排序方式: 共有4条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1
1.
Marcel Fratzscher Bert Rürup Jochen Pimpertz Christoph Butterwegge Stephan Leibfried Kerstin Martens Uwe Schimank 《Wirtschaftsdienst》2017,97(5):315-332
Democracy seems to be at risk. People elect populists and autocrats, who offer simple solutions to social problems. Often, these problems are not even real ones but are only perceived as such. Economists have measures to determine which problems are fact-based, but they cannot draw a clear distinction between academic analysis and normative demand. If politics pursues a correction of a market outcome, any normative criteria other than efficiency have to be outlined explicitly. Nevertheless, some authors consider inequality one of the central contemporary social and economic challenges. Marcel Fratzscher emphasises that the solution is not found in more redistribution via taxes and transfers, but rather through greater equality of opportunity and social and educational mobility. Bert Rürup thinks that to stabilise the acceptance of the compulsory pension scheme, the dominance of the equivalence principle should be reduced. Further, the existence of different federal subsidy schemes should be replaced by a fixed federal contribution rate in alignment with the pension expenditures. In an international comparison, the fiscal burden for households with small and mid-level earned incomes is exceptionally high in Germany. In order to reduce this burden, Rürup suggests a contribution-free allowance for the social insurance contributions. 相似文献
2.
3.
Christoph Butterwegge 《Publizistik》2008,53(4):582-588
Ohne Zusammenfassung
Dr. Christoph Butterwegge ist Professor für Politikwissenschaft an der Universit?t zu K?ln. 相似文献
4.
1