An Empirical Investigation of the Relationships between Ethical Beliefs, Ethical Ideology, Political Preference and Need for Closure |
| |
Authors: | Patrick Van Kenhove Iris Vermeir Steven Verniers |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Department of Marketing, Hoveniersberg 24, B-9000 Gent, Belgium;(2) Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Department of Marketing, Hoveniersberg 24, B-9000 Gent, Belgium |
| |
Abstract: | An analysis is presented of the relationships between consumers ethical beliefs, ethical ideology, Machiavellianism, political preference and the individual difference variable "need for closure". It is based on a representative survey of 286 Belgian respondents. Standard measurement tools of proven reliability and robustness are used to measure ethical beliefs (consumer ethics scale), ethical ideology (ethical positioning), Machiavellianism (Mach IV scale) and need for closure. The analysis finds the following. First, individuals with a high need for closure tend to have beliefs that are more ethical as regards possible consumer actions, and score higher on idealism and lower on Machiavellianism, than those with a low need for closure. Second, a correlation exists between political preference and ethical beliefs. Third, a significant relationship exists between ethical ideology and political preference for the two largest political parties. Fourth, individuals with a high and low need for closure have different political preferences for right-wing and left-wing parties. |
| |
Keywords: | consumer ethics ethical beliefs ethical ideology ethical position idealism Machiavellianism need for closure political preference relativism |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|