Thatcher Monetary Policy is Working: No Case for Reflation

The Prime Minister's monetary policy has been widely condemned as failing. Two American observers of British economic policy, an academic and a practical economist, maintain that the evidence shows both that it is working effectively and that there is no convincing argument for abandoning it.     

Investment Risk,Bankruptcy Risk,and Pension Reform in Canada

The wealth redistributive effects of retroactive termination insurance together with the difficulty of determining insurance premiums suggest that an alternative response, such as improved disclosure of worker benefits in the event of plan wind-up, may be preferred if the government remains concerned about the security of benefits in underfunded plans. Members of money purchase plans may well be less subject to investment risk than members of defined benefit plans, contrary to the claim of many. In Canada, defined benefit plans appear to have been transformed into defined benefit/money purchase hybrids, and this has several important implications.     

An Analysis of the Impact of Deposit Rate Ceilings on the Market Values of Thrift Institutions

This paper examines the impact of changes in deposit interest rate regulations on the common stock values of savings and loan institutions. The analysis indicates that stockholder-owned savings and loans (S & L's) have experienced statistically significant declines in equity market values at the announcement of the removal of ceilings on certain consumer (small saver) certificate accounts and the introduction of short term variable rate money market certificates. We find the evidence to be consistent with the hypothesis that S & L's have earned economic rents from restrictions on interest rates paid to small saver accounts, and that relaxation of interest rate ceilings has reduced these rents.     

When a Gain Comes at a Price: Pay Attitudes after Changing Tier Status

This study compares attitudes toward pay and work of employees who changed from the high tier to the low tier after transferring jobs from low-to high-paying departments with those who similarly transferred but did not change tiers. The former had lower Pay Satisfaction than the latter, but they did not differ in Job Satisfaction and Union and Employer Commitment. The findings suggest that the change-tier employees' loss of high-tier status was a likely reason for their pay dissatisfaction.     

Factors Related to Auditor-Client Disagreements over Income-Increasing Accounting Methods*

Abstract. The Securities and Exchange Commission requires disclosure of auditor-client disagreements that precede a change in auditor. Although prior research has documented that disclosure of disagreements is associated with a decline in equity value, no empirical work has examined factors that result in auditor-client disagreements. We hypothesize that managers are motivated by debt and compensation arrangements to propose methods that are objected to by their auditors (resulting in a disagreement). Because of their greater independence, we also hypothesize that reported disagreements will be more likely for Big Eight (now Big Six) auditors, A comparison of 40 firms that changed auditors and reported a disagreement with a control group of 40 firms that simply changed auditors revealed that disagreement firms are more likely to have debt covenant violations. Disagreement firms are also more likely to have higher leverage, a decline in earnings, and Big Eight auditors. For firms that disclosed the magnitude of the disagreement's effect on earnings, the use of the questionable procedure tended to enhance “flat” earnings growth. Résumé. La Securities and Exchange Commission exige que soit publiée l'information relative aux désaccords vérificateur-client qui précèdent un changement de vérificateurs. Bien que les recherches antérieures aient démontré que la publication de cette information est accompagnée d'un déclin de la valeur des titres, aucun travail empirique n'a examiné les facteurs qui sont à l'origine des désaccords vérificateur-client. Les auteurs posent l'hypothèse selon laquelle ce sont le passif et les régimes de rémunération qui motivent les gestionnaires à proposer des méthodes auxquelles s'opposent les vérificateurs (et qui donnent lieu à un désaccord). Les auteurs posent également l'hypothèse selon laquelle il est plus probable que les désaccords déclarés mettent en cause les huit grands cabinets d'experts-comptables (maintenant les six grands), étant donné leur indépendance plus grande. La comparaison de 40 entreprises ayant changé de vérificateurs et fait état d'un désaccord à un groupe de contrôle de 40 entreprises ayant simplement changé de vérificateurs a révélé que les entreprises en désaccord sont davantage susceptibles d'avoir dérogé à des clauses restrictives. Les entreprises qui déclarent être en désaccord avec leurs vérificateurs sont aussi davantage susceptibles d'être caractérisées par un levier financier élevé, un déclin dans les bénéfices et le recours aux services d'un cabinet d'experts-comptables appartenant aux huit grands. Dans le cas des entreprises qui ont fait état de l'ampleur des conséquences du désaccord sur les bénéfices, l'utilisation du procédé discutable a eu tendance à favoriser une croissance « horizontale » des bénéfices.     

Default Risk in Futures Markets: The Customer-Broker Relationship

The traditional view of the futures clearinghouse as an insurer that eliminates the need for customers to evaluate default risk is inaccurate. A clearinghouse member default in 1985 confirms that the clearinghouse only guarantees payment from member to member, not from customer to customer or member to customer. Thus, non-defaulting customers are subject to losses as a result of the action of individuals with whom thay have no contractual obligations. This study models the behavior of customers choosing a futures commission merchant (FCM) given the current legal position of the clearinghouse. In a single-period model with symmetric information, customers can eliminate their exposure to defaults of other customers or of their FCM only by choosing to trade through “boutique” (undiversified) FCMs. In practice, monitoring and rebalancing costs may impede the attainment of zero default risk. However, FCM diversification remains an important factor in customer choice of an FCM. When setting capital requirements, clearinghouses and government regulators need to consider the implications of diversification for both customer and market protection.