How reviewers’ use of profanity affects perceived usefulness of online reviews |
| |
Authors: | Michael Hair Timucin Ozcan |
| |
Institution: | 1.Southern Illinois University Edwardsville,Edwardsville,USA;2.Crummer Graduate School of Business,Rollins College,Winter Park,USA |
| |
Abstract: | This research explores the effects of profanity on perceptions of online reviews’ usefulness. Based on the prior research that described asymmetric attribution effects, we predict that when consumers see profanity in an online review, their reactions differ depending on the valence of the review. Specifically, when profanity is used in a negative review, it should reduce review usefulness because of decreased perceived reviewer objectivity. Among positive reviews, profanity increases review usefulness through greater perceived reviewer credibility. Through analysis of Yelp data, we show that the effect of profanity on usefulness depends on review valence. Experimentally, we demonstrate the opposing mediating effects of perceived objectivity and credibility on the usefulness of the review. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|