高职院校思想政治教育工作创新研究

和谐社会是以人为本的社会，人素质的提高和全面发展必须依靠教育。针对高职院校思想政治教育工作面临的新形势，必须对其进行机制改革和方法创新，通过对学生人性的充分肯定，对学生的智慧和潜能进行正确引导和开发，使之对自由与秩序、公平与正义满怀信心和追求，从而调动他们的积极性，最大限度地激发其创造力，成为构建社会主义和谐社会、推动社会协调发展的重要力量。     

忽视道德教化：秦王朝灭亡原因的文化视角

在中国古代社会,由于忠、孝、节、义的教育深入人心,故而在大多数封建皇朝灭亡的时候,总有一些臣子为这个皇朝殉节。只有秦朝灭亡的时候找不到一个殉节的君王和臣子,原因就在于秦国和秦朝长期推行法家文化,过分强调以利益规范人与人之间的关系,而忽视道德教化,尤其是节操教育。秦文化这种缺陷直接导致了秦上层的道德堕落,并成为秦王朝迅速灭亡的一个重要原因。     

物流人才培养应准确把握"宽口径重基础"科学含义

文中针对物流教育近年来超常发展的现实和存在的的主要问题,重点论述了"宽口径、重基础"的在我国高等教育现阶段的合理内涵和确切含义,并认为,物流教育应以相对明确的目标岗位群为培养方向,才能培养出真正满足企业需求的毕业生。     

论教育考试作弊及其防治

作弊是对教育考试的蓄意挑战,严重地威胁着教育考试公正.然而在对教育考试作弊的看法上存在着偏差.要有效地惩治作弊,首先必须认定作弊即作恶,进而弄清当前作弊日趋严重的主要原因,并在此基础上采取相应的对策和措施.本文主要针对人们对教育考试作弊的同情态度讨论作弊的邪恶本质及其对教育考试公正的破坏性、教育考试作弊的基本形式及新趋势和对其进行综合惩治的基本思路.     

Hospitality studies and hospitality management: A symbiotic relationship

The key contribution of this paper is to critically analyse advances made since the introduction of hospitality as a higher education subject, to capture contemporary thinking, and to support the recognition of the intellectual benefits for hospitality management theory and practices of a curriculum informed from a social science-based studies perspective. The benefits of this inter-relationship are demonstrated through the inclusion of an illustration informed by historical means of enquiry, which applies hermeneutical analysis and interpretation of St. Benedict's Rule (c. 530 A.D.). This serves to tangibly demonstrate the academic rigour, value, and educational gains achievable through a symbiotic relationship between hospitality studies and hospitality management.     

大学生诚信教育研究

大学生诚信教育是社会主义市场经济发展的需要，是践行科学发展观的必然要求，也是大学生个人健康成长的需要，对构建“和谐社会”具有重要战略意义。为强化大学生的诚信意识，突出诚信在成长道路上的重要作用，营造公平竞争、求真务实的校园风气，把大学生培养成为诚实守信、知行统一的文明大学生，本文针对大学生诚信危机状况进行了分析，提出了加强大学生诚信教育的途径。     

论广东地区的社会工作教育实践

本文总结了广东地区的社工教育在发展初期所面临的师资、专业实习、课程与教材建设、职业化等方面的困境,分析了该地区在社工教育实习教育、社工职业化及与社工界与港台的合作等方面所作出的积极实践,并就新形势下广东地区的社会工作教育提出了一些观点与建议。     

依托财经办学特色构建多层次一体化培训体系

根据《国家中长期教育改革和发展规划纲要(2010—2020年)》中有关于职业教育的论述精神,职业院校应在开展学历教育的同时,利用学校的优势办学资源开展各类职业培训,为社会服务。以桂林市财贸管理干部中等专业学校为例,从培训模块体系、培训组织体系、质量监控保障体系等方面,构建了一套完整、科学、规范的财经类职业技能培训体系,开展了较大规模的财经技能培训和鉴定考试工作,很好地发挥了为桂北地区经济服务的职能。     

Evaluating the efficiency and productivity change within government subsidy recipients of a national technology innovation research and development program

This study analyzes the efficiency and productivity change within government subsidy recipients of a national technology innovation research and development (R&D) program. We examine 6,990 government‐sponsored, completed R&D projects during the last three performance follow‐up survey years from 2010 to 2012, and present a design of the sample of panel data to cope with the typical R&D performance time lag using a set of massive observations associated with completed R&D projects for the past 7 years from 2005 to 2011. In particular, data envelopment analysis is adopted to measure the efficiency and productivity change, which is measured in the Malmquist index. Parametric and nonparametric statistical tests are carried out to check for statistically significant differences among the characteristics regarding the types of government subsidy recipients. This study's major findings are as follows. First, during the entire period analyzed (2010–2012), there was a similar yearly pattern of statistically significant differences in the government subsidy means among the recipient types. In contrast, there were no obviously equivalent differences in the efficiency and productivity change. Second, the productivity had increased year on year, but the increments were reduced from year to year. Third, the productivity change was induced mainly by the Frontier‐shift, which indicates overall technology innovation progress, compared with the Catch‐up, which only indicates a simple increase in the efficiency. In particular, in this empirical analysis, the recipient types of ‘national laboratory’ and ‘large company’ had relatively larger sizes of government subsidies per project. However, the efficiency and productivity change of these types was not better than the others. This implies, therefore, that the government should control the ratio of the subsidy to the total R&D budget with an appropriate upper limit.

• I empirically evaluate the productivity change within a national technology innovation R&D program.
• I design a sample of panel data to cope with the typical R&D performance time lag using massive observations.
• There is no obvious relationship between the government subsidy size and R&D productivity change.
• Some particular types of government subsidy recipient are inferior in terms of R&D productivity change.
• It practically implies that the government should control the ratio of the subsidy to the total R&D budget.