浅析绵阳生态城市建设

This paper probes into the establishment of ecological city of Mianyang and directive thoughts, measures,and countermoves are put forward based on analyzing the current situation about ecological environment of Mianyang City.     

生态伦理：从生态理想到生态文明

人与自然的和谐是一种生态理想,生态文明是生态理想的现实化,生态理想的现实化有赖于制度变革和制度安排,制度安排应当遵循生态伦理的基本原则。     

传统山地建筑的生态价值评析——以滇南彝族土掌房为例

在当今全球低碳经济视野下,生态建筑已然成为建筑设计的一种必然趋势。而如何将传统建筑的生态价值合理的发掘、改进并创新,然后运用到现代建筑设计中,这更是值得我们去认真探讨的。通过对滇南彝族传统民居土掌房的生态价值分析和评价,总结出了土掌房的生态优势对现代山地建筑的借鉴意义,以此来为生态建筑设计提供设计思路。     

长株潭两型社会林业生态建设研究

长株潭两型社会获批给区域生态建设提供了良好契机,林业生态建设是目前生态建设的首要任务,两型社会建设和林业生态建设的最终落脚点是生态文明。目前该区域局部环境状况恶化、森林覆盖率、城市绿化率低于全省平均水平,城市社会发展不可持续。在提出构建环境友好型两型社会的背景下,沿湘江流域和三市结合部布局生态公益林带,加强林业生态建设和都市生态圈建设,对保护湘江水质、改善区域环境、支撑两型社会建设具有重要的战略意义。     

构建“校企共生态”校园文化 推进高职院校可持续发展

从党的十七大提出要建设生态文明,到十八大报告提出要把生态文明建设放在突出地位,生态俨然成为当今社会最热门的话题和最重要的主题之一。本文以当代构建和谐社会和生态文明背景下的高职教育体系为目标,以人为本,从学生个体和谐发展的角度出发,努力搭建校园文化和企业文化融通的平台,积极打造校企共生态校园文化,推进高职院校的可持续发展。     

武陵源世界自然遗产地导游生态意识研究

以生态旅游的核心内涵、生态导游的双向责任模式系统及生态导游定义为三大理论基础,设计问题对武陵源世界自然遗产地的300名地接导游的生态意识进行了调查,结果表明该地导游生态意识总体处于良好状态,但对生态旅游内涵、本质方面的认识不足。建议政府、学术界及旅游业界从各自的角度为提高导游生态意识做更多的具体努力。     

The Sustainability of Indian Fiscal Policy: A Reassessment of the Empirical Evidence

This paper reassesses the sustainability of fiscal policy in India from 1950 to 2010. Overall, the evidence broadly supports the hypothesis that the fiscal policy is "weakly" sustainable and documents a higher speed of adjustment to the intertemporal budget constraint than earlier papers do. Notwithstanding this improvement in the fiscal outlook, the author suggests that India should pursue a policy of fiscal consolidation in the years ahead, both because the ratio of public debt to the gross domestic product is still high compared to other emerging market countries and because "weak" fiscal solvency implies potential adverse consequences on the management of public debt.     

Impacts of Human Activity on Biodiversity——An Approach to Driving Force indicators

The impact of human activity on biodiversity is very complicated, making it difficult to design practical indicators for assessment. Currently, state and response indicators are listed within Chapter 15 of Agenda 21, but no mention is made of driving force indicators and how they relate to biodiversity protection. This paper represents an effort to identify and then operationalize the idea of driving force indicators at national level. Five human induced factors affecting blodiversity were discussed: (a) habitat toss and fragmentation; (b) overexploitation of resources; (c) species introduction; (d) pollution; and (e) climate change. From these five factors, a subset was selected to serve as possible driving force indicators: (1) habitat loss, (2) the ratio of exotic species to indigenous ones, and (3) the change in pollution status. Although the three indicators are relatively simple, they cover the most important human impacts on biodiversity and offer the potential for further redefinition and ultimate use within the spirit of biodiversity protection.