共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 140 毫秒
1.
对美国量化宽松货币政策的经济学分析 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
2010年底美国在经济低迷、失业率居高不下的背景下,推出的第二轮量化宽松货币政策不能从根本上改变美国经济现状及通缩趋势,但会给其他国家的经济造成负面影响,增加通胀压力。我国应使外汇储备多样化,控制好国内金融市场,推动人民币国际化,防止美国量化宽松货币政策可能带来的泡沫风险。 相似文献
2.
本文首先介绍了美国第二轮量化宽松货币政策提出的背景;其次简述美国第二轮量化宽松货币政策的内容及其影响;再次提出对我国的启示,包括:外汇储备多样化,控制好国内金融市场,推动人民币国际化。 相似文献
3.
随着美国经济的复苏,美联储逐渐退出了其自2008年来采取的量化宽松货币政策,美国经济进入加息周期.在美联储加息预期下,全球金融资产价格波动频繁.美国量化宽松货币政策退出对我国金融资产价格影响如何?本文以2013年11月至2016年6月美联储的持债规模和上证指数、美元兑人民币汇率中间价、一年期Shibor数据为样本,采用VAR模型实证分析了美国量化宽松货币政策退出对我国金融资产价格的影响.结果显示,美国量化宽松货币政策退出对美元兑人民币汇率中间价有显著的正向冲击,人民币具有贬值的压力;对上证综合指数有负向冲击,我国上证综合指数在美国量化宽松货币政策退出期间会降低;对一年期的Shibor有正向冲击,一年期的Shibor在美国量化宽松货币政策退出期间会上浮. 相似文献
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
美国量化宽松货币政策经济学评价:内容、影响及启示 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
2010年11月3日,美联储宣布了第二轮量化宽松方案来刺激萎靡不振的美国经济,即通过购进6000亿美元国债等方式向经济注入流动性,并宣布继续维持0-0.25%历史最低利率至更长时间。这对世界和中国的经济都将产生不可估量的影响,有必要进行深入分析。本文首先介绍了美国第二轮量化宽松货币政策提出的背景;其次,简述美国第二轮量化宽松货币政策的内容及其影响;再次,提出对我国的启示,包括:外汇储备多样化,控制好国内金融市场,推动人民币国际化。 相似文献
9.
10.
11.
美国出口管制政策、对华出口管制及其发展趋势研判 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
出口管制政策是美国为保障国家安全、实现外交政策所采取的经济手段之一。美国出口管制政策的原则有国家安全原则、外交政策原则和短缺物质原则等,出口管制政策的措施主要有许可证审批、商品管制清单和国别分类组等内容。影响美国对华出口管制政策未来发展的因素众多,如中国经济崛起、台海局势及美国对华巨额贸易逆差等,短期内美国不太可能放松直至取消对华出口管制政策。美国对华出口管制政策既损害了美国自身经济贸易的发展,也损害了中国经济贸易的发展,其实质是一种经济帝国主义的表现。 相似文献
12.
External shocks, U.S. monetary policy and macroeconomic fluctuations in emerging markets 总被引:4,自引:0,他引:4
Bartosz Ma?kowiak 《Journal of Monetary Economics》2007,54(8):2512-2520
Estimated structural VARs show that external shocks are an important source of macroeconomic fluctuations in emerging markets. Furthermore, U.S. monetary policy shocks affect interest rates and the exchange rate in a typical emerging market quickly and strongly. The price level and real output in a typical emerging market respond to U.S. monetary policy shocks by more than the price level and real output in the U.S. itself. These findings are consistent with the idea that “when the U.S. sneezes, emerging markets catch a cold.” At the same time, U.S. monetary policy shocks are not important for emerging markets relative to other kinds of external shocks. 相似文献
13.
This paper analyzes how U.S. monetary policy affects the pricing of dollar‐denominated sovereign debt. We document that yields on dollar‐denominated sovereign bonds are highly responsive to U.S. monetary policy surprises—during both the conventional and unconventional policy regimes—and that the passthrough of unconventional policy to foreign bond yields is, on balance, comparable to that of conventional policy. In addition, a conventional U.S. monetary easing (tightening) leads to a significant narrowing (widening) of credit spreads on sovereign bonds issued by countries with a speculative‐grade credit rating but has no effect on the corresponding weighted average of bilateral exchange rates for a basket of currencies from the same set of risky countries; this indicates that an unanticipated tightening of U.S. monetary policy widens credit spreads on risky sovereign debt directly through the financial channel, as opposed to indirectly through the exchange rate channel. During the unconventional policy regime, yields on both investment‐ and speculative‐grade sovereign bonds move one‐to‐one with policy‐induced fluctuations in yields on comparable U.S. Treasuries. We also examine whether the response of sovereign credit spreads to US monetary policy differs between policy easings and tightenings and find no evidence of such asymmetry. 相似文献
14.
