我国基金家族明星基金溢出效应显著性的实证分析

明星基金溢出效应是指基金家族中业绩高且稳定的基金增加了同家族其它基金的现金流入，国外大量文献也证明基金家族中确实存在明星基金溢出效应。本文基于因子分析对基金业绩进行综合评价，选取两组基金，运用均值检验比较这两组基金现金流入的差异。实证结果显示，存在明星基金的基金组现金流入显著高于不存在明星基金的基金组现金流入，即我国基金家族明星基金溢出效应具有显著性。     

基金家族业绩评价指标的构建与应用研究

本文选取2012—2013年度拥有2只及2只以上股票型和混合型基金的基金家族作为研究样本,构建了基金家族的整体业绩评价指标,包括加权平均业绩、加权排名百分位数、优质基金比率、业绩极差等,并从两个方面进行了相关的应用研究,其实证研究显示:明星家族的整体业绩水平显著高于非明星家族,是真正的明星家族;无论是明星家族还是非明星家族,整体业绩水平都不会长期保持,投资者不能单纯的依赖明星家族的年度业绩水平作为投资依据。     

明星基金暂停申购是“馅饼”还是“陷阱”？

全面系统地研究了基金家族长期暂停申购明星基金的内在动因及效果。运用2007年至2013年的数据,发现暂停申购明星基金可以产生溢出效应,提高基金家族的资金净流入增长率,而明星基金暂停申购后的业绩并未改善,说明暂停申购明星基金只是基金家族的一种营销手段,而不是为了保护投资者权益。     

明星基金暂停申购是“馅饼”还是“陷阱”?

全面系统地研究了基金家族长期暂停申购明星基金的内在动因及效果。运用2007年至2013年的数据,发现暂停申购明星基金可以产生溢出效应,提高基金家族的资金净流入增长率,而明星基金暂停申购后的业绩并未改善,说明暂停申购明星基金只是基金家族的一种营销手段,而不是为了保护投资者权益。     

基金现金流、明星基金与溢出效应

本文建立动态面板数据模型,运用系统广义矩(System GMM)方法对基金现金流和基金业绩、明星基金和溢出效应的关系进行考察。结果发现,无论是从单只基金层面还是从基金系层面,基金(基金系)现金流都与基金(基金系)业绩呈显著负相关。对明星基金本身来说,表现为净现金流出;但明星基金为同属一个基金系的其他成员基金带来显著的正向溢出效应。另外,从基金系角度看,虽然存在溢出效应,明星基金的存在并没有给整个基金系带来显著的现金流入,说明基金系的造星策略并不十分有效。     

基金家族、家族偏爱与家族竞争策略——基于中国开放式股票型基金的经验证据

实证研究了基金公司为提升家族整体绩效而采用的偏爱性竞争策略,结果显示同一家族旗下的高价值基金(高费用或高历史绩效基金)与低价值基金之间的绩效差异显著大于投资风格类似、但隶属于不同家族的高价值基金与低价值基金间的绩效差异;基金家族会通过转移旗下受托资产绩效的家族竞争策略使家族中高价值基金获取超额绩效,从而为家族吸引更多的净资金流入,最终实现提升基金家族竞争力和整体绩效的目标。     

开放式基金渠道营销对资金流动的影响——基于非平衡面板数据的实证分析

针对基金渠道营销对基金资金流入的影响效应,基于2011-2015年我国147只开放式股票型基金的非平衡面板数据,实证分析渠道营销对基金资金流动的影响.通过采用非平衡面板的固定效应模型研究结果表明:与已有文献所证实的营销资金投入与资金净流入呈正比关系的结论不同,发现营销资金投入的增加,并不会使资金流入增加,反而与资金净申购率呈显著负相关关系,这其中原因与我国投资者的有限理性有很大关系.     

金融危机背景下基金家族绩效与风险关系研究——基于面板数据模型的实证分析

以中国基金市场32家基金管理公司旗下的103只开放式偏股型基金作为样本,选择恰当的面板数据模型形式,分别建立金融危机之前、危机期间和危机之后三个时期基金家族绩效与风险关系模型,以剖析不同经济形势下两者之间的关系。结果表明,金融危机之前和危机期间基金家族绩效与风险显著负相关,而危机之后两者关系不显著,在金融危机期间和危机之后基金业绩效状况持续恶化,危机之后基金业整体风险水平降低;金融危机后,为弥补金融危机中造成的损失,各基金家族倾向于采取"打造明星基金"的投资策略以充分利用有限资源、提升家族整体绩效。     

基金家族“造星”:基本动因、行为评价与形成机理——一个理论研究框架的构建

本文在梳理相关文献的基础上,对基金家族"造星"策略的基本动因、行为评价和形成机理进行了深入分析,并通过明星绩效溢出效应、家族跨基金补贴行为的存在性与路径选择、家族造星主体识别和形成机理等研究模块构建了基金家族造星策略的理论研究框架,以此来探索基金市场上基金家族造星热潮的"黑箱"操作,以期为后续相关研究奠定基础。     

开放式基金渠道营销对资金流动的影响研究——基于非平衡面板数据的实证分析

本文基于2011-2015年我国147只开放式股票型基金的非平衡面板数据,实证分析渠道营销对基金资金流动的影响,研究结果发现:与已有文献所证实的营销资金投入与资金净流入呈正比关系的结论不同,营销资金投入的增加,并不会使资金流入增加,反而与资金净申购率呈显著负相关关系,且这一结果与我国投资者的有限理性有很大关系.     

Is There a Favoritism Strategy in Taiwan Mutual-Fund Companies?

