The Methodology of Early Accounting Theorists

If, as Watts and Zimmerman (1986) suggest, a unique methodological foundation is the hallmark of a mature discipline, accounting fails to qualify. In this article, methodological arguments of accounting theorists in the first part of this century are examined. 'Pattern Modeling' is suggested as a basis for methodological appraisal. The conclusion reached is that the major theoretical works in accounting were methodologically unsophisticated-particularly in comparison with other disciplines such as economics.     

Managers' Choices of Performance Measures in Promotion Decisions: An Analysis of Alternative Job Assignments

In this study, we investigate the choice of performance measures in promotion decisions. In particular, we examine the extent to which managers incorporate different performance measures for different types of job assignment. Based on a simple theoretical framework, we predict that, in making promotion decisions, the weight on current job performance decreases with increases in the change in tasks upon promotion, while the weight on subjective assessments of ability increases. This result basically follows from the premise that, with increased changes in tasks between hierarchical levels, the ability to master the current job says little about the ability needed in the next job, which makes current job performance less informative and increases the emphasis on subjective assessments. Using panel data of a retail bank, we find that individual managers behave according to our predictions. By examining the choice of performance measures in promotion decisions, we are able to provide unique insights into the incentive versus sorting roles of promotions, which has important implications for performance measurement and incentive system design.     

The effects of line-of-business reporting on competition in oligopoly settings*

Abstract. This study considers the welfare effects of line-of-business (LOB) reporting by firms operating in imperfectly competitive markets. The analysis is based on a two-period model in which a multisegment firm, labeled the incumbent, operates as a monopolist in two markets in the first period and then competes against an entrant in each of the two markets in the second period. The incumbent obtains private information in the first period. LOB reporting fully reveals that information to the entrants; aggregate reporting only partially reveals the incumbent's information. The second-period consequences on firms and consumers parallel results previously available from the information-sharing literature. These results serve to explain why some firms opposed the imposition of LOB reporting by accounting rule-making bodies. The incumbent may distort first-period production in an attempt to influence entrant beliefs. However, such distortions lower the incumbent's expected first-period profit and result in no gains in the second period. Nonetheless, in equilibrium, these distortions cannot be avoided unless the entrants observe the incumbent's first-period production or prices, suggesting a role for nonfinancial disclosures in accounting reports. Résumé. Les auteurs se penchent sur l'effet «protecteur» de la communication d'informations relatives au secteur d'activité par les entreprises qui exercent leurs activités sur des marchés imparfaitement concurrentiels. L'analyse est fondée sur un modèle comportant deux périodes, dans lequel une entreprise oeuvrant dans plusieurs secteurs d'activité-désignée sous l'appellation d'entreprise installée—exerce un monopole dans deux marchés au cours de la première période et doit ensuite livrer concurrence à un nouveau venu dans chacun des deux marchés au cours de la seconde période. L'entreprise installée obtient de l'information privilégiée au cours de la première période. L'information sectorielle livre intégralement cette information aux nouveaux venus, mais l'information consolidée ne révèle qu'une partie de l'information dont dispose l'entreprise installée. Les résultats de la seconde période pour les entreprises et les consommateurs s'apparentent à ceux qui ont été exposés jusqu'à maintenant dans les écrits relatifs au partage d'informations. Ces résultats viennent expliquer pourquoi certaines entreprises se sont opposées à ce que les organismes de réglementation comptable fassent de la présentation de l'information sectorielle une obligation. L'entreprise installée peut «biaiser» l'information relative à la première période dans l'intention d'influer sur les convictions des nouveaux venus. Ces distorsions diminueront cependant le profit espéré par l'entreprise installée au cours de la première période et se traduiront par des gains nuls au cours de la seconde période. Néanmoins, en situation d'équilibre, ces distorsions ne peuvent être évitées, à moins que les nouveaux venus n'observent la production ou les prix de l'entreprise installée au cours de la première période, ce qui permet de croire que la présentation d'informations non financières dans les rapports comptables a un rôle à jouer.