It is documented in the literature that U.S. and many international stock returns series are sensitive to U.S. monetary policy. Using monthly data, this empirical study examines the short-term sensitivity of six international stock indices (the Standard & Poor 500 [S&P] Stock Index, the Morgan Stanley Capital International [MSCI] European Stock Index, the MSCI Pacific Stock Index, and three MSCI country stock indices: Germany, Japan, and the United Kingdom) to two major groups of U.S. monetary policy indicators. These two groups, which have been suggested by recent research to influence stock returns, are based on the U.S. discount rate and the federal funds rate. The first group focuses on two binary variables designed to indicate the stance in monetary policy. The second group of monetary indicators involves the federal funds rate and includes the average federal funds rate, the change in the federal funds rate, and the spread of the federal funds rate to 10-year Treasury note yield. Dividing the sample period (1970-2001) into three monetary operating regimes, we find that not all policy indicators influence international stock returns during all U.S. monetary operating periods or regimes. Our results imply that the operating procedure and/or target vehicle used by the Federal Reserve Board (Fed) influences the efficacy of the policy indicator. We suggest caution in using any monetary policy variable to explain and possibly forecast U.S. and international stock returns in all monetary conditions. 相似文献
15.
This paper analyzes intraday changes in firm‐level equity prices around interest rate announcements to assess the transmission of U.S. monetary policy to the global economy. We document that foreign firms on average are roughly as sensitive to U.S. monetary policy as U.S. firms, although we also find considerable cross‐sectional variation across firms. In particular, foreign stocks in cyclically sensitive industries show stronger responses to interest rate surprises, consistent with a demand channel of policy transmission. In addition, transmission of U.S. policy appears to be stronger to economies with fixed exchange rates. Evidence for a credit channel is weaker. 相似文献
16.
Hot Money and Quantitative Easing: The Spillover Effects of U.S. Monetary Policy on the Chinese Economy 下载免费PDF全文
We develop a factor‐augmented vector autoregression (FA‐VAR) model to estimate the effects that unanticipated changes in U.S. monetary policy and economic policy uncertainty have on the Chinese housing, equity, and loan markets. We find the decline in the U.S. policy rate since the Great Recession has led to a significant increase in Chinese housing investment. One possible reason for this effect is the substantial increase in the inflow of “hot money” into China. The responses of Chinese variables to U.S. shocks at the zero lower bound are different from those responses in normal times. 相似文献
17.
在中美两国经济不断交融发展的同时,贸易摩擦日益严重。自2005年7月以来人民币对美元汇率已升值近17%,但对美贸易顺差仍旧持续。从博弈理论视角对中美两国的汇率政策研究分析,得出三点结论:单纯运用汇率工具调节两国的贸易,会形成双方谈判力量的"掠夺性"均衡;汇率与贸易政策冲突,贸易政策会将汇率政策变动产生的效应抵消;非经济因素使中美汇率博弈形成暂时均衡,但不稳定。 相似文献
18.
The 1996 U.S. welfare reform legislation established the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program. TANF represents the ascendance of the view that market work should be substituted for benefit recipiency. We describe the problems inherent in U.S. social welfare policy prior to TANF (emphasizing its serious labor supply disincentives), catalogue the wide variety of economic changes implicit in TANF, and describe the policies undertaken by the state of Wisconsin, a leader in implementing the new federal policy. We conclude by asking if this U.S. reform can serve as a model for other nations. 相似文献
19.
This article analyzes the economic and financial sources of fluctuations among the U.S. federal funds rates, the U.S. economic policy uncertainty, and the indices of the U.S., European, Asian, and Islamic stock markets. The impulse response analysis shows that the U.S. economic policy uncertainty shocks have significant and negative effects unanimously on the U.S., European, Asian, and Islamic stock markets. A contractionary monetary policy shock, in terms of a higher federal funds rate, has also a statistically significant and negative effect on all of the stock markets. The variance decomposition results indicate that the Islamic stock index is mainly affected by the U.S. stock index shock, thus negating its dichotomy hypothesis. The U.S. economic uncertainty shock explains an important portion of fluctuations for all four stock indices. The degree of synchronization between the EU stock market and other markets has weakened after the U.S. financial crisis. 相似文献
20.
Facing the economic downturn, the central bank of U.S. and Japan adopts the unconventional monetary policy to stimulate their economy. This paper studies the quantitative easing policy effectiveness via the tail risks of stock markets in the U.S., Japan and the other 74 countries. Although the stock markets of U.S. and Japan reveals the announcement-day effects of the QE policy, this study finds an asymmetric tail risk of return distribution on the QE policy effect. The post-period right-tail and left-tail risks of the stock markets are significantly smaller and larger than that of the pre-period of the QE programs, respectively. This implies that the tail risks of stock returns have dissimilar interdependence with the QE programs. Furthermore, the geographical dependence is the major factor that determines the contagion of stock market, and the fragility of foreign stock market caused by the US QE policy is larger than that of the Japan. 相似文献