This paper investigates whether Taiwan mutual-fund companies actively pursue a corporate-level strategy of enhancing the performance of "high-value" funds (i.e., high fee-ratio funds or high past performers) at the expense of other "low-value" funds belonging to the same companies. The results show a significant difference between high- and low-value funds within the same fund families and that this difference favors the high past-perorming funds. The future incremental cash inflows from these high-value funds indicate that fund companies indeed benefit from the subsidized strategy. Our findings highlight the potential for agency problems and the importance of corporate and fund governance in the Taiwan asset-management industry.     

Capacity effects and winner fund performance: the relevance and interactions of fund size and family characteristics

This study analyzes the existence of capacity effects and performance persistence for US equity mutual funds for the period from 1992 to 2007. We focus on winner funds and distinguish between capacity effects from both size and inflows and explore their interactions with two measures of family size, i.e. family total net assets under management (family TNA) and the number of funds at the family level (family breadth). The differentiation of family size allows us to analyze competing effects at the family level such as economies of scale as well as organizational complexity costs and conflicts of interest. Our empirical results confirm diseconomies of scale at the winner fund level and indicate that only small winner funds with low inflows significantly outperform the four-factor benchmark on a net return basis. There are no universal benefits from economies of scale at the family level, but our findings suggest the existence of conflicts of interest in families offering a relatively large number of funds. Small winner funds in families offering a small number of funds significantly outperform while economies of scale only materialize among extremely small winner funds. We provide detailed robustness checks for our empirical results. Overall, simply conditioning on fund size is not sufficient for selecting future outperforming funds. The results indicate that fund investors may earn positive abnormal returns when combining information on fund size with information on fund flows or fund family affiliations in their asset allocation decisions.     

Why are some mutual funds closed to new investors?

Fund families typically claim that closing a fund protects the fund's superior performance by preventing it from growing too large to be managed efficiently. Even though funds with better performance and larger size are more likely to be closed, there is no evidence that closing a fund can indeed protect its performance. Instead, fund closing decisions are more likely to be motivated by spillover effects – by closing a star fund, the fund family signals its superior performance and also brings investors' attention and investments to other funds in the family. Some evidence exists to suggest that the closing strategy is effective in generating higher inflows into the rest of the family, at least in the short run.     

The investment behavior of buyout funds: Theory and evidence

We analyze the determinants of buyout funds’ investment decisions. We argue that when there is imperfect competition for private equity funds, the timing of funds’ investment decisions, their risk-taking behavior, and their subsequent returns depend on changes in the demand for private equity, conditions in the credit market, and fund managers’ ability to influence perceptions of their talent. We investigate these hypotheses using a proprietary dataset of 207 U.S. buyout funds that invested in 1,957 buyout targets over a 30-year period. Our dataset contains precisely dated cash inflows and outflows in every portfolio company, links every buyout target to an identifiable buyout fund, and is free from reporting and survivor biases. Thus, we are able to characterize every buyout fund's precise investment choices. Our findings are as follows. First, established funds accelerate their investment flows and earn higher returns when investment opportunities improve, competition for deal flow eases, and credit market conditions loosen. Second, the investment behavior of first-time funds is less sensitive to market conditions. Third, younger funds invest in riskier buyouts, in an effort to establish a track record. Finally, following periods of good performance, funds become more conservative, and this effect is stronger for first-time funds.     

The Effects of Advertising on Mutual Fund Flows: Results from a New Database

We examine 471,000 mutual fund company advertisements from 1997 to 2003 to study advertising's effect on fund inflows. We find advertising is generally ineffective in attracting inflows but was more effective during the bear market despite smaller advertising expenditures during this time. The top 10 advertisers in our sample were most successful in capturing inflows. These companies generated inflows with mutual fund ads; other companies succeeded when advertising their other products and their brand image. Within a fund family, advertising affects the flagship fund differently than the other funds. Sample firms appeared unable to choose correctly between print and TV ads.     

Flow-Performance Relationship and Star Effect: New Evidence from Chinese Mutual Funds

In this paper, we reexamine the mutual fund flow-performance relationship and star effect using mutual funds in China that have unique features of high risk and low performance persistence. Confirming prior studies, we find that fund performance is positively related to flows in subsequent periods. However, our results show that funds that performed well in the past do not attract additional inflows after controlling for performance. In addition, a star fund, a fund with a five-star Morningstar rating, does not have any significant effect on the fund's flows. These results suggest that it is important to recognize the difference in investor groups and factors that affect performance persistence when analyzing the mutual fund flow-performance relationship.     

Family Matters: Rankings Within Fund Families and Fund Inflows

Abstract:  This paper examines the influence of the position of a fund within its family on its subsequent net-inflows. Our empirical study of the US equity mutual fund market shows that reaching a top position within the family leads to large inflows. These inflows accrue beyond those expected, given the performance of the fund in its respective market segment. The effect is much stronger in large families than in small families. We also find that inflows significantly increase if a fund moves into the top positions within its family from one year to another. These results lead to competition within the fund family and to important risk taking incentives for fund managers.     

我国基金公司内部封闭式基金对开放式基金的补贴研究

由于封闭式基金与开放式基金的差异,基金公司倾向于补贴开放式基金而侵害封闭式基金的利益。经验证据表明,我国基金公司确实存在封闭式基金对开放式基金的补贴行为。论文进而构建了一个封闭式基金对开放式基金补贴模型,指出投资者偏好、市场预期的开放式基金销售量、激励机制、基金公司自身的管理能力是影响补贴行为的重要因素,并讨论了如何进行防范。