Walgreens重回时代广场“斜线”令世界十字路口耳目一新

巴里温斯顿(Barry Winston),这名专门负责时代广场的标志专家说:“Walgreens已经为入驻时代广场做出了一个新的构想,其中包括一个令人惊叹的LED显示屏,那将是迄今为止在时代广场出现过的最大,最独特的LED显示屏。“     

情定迈阿密——Coppertone女孩和她的小狗标识重新闪耀

这是和Andy Warhol的汤罐一样出名的标志。12月的迈阿密,晴朗的夜晚,Jerry Begins微笑的看着全面翻修的Coppertone女孩带着淘气的咬着她泳衣的可卡犬再次回到城市的MIMO区。Jerry的父亲有家公司Tropicalites,最初是建造和安装标志符号,帮助协调和宣传防晒产品的标志,现在位于比斯坎湾大道北侧7300.     

金融业的成功 从事金融服务的人同样能够在招牌行业取得新的成功

“一旦拥有了所有的技术和资源,那么是时候开设一家招牌商店了。“十年前.世纪招牌制作公司(美国新墨西哥,阿尔伯克基州)在圣菲的一个小村庄里进行了改造.并于1932年进行了一次大规模的整修,具备了一个完整的环保图形软件包,其中包括,建筑证明、房间号码牌、指路标志,以及其它的一些圈形设施等。     

Livin''La Vida Libre Media 1为一家以古巴为主题的奥兰多餐厅制作了非常有趣味的招牌

Dale is president and co-partner at Media 1 ldentity Solutions (Longwood,FL).Cuba Libre在Pointe Orlando开设了第三家分公司,这家公司设立了户外购物和餐饮,还在街对面开设了娱乐场所,从以橙县(佛罗里达州)的会议中心到设施齐全的国家商会,非常具有吸引力。这家餐馆将它的货物运输到一个现已禁止的岛屿上,这种境况让人想起了很久之前卡斯特罗的哈瓦那。Cuba Libre公司在深夜还会播放一些生动的音乐,配合以拉丁音乐为主题的歌舞表演,同时提供丰盛的可供选择的拉丁鸡尾酒和诱人的古巴车票。这是一个两层楼,占地面积为20000平方英尺的场所,所有装置都是露天的,建筑色彩鲜明,植物颇有异国风情,服务员们统一身穿瓜亚贝拉制服,周围散发出一种热带雨林的氛围。     

一场数字标识革命 这不再是你爸爸的生意了

从1976年到1985年,我掌管Biggsigns Inc.(aka Wet Paint Sign)I,是一个为大辛辛那提和北肯塔基服务的标识和图形设计公司。我学这个的时候用的是老式的工具和方法。我们以前用的是刻字笔,油漆喷雾器,支腕杖,提花轮,丝网印刷,一次性刻字瓷漆和普锐涂料等等。     

Understanding the Decline of China's State Sector

MOCT-MOST: Economic Policy in Transitional Economies -     

Lost in translation: Delayed ex-dividend price adjustments of Hong Kong ADRs

Previous research documents that Hong Kong stocks have a full ex-dividend price adjustment consistent with dividends and capital gains being tax free. We examine ex-dividend price behavior of Hong Kong ADRs to assess the impact of differing tax environments in US and Hong Kong. These ADRs typically go ex-dividend before their underlying stock. They experience significant abnormal returns of 1.16% on their ex-day; the average ex-day price drop is only 30% of the dividend. However, ADR prices drop when the underlying stock goes ex-dividend subsequently. The cumulative ADR price drop is equal to the dividend. Thus, the ADR ex-dividend adjustment resembles that of the underlying stock, consistent with home country tax laws governing ADR price behavior. Neither liquidity nor transaction costs can explain the anomalous delayed ex-dividend adjustment of ADRs.     

Paradox,accounting values,and intelligible regulation

Expected utility theory, which includes estimating the probabilities of uncertain future outcomes, is the classical model for rational economic decision making, and, by implication, rational valuation and financial reporting regulation. In Wittgensteinian terms it is a ‘hinge’ of the language game in which these practices are embedded. When rendered explicit, however, this ‘hinge’ appears to be formally incoherent. The exploration of this problem has consequences for all of our arguments over the epistemological underpinnings of accounting reports – whether realist, representational, constructivist, or otherwise.Arguably, there are two complementary primitive models that underlie real-world probability estimation. Taken together, they generate a version of Goodman's inductive paradox (other versions of which also arise for non-inductive empirical generalisation). This, in its turn, is related to Kripke's paradox, which arises when we try to give behavioural accounts of rule following, and so of participation in a language game.This paper explicates this type of paradox in the context of commercial decision making, and considers its consequences. The existence of paradoxes should render the system that generates them completely incoherent, but (paradoxically …) they seem to be generated by any attempt to give complete accounts of some of the normative fundamentals which underlie linguistic practice – such as truth-telling, validity and rule-following.Whether or not these paradoxes represent a serious threat to the coherence of the empirical or behavioural sciences, it might be objected that commercial decision making methods and financial regulation rarely aspire to the kind of rigour that these disciplines attempt to achieve. Part of the argument of this paper will be that the intelligibility of commercial language suggests an approach to these paradoxes which is not obvious from more traditional philosophical perspectives.The intentionality of belief renders certain belief claims by participants in a shared language game incorrigible (within the game), in the sense that they can be doubted only by doubting the seriousness or quality of participation. If certain statements about rule following and word meaning have this same quality, then there is a way of avoiding the consequences of Goodman's and Kripke's paradoxes, and of sterilising the probability estimation paradox for any playable commercial language game.