A response to the critiques of DEA by Dmitruk and Koshevoy, and Bol |
| |
| Authors: | W. W. Cooper Z. Huang S. Li J. Zhu |
| |
| Affiliation: | (1) Department of Information, Risk, and Operations Management (IROM), The University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station B6500, Austin, TX 78712-0212, USA;(2) School of Business, Adelphi University, Garden City, Long Island, NY 11530, USA;(3) Department of Management, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA 01609, USA |
| |
| Abstract: | We here critique the articles by Dmitruk & Koshevoy (1991, J Econ Theory 55:121–144) and by Bol (1986, J Econ Theory 38:380–385) by showing how to solve the examples they erected to show the non-existence of functions for evaluating performance efficiencies in DEA. We also show that functions satisfying these criteria—and other important criteria as well—were already available prior to the publications of D&K and by Bol and have since been greatly extended to increase the power and scope of DEA. |
| |
| Keywords: | Performance evaluations Efficiency measures Effectiveness measures |
| 本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录！ |
|
