用效率是实现高等教育发展战略目标的重要保障之一。适应经济新常态,通过项目库管理的方式对教育经费投入实施全面预算管理,建立健全"全覆盖、全过程、全方位"的教育经费预算绩效管理体系,能够优化教育经费使用结构,提高教育经费的使用效益。严格推行项目库管理,进一步完善和优化高校预算管理不仅是财政深化预算管理体制改革的重要举措之一,也是优化教育资源配置,提高财政资金使用效益的必然要求和实现我国教育现代化的重要保障。     

发行教育彩票的可行性研究

目前,我国教育经费的主要来源渠道只有学费、政府拨款以及社会捐赠,教育经费投入不足问题长期制约着我国教育事业的发展。而发行教育彩票,在国外已有先例,作为缓解教育经费投入不足的途径之一,不失为一条值得尝试的筹资方式。从国内发展现状来看,彩票业具备广阔的市场空间和强大的筹资功能,从其经济属性和公益性特征来看,教育彩票的发行是具有可行性的。     

教育经费紧缺原因及解决对策

教育经费紧缺原因及解决对策张文库近几年国家各级财政对教育事业投入的资金不断增加，办学条件不断改善，教育事业得到了相应地发展。据我们黑龙江省松花江地区财政部门统计，全区每年投入教育事业经费占财政总支出的４３％以上，每年教育经费增长幅度均超过财政总支出增...     

支付能力差异、入学机会与学费的歧视性定价

社会成员之间的支付能力差异是任何社会客观存在的经济现象。学费制度下,解决支付能力差异,实现教育公平目标的基本思路有两条：一是对不同的人群实施有效的学生资助,二是对不同的人群制定不同的学费——歧视性定价,且两种解决方式可以实现有机的耦合。建立完善我国有效的大学生资助体系,制定科学合理、分类有序的学费定价制度,实行学费的歧视定价,是深化我国高等教育学费制度改革有效路径。     

Higher Education Finance in the UK*

The introduction of top‐up fees for home‐domiciled undergraduate tuition in England from 2006–07 – and their planned increase in 2012–13 – raises important issues for university funding in Scotland, since it abolished tuition fees for Scottish and EU students in 2000–01. This paper focuses on what the increase in resources directed at English universities arising from top‐up fees means for the relative funding of English and Scottish undergraduates. Widely‐used funding‐per‐head figures do not provide an accurate picture of home‐ and EU‐domiciled undergraduate funding, as they include funding for research, postgraduate degrees and overseas students. The empirical work of this paper focuses on creating a consistent series of funding per full‐time equivalent undergraduate over time for England and for Scotland, stripping out funding for research, non‐EU students and postgraduate degrees to create a more accurate picture of the funding gap between the two countries. It also takes into account the different composition of undergraduate degree subjects taken in England and Scotland. The findings indicate that the apparent historical advantage in funding per head in Scottish institutions compared with English ones has been largely driven by compositional differences: Scotland has a high proportion of medical, science and engineering undergraduates – subjects that command greater funding due to their relative complexity to teach. The top‐up fee introduced in 2006–07 brought funding per head in England to a level similar to that experienced in Scotland, and the future increase will result in funding per head in England outstripping that in Scotland by some magnitude. This suggests that the funding of Scottish students will fall significantly behind that of English students unless additional new sources of public or private funding for nScottish universities are found.     

强化高校收费管理工作的几点思考

收费管理是高校财务工作的重要内容，意义重大。文章结合自己在收费工作中的经验，就高校教育收费管理存在的问题及强化高校教育收费管理的措施略谈以下几点认识。     

自费来华留学学费定价研究

自费来华留学高等教育不仅具有一定的公共性,而且具有显著的私人性.对于来华留学生高等教育学费定价不仅需要考虑高校办学成本、教学质量和专业等国内因素,更要考虑国际汇率、通货膨胀率及国际教育市场需求状况等国际因素.本文就国内外留学生高等教育学费定价现状及特点进行分析,重点研究了国际因素对来华留学高等教育学费定价的影响,提出了...     

University Tuition Fees and High School Students’ Educational Intentions

This paper studies whether higher education tuition fees influence the intention to acquire a university degree among high school students and, if so, whether the effect on individuals from low‐income households is particularly strong. We analyse the introduction and subsequent elimination of university tuition fees in Germany across states and over time in a difference‐in‐differences setting. Using data from the Youth Questionnaire of the German Socio‐Economic Panel (SOEP), we find a large negative effect of tuition fees on the intentions of 17‐year‐olds to acquire a higher educational degree, with a decrease of around 8 percentage points (10 per cent). Individuals from low‐income households mainly drive the results. This study documents that the introduction of relatively low university tuition fees of €1,000 per academic year can considerably lower young people's educational intentions.     

我国高等教育成本负担理论的思考

高等教育成本负担理论提出虽然只有几十年，但是它已经被世界大多数国家所认可。此理论倡导的是谁受益谁付费的公平理念。但是它是否真的公平？本文从学费增幅和居民可支配收入的增幅、城乡居民高等教育负担、各阶层受教育情况等方面探讨我国高等教育成本负担情况，得出了我国的高等教育成本负担是不公平的结论，并提出了改进之策。     

高等教育融资的制度变迁与融资对策

我国的国情是“穷国”办了世界最大规模的教育,教育融资不足的问题是制约我国公立高等教育发展,乃至影响整个经济发展和社会进步的极为重要的课题。针对公立高等教育的准公共产品属性,我国公立高等教育融资需要国家、社会、学校及学生多主体同步推进,逐步加以解决。国家应该承担起教育投入的主要责任,合理规避高校贷款的融资风险;作为有益补充,学校可以采用稳步推进BOT融资等市场化融资手段,同时建立和完善“资本投资式”的助学贷款机制,减轻政府的财政负担。     

Fair Value Exposure,Changes in Fair Value and Audit Fees: Evidence from the Australian Real Estate Industry

This paper investigates the relationship between audit fees and both fair value exposure and changes in fair value of investment properties. The study is motivated by the limited and inconclusive evidence on the effect on audit fees of full fair value reporting for illiquid assets. Using hand‐collected data from the Australian real estate industry, we find a negative (positive) association between audit fees and fair value exposure (changes in fair value of investment properties). Our findings also indicate that the use of unobservable inputs in fair value estimates for investment properties does not significantly increase audit risk and audit fees. Further, we find that audit fees are higher for firms with fair values of investment – properties estimated by external and mixed valuers – compared to firms with fair values estimated by directors alone. This study enriches the audit fee literature by documenting auditors’ pricing decisions in an area that involves significant estimation and valuation risks.     

Risk in Audit Pricing: The Role of Firm-Specific Dimensions of Risk

This chapter investigates the impact of the firm-specific dimensions of risk suggested in the finance literature, the financial risk, operating leverage and business risk on audit fees. It is hypothesized that audit fees are related to these three dimensions of risk, size, audit complexity and a set of the agency theory based control variables. The hypothesis is empirically tested using a sample from the U.K. audit market. The results of the study show that audit fees as hypothesized are positively related to financial leverage, operating leverage and business risk of a firm and that the control variables behave according to expectations. This implies that the three dimensions of the firm-specific risk are taken into account in audit pricing decisions and should therefore be incorporated into models when investigating the audit pricing issues.